Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Ecological site DX032X01B172

Stony Upland (StU) Big Horn Basin Rim

Last updated: 9/07/2023
Accessed: 11/23/2024

Home / Esd catalog / MLRA 032X / Ecological site DX032X01B172

USC

Metric

General information

Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.

MLRA notes

Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 032X–Northern Intermountain Desertic Basins

Major land resource area (MLRA):

032X – Northern Intermountain Desertic Basins – This MLRA is comprised of two major Basins, the Big Horn and Wind River. These two basins are distinctly different and are split by LRU’s to allow individual ESD descriptions. These warm basins are surrounded by uplifts and rimmed by mountains, creating a unique set of plant responses and communities. Unique characteristics of the geology and geomorphology further individualize these two basins.

Further information regarding MLRAs, refer to: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. Available electronically

LRU notes

Land Resource Unit (LRU):

32X01B (WY): This LRU is the Big Horn Basin within MLRA 32. This LRU is lower in elevation, slightly warmer and receives slightly less overall precipitation than the Wind River Basin (LRU 02). This LRU was originally divided into two LRU's - LRU A which was the core and LRU B which was the rim. With the most current standards, this LRU is divided into two Subsets. This subset is Subset B, referred to as the Rim, is a transitional band between the basin floor and the lower foothills. The subset encircles Subset A which was originally LRU A. As the LRU shifts towards the south and tracks east, changes in geology and relation to the mountain position, creates a minor shift in soil chemistry influencing the variety of ecological sites and plant interactions. The extent of soils currently correlated to this ecological site does not fit within the digitized boundary. Many of the noted soils are provisional and will be reviewed and corrected in mapping update projects. Other map units are correlated as small inclusions within other MLRA’s/LRU’s based on elevation, landform, and biological references.

Moisture Regime: Ustic Aridic – Prior to 2012, many of the soils within this group were correlated as Frigid Ustic Aridic or as Mesic Typic Aridic, with few mapped within this cross over zone. As progressive soil survey mapping continues, these “crossover” or transitional areas are being identified and corrected.

Temperature Regime: Mesic
Dominant Cover: Rangeland, with Saltbush flats the dominant vegetative cover for this LRU/ESD.
Representative Value (RV) Effective Precipitation: 10-14 inches (254 – 355 mm)
RV Frost-Free Days: 105-125 days

Classification relationships

Relationship to Other Established Classification Systems:

National Vegetation Classification System (NVC):
3 Xeromorphic Woodland, Scrub & Herb Vegetation Class
3.B Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland Subclass
3.B.1 Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland formation
3.B.1.NE Western North American Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland Division
M169 Great Basin & Intermountain Tall Sagebrush Shrubland & Steppe Macro group
G302 Artemisia Tridentata - Artemisia tripartita - Purshia tridentata Big Sagebrush Steppe Group
A3182 Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis Mesic Steppe & Shrubland Alliance
CEGL001051 - Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis/Hesperostipa comata Shrubland

Ecoregions (EPA):
Level I: 10 North American Deserts
Level II: 10.1 Cold Deserts
Level III: 10.1.18 Wyoming Basin
Level IV: 10.1.18.b Big Horn Basin (and)
10.1.18.d Foothill Shrublands and Low Mountains (and)
10.1.18.g Big Horn Salt Desert Shrub Basin

Ecological site concept

• Site receives no additional water.
• Slope is <30%
• Soils are:
o Textures range from fine sandy loam to clay loam in top 4” (10 cm) of mineral soil surface
o Clay content is ≥18% in top 4” (10 cm) of mineral soil surface
o All subsurface horizons in the particle size control section have a weighted average of ≥18% but < 35% clay. (The particle size control section is the segment of the profile from either the start of an argillic horizon for 50 cm’s or from 25-100 cm’s).
o Moderately deep to very deep (20-80+ in. (50-200+ cm)
o Greater than 5% stone and boulder cover (generally 5-15%) with cobble and gravel cover
o Skeletal (≥35% rock fragments) starting within 8-20” (20-50 cm) of mineral soil surface (may have up to but not exceeding 35% rock fragments above 8")
o Non-saline, sodic, or saline-sodic

Associated sites

DX032X01B121	Limy Skeletal (LiSk) Big Horn Basin Rim
DX032X01B175	Skeletal (Sk) Big Horn Basin Rim
DX032X01B122	Loamy (Ly) Big Horn Basin Rim
DX032X01A162	Shallow Loamy (SwLy) Big Horn Basin Core

Similar sites

DX032X01B175	Skeletal (Sk) Big Horn Basin Rim
DX032X01B109	Cobbly Upland (CoU) Big Horn Basin Rim

DX032X01B175

Skeletal (Sk) Big Horn Basin Rim

DX032X01B109

Cobbly Upland (CoU) Big Horn Basin Rim

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Tree	Not specified
Shrub	(1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis (2) Artemisia frigida
Herbaceous	(1) Pseudoroegneria spicata (2) Hesperostipa comata

Legacy ID

R032XB172WY

Download full description

Physiographic features

This site occurs on undulating rolling landforms, generally on steeper sideslopes or alluvial fans.

Table 2. Representative physiographic features

Landforms	(1) Intermontane basin > Eroded fan remnant (2) Intermontane basin > Alluvial fan (3) Intermontane basin > Outwash fan
Runoff class	Negligible to high
Elevation	1,494 – 1,585 m
Slope	0 – 60%
Aspect	Aspect is not a significant factor

Climatic features

Annual precipitation and modeled relative effective annual precipitation ranges from 10 to 14 inches (254–355 mm). The normal precipitation pattern shows peaks in May and June and a secondary peak in September. This amounts to about 50 percent of the mean annual precipitation. Much of the moisture that falls in the latter part of the summer is lost by evaporation, and much of the moisture that falls during the winter is lost by sublimation. Average snowfall totals about 20 inches annually. Wide fluctuations may occur in yearly precipitation and result in more dry years than those with more than normal precipitation.

Temperatures show a wide range between summer and winter and between daily maximums and minimums, due to the high elevation and dry air, which permits rapid incoming and outgoing radiation. Cold air outbreaks from Canada in winter move rapidly from northwest to southeast and account for extreme minimum temperatures. Chinook winds may occur in winter and bring rapid rises in temperature. Extreme storms may occur during the winter, but most severely affect ranch operations during late winter and spring. High winds are generally blocked from the basin by high mountains, but can occur in conjunction with an occasional thunderstorm. Growth of native cool-season plants begins about April 1 and continues to about July 1. Cool weather and moisture in September may produce some green-up of cool-season plants that will continue to late October. For detailed information visit the Natural Resources Conservation Service National Water and Climate Center at http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/. Clark 3NE, Cody, Cody 12SE, Heart Mtn, and Powell Fld Stn are the representative weather stations within LRU D. The following graphs and charts are a collective sample representing the averaged normals and 30-year annual rainfall data for the selected weather stations from 1981 to 2010.

Table 3. Representative climatic features

Frost-free period (characteristic range)	87-97 days
Freeze-free period (characteristic range)	113-123 days
Precipitation total (characteristic range)	229-279 mm
Frost-free period (actual range)	83-108 days
Freeze-free period (actual range)	111-125 days
Precipitation total (actual range)	178-305 mm
Frost-free period (average)	93 days
Freeze-free period (average)	118 days
Precipitation total (average)	254 mm

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 1. Monthly precipitation range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range

Bar

Line

Figure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature

Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern

Figure 6. Annual average temperature pattern

Climate stations used

(1) HEART MTN [USC00484411], Powell, WY
(2) CODY [USC00481840], Cody, WY
(3) CODY 12SE [USC00481850], Meeteetse, WY
(4) THERMOPOLIS 9NE [USC00488884], Thermopolis, WY
(5) POWELL FLD STN [USC00487388], Powell, WY
(6) SHELL 1NE [USC00488124], Shell, WY

Influencing water features

The characteristics of these upland soils have no influence from ground water (water table below 60 inches or 150 cm) and have minimal influence from surface water or overland flow. There may be isolated features that are affected by snowpack that persists longer than surrounding areas due to position on the landform (shaded or protected pockets), but overflow is not a suitable fit. No streams are classified within this ecological site.

Soil features

The soils of this site are deep to moderately deep (greater than 20" to bedrock), moderately well to somewhat excessively well-drained & moderately slow to moderately rapid permeable. This site consists of a strong cap of soils with few rock fragments (less than 35%) with a skeletal fraction with bouldery to cobbly coarse fragments lower in the soil profile. The soil surface can be covered extensively with these coarse fragments, with at least 5% stones and boulders. The increased fragment cover impacts the plant cover, and plant density is reduced. The soil characteristics having most influential to the plant community are volume of coarse fragments in the profile that reduces the available moisture and the extensive cover of these coarse fragments, which can reduce the plant density.

Major Soil Series correlated to this site includes: Romberg

Table 4. Representative soil features

Parent material	(1) Colluvium – interbedded sedimentary rock (2) Glaciomarine deposits – igneous and metamorphic rock (3) Slide deposits – igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock
Surface texture	(1) Extremely bouldery, extremely stony, very stony loam (2) Silt loam (3) Clay loam (4) Sandy clay loam
Family particle size	(1) Fine-loamy (2) Loamy-skeletal (3) Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal
Drainage class	Well drained to somewhat excessively drained
Permeability class	Moderately slow to moderately rapid
Soil depth	51 cm
Surface fragment cover <=3"	0 – 50%
Surface fragment cover >3"	5 – 35%
Available water capacity (Depth not specified)	7.11 – 15.24 cm
Calcium carbonate equivalent (Depth not specified)	0 – 14%
Electrical conductivity (Depth not specified)	0 – 4 mmhos/cm
Sodium adsorption ratio (Depth not specified)	0 – 12
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (Depth not specified)	6.8 – 8.4
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20.3cm)	0 – 15%
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20.3cm)	0 – 10%

Ecological dynamics

The Stony Upland ecological site within the Absaroka Lower Foothills was originally correlated as a coarse upland range site. During the review of the coarse upland range site, communities were identified with a significant stone and boulder surface cover that had a fine-loamy surface soil (top 8 to 10 inches of the soil profile with less than 35 percent rock fragments) with a skeletal subsurface soil that was comprised of cobbles and stones. Although similar to the Coarse Upland range site, the community potential and system resilience are altered by the contrasting textural classes. The dominance of bluebunch wheatgrass, increased surface fragment cover and reduced production express the “shallow” acting characteristic of the site. Wyoming big sagebrush is generally restricted in cover due to limited available rooting soil surface. Minimal research can be found for this particular ecological site.

Potential vegetation on the Stony Upland ecological site, as with the Loamy ecological site, is dominated by mid-stature cool-season perennial grasses. Other significant vegetation includes Wyoming big sagebrush, fringed sagewort and a variety of forbs. Purple prairie clover is unique to this site, as well as yucca. The expected potential composition is 75 percent grasses, 10 percent forbs, and 15 percent woody plants. The composition and production will vary due to historic use and fluctuating precipitation.

As the Stony Upland ecological site deteriorates species such as threadleaf sedge, Sandberg bluegrass, and broom snakeweed will increase. Plains pricklypear and weedy annuals will invade. Cool-season grasses such as bluebunch wheatgrass, needle and thread, and Indian ricegrass will decrease in frequency and production.

Sagebrush may not be resilient once it has been removed or severely reduced if a vigorous stand of grass exists and is maintained. Threadleaf sedge may become the dominant vegetation if the area is subjected to frequent and severe (continuous season-long) periods of grazing, especially year-long grazing; resulting in a dense sod cover of threadleaf sedge.

The reference plant community (description follows the plant community diagram) has been determined by study of relic rangeland sites, or areas protected from excessive disturbance. Trends in plant communities going from heavily grazed areas to lightly grazed areas, seasonal use pastures, and historical accounts have also been used.

The following is a State and Transition Model (STM) Diagram for this ecological site. An STM has five fundamental components: states, transitions, restoration pathways, community phases and community pathways. The state, designated by the bold box, is a single community phase or suite of community phases. The reference state is recognized as State 1. It describes the ecological potential and natural range of variability resulting from the natural disturbance regime of the site. The designation of alternative states (State 2, etc) in STMs denotes changes in ecosystem properties that cross a certain threshold.

Transitions are represented by the arrows between states moving from a higher state to a lower state (State 1 - State 2) and are denoted in the legend as a “T” (T1-2). They describe the variables or events that contribute directly to loss of state resilience and result in shifts between states. Restoration pathways are represented by the arrows between states returning back from a lower state to a higher state (State 2 - State1 or better illustrated by State 1

State and transition model

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text

Ecosystem states

1. Perennial Grasses/Sagebrush

2. Sod-former/Sagebrush

3. Perennial Grasses

4. Invaded

5. Degraded

T1-2	-	Frequent and severe grazing (yearlong grazing) or compaction from surface traffic, will weaken the mid-stature grasses and allow threadleaf sedge to increase.
T1-3	-	Frequent and severe grazing as well as prolonged drought weakens the woody cover reducing the community to a grass dominated canopy.
T2-4	-	Drought with or without hoof impact or mechanical soil impact to displace the sod opens the niche for invasive species to establish.
T3-4	-	Disturbance to the soil surface provides the opportunity for invasive species to find their niche in a community.
R4-5	-	Integrated weed management, seeding and grazing management will establish a community similar to Reference.
T5-4	-	Any disturbance to or failure in reclaiming the community leaves this State at risk to invasion.

State 1 submodel, plant communities

1.1. Bluebunch Wheatgrass/Sagebrush

SWAPAEH

State 2 submodel, plant communities

2.1. Sod-former/Sagebrush

SWAPAEH

State 3 submodel, plant communities

3.1. Bluebunch Wheatgrass/Pin Cushion Forbs

SWAPAEH

State 4 submodel, plant communities

4.1. Perennial Grasses/Invasive Species/Sagebrush

SWAPAEH

State 5 submodel, plant communities

5.1. Disturbed Lands

SWAPAEH

State 1
Perennial Grasses/Sagebrush

The Perennial Grasses/Sagebrush State (State 1) is the reference community for the Stony Upland ecological site. The prominent cover is bluebunch wheatgrass, needle and thread, and other mid-stature cool-season bunchgrasses with perennial forbs and a mix of Wyoming big sagebrush and fringed sagewort make for a productive and stable site.

Characteristics and indicators. Bluebunch wheatgrass is the dominant herbaceous species on this site with Wyoming big sagebrush as the dominant woody cover. Pincushion or low growing forbs are also prominent in the community. Purple prairie clover is a unique and very characteristic forb found on this ecological site within the Clark, WY area, marked by glacial deposits.

Resilience management. The hardiness of the vegetation that thrive within the Stony Upland ecological site create a plant community resistant to change. The community is drought tolerant and flexible to the variable climatic conditions. But once disturbed, the herbaceous component of this site is difficult to restore, reducing the resiliency of the community.

Community 1.1
Bluebunch Wheatgrass/Sagebrush

Figure 7. Bluebunch wheatgrass and Wyoming big sagebrush are prominant components of the Reference Site for the Stony Upland ecological site within the Big Horn Basin Rim subset.

This plant community is the interpretive plant community for the Stony Upland ecological site and is considered to be the Reference Plant Community. This community evolved with grazing by large herbivores and infrequent periodic fires. This plant community can be found on areas that are properly managed with grazing and on areas receiving occasional short periods of rest. The potential vegetation is about 75% grasses or grass-like plants, 15% forbs, and 10% woody plants. This state is dominated by mid-stature cool-season grasses. The major grasses include bluebunch wheatgrass, needle and thread, Indian ricegrass, and western wheatgrass. Other grasses occurring in this state include prairie junegrass, Sandberg bluegrass and bottlebrush squirreltail. Wyoming big sagebrush is an element of this state, occurring in a mosaic pattern, and making up 5 to 15% of the annual production. Fringed sagewort is common in the community as are a variety of forbs. Purple prairie clover is a unique species found within specific zones of Stony upland and Skeletal map units within the Clark area. Dotted Gayfeather is found on redder soils north of Cody on this ecological site. The total annual production (air-dry weight) of this state is about 350 lbs./acre, but it can range from about 200 lbs./acre in unfavorable years to about 500 lbs./acre in above average years.

Resilience management. This plant community is extremely stable and well adapted to the climatic conditions. The diversity in plant species is moderate to high across this community which allows for drought tolerance. This is a sustainable plant community (site/soil stability, watershed function, and biologic integrity).

Dominant plant species

Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis), shrub
prairie sagewort (Artemisia frigida), shrub
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
needle and thread (Hesperostipa comata), grass
prairie Junegrass (Koeleria macrantha), grass
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous
purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea), other herbaceous
beardtongue (Penstemon), other herbaceous

Dominant resource concerns

Sheet and rill erosion

Figure 8. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)

Table 5. Annual production by plant type

Plant type	Low (kg/hectare)	Representative value (kg/hectare)	High (kg/hectare)
Grass/Grasslike	168	280	392
Shrub/Vine	45	84	112
Forb	11	28	56
Total	224	392	560

Table 6. Ground cover

Tree foliar cover	0%
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover	5-15%
Grass/grasslike foliar cover	5-15%
Forb foliar cover	0-5%
Non-vascular plants	0%
Biological crusts	0-5%
Litter	5-15%
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3"	10-35%
Surface fragments >3"	5-35%
Bedrock	0%
Water	0%
Bare ground	15-30%

Table 7. Soil surface cover

Tree basal cover	0%
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover	0%
Grass/grasslike basal cover	0%
Forb basal cover	0%
Non-vascular plants	0%
Biological crusts	0-5%
Litter	5-15%
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3"	10-35%
Surface fragments >3"	5-35%
Bedrock	0%
Water	0%
Bare ground	15-30%

Table 8. Canopy structure (% cover)

Height Above Ground (m)	Tree	Shrub/Vine	Grass/ Grasslike	Forb
<0.15	–	0-5%	0-5%	0-5%
>0.15 <= 0.3	–	5-10%	5-20%	0-5%
>0.3 <= 0.6	–	1-5%	0-5%	–
>0.6 <= 1.4	–	–	–	–
>1.4 <= 4	–	–	–	–
>4 <= 12	–	–	–	–
>12 <= 24	–	–	–	–
>24 <= 37	–	–	–	–
>37	–	–	–	–

Figure 9. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). WY0701, 10-14E upland sites.

Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
J	F	M	A	M	J	J	A	S	O	N	D
			5	25	40	10	5	10	5

State 2
Sod-former/Sagebrush

The Sod-former/Sagebrush ecological site is a short-stature community that has shifted from the cool-season bunchgrasses to tillering grass-likes (blue grama and threadleaf sedge). Fringed sagewort and prickly pear cactus are common.

Characteristics and indicators. Wyoming big sagebrush is present but in this State with an increase in fringed sagewort and rubber rabbitbrush. The sagebrush cover is dwarfed or droughty in appearance and generally has been reduced in vigor by the shift in hydrology of this community. Most other mid and short-stature cool-season bunchgrasses are limited to within the canopy of the sagebrush or within the protective cactus clumps.

Resilience management. The dense root map of blue grama and threadleaf sedge makes this community resistant to change. The doughtiness of the subset and high rock cover limits the resilience to disturbance. Although the establishment of tillering grasses is a slow process, it will recover with time. Removal of grazing or disturbance does not provide a significant shift in the herbaceous cover within this community. However, the overall health and vigor of both the herbaceous and woody cover will improve with the removal of the grazing pressure or disturbance.

Community 2.1
Sod-former/Sagebrush

Figure 10. Blue grama and threadleaf sedge occurring in dense patches within this landscape, and is beginning to limit other native vegetation.

This plant community is the result of frequent and severe (year-long or continuous season-long) grazing, which has adversely affected the perennial grasses as well as impacted the shrub component. Other factors that can affect this community include drought, shift in climate, wildlife browsing and alternative uses. A dense sod of blue grama and threadleaf sedge dominates this state. When compared to the Reference Communities, prickly pear cactus has increased as Wyoming big sagebrush is reduced or in some cases removed. Rubber rabbitbrush and fringed sagewort persists or increases in the community. All cool-season mid-stature grasses and forbs have been greatly reduced. Production has significantly decreased. Annual production values have not been provided for this community due to the lack of sufficient data to provide dependable values.

Resilience management. Rangeland Health Implications/Indicators: This community is resistant to change and continued frequent and severe grazing or the removal of grazing does not seem to affect the plant composition or structure of blue grama and threadleaf sedge. Eventually, the shrub component can be removed from the plant community. The biotic integrity is not functional and plant diversity is extremely low. The plant vigor is significantly weakened and replacement capabilities are limited due to the reduced number of cool-season grasses. This sod-bound plant community slows water infiltration, and funnels water off-site, down-slope communities are affected by excessive runoff that can cause rills and gully erosion. Water flow patterns are obvious in areas of bare ground, and pedestalling is apparent along the sod edges. Rill channels are noticeable in the interspaces and down slope. The watershed may or may not be functioning, as runoff may affect adjoining sites.

Dominant plant species

prairie sagewort (Artemisia frigida), shrub
rubber rabbitbrush (Ericameria nauseosa), shrub
Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis), shrub
threadleaf sedge (Carex filifolia), grass
blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis), grass
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
woolly plantain (Plantago patagonica), other herbaceous
broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae), other herbaceous
plains pricklypear (Opuntia polyacantha), other herbaceous

Dominant resource concerns

Sheet and rill erosion
Ephemeral gully erosion
Plant productivity and health
Plant structure and composition
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
Feed and forage imbalance
Inadequate livestock water quantity, quality, and distribution

State 3
Perennial Grasses

The loss of most of the woody understory in the Perennial Grasses State leaves a scabby (in appearance) cover of bunch grasses, generally bluebunch wheatgrass. The cover of pincushion or low growing forbs is similar to reference or has increased with the loss of other cover.

Characteristics and indicators. The dominance of mid-stature grass cover and the lack of most woody cover is the indication of the Perennial Grasses State. Remnant populations of other shrubs will occur in a scattered canopy usually on the edges of the landform.

Resilience management. The lack of native propagates and the droughty limitations created by the rock soil cover restricts the ability for sagebrush to recover, lowering the resiliency of this State.

Community 3.1
Bluebunch Wheatgrass/Pin Cushion Forbs

The Bluebunch Wheatgrass/Pin Cushion Forbs Community Phase is the result of frequent and severe grazing and drought. Wyoming big sagebrush becomes decandant and then leaves the canopy, while fringed sagewort, and prickly pear cactus increase in this plant community. Forbs are present, especially lower growing pin cushion forbs. The grass canopy is less diverse, and is predominantly bluebunch wheatgrass, with prairie junegrass, sandberg bluegrass, and threadleaf sedge filling in. Cactus often invades. The annual production declines with the loss of sagebrush cover. Miscellaneous shrub production may fluctuate slightly. The lack of moisture capture and remaining interspaces leaves this site vulnerable to weedy annual species such as cheatgrass. If invasive species gain a foothold, they push the state across a threshold into the Invaded State. Annual production values have not been provided for this community due to the lack of sufficient data to provide dependable values.

Resilience management. Rangeland Health Implications/Indicators: This plant community is resistant to change. Fire threat is still low because of the lack of continuous fine fuels. Plant diversity is moderate to poor. The plant vigor is diminished and replacement capabilities are limited due to the reduced number of cool-season grasses. Soil erosion is accelerated because of increased bare ground and lack of woody cover and debris to slow water and wind movement. Water flow patterns and pedestalling are obvious. Infiltration is slightly reduced and runoff is increased. Rill channels may be noticeable in the interspaces and gullies may be establishing where rills have concentrated down slope.

Dominant plant species

prairie sagewort (Artemisia frigida), shrub
rubber rabbitbrush (Ericameria nauseosa), shrub
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
threadleaf sedge (Carex filifolia), grass
woolly plantain (Plantago patagonica), other herbaceous
plains pricklypear (Opuntia polyacantha), other herbaceous
spiny phlox (Phlox hoodii), other herbaceous

Dominant resource concerns

Sheet and rill erosion
Ephemeral gully erosion
Aggregate instability
Naturally available moisture use
Plant productivity and health
Plant structure and composition
Feed and forage imbalance
Inadequate livestock water quantity, quality, and distribution

State 4
Invaded

The Invaded State has a range of variability that is distinguished by its population of invasive or introduced (non-native) species that has successful established and become significant within the composition of the community. A significant component of this community initially is native species common to the Stony Upland ecological site.

Characteristics and indicators. The composition by weight of five percent or more of an invasive species is the factor tipping a community over the threshold into the Invaded State. The community can be relatively intact, having a representative composition of native species similar to the Reference State, but with a significant composition (minimum of five percent) cover of an invasive species or mix of invasive species. Cheatgrass is the most significant threat at this time; however, there are other aggressive non-native species that pose a concern on this ecological site. These species include field cottonrose, mustards, thistle, and kochia.

Resilience management. The competitive edge of most invasive species makes this site resistant to change and resilient following disturbance. Cheatgrass has been seen to respond with a positive potential following disturbances (fire, mechanical).

Community 4.1
Perennial Grasses/Invasive Species/Sagebrush

Figure 11. Cheatgrass is a prevalent invader within any community for the Stony Upland ecological site.

The Perennial Grasses/Invasive Species/Sagebrush phase has maintained a representative sample of the perennial grasses and forbs that are typical of the site with Wyoming big sagebrush. The invasive species are present and hold a significant (five percent or greater) composition of the landscape, and are prominent on the site (referring to a more wide scale composition, not one isolated patch in an isolated portion of the landscape). Production of the desired perennial species is generally reduced but the total production is maintained or elevated due to the production potential of the invasive species.

Resilience management. Rangeland Health Implications/Indicators: This plant community is resistant to improvement, but will continue to degrade with no inputs. These areas may be more prone to fire as fine fuels are more available and the bare ground between the sagebrush plants is decreased. Plant diversity is moderate to poor. The plant vigor is diminished and replacement capabilities are limited due to the reduced number of cool-season grasses. Plant litter is noticeably more when compared to reference communities due to the potential biomass produced by the invasive species (species dependent). Soil erosion is variable depending on the species of invasion and the litter accumulation thus associated. This variability also applies to water flow patterns and pedestalling. Infiltration is reduced and runoff is increased due to loss of perennial vegetation and root density.

Dominant plant species

Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis), shrub
rubber rabbitbrush (Ericameria nauseosa), shrub
prairie sagewort (Artemisia frigida), shrub
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
needle and thread (Hesperostipa comata), grass
cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), grass
broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae), other herbaceous
plains pricklypear (Opuntia polyacantha), other herbaceous
thistle (Cirsium), other herbaceous

Dominant resource concerns

Aggregate instability
Plant productivity and health
Plant structure and composition
Wildfire hazard from biomass accumulation
Feed and forage imbalance

State 5
Degraded

The Degraded State could be drafted as a stand-alone box within the state and transition model diagram. No matter what state a site originally is ranked in, once the site is mechanically disturbed, or suffers a catastrophic or significant natural disaster that alters the soil properties (erosional, depositional, hydrological or chemical), the site potential is altered. The shift in potential and response to management makes it no longer similar to the reference community. The potential shifts are highly variable, so a dynamic state was captured to highlight the altered communities that exist on the landscape. The amount of surface stone and boulder cover limits the extent of disturbances that may occur. Alteration of the community may be extensive enough (removal of the stones and boulders), that site potential has shifted to a different ecological site or so slight that it may be difficult to identify.

Characteristics and indicators. The soil disturbance and mechanical or physical removal of the vegetative canopy is the key characteristic of the Disturbed State. The initial indicators are the primary successional species that establish following a disturbance including kochia, six weeks fescue, and sunflowers. These initial colonizers will then be followed by any seeded species, or other species from within the locations seed bank.

Resilience management. The Disturbed State is highly variable and in a state of flux as the successional processes occur. Continued disturbance of these communities is a potential threat; and the communities are at-risk of transitioning to the Invaded State.

Community 5.1
Disturbed Lands

The title Disturbed Lands is encompassing two broad classifications of land types. Go-back fields are referring to sites that were once cultivated or have had minor surface disturbance, and have since been left to natural processes. The Stony Upland ecological site was not typically farmed, and was not directly influenced by homesteading or irrigation processes. The extent of this type is not known on the landscape. In a similar process, mined lands or lands affected by energy development including gravel or mineral excavation pits, transmission corridors, transportation corridors and oil and gas development sites provide a host of successional processes. Many times, these locations are re-exposed to disturbance frequently by mechanical means leaving annual weeds and primary successional species as the dominate canopy. Older, established sites or abandoned locations, have established communities similar to those expected on go-back fields and may be stable in nature. Transportation corridors for recreation or development activities are the most common on the Stony Upland ecological site, but occurrences are limited and generally minor in size. The reclamation processes is limited due to the rock content of these communities. The growth curve of this plant community will vary depending on the species that are selected for seeding. For a more accurate portrait of the growth curve for the seeded community, the species used and the climatic tendencies of the region must be considered.

Resilience management. Rangeland Health Implications/Indicators: The plant community is variable and depending on the age of the stand and the stage of successional tendencies that the location is in will determine how stable (resilient/resistant) the community is. Plant diversity is generally strong, but is usually lacking in the structural groups that are desired on the site. Soil erosion is variable depending on the disturbance regime that is occurring on the site and again on the specific community that has established on a specific location. The variability of the water flow and pedestalling as well as infiltration and runoff is determined again by the species that establishes on this site.

Dominant plant species

rubber rabbitbrush (Ericameria nauseosa), shrub
prairie sagewort (Artemisia frigida), shrub
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
prairie Junegrass (Koeleria macrantha), grass
sixweeks fescue (Vulpia octoflora), grass
broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae), other herbaceous
yellow salsify (Tragopogon dubius), other herbaceous
tansymustard (Descurainia), other herbaceous

Dominant resource concerns

Sheet and rill erosion
Ephemeral gully erosion
Aggregate instability
Plant productivity and health
Plant structure and composition
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
Feed and forage imbalance

Transition T1-2
State 1 to 2

Frequent and severe (year-long or continuous season-long ) grazing or compaction from surface traffic, will convert the plant community to a threadleaf sedge sod. The impact of frequent or repeated defoliation during grazing, hoof impact, and lack of rest for recovery weakens and removes the key grass species in the community. As the mid-stature grasses decline, threadleaf sedge is able to increase and alter the hydrology of the site.

Constraints to recovery. The dense root mat formed by threadleaf sedge alters the hydrology, effectively removing moisture from the site, limiting the available resources for other native species. The dense sod also limits the available soil space for seedling establishment. Interpspaces between sod patches are prone to erosion and runoff (limited infiltration of moisture).

Transition T1-3
State 1 to 3

Frequent and severe grazing begins the shift to the Perennial Grasses State. Drought, insect damage, and other natural disturbances to the woody vegetation (including wildfire) is a major factor in the transition to this grass dominated State.

Constraints to recovery. The lack of a seed bank and the droughty nature of the soils limits seedling establishment and survival. The unpredictable and variable spring precipitation also limits success of recovery for the Stony Upland ecological site.

Transition T2-4
State 2 to 4

Drought, Frequent or severe grazing, Disturbance – Drought alone, or with grazing intensity, weakens and eventually removes Wyoming big sagebrush on the landscape. Once sagebrush has been removed from a community, it is extremely difficult and input heavy to re-establish. Threadleaf sedge has been seen to die back or die out with prolonged drought opening the canopy and the community’s vulnerability to invasive species. Disturbance by mechanical means or human activities that break the root masses or disturb the soil surface open this closed community to potential invasive species, especially when there is a readily available seed source for those invasive species.

Constraints to recovery. The dense sod of threadleaf sedge will continue to impact the hydrology and competition for limited resources in this community limiting the potential for recovery. The lack of other key herbaceous species also is a constraint on this site. The inability, at this time, to eradicate cheatgrass does not allow for a complete recovery of an invaded community.

Transition T3-4
State 3 to 4

Drought, soil disturbances, or high-intensity grazing with a seed source present can open the soil surface allowing invasive species to establish. Although not common, fire can provide the niche for cheatgrass to establish on this site.

Constraints to recovery. Once invasive species, especially cheatgrass, establish, it is costly and difficult (if even possible) to remove. The lack of the key grass species also limits recover of this site.

Restoration pathway R4-5
State 4 to 5

Integrated Pest Management, with Seeding the site to a native mixture - Success is not known to have occurred, and is rated to be low and highly variable for the rate of control of most species. Cheatgrass is one of the most invasive species for many ecological sites, although there are other challenges. With intensive weed control and inputs this community can resemble an at-risk community within the reference state, but it is not possible to reach the reference community condition once annuals have established.

Conservation practices

Critical Area Planting
Prescribed Grazing
Grazing Land Mechanical Treatment
Range Planting
Heavy Use Area Protection
Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Upland Wildlife Habitat Management

Transition T5-4
State 5 to 4

Frequent or Severe Grazing, Disturbance with a seed Source, or Drought - Any disturbance that occurs or stress that is placed on the herbaceous cover, weakens the canopy and allows for invasive species to establish if a seed source is present. This State is at high risk of transitioning to an Invaded State. The limited abilities to complete a seeding on rocky soil opens the community to invasion.

Constraints to recovery. The challenge of eradicating or reducing invasive species such as cheatgrass prevents recovery of most invaded communities without significant inputs for weed control, seeding with long-term grazing management.

Additional community tables

Table 9. Community 1.1 plant community composition

Group	Common name	Symbol	Scientific name	Annual production (kg/hectare)	Foliar cover (%)
Grass/Grasslike
1	Mid-stature Cool-season Bunchgrasses			84–280
	bluebunch wheatgrass	PSSP6	Pseudoroegneria spicata	56–224	10–30
	needle and thread	HECO26	Hesperostipa comata	6–56	1–10
	Indian ricegrass	ACHY	Achnatherum hymenoides	0–28	0–5
2	Rhizomatous Cool-season Grasses			28–84
	western wheatgrass	PASM	Pascopyrum smithii	6–56	1–10
	thickspike wheatgrass	ELLAL	Elymus lanceolatus ssp. lanceolatus	0–28	0–5
3	Short-stature Cool-season Bunchgrasses			0–28
	squirreltail	ELEL5	Elymus elymoides	0–28	0–5
	prairie Junegrass	KOMA	Koeleria macrantha	0–28	0–5
	Sandberg bluegrass	POSE	Poa secunda	0–28	0–5
4	Miscellaneous Grasses			0–28
	threadleaf sedge	CAFI	Carex filifolia	0–28	0–5
	blue grama	BOGR2	Bouteloua gracilis	0–28	0–5
	Grass, perennial	2GP	Grass, perennial	0–28	0–5
Forb
5	Perennial Forbs			11–56
	milkvetch	ASTRA	Astragalus	0–28	0–5
	purple prairie clover	DAPU5	Dalea purpurea	6–28	1–5
	beardtongue	PENST	Penstemon	0–28	0–5
	spiny phlox	PHHO	Phlox hoodii	0–28	0–5
	scarlet globemallow	SPCO	Sphaeralcea coccinea	0–28	0–5
	dotted blazing star	LIPU	Liatris punctata	0–28	0–5
	Forb, perennial	2FP	Forb, perennial	0–28	0–5
Shrub/Vine
6	Dominant Shrubs			28–112
	Wyoming big sagebrush	ARTRW8	Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis	28–112	5–15
	prairie sagewort	ARFR4	Artemisia frigida	0–28	0–5
7	Miscellaneous Shrubs			0–56
	rubber rabbitbrush	ERNA10	Ericameria nauseosa	0–56	0–10
	winterfat	KRLA2	Krascheninnikovia lanata	0–28	0–5
	Shrub (>.5m)	2SHRUB	Shrub (>.5m)	0–28	0–5

Interpretations

Animal community

Animal Community – Wildlife Interpretations:

1.1 - Bluebunch Wheatgrass/Sagebrush (Reference Community): The predominance of grasses in this plant community favors grazers and mixed-feeders, such as bison, elk, and antelope. Suitable thermal and escape cover for deer may be limited due to the low quantities of woody plants. However, topographical variations could provide some escape cover. When found adjacent to sagebrush dominated states, this plant community may provide brood rearing/foraging areas for sage grouse, as well as lek sites. Other birds that would frequent this plant community include western meadowlarks, horned larks, and golden eagles. Many grassland obligate small mammals would occur here.

2.1 - Threadleaf Sedge/Sagebrush Plant Community: This community provides limited foraging for antelope and other grazers. They may be used as a foraging site by sage grouse where reference state community phases are limited. Generally, these are not target plant communities for wildlife habitat management.

3.1 - Bluebunch Wheatgrass/ Pin cushion Forbs Community: the predominance of grasses in this plant community favors grazers and mixed-feeders, however, the lack of vigor limits available forage to utilize.

4._ - Invaded State: The retained combination of sagebrush and the added diversity with the invasive grasses and/or forbs provide an extended plant community for wildlife. The similarities to Community Phase 1.1 are to some extent enhanced for some species with the added forage provided by the invasive species. But as the invasive species increase, decreasing the desirable species, the wildlife species benefits are decreased as well.

5.1 - Disturbed Lands: The variability of this site prevents a detailed review of wildlife benefits. However, many of the introduced grasses, forbs and shrubs can provide adequate cover, feed and nesting sites for those wildlife species that would have selected the site prior to disturbance. Limitations and enhancements need to be considered by specific locations.

Animal Community – Grazing Interpretations:

The following table lists suggested stocking rates for cattle under continuous season-long grazing under normal growing conditions. These are conservative estimates that should be used only as guidelines in the initial stages of the conservation planning process. Often, the current plant composition does not entirely match any particular plant community (as described in this ecological site description). Because of this, a field visit is recommended, in all cases, to document plant composition and production. More precise carrying capacity estimates should eventually be calculated using this information along with animal preference data, particularly when grazers other than cattle are involved. Under more intensive grazing management, improved harvest efficiencies can result in an increased carrying capacity. If distribution problems occur, stocking rates must be reduced to maintain plant health and vigor.

The Carrying capacity is calculated as the production for a normal year X .25 efficiency factor / 912.5 #/AUM to calculate the AUM's/Acre and Acres/AUM.

Plant Community Production Carrying Capacity*
Plant Community Description/Title: Lbs./Acre AUM/Acre Acres/AUM
1.1 Bluebunch Wheatgrass/Sagebrush 200 - 350 - 500 0.07 AUM/ac 14 ac/AUM
1.2 Perennial Grasses/Sagebrush ** **
2.1 Threadleaf Sedge/Sagebrush ** **
3.1 Bluebunch Wheatgrass/Pin Cushion Forbs ** **
4._ Invaded ** **
5.1 Disturbed Lands ** **

* - Carry Capacity is figured for continuous, season-long grazing by cattle under average growing conditions.
** - Sufficient data for invaded and reclaimed communities has not be collected or evaluated, at this time, so no projection of a stocking rate recommendation or production range will be established at this time.

Grazing by domestic livestock is one of the major income-producing industries in the area. Rangeland in this area may provide yearlong forage for cattle, sheep, or horses. During the dormant period, the forage for livestock use needs to be supplemented with protein because the quality does not meet minimum livestock requirements.

Distance to water, shrub density, and slope can affect carrying capacity (grazing capacity) within a management unit. Adjustments should be made for the area that is considered necessary for reduction of animal numbers. For example, 30% of a management unit may have 25% slopes and distances of greater than one mile from water; therefore, the adjustment is only calculated for 30% of the unit (i.e. 50% reduction on 30% of the management unit). Fencing, slope length, management, access, terrain, kind and class of livestock, and breeds are all factors that can increase or decrease the percent of graze-able acres within a management unit. Adjustments should be made that incorporate these factors when calculating stocking rates.

Hydrological functions

Water is the principal factor limiting forage production on this site. This site is dominated by soils in hydrologic group B and C, with localized areas in hydrologic group D. Infiltration ranges from moderately slow to moderate. Runoff potential for this site varies from low to moderate depending on soil hydrologic group and ground cover. In many cases, areas with greater than 75% ground cover have the greatest potential for high infiltration and lower runoff. An example of an exception would be where short-grasses form a strong sod and dominate the site. Areas where ground cover is less than 50% have the greatest potential to have reduced infiltration and higher runoff (refer to Part 630, NRCS National Engineering Handbook for detailed hydrology information).

Rills and gullies should not typically be present. Water flow patterns should be barely distinguishable if at all present. Pedestals are only slightly present in association with bunchgrasses. Litter typically falls in place, and signs of movement are not common. Chemical and physical crusts are rare to non-existent. Cryptogamic crusts are present, but only cover 1-2% of the soil surface.

Recreational uses

The Stony Upland ecological site provides hunting opportunities for upland game species. The wide varieties of plants which bloom from spring until fall have an aesthetic value that appeals to visitors. Outside of plants, the extent offers a variety of cultural resources to view on the landscape based on the location of many of these sites on higher ground on the benches and fans which also provides a rich source of geology for exploration. The Stony Upland ecological site has access limitations when associated with roadways and trails. The land surface is a sound base for travel and camping in relation to erosion potential, however the cover of stones and boulders limits the ease, comfort, and functionality for all these uses.

Wood products

No appreciable wood products are present on the site. Isolated areas of limber pine and Rocky Mountain juniper exist within the Stony Upland ecological site that may offer a limited extent of firewood timber.

Other products

Herbs: The forb species of the Stony Upland ecological site have medicinal characteristics and have been used by the Native Americans in this area and more recently by the naturopathic profession.

Ornamental Species: The forbs commonly found as well as the shrub component of these communities have been used in landscaping and xeriscaping.

Supporting information

Inventory data references

Information presented was derived from NRCS inventory data and historic range site descriptions. Field observations from range-trained personnel also were used. Those involved in the development of the new concept for the Stony Upland ecological site include Tricia Hatle, Range Management Specialist, US Department of the Interior-Bureau of Land Management (USDI-BLM); Karen Hepp, Range Management Specialist, USDI-BLM; and Marji Patz, Ecological Site Specialist, NRCS. Other sources used as references include USDA NRCS Water and Climate Center, USDA NRCS National Range and Pasture Handbook, USDI and USDA Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health Version IV, and USDA NRCS Soil Surveys from various counties.

Quality control and quality assurance completed by NRCS: Dan Mattke, Area Resource Soil Scientist; Daniel Wood, MLRA Soil Survey Leader; John Hartung, Wyoming State Rangeland Management Specialist; James Bauchert, Wyoming State Soil Scientist; and Scott Woodall, Regional Quality Assurance Ecological Site Specialist.

For specific data inquiries, contact the Powell, Wyoming Soil Survey Office (USDA-NRCS).

Inventory Data References:
Ocular field estimations observed by trained personnel were completed at each site. Then sites were selected where a 100-feet tape was stretched, and the following sample procedures were completed by inventory staff. For full sampling protocol and guidelines with forms please refer to the Wyoming ESI Operating Procedures, compiled in 2012 for the Powell and Rock Springs Soil Survey Office, USDA-NRCS.
• Double Sampling Production Data (9.6 hoop used to estimate 10 points, clipped a minimum of three of these estimated points, with two 21-foot X 21-foot square extended shrub plots).
• Line Point Intercept (overstory and understory captured with soil cover). Height of herbaceous and woody cover is collected every three feet along established transect.)
• Continuous Line Intercept (Woody Canopy Cover, with minimum gap of 0.2 foot for all woody species and succulents. Intercept height collected at each measurement.),
• Gap Intercept (Basal Gap measured with a minimum gap requirement of 0.7 foot.),
• Sample Point (Ten 1-meter square point photographs taken at set distances on transect. Read using the sample point computer program established by the High Plains Agricultural Research Center, WY).
• Soil Stability (Slake Test – surface and subsurface samples collected and processed according to the soil stability guidelines provided by the Jornada Research Center, NM.)

Other references

Baker, William L. 2006. Fire and Restoration of Sagebrush Ecosystems. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(1): 177-185.

Bestelmeyer, B., and J.R. Brown. 2005. State-and-transition models 101: a fresh look at vegetation change. The Quivira Coalition Newsletter, Vol. 7, No. 3.

Bestelmeyer, B., J.R. Brown, K.M. Havstad, B. Alexander, G. Chavez, and J.E. Herrick. 2003. Development and use of state and transition models for rangelands. Journal of Range Management 56(2):114-126.

Bestelmeyer, B., J.E. Herrick, J.R. Brown, D.A. Trujillo, and K.M. Havstad. 2004. Land management in the American Southwest: a state-and-transition approach to ecosystem complexity. Environmental Management 34(1):38-51.

Herrick, J.E., J.W. Van Zee, K.M. Havstad, L.M. Burkett, and W.G. Whitford. 2005. Monitoring manual for grassland, shrubland and savanna ecosystems. Volume I Quick Start. USDA - ARS Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, New Mexico.

Herrick, J.E., J.W. Van Zee, K.M. Havstad, L.M. Burkett, and W.G. Whitford. 2005. Monitoring manual for grassland, shrubland and savanna ecosystems. Volume II: Design, supplementary methods and interpretation. USDA - ARS Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, New Mexico.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. (electronic) National Water and Climate Center. Available online at http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed November 2014.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2009. Plant Guide: Cheatgrass. Prepared by Skinner et al., National Plant Data Center.

Pellant, M., P. Shaver, D. A. Pyke, and J. E. Herrick. 2005. Interpreting indicators of rangeland health. Version 4. Technical Reference 1734-6. USDI-BLM.

Ricketts, M. J., R. S. Noggles, and B. Landgraf-Gibbons. 2004. Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range Survey and Assessment. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Schoeneberger, P.J., D.A. Wysocki, E.C. Benham, and Soil Survey Staff. 2012. Field book for describing and sampling soils, Version 3.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE .

Stringham, T.K. and W.C. Krueger. 2001. States, transitions, and thresholds: further refinement for rangeland applications. Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University. Special Report 1024.

Stringham, T.K., W.C. Kreuger, and P.L Shaver. 2003. State and transition modeling: an ecological process approach. Journal of Range Management 56(2):106-113.

United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil Survey Manual, United States Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 18, Chapter 3: Examination and Description of Soils. p.192- 196.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1997. National Range and Pasture Handbook. (http://www.glti.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/publications/nrph.html). Accessed October 2014.

Trlica, M.J. 1999. Grass growth and response to grazing. Range . Colorado State University Cooperative Extension, Natural Resource Series. No. 6.108.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA/NRCS). 2007. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA/NRCS), Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 11th Edition.

USDA/NRCS Soil survey manuals for various counties within MLRA 32X. Web soil survey is available online at: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm.

Western Regional Climate Center. 2014. Electronic station metadata. Available online at: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/summary/climsmwy.html.

Approval

Kirt Walstad, 9/07/2023

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)	Marji Patz
Contact for lead author	marji.patz@usda.gov; 307-271-3130
Date	01/19/2022
Approved by	Kirt Walstad
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production