Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R025XY314UT
Upland Loam (Wyoming Big Sagebrush)
Accessed: 12/30/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Ecological site concept
This site is located on lower benches and valley floors. The site is visualy a Wyoming big sagebrush site. The site is in the 12 to 14 inch precitation zone primarly.
Associated sites
R025XY316UT |
Upland Shallow Loam (Black Sagebrush) This site is located on the ridge tops that run through this site. |
---|---|
R025XY318UT |
Upland Stony Loam (Black Sagebrush) This site is located on ridge side slopes usally on west and South facing slopes. |
R025XY322UT |
Upland Juniper Savanna (Utah Juniper) This site is located on the broader landscape areas licated below the site. |
Similar sites
R028AY309UT |
Upland Loam (Wyoming Big Sagebrush) This site will often have a smaller number of forbs and less forb diversity. |
---|
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Artemisia tridentata var. wyomingensis |
Herbaceous |
(1) Pseudoroegneria spicata |
Physiographic features
This site can be found on alluvial fans, fan remnants (lower benches), on hillslopes, and mesas between slopes of 0 to 20%, but the slope range is wide and this site can be found on slopes up to 60%. It can occur at elevations between 4.900 to 7,400 feet, although this site can be found at elevations as low as 4,600. Flooding and ponding do not occur on this site.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Alluvial fan
(2) Fan remnant (3) Mesa |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 4,900 – 7,400 ft |
Slope | 20% |
Climatic features
The climate is cold and snowy winters and warm and dry summers. The average annual precipitation is 12 -14 inches. Approximately 40 percent comes as rain from May through September. On the average, July and September are the driest months and April through June are the wettest months. In average years, grasses begin growth around May 1 and end growth around September 30.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 125 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 154 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 14 in |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils on this site were formed in colluvuim and or slope alluvium over residuum weathered from sandstone, mica schist, quartzite, limestone, conglomerate, and volcanic ash. The soil is well drained with moderate to moderately rapid permeability in the upper 10 inches of soil. The soil is also deep to moderately deep with bedrock between 20 and 60 inches beneath the soil surface for half of the mapped acreage. Restrictive layers can be found on these soil components within this site: Bluehill, Coalbank, Raftriver, and Tomsherry. The soil texture at the surface at most sites is fine sandy loam or loamy, however other surface textures can be found, such as silt loam and gravely sandy loam. Rock fragments between 2 mm and 3 inches on the surface are between 5 and 11% by cover and in the subsurface 0 to 5% by volume. Surface and subsurface rocks over 3 inches in diameter are 11 to 12% and 0 to 1% by cover and volume, respectively. Available water capacity is between 2.3 and 3.1 in the upper 40 inches of soil. The soil pH is between 6.6 and 8.4. The soil temperature regime is frigid. The moisture regime is Aridic Xeric.
Soils associated with this site:
Box Elder Co UT601: Raftriver (65, 66, 97), Cottonthomas (20), Tomsherry (20), Duckree (65), Bluehill (9), Coalbank (9)
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Alluvium
–
quartzite
(2) Colluvium – limestone and sandstone (3) Residuum – mica schist |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Fine sandy loam (2) Loam |
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Moderate to moderately rapid |
Soil depth | 20 – 60 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 5 – 11% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 5% |
Available water capacity (0-40in) |
2.3 – 3.1 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-40in) |
15% |
Electrical conductivity (0-40in) |
2 mmhos/cm |
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-40in) |
10 |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-40in) |
6.6 – 8.4 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
11 – 12% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
1% |
Ecological dynamics
The following are the narratives for each of the described plant communities. These plant communities may not represent every possibility, but they probably are the most prevalent and repeatable plant communities. As more data is collected, some of these plant communities way be revised or removed, and new ones may be added. None of these plant communities should necessarily be thought of as the “desired plant community”. According to the USDA NRCS National Range and Pasture Handbook, the desired plant community will be determined be the decision makers and will meet minimum quality criteria established by the NRCS. The main purpose for including any description of a plant community here is to capture the current knowledge and experience at the time of this revision.
State and transition model
Figure 4. R025XY314UT State and Transistion Model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
States 2 and 5 (additional transitions)
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 5 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
This state includes the plant communities that were best adapted to the unique combination of factors associated with this ecological site prior to European settlement. It was in a natural dynamic equilibrium with the historic biotic, abiotic, climatic factors all being able to function freely. This dominant aspect of the plant community is Wyoming big sagebrush and Bluebunch wheatgrass. The community is made up of 60 % Grass 10 % forbs and 30 % shrubs on a dry weight base. The Fire Regimes on this site would be 35 to 80 years. All of these scenarios are very interrelated and dependent on weather patterns and events as well as fire frequency and intensity. The fire frequency should be around 35 to 80 years. Any set of events that are strong enough to force the plant community out of this pattern can push it over a threshold and into another state.
Community 1.1
Wyoming big sagebrush > Perennial cool season grasses > Forbs > Other native shrubs
Wyoming big sagebrush, Perennial cool season grasses, Forbs and other shrubs: This is the Community that is described in the initial Plant List. This community is represented with 60% grasses, 10% Forbs and 30% Shrubs. The dominant shrub visually and in production is Wyoming big sagebrush. The dominant grass is Bluebunch wheatgrass and the dominant Forb visually is Western yarrow. This community is strong enough to only have around 12 – 18% bare ground..
Figure 5. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 537 | 650 | 725 |
Shrub/Vine | 250 | 475 | 570 |
Forb | 90 | 100 | 110 |
Total | 877 | 1225 | 1405 |
Table 6. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 15-35% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 25-40% |
Forb foliar cover | 5-15% |
Non-vascular plants | 0.5-2.0% |
Biological crusts | 0.5-2.5% |
Litter | 10-20% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-8% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 10-25% |
Table 7. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (ft) | Tree | Shrub/Vine | Grass/ Grasslike |
Forb |
---|---|---|---|---|
<0.5 | – | – | – | – |
>0.5 <= 1 | – | – | 5-10% | 5-10% |
>1 <= 2 | – | 1-5% | 15-30% | 1-5% |
>2 <= 4.5 | – | 10-20% | 0-5% | – |
>4.5 <= 13 | – | – | – | – |
>13 <= 40 | – | – | – | – |
>40 <= 80 | – | – | – | – |
>80 <= 120 | – | – | – | – |
>120 | – | – | – | – |
Figure 6. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). UT3141, PNC. Excellent Condition.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 30 | 44 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.2
Wyoming big sagebrush > Other native shrubs > perennial cool season grasses > =forbs
Wyoming big sagebrush, other native shrubs, Perennial cool season grasses, and Forbs: This Community is shows up when there is a period of time when the Wyoming big sagebrush increases to where it is suppressing the understory and other shrubs (notably) Mountain snowberry, Low rabbitbrush and Utah serviceberry increase which also helps to suppress the herbaceous understory. This community is strong enough to only have around 12 – 20% bare ground.
Community 1.3
Perennial cool season grasses > Forbs > Fire tolerant Shrubs
Perennial cool season grasses, Forbs and Fire tolerant shrubs: This community usually occurs when there is a hot erratically moving fire that heats the ground to the point where it damages the antelope bitterbrush so that it cannot take the dominant community position. The plant community is represented with 65% grasses, 10% forbs and 25% shrubs. The initial Plant List of Grasses and Forbs will be quite accurate in this community also. This community will likely have around 15 – 20% bare ground.
Pathway 1.1a
Community 1.1 to 1.2
Time without catastrophic event. This was probably dependent on a specific chain of climatic events.
Pathway 1.1b
Community 1.1 to 1.3
Fire; insects; prolonged drought; pathogens that kills and/or reduces the Dominant shrub overstory. Fire is the most likely of these disturbances
Pathway 1.2a
Community 1.2 to 1.3
Fire; insects; prolonged drought; pathogens that kills and/or reduces the Dominant shrub overstory. Fire is the most likely of these disturbances
Pathway 1.3a
Community 1.3 to 1.1
Time without catastrophic event. This was probably dependent on a specific chain of climatic events.
State 2
Current Potential State
This state includes the biotic communities that would become established on the ecological site if all successional sequences were completed without interferences by man under the present environmental conditions. Natural disturbances are inherent in its development. The CPS state will include acclimatized, naturalized or invasive nonnative species. There is no known way to effectively remove these plants from the site once they have become established. The level of occurrence of these plants in the CPS is such that careful management can prevent their domination of the site. This site is irreversibly changed. Plant communities within the CPS state may be managed and used for various purposes by man without significant alteration in plant community composition or production. It includes all of the plant communities that exist in the RPC state with the inclusion of species that are non-native to this ESD. These non-native plants are not to be considered when considering plants for the rangeland health site evaluation. The complete list of plants for this state are the ones listed in the Reference Plant Community list with these and other Non-Native and/or Native species. All of these scenarios are very interrelated and dependent on weather patterns and events as well as fire frequency and intensity. The fire frequency should be around 35 to 80 years. Any set of events that are strong enough to force the plant community out of this pattern can push it over a threshold and push it into another state.
Community 2.1
Wyoming big sagebrush > Perennial cool season grasses > Forbs > Other Native shrubs > Non-Native spe
Wyoming big sagebrush, Perennial cool season grasses, Forbs and other shrubs: This is the Community that is described in the initial Plant List. This community is represented with 60% grasses, 10% Forbs and 30% Shrubs. The dominant shrub visually and in production is Wyoming big sagebrush. The dominant grass is Bluebunch wheatgrass and the dominant Forb visually is Western yarrow. This community is strong enough to only have around 12 – 18% bare ground. This community will have notable amounts of non-native species shown above as well as others not mentioned.
Community 2.2
Wyoming big sagebrush > Other Native Shrubs > Perennial cool season grasses >= Forbs > Non-Native Sp
Wyoming big sagebrush, other native shrubs, Perennial cool season grasses, and Forbs: This Community is shows up when there is a period of time when the Wyoming big sagebrush increases to where it is suppressing the understory and other shrubs (notably) Mountain snowberry, Low rabbitbrush and Utah serviceberry increase which also helps to suppress the herbaceous understory. This community is strong enough to only have around 15 – 20% bare ground. This community will have notable amounts of non-native species shown above as well as others not mentioned.
Community 2.3
Perennial cool season grasses > forbs > Fire tolerant Shrubs > Non-Native Species
Perennial cool season grasses, Forbs and Fire tolerant shrubs: This community usually occurs when there is a hot erratically moving fire that heats the ground to the point where it damages the antelope bitterbrush so that it cannot take the dominant community position. The plant community is represented with 65% grasses, 10% forbs and 25% shrubs. This community will have notable amounts of non-native species shown above as well as others not mentioned. The initial Plant List of Grasses and Forbs will be quite accurate in this community also. This community will likely have around 10 – 25% bare ground. This community will have notable amounts of non-native species shown above as well as others not mentioned.
Pathway 2.1a
Community 2.1 to 2.2
Time without catastrophic event. This is dependent on a specific chain of climatic events
Pathway 2.1b
Community 2.1 to 2.3
Fire; insects; prolonged drought; pathogens that kills and/or reduces the dominant shrub overstory. Also overgrazing with or without drought over a prolonged period of time Fire and/or overgrazing are the most common of these disturbances
Pathway 2.2a
Community 2.2 to 2.3
Fire; insects; prolonged drought; pathogens that kills and/or reduces the dominant shrub overstory. Also overgrazing with or without drought over a prolonged period of time Fire and/or overgrazing are the most common of these disturbances
Pathway 2.3a
Community 2.3 to 2.1
Time without catastrophic event. This is dependent on a specific chain of climatic events
State 3
Utah Juiper / Invasive Annuals
This State has only two described Plant Communities but many variations of the represented ones are present. This is the State that this plant community will move to when there is a lack of fire with a source of Utah Juniper and maybe a source of pinyon seed. Movement from community fase to community fase can and often is accelerated by overgrazing. The dominate aspect of the plant community is Utah Juniper and Cheatgrass brome. This State can persist for a long time until extreme conditions needed for a wildfire occur or some other management treatment is implemented.
Community 3.1
Utah Juniper > wyoming big sagebrush > Native Perennials > Invasive Annuals
This community has a strong overstory of Utah Juniper and Singleleaf pinyon but still has an understory similar to community 2.1. This community will have around 20 – 35% bare ground. Fire is the surest means to bring this community back toward the Current potential State.
Community 3.2
Utah Juniper > Invasive annuals
This community is present when 99 – 100% of the native plants have been removed from the plant community and only Pinyon and Juniper with a sparse understory of Invasive annuals are left on the site. This community will have around 35 – 85% bare ground.
Pathway 3.1a
Community 3.1 to 3.2
Overgrazing with or without drought over a prolonged period of time
Pathway 3.2a
Community 3.2 to 3.1
Fire; insects; prolonged drought; pathogens that kills and/or reduces the Dominant shrub overstory. Fire is the most effective of these disturbances
State 4
Yellow rabbitbrush / Invasive Annuals
This is the state that this plant community will move to when it is in an over grazed condition and/or drought condition and then burned (wild or controlled) and not seeded or seeding is not successful. The dominant aspect of the plant community is Cheatgrass brome, Yellow rabbitbrush with a very small amount of Wyoming big sagebrush. The community will usually be made up of 70 % Cheatgrass brome and 10 % Forbs and 20 % Yellow rabbitbrush with minor components of other shrubs.
Community 4.1
Yellow rabbitbrush > Invasive Annuals >= Native Perennials
Yellow rabbitbrush, Invasive annuals, Native perennials: This plant community consists of approximately 35% Yellow rabbitbrush, 50% invasive annuals, and 10% Native perennials with a small component of other species. This community will have around 20 – 35% bare ground.
Figure 8. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). UT3142, Cheatgrass brome - Yellow rabbitbrush.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 25 | 34 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Community 4.2
Invasive Annuals
Invasive annuals: This plant community consists of approximately 85% invasive annuals (Mostly Cheatgrass brome and Japanese (Field) brome), and 10% Native perennials with a small component of other species. This community will have around 20 – 45% bare ground.
Pathway 4.1a
Community 4.1 to 4.2
Increased fire frequency (from 20 - 45 years to 5 - 10 years) and intensity without follow-up management. Overgrazing can move this change along faster. In the State (4) the Yellow rabbitbrush / Invasive annuals State the fire frequency will remain at a 5 – 10 year interval. This condition is self sustaining and the site will keep deteriorating until the site potential is lost. This will continue unless a large amount of energy is injected into the system to cause a change to take place.
Pathway 4.2a
Community 4.2 to 4.1
Time and management of grazing alone or along with other disturbances where human and/or naturalized introduction of native and/or introduced perennial plant species takes place.
State 5
Seeded Range State
This state exists when the site is cultivated and/or burned and planted to Introduced and in some situations Native grasses, forbs and often half shrubs and shrubs.
Community 5.1
Introduced Perennial Plants
The plant community here consists of Introduced and in some situations Native grasses, forbs and half shrubs and shrubs. It is normally as productive as the site is in the Current Potential State.
Community 5.2
Native Shrubs >= Introduced Perennial Plants
This site comes into existence when weather conditions create the kind of episodic situation that allows Wyoming big sagebrush to move back onto the site.
Pathway 5.1a
Community 5.1 to 5.2
Time without catastrophic event. This is dependent on a specific chain of climatic events
Pathway 5.2a
Community 5.2 to 5.1
Time and management of grazing alone or along with other disturbances where human intervention takes place to move the community back.
Transition T1a
State 1 to 2
Introduction of non-native species into the ecosystem.
Transition T2a
State 2 to 3
Prolonged Drought, Overgrazing, Extreme lengthening of the fire interval frequency. This takes place when the sagebrush canopy gets so heavy that it destroys the perennial grass and forb under story and the fire frequency is increased from 20- to 45 years to 60 – 90 years and the introduction of Utah juniper.
Transition T2b
State 2 to 4
Continued overgrazing and increase of fire frequency over a very prolonged period of time. (5 – 12 year fire frequency interval)
Transition T2c
State 2 to 5
Human caused disturbance (mechanical treatment and seeding; chemical treatment and seeding. etc.)
Transition T3a
State 3 to 4
Continued overgrazing and increase of fire frequency over a very prolonged period of time. (5 – 10 year fire frequency interval)
Transition T3b
State 3 to 5
Human caused disturbance (mechanical treatment and seeding; chemical treatment and seeding. etc.)
Transition T4b
State 4 to 3
Prolonged Drought, Overgrazing, Extreme lengthening of the fire interval frequency. This takes place when the understory gets so depleted and the perennial grass and forb understory have been destroyed. At this time the fire frequency will increase from 20- to 45 years to 60 – 90 years because of the amount of bare ground common with this situation along with the introduction of Utah juniper.
Transition T4a
State 4 to 5
Human caused disturbance (mechanical treatment and seeding; chemical treatment and seeding. etc.)
Restoration pathway R5a
State 5 to 2
Time with proper management that favors the Native Plants as they move back into the site.
Conservation practices
Prescribed Grazing |
---|
Transition T5a
State 5 to 3
Prolonged Drought, Overgrazing, Extreme lengthening of the fire interval frequency. This takes place when the sagebrush canopy gets so heavy that it destroys the perennial grass and forb under story and the fire frequency is increased from 20- to 45 years to 60 – 90 years and the introduction of Utah juniper.
Additional community tables
Table 8. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | Primary Shrubs | 124–190 | ||||
Utah serviceberry | AMUT | Amelanchier utahensis | 110–220 | – | ||
3 | Secondary Shrubs | 29–48 | ||||
Shrub, other | 2S | Shrub, other | 5–95 | – | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 10–29 | – | ||
slender buckwheat | ERMI4 | Eriogonum microthecum | 10–29 | – | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 10–29 | – | ||
granite prickly phlox | LIPU11 | Linanthus pungens | 10–29 | – | ||
Utah snowberry | SYORU | Symphoricarpos oreophilus var. utahensis | 10–29 | – | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 10–29 | – | ||
broom snakeweed | GUSA2 | Gutierrezia sarothrae | 0–19 | – | ||
pricklypear | OPUNT | Opuntia | 5–15 | – | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | Primary Grasses | 380–570 | ||||
Thurber's needlegrass | ACTH7 | Achnatherum thurberianum | 143–190 | – | ||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 143–190 | – | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 48–95 | – | ||
1 | Secondary Grasses | 48–95 | ||||
Grass, perennial | 2GP | Grass, perennial | 48–95 | – | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 29–48 | – | ||
Geyer's sedge | CAGE2 | Carex geyeri | 20–48 | – | ||
squirreltail | ELEL5 | Elymus elymoides | 29–48 | – | ||
thickspike wheatgrass | ELLA3 | Elymus lanceolatus | 29–48 | – | ||
needle and thread | HECO26 | Hesperostipa comata | 29–48 | – | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 29–48 | – | ||
western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 29–48 | – | ||
Grass, annual | 2GA | Grass, annual | 29–48 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | Primary Forbs | 55–110 | ||||
western yarrow | ACMIO | Achillea millefolium var. occidentalis | 29–48 | – | ||
white sagebrush | ARLUC8 | Artemisia ludoviciana ssp. candicans | 29–48 | – | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 29–48 | – | ||
2 | Secondary Forbs | 110–165 | ||||
Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 5–143 | – | ||
Forb, annual | 2FA | Forb, annual | 11–110 | – | ||
Torrey's milkvetch | ASCA9 | Astragalus calycosus | 10–29 | – | ||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 10–29 | – | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 10–29 | – | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 10–29 | – | ||
longstalk springparsley | CYLO | Cymopterus longipes | 10–29 | – | ||
twolobe larkspur | DENU2 | Delphinium nuttallianum | 10–29 | – | ||
sanddune wallflower | ERCAC | Erysimum capitatum var. capitatum | 5–29 | – | ||
shaggy fleabane | ERPU2 | Erigeron pumilus | 10–29 | – | ||
common sunflower | HEAN3 | Helianthus annuus | 5–29 | – | ||
western stoneseed | LIRU4 | Lithospermum ruderale | 5–29 | – | ||
smoothstem blazingstar | MELA2 | Mentzelia laevicaulis | 0–29 | – | ||
yellow owl's-clover | ORLU2 | Orthocarpus luteus | 0–29 | – | ||
low beardtongue | PEHU | Penstemon humilis | 10–29 | – | ||
scarlet globemallow | SPCO | Sphaeralcea coccinea | 10–29 | – | ||
foothill deathcamas | ZIPA2 | Zigadenus paniculatus | 10–29 | – | ||
Utah buttercup | RAJO | Ranunculus jovis | 10–19 | – | ||
manyflower stickseed | HAFL2 | Hackelia floribunda | 10–19 | – | ||
wavyleaf thistle | CIUNU | Cirsium undulatum var. undulatum | 1–19 | – | ||
Rocky Mountain beeplant | CLSE | Cleome serrulata | 5–19 | – | ||
sego lily | CANU3 | Calochortus nuttallii | 10–19 | – | ||
Nevada onion | ALNE | Allium nevadense | 10–19 | – | ||
flatbud pricklypoppy | ARMUR | Argemone munita ssp. rotundata | 0–15 | – | ||
roundspike cryptantha | CRHU2 | Cryptantha humilis | 5–15 | – | ||
pale evening primrose | OEPA | Oenothera pallida | 5–15 | – | ||
mountain tarweed | MAGL2 | Madia glomerata | 0–15 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
This site provides grazing / Browsing for cattle and sheep in the spring, summer, and fall. Also Mule Deer and Elk in fall and winter.
Wildlife that use this site include blacktail jackrabbit, coyote, sage grouse, Elk and mule deer.
Hydrological functions
The soil series are in Hydologic group B. The runoff curve number is 61 when the vegetation and soil are in good condition.
Recreational uses
Recreation activities include aesthetic value; and fair opportunities for hiking and hunting.
Wood products
There are no wood products from this site unless there is Utah Juniper invasion onto the site. With this event you will be able to harvest Cedar posts and firewood.
Other products
Threatened and endangered species include plants and animals.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
The Range site description was documented with one (1) 417 and five (5) UT2s.
Type locality
Location 1: Box Elder County, UT | |
---|---|
Township/Range/Section | T14N R17W S24 |
General legal description | SE ¼ NW ¼ Section 24, Township 14N, Range 17W – Junction Valley |
Contributors
GBB
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Shane A. Green (NRCS), Brock Benson (NRCS), Robert D. Stager (BLM), Mike Gates (BLM), Tyler Staggs (BLM), Alan Bass (BLM). Revised to include updated terminology and concepts by V. Keith Wadman (NRCS Retired). |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | shane.green@ut.usda.gov |
Date | 12/15/2011 |
Approved by | Shane A. Green |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None to very few rills present. Some very minor rill development may occur on steeper slopes or on areas located below exposed bedrock or other water shedding areas where increased runoff may occur. Any rills present should be <1 inch deep, fairly short (<6 feet long) and somewhat widely spaced (4-8 feet). Minor rill development may be observed following major thunderstorm or spring runoff events but should heal during the next growing season. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Some very minor evidence of water flow patterns may be found around perennial plant bases. They show little evidence of current erosion. They are expected to be short (1-3 feet), stable, sinuous and not connected. There may be very minor evidence of deposition. Evidence of water flow may increase somewhat with slope. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Perennial vegetation shows little evidence of erosional pedestalling (2 to 3% of individual plants). Plant roots are covered and litter remains in place around plant crowns. Terracettes should be absent or, if present, stable. A slight increase in both pedestal and terracette development may occur with increasing slope. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
10-15% bare ground on slopes 5 to 25% and 15 to 30% bare ground on slopes greater than 25%. Bare ground spaces should not be greater than 1 to 2 feet in diameter. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None to very few gullies present on site. Rare gullies may be present in landscape settings where they transport runoff from areas of greater water flow such as exposed bedrock. These gullies will be limited to slopes exceeding 20% slope and adjacent to sites where this runoff accumulation occurs. Any gullies present should show little sign of accelerated erosion and should be stabilized with perennial vegetation. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None. No evidence of wind generated soil movement is present. Wind caused blowouts and deposition are not present. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Most litter resides in place with some redistribution caused by water movement. Minor litter removal may occur in flow channels with deposition occurring within 1 to 2 feet at points of obstruction. The majority of litter accumulates at the base of plants. Some grass leaves and small twigs (grass stems) may accumulate in soil depressions adjacent to plants. Woody stems are not likely to move. However, some litter movement is expected (up to 6 feet) with increases in slopes >15% and/or increased runoff resulting from heavy thunderstorms. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
This site should have a soil stability rating of 4 or 5 under the plant canopies, and a rating of 3 to 5 in the interspaces. The average rating should be a 4. Soil surface textures are loams, fine sandy loams and silt loams. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Soil surface 0-3 inches. Texture is a loam; color is dark brown (10YR3/3); and structure is weak thin platy. Ochric epipedon ranges to 12 inches. Other soil series may have mollic epipedons. Use the specific information for the soil you are assessing found in the published soil survey to supplement this description. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Perennial vegetation produces sufficient cover and spatial arrangement to intercept most raindrops and reduce raindrop splash erosion. Litter on soil surface and cryptogamic crusting, where present, also protects soil from splash erosion and encourages a higher rate of infiltration. Plant spatial distribution should slow runoff, allowing additional time for infiltration. Bare spaces are expected to be small and irregular in shape and are usually not connected. Vegetative structure is usually adequate to capture snow and ensure that snowmelt occurs in a controlled manner, allowing maximum time for infiltration, and reducing runoff and erosion in all but the most extreme storm events. When perennial grasses and shrubs decrease due to natural events including drought, insect damage, etc., which reduce ground cover and increasing bare ground, runoff is expected to increase and any associated infiltration reduced. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None. Some soils have a calcic horizon that could be mistaken for a compaction layer. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Perennial bunchgrasses (bluebunch wheatgrass, Thurber needlegrass) > Non-sprouting shrubs (Wyoming big sagebrush).Sub-dominant:
Rhizomatous grasses > Sprouting shrubs > Perennial forbs.Other:
A wide variety of other perennial grasses and both perennial and annual forbs can be expected to occur in the plant community.Additional:
Natural disturbance regimes include fire, drought, and insects. Assumed fire cycle of 35 to 80 years. Functional/structural groups may appropriately contain non-native species if their ecological function is the same as the native species in the reference state (e.g. Crested wheatgrass, intermediate wheatgrass, Siberian Wheatgrass etc.)
Following a disturbance such as fire, drought, rodents or insects that remove woody vegetation, forbs and perennial grasses (herbaceous species) may dominate the community for a period of time. If a disturbance has not occurred for an extended period of time, woody species will continue to increase. These conditions would reflect a functional community phase within the reference state. -
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
All age classes of perennial grasses should be present under average to above average growing conditions with age class expression likely subdued during periods of extended drought. Slight decadence in the principle shrubs could occur near the end of the fire cycle or during periods of extended drought, or insect infestations. In general, a mix of age classes should be expected with some dead and decadent plants present not exceeding 5%. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Litter cover will be heavier under plants. Most litter will be herbaceous and depths of 1/2 to 1 inch would be considered normal. Perennial vegetation should be well distributed on the site. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Annual production in air-dry herbage should be approximately 900 - 1100 #/acre on an average year, but could range from 700 to 1400#/acre during periods of prolonged drought or above average precipitation.
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Cheatgrass, Russian thistle, Utah juniper, and non-native invasive annual forbs such as mustards or halogeton. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All perennial plants should have the ability to reproduce in all years, except in extreme drought years. Green rabbitbrush sprouts vigorously following fire. There are no restrictions on either seed or vegetative reproduction. Some seedling recruitment of major species is present during average and above average growing years.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.