Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R029XY162NV
ERODED SLOPE 8-10 P.Z.
Accessed: 11/13/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Associated sites
R029XY006NV |
LOAMY 8-10 P.Z. |
---|---|
R029XY161NV |
SHALLOW COBBLY LOAM 8-10 P.Z. |
Similar sites
R029XY085NV |
BOULDERY SLOPE 5-8 P.Z. EPVI-ERFAP dominant shrubs; more productive site |
---|---|
R029XY021NV |
LOAMY HILL 5-8 P.Z. GRSP-LYCIU dominant shrubs |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Psorothamnus polydenius |
Herbaceous |
(1) Achnatherum hymenoides |
Physiographic features
This site occurs on eroding sideslopes of fan remnants and partial ballenas. Slopes range from 15 to 50 percent. Elevations are 4250 to about 6400 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Ballena
(2) Fan remnant |
---|---|
Elevation | 4,250 – 6,400 ft |
Slope | 15 – 50% |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
The climate associated with this site is arid, characterized by cool, moist winters and hot, dry summers. Average annual precipitation is (6) 8 to 10 inches. Mean annual air temperature is 50 to 53 degrees F. The average growing season is about 110 to 140 days.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 140 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 0 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 10 in |
Figure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
There are no influencing water features associated with this site.
Soil features
The soils associated with this site are very shallow to a duripan and well drained. These soils have formed in calcareous loess over gravelly alluvium derived from limestone. The soil profile is modified with over 35 percent rock fragments. High amounts of rock fragments occur at the soil surface. Coarse fragments on the surface provide a stabilizing affect on surface erosion conditions. Runoff is high to very high, available water capacity is very low and water intake rates are very slow to moderate.
The soil series associated with this site is Treadwell.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Gravelly sandy loam |
---|---|
Drainage class | Well drained to somewhat excessively drained |
Permeability class | Very slow to moderate |
Soil depth | 2 – 10 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 45% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 70% |
Available water capacity (0-40in) |
0.4 – 0.5 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-40in) |
10 – 20% |
Electrical conductivity (0-40in) |
2 mmhos/cm |
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-40in) |
5 |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-40in) |
7.4 – 11 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
10 – 65% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
Not specified |
Ecological dynamics
As ecological condition declines, Nevada dalea, rubber rabbitbrush, and horsebrush will increase while Indian ricegrass will decrease. Red brome and cheatgrass are species likely to invade this site.
Fire Ecology:
Mean fire return intervals for desert shrub communities is greater than 100 years. Fire is a very rare occurrence on this sparse site. Rubber rabbitbrush is often top-killed by fire. Rubber rabbitbrush is a fire-adapted species that is typically unharmed or enhanced by fire. Recovery time is often rapid to very rapid. Rubber rabbitbrush is often one of the first species to colonize burned areas by sprouting or from off-site seed. Nevada dalea has little adaptation to fire and is probably killed. Green ephedra generally sprouts vigorously from the roots or root crown after fire and rapidly produces aboveground biomass from surviving meristematic tissue. Indian ricegrass can be killed by fire, depending on severity and season of burn. Indian ricegrass reestablishes on burned sites through seed dispersed from adjacent unburned areas.
State and transition model
Figure 3. DRAFT STM
Figure 4. DRAFT STM LEGEND
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
Community 1.1
Reference Plant Community
The reference plant community is dominated by Nevada dalea, rubber rabbitbrush, and Indian ricegrass. Potential vegetative composition is about 15% grasses, 10% forbs, and 75% shrubs. Approximate ground cover (basal and crown) is 5 to 10 percent.
Figure 5. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 56 | 94 | 131 |
Grass/Grasslike | 11 | 18 | 26 |
Forb | 8 | 13 | 18 |
Total | 75 | 125 | 175 |
State 2
Current Potenital
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | Primary Perennial Grasses | 6–13 | ||||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 6–13 | – | ||
2 | Secondary Perennial Grasses | 3–10 | ||||
threeawn | ARIST | Aristida | 1–3 | – | ||
King's eyelashgrass | BLKI | Blepharidachne kingii | 1–3 | – | ||
squirreltail | ELEL5 | Elymus elymoides | 1–3 | – | ||
James' galleta | PLJA | Pleuraphis jamesii | 1–3 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | Perennial | 3–10 | ||||
James' galleta | PLJA | Pleuraphis jamesii | 1–3 | – | ||
globemallow | SPHAE | Sphaeralcea | 1–3 | – | ||
4 | Annual | 1–4 | ||||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 6–13 | – | ||
squirreltail | ELEL5 | Elymus elymoides | 1–3 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
5 | Primary Shrubs | 68–107 | ||||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNAN5 | Ericameria nauseosa ssp. nauseosa var. nauseosa | 31–44 | – | ||
Nevada dalea | PSPO | Psorothamnus polydenius | 31–44 | – | ||
mormon tea | EPVI | Ephedra viridis | 6–19 | – | ||
6 | Secondary Shrubs | 6–19 | ||||
Heermann's buckwheat | ERHE | Eriogonum heermannii | 1–4 | – | ||
burrobrush | HYSA | Hymenoclea salsola | 1–4 | – | ||
desert pepperweed | LEFR2 | Lepidium fremontii | 1–4 | – | ||
Fremont's mahonia | MAFR3 | Mahonia fremontii | 1–4 | – | ||
spiny menodora | MESP2 | Menodora spinescens | 1–4 | – | ||
desert snowberry | SYLO | Symphoricarpos longiflorus | 1–4 | – | ||
littleleaf horsebrush | TEGL | Tetradymia glabrata | 1–4 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
Livestock Interpretations:
This site has limited value for livestock production due to steep slopes and low forage production. Grazing management should be keyed to perennial grass production. Indian ricegrass is highly palatable to all classes of livestock in both green and cured condition. It supplies a source of green feed before most other native grasses have produced much new growth. In general, livestock forage only lightly on this species during the summer, but winter use can be heavy in some locations. Fall use is variable, but flowers are often used by livestock. A few leaves and the more tender stems may also be used. Nevada dalea is of little importance to livestock due to its low palatability. Green ephedra is heavily browsed by livestock on winter range but only moderately or lightly browsed during other seasons.
Stocking rates vary over time depending upon season of use, climate variations, site, and previous and current management goals. A safe starting stocking rate is an estimated stocking rate that is fine tuned by the client by adaptive management through the year and from year to year.
Wildlife Interpretations:
Wildlife forage only lightly on rubber rabbitbrush during the summer, but winter use can be heavy in some locations. Fall use is variable, but flowers are often used by wildlife. A few leaves and the more tender stems may also be used. The forage value of rubber rabbitbrush varies greatly among subspecies and ecotypes. Green ephedra is an important browse species for big game. It is heavily browsed by big game on winter range because the stems are usually above the snow. It is only moderately or lightly browsed during other seasons. Nevada dalea has low palatability so is little used by wildlife. Indian ricegrass is eaten by pronghorn in moderate amounts whenever available. A number of heteromyid rodents inhabiting desert rangelands show preference for seed of Indian ricegrass. Indian ricegrass is an important component of jackrabbit diets in spring and summer. Indian ricegrass seed provides food for many species of birds. Doves, for example, eat large amounts of shattered Indian ricegrass seed lying on the ground.
Hydrological functions
Runoff is medium to high. Permeability is very slow to moderate.
Recreational uses
Aesthetic value is derived from the diverse floral and faunal composition and the colorful flowering of wild flowers and shrubs during the spring and early summer. This site offers rewarding opportunities to photographers and for nature study. This site is used for camping and hiking and has potential for upland and big game hunting.
Other products
Indian ricegrass was traditionally eaten by some Native Americans. The Paiutes used seed as a reserve food source.
Supporting information
Type locality
Location 1: Lincoln County, NV | |
---|---|
Township/Range/Section | T2S R61E S23 |
General legal description | West of Hwy. 318, approximately 15 miles north of Hiko, Nevada. |
Other references
Fire Effects Information System (Online; http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/)
Hood, Sharon M.; Miller, Melanie, editors. 2007. Fire Ecology and Management of the Major Ecosystems of Southern Utah. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-202. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 110p.
USDA-NRCS Plants Database (Online; http://www.plants.usda.gov)
Contributors
CMJ/PN-E
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | |
Approved by | |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.