Sandy (Sy) Big Horn Basin Core
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
-
Transition T1A
Frequent or high-intensity herbivory weakens the ability of the grasses to persist, especially during prolonged drought. Removal of or significant decrease in key grasses and a shift to a more pronounced sagebrush community renders a site difficult to restore back to the Reference State without mechanical or similar treatments.
More details -
Transition T1B
Long duration, high-intensity grazing reduces the bunchgrass component and encourages the mat- or sod-forming species. Prolonged drought stresses plants, opening the canopy for sod-formers. Removal of sagebrush by disturbances opens the canopy, aiding the transition.
More details -
Restoration pathway R2A
Removal or thinning of the sagebrush by mechanical or chemical means or by fire with remnant populations of native perennial desired grass species will lead to this community, if time is given for recovery and seedling establishment. Frequent use of this community during the dormant season will work to reduce the sagebrush through trampling and grazing but may encourage shorter-statured, more tolerant species and not the more desired species.
More details -
Transition T2A
Sod-forming species such as blue grama can tolerate high levels of use and will maintain as other native species decline. This decline creates a sagebrush–sod-former community that is resistant to change with management. Impacts to sagebrush by disease or insect damage will shift this to the secondary community phase.
More details -
Transition T2B
When seed sources are prevalent for invasive species, stress from drought, wildfire, or other natural and man disturbances, removes or exposes the soil and presents a niche for invasion by undesirable weeds.
More details -
Transition T3A
The interstitial spaces within the patchy canopy of sod-formers leaves areas for weedy species to establish, especially with disturbance or high traffic areas.
More details -
Restoration pathway R4A
Integrated pest management plan and intense weed control after and possibly before seedbed preparation will be necessary to overcome a severe weed infestation. Working a location and using either improved varieties, native seed, or, in some cases, an introduced species suited for the management use intended may be the only way to overcome some invasive species.
More details -
Transition T5A
In the reclamation or restoration process, or after a land disturbance occurs, if no management is put into place to prevent a reoccurrence or a new infestation of weeds, the community will revert or transition to an invaded state. Wildfire, prescribed burning, drought, or frequent and severe misuse by large herbivores can be a source of the disturbance that either opens the canopy or introduces the species to the location.
More details -
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
State 1
Reference
Description
Wyoming big sagebrush has a foothold in the community but mid-stature bunchgrasses are the dominant contributors to composition.
Characteristics and indicators
This state is characterized by the key species, including 10 percent or less composition by cover of Wyoming big sagebrush, with predominantly needle and thread and Indian ricegrass (30-50 percent composition). Areas of thickspike wheatgrass exist with the other minor components to the overall composition which are prairie Junegrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, sand dropseed, threeawn, blue grama, and threadleaf sedge.
Submodel
Description
Persistence of drought or frequent overuse by livestock or wildlife leads to a decline of the herbaceous species, creating the Mixed Shrub and Bare Ground State. This State can be exacerbated by insects and other human disturbances. The total woody canopy cover does not necessarily always increase with this community, but the percentage of composition by cover and production is swayed by the decrease of herbaceous vegetation and the relative stability of woody production, creating the appearance of increased canopy by shrubs.
Characteristics and indicators
The coarse texture of the soils on this site provides the opportunistic shrubs such as shadscale, spiny hopsage, yucca, skunkbush sumac, and four-wing saltbush to establish along with Wyoming big sagebrush. These shrubs provide protection and create a niche for most herbaceous understory to persist and maintain some vigor in difficult conditions. The additional moisture provided by the shade of the canopy as well as protection from grazing benefit most native grasses.
Resilience management
As the herbaceous cover declines and the site continues to weaken, the sagebrush and other shrub cover is susceptible to attack by insects, disease, and general old age that can remove it from the system leaving it at-risk of invasion or transition to a more degraded state. There is a high level of variability of species in this State (State 2, Mixed Shrubs/Bare Ground), that will shift with precipitation patterns or as a response to past management. Only one well-defined community will be provided, with discussion of transitions or variances from this community.
The overall droughty nature of coarse textured soils exacerbates the impact of droughty conditions and reduces the resilience and resistance of this site to further shift during extended dry periods. The presence of spiny hopsage and yucca on this site is not frequent, but when it does occur it can easily become prominent, specifically for winter grazing allotments. Yucca’s growth habits produce a more pronounced pedestalling and drift or scour pattern on the landscape than seen with sagebrush.
Risk of wildfire within this state is minimal due to the lack of fine fuels within the understory, but the canopy of the woody vegetation can easily carry a fire under certain weather conditions. The loose or coarser texture of these soils allows for increased wind scour and drifting or mounding to occur with more open ground between canopy “patches” that further hinders fire movement. Depending upon the prescription of use, trailing and other erosional patterns are highly visible in this State.
Submodel
State 3
Sod Bound
Description
The dominant sod-forming grass or grass-like that currently exists within this LRU is blue grama; however, there is a limited component of threadleaf sedge. Both are species that persist as a component of the perennial vegetation naturally (in Reference communities) within this ecological site. The general tendency is for these species to increase with prolonged drought or under grazing pressure, becoming dominant.
Characteristics and indicators
This community is characterized by a dominance of blue grama with some threadleaf sedge. Remnants of the other vegetation natural to this site will persist, but is restricted by the dense mats of blue grama.
Resilience management
Together as the dominant species, they alter the hydrology of the site by increasing the surface runoff from the dense shallow root system that inhibits the movement of water through or will direct surface flow around the edge of the “clump,” concentrating flow into channel-like patterns, creating a drier environment for native grass species and forbs to persist.
Submodel
Description
Wyoming rangelands, much like the neighboring states, has quickly fallen victim to the aggressive invasion of cheatgrass, also called downy brome (Bromus tectorum). The rapid development of an extensive seedbank and duff layer forms with the potential for multiple growth cycles throughout a year. The advantageous ability of cheatgrass to persist through the winter under a blanket of snow and sprout early makes it difficult for natives to outcompete it for limited resources. Shifts in climatic patterns, changes in management, and exposure to human activity are a few of the explanations for the current flush and rapid expansion across the western United States.
Although cheatgrass is the most prevalent large-scale threat for rangeland managers, a variety of knapweeds (spotted, Russian, etc.), in combination with other aggressive invaders such as whitetop (hoary cress), black henbane, field bindweed, and leafy spurge are increasing in density and frequency, producing their own set of challenging management issues. As more species are found or as other species become more prevalent on a large scale, the community dynamics in this state will shift in response to the concerns of the identified species.
Characteristics and indicators
The Invaded State is characterized by the presence and eventual dominance of invasive and non-native species. The open canopy of the arid native community combined with extended periods of drought alone or in combination with overutilization, insect damage, or wildfire, has weakened the native composition, thus allowing invasion.
Resilience management
The competitive nature of annuals and other invasive species creates a complex environment that inhibits control and makes it implausible to attain complete eradication once an invasive species has established on the landscape.
Submodel
Description
The arid nature of this region has played a major role in the development and transitions in land use over time. Early settlers worked to farm any land that was accessible by water (canal systems) and equipment. Many of these small areas were later abandoned and left to return to rangeland. Other landscapes were treated with a variety of prescriptions to manage or eradicate sagebrush. Tillage of the soil, changes in hydrology caused by the loss of vegetative structure, constant natural climatic fluctuations, and advancements in seed sources has led to the creation of a site description for the Altered State.
The disturbed or degraded state could be drafted as a stand-alone box within the State-and-Transition Model diagram. No matter how a location is classified, once the site has experienced an event that has altered the soil properties (erosional, depositional, hydrological, or chemical), the site potential is altered. To consider this as an alternate ecological site would not be unreasonable. In some cases (site by site consideration), recorrelation of a location may be the best solution. In many cases, however, the soils have not been altered out of the current site characteristics, but the potential has shifted enough that it is no longer truly comparable to the Reference State (State 1).
Characteristics and indicators
Mechanical, cultural, or natural disturbance to soils resulting in an alteration of structure, hydrologic function, and possibly stability prevent a site from supporting the native vegetation or responding to management in the same way as an undisturbed site. Reclamation or restoration of an area will not replace the original function and factors that made the original location respond as it did. Therefore, these "altered" lands may, after significant inputs and time, resemble the Reference Communities (1.1 or 1.2), but they will not respond or function as the Reference Community.
Resilience management
The species selection, extent or occurrence of tillage, and the resulting loss of structure, moisture, biotic degradation, changes in infiltration and water-holding capacity, and change in permeability are all factors that affect a planted site. The time required and feasibility for the redevelopment of soil, as well as variability in plant establishment and climatic conditions determine the successional path after a disturbance event. Kochia, Russian thistle, and mustards are the typical primary successional species in this LRU. Although they provide organic material, nutrient flow and erosional protection, they lack the structure and root system to fully stabilize the site. With time, the site may become similar in composition to Reference, but the integrity of the soil is altered, changing community potential. To capture the dynamics of this process, an Altered State was added to document these communities that exist on the landscape.
Submodel
Mechanism
Frequent and severe grazing (year-long) or drought with the absence of brush management or wildfire—The conversion to a Wyoming Big Sagebrush/Bare Ground plant community is a response to extended periods of stress, both climate- and human-induced. Frequent or high-intensity herbivory with minimal to no recovery period weakens the ability for the grasses to persist, especially during prolonged drought. With the weakened herbaceous cover, the composition will shift to predominantly Wyoming big sagebrush. Over time sagebrush composition will increase inhibiting the recovery. With added climatic stress, species diversity and productivity are lost, and the community crosses into the Sagebrush/Bare Ground State. An illusion of crossing the threshold to State 2 is created in extended periods of significant fluctuation in precipitation patterns affecting production of prominent plants within this system. The loss of species diversity and increased bare ground over a period of years, along with lack of litter are the indicators that a true transition has occurred. It is important to recognize that woody cover is a factor of the number of plants as well as canopy cover. In some instances, the number of actual sagebrush plants may not increase to cause this shift, but the change in composition or vigor of the wood canopy, as well as the loss of herbaceous canopy, creates the perception of an increased number of plants when it is the ratio, size, and age that is more likely to shift.
Constraints to recovery
Having sufficient key species and cooperation of precipitation and rest from use to allow the native bunchgrasses to re-establish within the interspaces of sagebrush is the main constraint to recovery. Being able to thin while maintaining some woody cover may also be challenging for the recovery process.
Mechanism
Frequent grazing (year-long), brush management, or fire with drought—Severe and frequent grazing reduces vigor and presence of key species, mainly needle and thread and Indian ricegrass, and short-statured grasses become dominant. Animal disturbance (hoof impact) and continuous use reduces the bunchgrass component by allowing repeated defoliation of the desirable species and damage to the structure of the plant. These impacts reduce recovery potential and ground cover for insulation and snow catch; weakening and, over time, removing select species. The open canopy and hoof impact encourage species that are tolerant to trampling and short bursts of spring and summer precipitation. These species generally are tillering, mat- or sod-forming species such as blue grama and threadleaf sedge. Prolonged drought stresses the plants and opens the canopy, allowing sod-formers to fill in the interspaces. The shallow, dense root mats will continue to spread over time. The added removal of sagebrush with animal impacts or with fire or brush management may open the canopy more and aid in establishment. Season of use and intensity of grazing (time and timing) are triggers that can reduce the risk of transitioning, or, if done improperly, can force the transition to occur rapidly. The increase in blue grama adds an element of midsummer growth that extends the “green” grazing window. However, adequate amounts and timing of moisture must occur to allow sufficient growth to prevent overuse of the cool-season species.
Constraints to recovery
The ability to weaken or break up the sod-forming species and the lack of remaining native (key) bunchgrasses are the main constraints to recovery for this community.
Context dependence
The time lapse for the occurrence of this state is varied. It is a transition that takes or may take a significant time frame (over ten years) to occur. Recovery may be able to be achieved; but at this time no proof of recovery, without mechanical interference, has been achieved/documented within a management time frame (25 years).
Mechanism
Prescribed grazing with brush management or wildfire—Thinning or patch treatments for sagebrush allow native herbaceous cover to respond to improved moisture and sunlight followed by prescribed grazing to prevent will help this community recover. Treatment will vary depending upon the existing composition of grasses remaining and the potential threats to the location. Removal or thinning of the sagebrush within this community will help to reduce competition, encouraging grasses and forb recovery if the disturbance or overuse (recreational or grazing pressure) is reduced. Drought may prolong the time required for recovery. Mowing or mulching sagebrush trials have shown a strong response by grasses with little to no recovery time post-treatment. The resulting community with these treatments is driven by the dominant species within the community pre-treatment or climatic and treatment conditions during and following may sway the community. It is crucial to investigate the immediate and surrounding area around treatment sites to ensure no invasive species (cheatgrass) are present before treatment type is decided and then applied. The arid climate and lack of fine fuels limits the feasibility of fire as a brush management tool in this system.
Mechanism
Drought, Disease or Insect Damage, Over-use, or Fire - Sod-forming species such as blue grama and threadleaf sedge can tolerate high levels of use and will maintain as other native species decline. Hoof action or compaction inhibits more desirable native species, allowing the sod-formers to become dominant on the landscape. This decline creates a sagebrush/sod community that is resistant to change with management. Impacts to sagebrush by disease or insect damage, as well as drought or herbivory, will shift this to the secondary community phase with cactus as a subdominant cover with blue grama.
Constraints to recovery
The hydrologic shift caused by blue grama and the tolerance and resiliency of this species limits the ability to weaken/reduce its foothold in the community enough to encourage the mid-stature bunchgrasses key to this site.
Mechanism
Fire (wild), Frequent or Severe Grazing, Drought with Insect Damage/Brush Management – Throughout most of this LRU there is a seed source present for cheatgrass, knapweed, and other invasive species. Stress to the native community from fire, drought, disease/insect damage to sagebrush, or ground/soil disturbance including impacts by grazing large herbivores or recreational uses; opens the canopy and exposes the soil, creating a niche for undesirable and invasive species to establish. Early detection and rapid response provides a chance to prevent a full-scale invasion, but if left untreated, infestations can establish rapidly and spread with one growing season. The population soon grows exponentially as further stress or disturbance occurs. In some cases, once the invasive species are established, they can create their own habitat; this reduces the competitive ability of native species. The open canopy of the Sagebrush/Bare Ground State is vulnerable to invasive species without further influence. With continued over-use, drought, or insect damage/disease, the invasive species will establish and quickly dominate a location. The threshold species in this system is Wyoming big sagebrush, which protects the remnants of the perennial native grasses, allowing them to persist on the landscape.
Constraints to recovery
The lack of sufficient key native species and the inability to eradicate or sufficiently control invasive species are the main constraints to recovery for this state.
Context dependence
Extent of the transition for the sagebrush/bare ground state to the invaded state will determine the severity of the recovery constraints. The loss of sagebrush from this state will further limit/remove any ability of this state to recover back to any previous state.
Mechanism
Frequent and severe grazing, drought, or disturbance with a seed source present—Increased interspatial gaps in these communities leaves exposed soil that is vulnerable to invasion by undesirable species. Increased pressure from overuse and drought work to weaken the sod or mat-like community, exposing soil further to annuals and other invaders, such as cheatgrass and knapweeds. The aggressive nature and altered hydrology of these sites do restrict weed invasion. But if a seed source is available, ground disturbance by herbivores or man-induced, allows invasive species to find a way into the community. Once established in the community, it may not be feasible to completely remove eradicate the invasive species. Once the invasive species have become prevalent on the landscape (less than 5 percent composition), the community crosses the threshold into the Invaded/Sagebrush State (State 4).
Constraints to recovery
The lack of ability to eradicate or remove invasive species from the community at this time is the constraint to any recover from the invader driven state.
Context dependence
Substantial evidence that a blue grama dominated community has shifted to a invade/sagebrush or invaded community has not been gathered. It has been documented where a significant population of invasive species (ex: cheatgrass) has established within the inter-spaces of the blue grama sod.
Mechanism
Integrated pest management with seeding—Integrated pest management with intense weed control after and possibly before seedbed preparation will be necessary to overcome a severe weed infestation. Working the soil and preparing a seedbed at a location and using improved varieties, native seed, or, in some cases, an introduced species suited for the intended land use may be the only way to overcome some invasive species. Success of reestablishing a native or desired plant community on a large scale is not documented. Small-scale attempts are rated to be low and highly variable for the rate of control of most species. Seedings can be designed to bring this community that is like an at-risk community within the Reference State, but that it is not possible to reach the Reference Community (1.1) once annuals have established on a site. The limited success of seedings, lack of seed sources for all native species, the possible need to mechanically prepare a seedbed, as well as alternation of soil stability and hydrologic functions inhibit a true Reference restoration for this site. The alteration of the soils, the change in the plant community, and the risk of reinvasion of the site inhibits its ability to react the same to management and environmental changes as a truly native community and so would enter an Altered State.
Context dependence
Species of concern (invasion) will be the determining factor to what processes will need to occur to allow an invaded community to be restored/reclaimed.
Relevant conservation practices
| Practice | External resources |
|---|---|
|
Critical Area Planting |
|
|
Grazing Land Mechanical Treatment |
|
|
Range Planting |
|
|
Heavy Use Area Protection |
|
|
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) |
|
|
Upland Wildlife Habitat Management |
|
|
Early Successional Habitat Development/Management |
|
|
Livestock Use Area Protection |
|
|
Planned Grazing System |
|
|
Native Plant Community Restoration and Management |
|
|
Prescribed Grazing |
|
|
Invasive Plant Species Control |
|
|
Grazing Management Plan |
|
|
Herbaceous Weed Control |
Mechanism
No use, fire (wild or prescribed), frequent or severe grazing, drought with seed source present—Lack of management to prevent a repeat of a specific disturbance or the absence of use following the reclamation or restoration process will cause the community to revert or transition to an invaded state. Wildfire, prescribed burning, drought, or frequent and severe use by large herbivores can be disturbances that either opens the canopy or introduces the species to the location. Extended periods of non-use create a decadent community with a large proportion of dead growth persisting around the crown of the plants, reducing vigor and production. As the plants begin to recede, the community becomes vulnerable to weed invasions. Frequent or severe grazing, drought, or fire can open the canopy to and assist with the incorporation of seed sources encouraging an invasion as well. This invasion triggers the transition to an Invaded State.
Constraints to recovery
The species of invasion is the major constraint to recovery. Eradication has been unsuccessful for most of the major species affecting these communities on a large scale.
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase (
) icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.