Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Ecological site AX001X01X401

Mesic Udic Forest

Last updated: 5/15/2025
Accessed: 12/05/2025

Home / Esd catalog / MLRA 001X / Ecological site AX001X01X401

USC

Metric

General information

Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.

MLRA notes

Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 001X–Northern Pacific Coast Range, Foothills, and Valleys

This area consists of a long and narrow range of mountains with associated foothills and valleys that parallels the Pacific Ocean. This area is entirely within the Pacific Border Province of the Pacific Mountain System in Oregon and Washington. MLRA 1 is bounded on the north by the highest elevations of the Olympic Mountains and the strait of Juan de Fuca, and by the Klamath Mountains on the south. The Washington portion of this MLRA is primarily composed of young Tertiary sedimentary rocks (siltstone and sandstone) mixed with some volcanic rocks of the same age. Glacial till and outwash deposits are also found in the northern half of this area in Washington. Much of this area is accreted terrane formed by tectonic processes. The average annual precipitation ranges from 60 to 200 inches (1,525 to 5,580 millimeters), increasing with elevation. Most of the precipitation in this area occurs during low-intensity, Pacific frontal storms and is evenly distributed throughout fall, winter, and spring.

The dominant soil orders in this MLRA are Andisols, Inceptisols, and Ultisols. Soil depths broadly range from shallow to very deep. Soils are primarily well drained, however poorly drained soils may be found in depressional areas and on alluvial floodplains. Surface textures are typically medial and loamy or clayey. Soils in this area dominantly have a mesic or frigid temperature regime and a udic moisture regime. Soils with aquic moisture regimes and cryic temperature regimes also occur.

Ecological site concept

Mesic Udic Forest sites occur on less stable landscape positions on glacial valley walls and colluvial aprons in the mesic temperature zone. These sites are located on the windward side of the Olympic mountains where precipitation is abundant, and on some protected aspects on the leeward side of the mountains where evaporative water loss is low. Relatively high slope gradients limit water infiltration on these sites, generating runoff to more stable Mesic Udic Moist Forests, Mesic Aquic Forests, and Temperate Wet Meadows. As a result, Mesic Udic Forest sites characteristically favor the growth and production of moist mesophytic understory species, such as salal (Gaultheria shallon) and twinflower (Linnaea borealis).

Mesic Udic Forest sites are characterized by a dense overstory of western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), accompanied by an understory shrub community of salal and red huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium). The herbaceous layer is dominated by western swordfern (Polystichum munitum) and twinflower. Western redcedar (Thuja plicata) may be present as a minor overstory component. Cascade barberry (Mahonia nervosa) is commonly present in the understory shrub and subshrub layers but is generally much less abundant than on Mesic Udic Dry Forest sites.

Associated sites

AX001X01X402	Mesic Udic Moist Forest Mesic Udic Moist Forest sites may occur downslope of Mesic Udic Forest sites and generally have more stable slope gradients. Mesic Udic Moist Forest sites have higher productivity. Mesic Udic Moist Forest sites typically support salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis).
AX001X01X200	Temperate Wet Meadow Temperate Wet Meadow sites may be found adjacent to or surrounded by Mesic Udic Forest sites. Temperate Wet Meadows occur on depressions and seeps. Temperate Wet Meadow sites lack tree cover.
AX001X01X004	Mesic Aquic Forest Mesic Aquic Forest sites may occur downslope or in mosaic with Mesic Udic Forest sites. Mesic Aquic Forest sites occur on depressions and seeps and are subject to ponding.

AX001X01X402

Mesic Udic Moist Forest

Mesic Udic Moist Forest sites may occur downslope of Mesic Udic Forest sites and generally have more stable slope gradients. Mesic Udic Moist Forest sites have higher productivity. Mesic Udic Moist Forest sites typically support salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis).

AX001X01X200

Temperate Wet Meadow

Temperate Wet Meadow sites may be found adjacent to or surrounded by Mesic Udic Forest sites. Temperate Wet Meadows occur on depressions and seeps. Temperate Wet Meadow sites lack tree cover.

AX001X01X004

Mesic Aquic Forest

Mesic Aquic Forest sites may occur downslope or in mosaic with Mesic Udic Forest sites. Mesic Aquic Forest sites occur on depressions and seeps and are subject to ponding.

Similar sites

AX001X01X406	Frigid Udic Forest Frigid Udic Forest sites occur at higher elevations and support Pacific silver-fir (Abies amabilis).
AX001X01X403	Mesic Udic Dry Forest Mesic Udic Dry Forest sites occur primarily in northeast quadrant of the park in the rain shadow of the Olympic mountains. Mesic Udic Dry Forest sites have much lower productivity and are indicated by the presence of oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor), and a higher abundance of Cascade barberry (Mahonia nervosa).

AX001X01X406

Frigid Udic Forest

Frigid Udic Forest sites occur at higher elevations and support Pacific silver-fir (Abies amabilis).

AX001X01X403

Mesic Udic Dry Forest

Mesic Udic Dry Forest sites occur primarily in northeast quadrant of the park in the rain shadow of the Olympic mountains. Mesic Udic Dry Forest sites have much lower productivity and are indicated by the presence of oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor), and a higher abundance of Cascade barberry (Mahonia nervosa).

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Tree	(1) Tsuga heterophylla (2) Pseudotsuga menziesii
Shrub	(1) Gaultheria shallon (2) Vaccinium parvifolium
Herbaceous	(1) Polystichum munitum (2) Linnaea borealis

Legacy ID

F001XA401WA

Download full description

Physiographic features

This site primarily occurs on glacial valley walls, moraine, and colluvial aprons on mountains. These upland forest sites are strongly influenced by slope gradient. Mesic Udic Forest sites are typically found on less stable slopes and generate run-off that is collected by more stable Mesic Udic Moist Forest, Mesic Aquic Forest, or Temperate Wet Meadow sites. These sites lose a moderate amount of moisture from run-off and exhibit an intermediate character between the Mesic Udic Moist Forest and Mesic Udic Dry Forest sites.

Table 2. Representative physiographic features

Landforms	(1) Mountains (2) Glacial-valley wall (3) Colluvial apron (4) Moraine
Flooding frequency	None
Ponding frequency	None
Elevation	984 – 2,625 ft
Slope	15 – 60%
Water table depth	59 in
Aspect	W, NW, N, NE, E, SE, S, SW

Climatic features

This site occurs in a mesic temperature and udic moisture regime. Precipitation arrives mostly via low-intensity, Pacific frontal storms. Precipitation is unevenly distributed, with the lowest amounts on the leeward side of the Coast Range mountains. Precipitation falls largely as snow in higher elevations. Precipitation is evenly distributed throughout the fall, winter, and spring, while summers are dry. Air temperatures vary significantly along the elevation gradient.

Table 3. Representative climatic features

Frost-free period (characteristic range)	180-240 days
Freeze-free period (characteristic range)
Precipitation total (characteristic range)	69-108 in

Soil features

The soils that support this ecological site occur in the mesic soil temperature regime and the udic soil moisture regime. Mountdeception soils are very deep, well-drained, formed from colluvium from metasedimentary rock, and occur on glacial valley walls and colluvial aprons. Saturated hydraulic conductivity is high or very high throughout, and rock fragment content is greater than 35 percent in the control section. Most soils contain a thin organic layer that protects the soil from wind and water erosion. These soils have no major limiting factors to plant growth. Although representative of this site, these soils may exist across multiple ecological sites because of naturally variable slope, texture, rock fragments, and pH. An on-site soil pit and the most current ecological site key are necessary to classify a site.

Table 4. Representative soil features

Parent material	(1) Colluvium – metasedimentary rock
Surface texture	(1) Gravelly silt loam (2) Gravelly loam (3) Gravelly sandy loam
Drainage class	Well drained
Soil depth	59 in
Surface fragment cover <=3"	Not specified
Surface fragment cover >3"	Not specified
Available water capacity (0-40in)	3.9 – 5.5 in
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-10in)	4.5 – 5.5
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20in)	15 – 50%
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20in)	30%

Ecological dynamics

Frequent, small-scale disturbance from windthrow events create a mosaic fabric of early-seral patches within late-seral communities. Canopy gaps created by windthrow favor growth of deciduous tree species such as red alder (Alnus rubra) and bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), as well as understory species. As conifers succeed, deciduous trees fail to regenerate in the absence of adequate sunlight. Dominant conifers on this site are susceptible to a variety of root and butt rot fungi. Wood decay fungi exacerbate mature trees’ vulnerability to windthrow events.

Infrequent, large-scale disturbances may occur in the form of stand-replacing wildfires, cataclysmic wind events, or large mass movement events. High force windstorms are a major source of large-scale disturbance in these forests. These blowdown events may be stand replacing and conditions tend to favor shade-intolerant species in their aftermath (Van Pelt, 2007). The fire regime of this site is characterized by high-intensity, stand-replacing fires with a long return interval of greater than 100 years (FEIS). Though infrequent, wildfires have a profound influence on the composition of these forests. Douglas-fir is a shade-intolerant species and generally requires a stand-replacing wildfire to clear canopy for successful recruitment and regeneration. In the absence of large-scale disturbance, more shade-tolerant western hemlock regenerates successfully and gradually succeeds Douglas-fir. The longevity of Douglas-fir preserves evidence of historical high-intensity fire events. Large mass-movement events also provide conditions for the initiation of primary succession. Landslides are a significant source of disturbance, owing to the steep terrain and sedimentary geology of the park. (Gavin, 2014). As with stand-replacing wildfires, bare patches created by landslides favor the establishment of non-shade tolerant Douglas-fir (Geertsema & Pojar, 2007).

Red alder and Douglas-fir recruits regenerate in the aftermath of stand-replacing disturbance, accompanied by California blackberry (Rubus ursinus) and fireweed (Chamerion angustifolium). As Douglas-fir and red alder grow and form a discrete canopy, the understory community diversifies. Shrub and forb layers develop, dominated by red huckleberry and vine maple (Acer circinatum), and western swordfern and sweet after death (Achlys triphylla), locally known as deerfoot vanilla leaf, respectively. As the canopy begins to mature, salal is established in the shrub layer. At this point, the canopy is composed of a single, dense stratum. Canopy stratification will be encouraged by tree maturation, as well as by mortality induced by small-scale disturbances. Increased vertical stratification promotes diversity and abundance of shrubs and forbs, allowing a return to reference community conditions.

Changes in disturbance frequency or intensity through human alteration of the natural fire regime and a changing climate may promote shifts in community structure and function. For example, fire suppression efforts will likely shift communities further towards shade-tolerant western hemlock-dominated seral stage. (Reed, 2010) Alternatively, increased fire frequency in some areas due to human activity will encourage Douglas-fir recruitment and establishment. (Gavin, 2015)

State and transition model

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text

1.1B	-	Low-intensity, local disturbance
1.1A	-	High-intensity disturbance
1.2A	-	Time without disturbance
1.2B	-	High-intensity disturbance
1.3A	-	Time without disturbance
1.4B	-	High-intensity disturbance
1.4A	-	Time without disturbance
1.5A	-	Time without disturbance
1.5B	-	High-intensity disturbance

State 1
Reference

The reference state is comprised of five communities in varying stages of regeneration following either small-scale or large-scale disturbance.

Dominant plant species

western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), tree
Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), tree
red alder (Alnus rubra), tree
salal (Gaultheria shallon), shrub
red huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium), shrub
California blackberry (Rubus ursinus), shrub
vine maple (Acer circinatum), shrub
western swordfern (Polystichum munitum), other herbaceous
twinflower (Linnaea borealis), other herbaceous
fireweed (Chamerion angustifolium), other herbaceous
sweet after death (Achlys triphylla), other herbaceous

Community 1.1
Western Hemlock, Douglas-fir, Salal, Red Huckleberry, Western Swordfern, and Twinflower

Structure: Multistory with small gap dynamics Western hemlock and Douglas-fir are the dominant overstory species in the reference community. The dense canopy precludes Douglas-fir regeneration except for limited recruitment in small gaps. Shade-tolerate western hemlock will continue to successfully regenerate in this community. Common understory species include salal, red huckleberry, western swordfern, and twinflower. Cascade barberry is frequently present in this community in low abundance. Vine maple may be found in small canopy gaps. High vertical stratification in the canopy and the presence of small gaps favor an abundant understory.

Community 1.2
Western Hemlock, Douglas-fir, Vine Maple, Red Huckleberry, Western Swordfern, and Sweet After Death

Structure: Mosaic of overstory and openings in varying states of regeneration This community is initiated in the wake of small-scale disturbance which creates small canopy openings. Vine maple establishes in regenerating canopy gaps. Western hemlock recruits will eventually establish in the canopy openings and regenerate the canopy. Douglas-fir often does not successfully regenerate in these small gaps as sunlight does is not sufficiently abundant for its seedlings. Twinflower is diminished in these less-shaded gaps. Sweet after death frequently establishes in small canopy gaps.

Community 1.3
Red Alder, Douglas-fir, California Blackberry, and Fireweed

Structure: Open forest with shrubby regeneration and snags This community is an early seral stage, occurring after a stand-replacing disturbance. Nearly all trees have been removed. In the case of high-intensity fire, few large fire-resistant trees may remain. Douglas-fir has thick, corky bark and mature individuals may be able to survive some fire events. Red alder establishes quickly in recently opened areas. Big leaf maple may also establish post-disturbance. Shrubs and forbs are often able to outcompete tree saplings for several years post-disturbance. California blackberry, locally known as trailing blackberry, and fireweed are frequently the first to establish in early seral communities.

Community 1.4
Douglas-fir, Red Alder, Red Huckleberry, Vine Maple, Western Swordfern, and Sweet After Death

Structure: Dense single-story Douglas-fir can regenerate successfully in the years following a stand-replacing disturbance. As time progresses, understory species regenerate and diversify. Vine maple, red huckleberry, salal, and cascade barberry often establish on this site, accompanied by western swordfern and sweet after death. Western hemlock is slower to establish post-disturbance and may not begin successful regeneration until a canopy has been established.

Community 1.5
Douglas-fir, Western Hemlock, Salal, Red Huckleberry, and Western Swordfern

Structure: Dense single stratum canopy with diminished understory Continued Douglas-fir growth forms a dense canopy. Western hemlock gradually regenerates under the canopy. The understory continues to develop. Salal and red huckleberry dominate the shrub layer, while western swordfern is common in the herbaceous layer. While the species composition of the understory begins to resemble the Reference community, understory productivity is diminished due to low canopy stratification and dense tree growth, limiting available sunlight at the forest floor. Additional time will be required for the stand to develop vertical stratification. Individual tree mortality will promote age class diversity and western hemlock will gradually begin replacing Douglas-fir.

Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.2

Minor disturbances, often caused by individual tree mortality, create small gaps in the forest canopy.

Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.3

Stand-replacing disturbances such as high-intensity fire, catastrophic windstorms, and mass-movement events open the forest and lead to the stand initiation phase of development.

Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1

Time without disturbance allows regeneration, growth, and progression to a later seral stage.

Pathway 1.2B
Community 1.2 to 1.3

Stand-replacing disturbances such as high-intensity fire, catastrophic windstorms, and mass-movement events open the forest and lead to the stand initiation phase of development.

Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.4

Time without disturbance allows regeneration, growth, and progression to a later seral stage.

Pathway 1.4B
Community 1.4 to 1.3

Stand-replacing disturbances such as high-intensity fire, catastrophic windstorms, and mass-movement events open the forest and lead to the stand initiation phase of development.

Pathway 1.4A
Community 1.4 to 1.5

Time without disturbance allows regeneration, growth, and progression to a later seral stage.

Pathway 1.5A
Community 1.5 to 1.1

Time without disturbance allows regeneration, growth, and progression to the reference community. Individual tree mortality gradually leads to a varied-age stand.

Pathway 1.5B
Community 1.5 to 1.3

Stand-replacing disturbances such as high-intensity fire, catastrophic windstorms, and mass-movement events open the forest and lead to the stand initiation phase of development.

Additional community tables

Supporting information

Other references

Breemen, Nico van. “How Sphagnum Bogs down Other Plants.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10, no. 7 (July 1, 1995): 270–75. 90007-1.

Dwire, K. and Kauffman, J. 2003. Fire and Riparian Ecosystems in Landscapes in the Western United States. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 178 pg. 61-74.

Franklin, Jerry F.; Cromack, Kermit, Jr.; Denison, William; [and others]. 1981. Ecological characteristics of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-118. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 48 p. [7551]

Gavin, D., Brubaker, L. (2015). The Modern Landscape of the Olympic Peninsula. In: Late Pleistocene and Holocene Environmental Change on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. Ecological Studies, vol 222. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11014-1_1

Geertsema, Marten & Pojar, James. (2007). Influence of landslides on biophysical diversity — A perspective from British Columbia. Geomorphology. 89. 55-69. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.07.019.

Goheen, E.M. and Willhite, E.A. 2006. Field Guide to Common Diseases and Inspect Pests of Oregon and Washington Conifers. Portland, Oregon: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region R6-NR-FID-PR-01-06.

Hanley, D.P and D.M. Baumgartner. 2002. Forest Ecology in Washington. Washington State University Extension Publishing. Technical Report EB 1943.

Hanson, E.J., D.L. Azuma and B.A. Hiserote. 2002. Site Index Equations and Mean Annual Increment Equations for Pacific Northwest Research Station Forest Inventory and Analysis Inventories, 1985-2001. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Research Note PNW-RN-533.

Hemstrom, M., Franklin, J. 1982. Fire and Other Disturbances of the Forests in Mount Rainier National Park. Quaternary Research, Vol 18 pp 32-61.

James K. Agee and Mark H. Huff. 1987. Fuel succession in a western hemlock/Douglas-fir forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 17(7): 697-704. https://doi.org/10.1139/x87-112

Nielsen, E. M., R. L. Brunner, C. Copass and L. K. Wise, 2021. Olympic National Park map class descriptions. National Park Service, Fort Collins.

Pojar J., and MacKinnon. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Lone Pine, Vancouver, British Columbia. 528 pages.

PRISM Climate Group, Oregon State University, http://prism.orgeonstate.edu, visited October 2023.

Reed Wendel, Darlene Zabowskl "Fire History within the Lower Elwha River Watershed, Olympic National Park, Washington," Northwest Science, 84(1), 88-97, (1 January 2010)

Rochefort, R.M. and Peterson, D.L. 1996. Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Trees in Subalpine Meadows of Mount Rainier National Park. Arctic and Alpine Research, Vol. 28, No. 1 pp 52-59.

Seastedt, T.R., Adams, G.A. 2001. Effects of Mobile Tree Islands on Alpine Tundra Soils. Ecology, Vol 82 pp 8-17.

Smith, K., G. Kuhn, and L. Townsend. 2008. Culmination of Mean Annual Increment for Indicator Tree Species in the State of Washington. USDA-NRCS Technical Note Forestry-9.

United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 2015. Silvics Manual Vol 1. http://na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/silvics_manual/Volume_1/vol1_Table_of_contents.htm, visited December 2015.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 2014. Ecological Site Descriptions for North Cascades National Park Complex, Washington.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Ecological Site Descriptions for Mount Rainier National Park, Washington.

Van Pelt, R. 2007. Identifying Mature and Old Forests in Western Washington. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA. 104 p

Washington Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program. 2015. Ecological Systems of Washington State. A Guide to Identification.

Wood, David, and Moral, Roger del. “Mechanisms of Early Primary Succession in Subalpine Habitats on Mount St. Helens.” Ecology 68, no. 4 (1987).

Zhao, Yunpeng, Chengzhu Liu, Simin Wang, Yiyun Wang, Xiaoqing Liu, Wanqing Luo, and Xiaojuan Feng. “‘Triple Locks’ on Soil Organic Carbon Exerted by Sphagnum Acid in Wetlands.” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 315 (December 2021): 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2021.09.028.

Contributors

Erin Kreutz
Abigail Field
Max Ross
Erik Dahlke
Alec Haulotte

Approval

Grant Petersen, 5/15/2025

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)
Contact for lead author
Date	05/17/2025
Approved by	Grant Petersen
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production

Indicators

Number and extent of rills:
Presence of water flow patterns:
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):

Dominant:

Sub-dominant:

Other:

Additional:
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial plant reproductive capability:

Download reference sheet

Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.

Ecosystem states

1. Reference

State 1 submodel, plant communities

1.1. Western Hemlock, Douglas-fir, Salal, Red Huckleberry, Western Swordfern, and Twinflower

1.2. Western Hemlock, Douglas-fir, Vine Maple, Red Huckleberry, Western Swordfern, and Sweet After Death

1.3. Red Alder, Douglas-fir, California Blackberry, and Fireweed

1.4. Douglas-fir, Red Alder, Red Huckleberry, Vine Maple, Western Swordfern, and Sweet After Death

1.5. Douglas-fir, Western Hemlock, Salal, Red Huckleberry, and Western Swordfern

Communities 1 and 5 (additional pathways)

1.1. Western Hemlock, Douglas-fir, Salal, Red Huckleberry, Western Swordfern, and Twinflower

1.5. Douglas-fir, Western Hemlock, Salal, Red Huckleberry, and Western Swordfern

1.1B	-	Low-intensity, local disturbance
1.1A	-	High-intensity disturbance
1.2A	-	Time without disturbance
1.2B	-	High-intensity disturbance
1.3A	-	Time without disturbance
1.4B	-	High-intensity disturbance
1.4A	-	Time without disturbance
1.5A	-	Time without disturbance
1.5B	-	High-intensity disturbance

Search

Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Ecological site AX001X01X401

Mesic Udic Forest

Last updated: 5/15/2025 Accessed: 12/05/2025

General information

MLRA notes

Ecological site concept

Associated sites

Similar sites

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Legacy ID

Ecosystem states

State 1 submodel, plant communities

Communities 1 and 5 (additional pathways)

Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Last updated: 5/15/2025
Accessed: 12/05/2025