Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site DX035X03B804
Shallow Sandy Loam 17-25" p.z. (PIPO)
Accessed: 11/21/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 035X–Colorado Plateau
This ecological site occurs in Common Resource Area 35.8 - the Colorado Plateau Ponderosa Pine Forests
The Common Resource Area occurs within the Colorado Plateau Physiographic Province. Elevations range from 6800 to 8500 feet and precipitation averages 17 to 25 inches per year. Vegetation includes ponderosa pine, white fir, aspen, pinyon, juniper, Gambel oak, big sagebrush, ceanothus, blue elderberry, muttongrass, upland sedge, and big wildrye, mountain muhly, Arizona fescue, pine dropseed, and blue grama. The soil temperature regime ranges from mesic to frigid and the soil moisture regime is typic ustic. This unit occurs within the Colorado Plateau Physiographic Province and is characterized by a sequence of flat to gently dipping sedimentary rocks eroded into plateaus, valleys and deep canyons. Sedimentary rock classes dominate the plateau with volcanic fields occurring for the most part near its margin.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
| Tree |
(1) Pinus ponderosa |
|---|---|
| Shrub |
(1) Arctostaphylos uva-ursi |
| Herbaceous |
(1) Festuca arizonica |
Legacy ID
F035XH804AZ
Physiographic features
This ecological site occurs nearly level plateaus and structural benches. The soils are shallow over sedimentary bedrock. Slopes range from 0 to 15 percent, but there can be steeper spots within the site. Soil surface textures range from fine sandy loam to gravelly loam. Subsurface textures range from fine sandy loam to very cobbly sandy clay loam. This site does not receive significant run-on moisture from adjacent ecological sites.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
| Landforms |
(1)
Knoll
(2) Plateau (3) Structural bench |
|---|---|
| Elevation | 7,800 – 8,500 ft |
| Slope | 15% |
| Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
Winter-summer moisture ratios are typically 70:30 on the west side of this LRU and shift to 60:40 on the east side. Late spring is usually the driest period, and early fall moisture can be sporadic. Summer rains fall from June through September; moisture originates in the Gulf of Mexico and creates convective, usually brief, intense thunderstorms. Cool season moisture from October through May tends to be frontal; It originates in the Pacific Ocean and the Gulf of California and falls in widespread storms with longer duration and lower intensity. Precipitation generally comes as snow from October into April. Snowpack can persist for 3-4 months, although it may disappear in exposed areas during prolonged dry weather. Summer daytime temperatures are typically 80-90 but can exceed 95 degrees F. Winter temperatures of around 0 degrees F are common and can reach -25 degrees F.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
| Frost-free period (average) | 100 days |
|---|---|
| Freeze-free period (average) | 130 days |
| Precipitation total (average) | 25 in |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
The soil moisture on this ecological site comes from precipitation. The site does not benefit significantly from run-on moisture. Shallow bedrock areas will concentrate water in deeper soil pockets, where most of the vegetation production occurs. Because of the shallow soils, larger rainfall events will not be entirely captured by the site. This site contributes runoff to other ecological sites.
Soil features
The soil here consists of shallow, well drained soils on footslopes of hills and summits of high plateaus, mesas, and structural benches. Surface textures range from fine sandy loam to gravelly loam. Subsurface textures range from fine sandy to very cobbly sandy clay loam.
Soil survey map unit components correlated to this ecological site include:
SSA-713 Chinle Area 56-Ahkoni family and 57-Akhoni;
SSA-715 Fort Defiance area MU's 1-Akhoni, 123 Viewpoint;
SSA-717 Shiprock area 700 & 710 Akhoni, 706 & 712 Viewpoint.
Table 4. Representative soil features
| Parent material |
(1)
Alluvium
–
sandstone
(2) Residuum – basalt |
|---|---|
| Surface texture |
(1) Fine sandy loam (2) Gravelly loam |
| Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
| Drainage class | Moderately well drained to well drained |
| Permeability class | Moderately rapid to rapid |
| Soil depth | 5 – 20 in |
| Surface fragment cover <=3" | 5 – 25% |
| Surface fragment cover >3" | 2 – 5% |
| Available water capacity (0-40in) |
2.5 in |
| Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-40in) |
6.1 – 7.3 |
| Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
10 – 25% |
| Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
15% |
Ecological dynamics
An ecological site is not a precise assemblage of species for which the proportions are the same from place to place or from year to year. In all plant communities, variability is apparent in productivity and occurrence of individual species. Spatial boundaries of the communities; however, can be recognized by characteristic patterns of species composition, association, and community structure. The historic climax plant community for this ecological site has been described by sampling relict or relatively undisturbed sites and/or reviewing historic records. The historic climax plant community is the plant community that evolved over time with the soil forming process and long term changes in climatic conditions of the area. It is the plant community that was best adapted to the unique combination of environmental factors associated with the site.
Natural disturbances, such as drought, fire, grazing of native fauna, and insects, are inherent in the development and maintenance of these plant communities. The effects of these disturbances are part of the range of characteristics of the ecological site. Fluctuations in plant community structure and function caused by the effects of natural disturbances help establish the boundaries and characteristics of an ecological site. They are accounted for as part of the range of characteristics of the ecological site. Recognizable plant community phases are identified in the reference state of the ecological site. Some sites may have a small range of variation, while others have a large range. Some plant community phases may exist for long periods of time, while others may only occur for a couple of years after a disturbance.
Deterioration of the plant community, hydrology, or soil site stability on an ecological site can result in crossing a threshold or potentially irreversible boundary to another state, or equilibrium. This can occur as a result of the loss of soil surface through erosion, the loss of the stability of the site due to disturbances that cause active erosion on the site, increases in the amounts and/or patterns or runoff from rainstorms, changes in availability of surface and subsurface water, significant changes in plant structural and functional types, or the introduction of non-native species. When these thresholds are crossed, the potential of the ecological site to return to the historic climax plant community can be lost, or restoration will require significant inputs . There may be multiple states possible for an ecological site, determined by the type and or severity of disturbance.
The known states and transition pathways for this ecological site are described in the state and transition model. Within each state, there may be one or more known plant community phases. These community phases describe the different plant community that can be recognized and mapped across this ecological site. The state and transition model is intended to help land users recognize the current plant community on the ecological site, and the management options for improving the plant community to the desired plant community.
Plant production information in this site description is standardized to the annual production on an air-dry weight basis in near normal rainfall years.
T1 Catastrophic Wildfire event
R1 Tree planting
State and transition model
Figure 4. 358 ShallowSandyLoamS&T
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
Community 1.1
Historic Cliimax Plant Community
This plant community is dominated by trees the most common being Ponderosa pine, then Douglas fir, and Quaking aspen. The understory species include: grasses and grass-like, Arizona fescue & mountain muhly. Forbs: Rosy pussytoes, fleabane & western brackenfern. Shrubs: mountain snowberry, Oregongrape & kinnikinnick. Trees (<4.5') at 5%: Ponderosa pine & Gambel oak. 1.1a Partial removal of mature PIPO canopy achieved through timber harvest, or Bark beetle infestation. The reduced canopy results in higher production on the forest floor of grass, forbs and to some extent shrubs. 1.2a Openings are filled in by natural regeneration of Ponderosa pine, forming an even aged tight canopy of sapling to pole size PIPO 1.3a Trees mature and are thinned more heavily than 1.3b, through fire or timber harvest forming a patchy and mature canopy. 1.3b Trees mature and are thinned either naturally or through Pre-commercial thinning forming a mature canopy.
Figure 5. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
| Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grass/Grasslike | 150 | 300 | 400 |
| Forb | 90 | 180 | 240 |
| Shrub/Vine | 45 | 90 | 120 |
| Tree | 15 | 30 | 40 |
| Total | 300 | 600 | 800 |
Figure 6. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3581, 35.8 17-25" p.z. all sites. Growth begins in the spring, most growth occurs during the summer rainy season..
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 24 | 21 | 23 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 7. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3902, 35.8 17-25" p.z. Arizona fescue. Growth begins in the late spring and extends through the summer rainy season..
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 30 | 30 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
State 2
Grass and Forb Dominated
Community 2.1
Grass and Forb Dominated
Severely ( <5%) reduced tree canopy and site becomes dominated by Grasses Forbs and to a lesser extent, shrubs. There is inadequate natural PIPO regeneration.
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
| Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
| 1 | Grasses | 150–400 | ||||
| Arizona fescue | FEAR2 | Festuca arizonica | 20–100 | – | ||
| Kentucky bluegrass | POPR | Poa pratensis | 20–100 | – | ||
| mountain muhly | MUMO | Muhlenbergia montana | 8–40 | – | ||
| White Mountain sedge | CAGE | Carex geophila | 15–40 | – | ||
| Ross' sedge | CARO5 | Carex rossii | 15–40 | – | ||
| squirreltail | ELELE | Elymus elymoides ssp. elymoides | 7–20 | – | ||
| Grass, perennial | 2GP | Grass, perennial | 7–20 | – | ||
| nodding brome | BRAN | Bromus anomalus | 7–20 | – | ||
|
Forb
|
||||||
| 2 | Forbs | 90–240 | ||||
| rosy pussytoes | ANRO2 | Antennaria rosea | 10–60 | – | ||
| hairy brackenfern | PTAQP2 | Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens | 10–60 | – | ||
| fleabane | ERIGE2 | Erigeron | 8–25 | – | ||
| Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 5–15 | – | ||
| western yarrow | ACMIO | Achillea millefolium var. occidentalis | 5–12 | – | ||
| ragwort | SENEC | Senecio | 5–12 | – | ||
| woodland strawberry | FRVE | Fragaria vesca | 5–12 | – | ||
| pingue rubberweed | HYRI | Hymenoxys richardsonii | 5–12 | – | ||
| cinquefoil | POTEN | Potentilla | 5–12 | – | ||
|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
| 3 | Shrubs | 45–120 | ||||
| kinnikinnick | ARUV | Arctostaphylos uva-ursi | 10–30 | – | ||
| creeping barberry | MARE11 | Mahonia repens | 10–30 | – | ||
| Gambel oak | QUGA | Quercus gambelii | 15–30 | – | ||
| mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 10–30 | – | ||
| Shrub (>.5m) | 2SHRUB | Shrub (>.5m) | 5–10 | – | ||
|
Tree
|
||||||
| 4 | Trees | 15–40 | ||||
| ponderosa pine | PIPO | Pinus ponderosa | 5–15 | – | ||
| quaking aspen | POTR5 | Populus tremuloides | 5–15 | – | ||
| Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir | PSMEG | Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca | 5–10 | – | ||
Table 7. Community 1.1 forest overstory composition
| Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | Diameter (in) | Basal area (square ft/acre) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tree
|
|||||||
| ponderosa pine | PIPO | Pinus ponderosa | Native | 10–80 | 40–50 | 10–18 | – |
| quaking aspen | POTR5 | Populus tremuloides | Native | 15–75 | 10–20 | 5–10 | – |
| Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir | PSMEG | Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca | Native | 4–70 | 10–15 | 8–15 | – |
Table 8. Community 1.1 forest understory composition
| Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)
|
||||||
| Arizona fescue | FEAR2 | Festuca arizonica | Native | – | 20–30 | |
| Kentucky bluegrass | POPR | Poa pratensis | Native | – | 10–20 | |
|
Forb/Herb
|
||||||
| rosy pussytoes | ANRO2 | Antennaria rosea | Native | – | 5–15 | |
|
Fern/fern ally
|
||||||
| hairy brackenfern | PTAQP2 | Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens | Native | – | 5–15 | |
Interpretations
Animal community
Suitability for grazing by livestock is good before canopy exceeds 50%. Cattle, sheep, goats and horses can use this site in summer and eaarly fall. Management considerations include use of Prescribed Grazing, water developments and reseeding grass following harvest operations for forage and to reduce erosion, grazing should not damage young trees.
Site factors affecting wildlife:
Water: Frequently found in scattered natural wetlands and springs.
Cover: good for most species.
Food: Good ppotential except where grazing is unmanaged.
Other: Snowfall causes shifts in wildlife populations.
Recreational uses
Landscape quality is good and recreational activities include hiking, camping, horseback riding, wildlife observations and photography.
Wood products
Gambel oak, Ponderosa pine, Douglas fir and Quaking aspen provide opportunities for firewood collection when dead and down.
Other products
Woodland Overstory Production:
PIPO PSMEG POTRT
Site Index: 80 71 79
Fuelwood (Cords/Ac):
Fence posts (7ft)/Ac:
Christmas Trees/Ac:
CMAI* per year:(bd ft/ac) 414 280 280
Productivity Class: 5 3 3
* CMAI is the "Culmination of Mean Annual Increment" or highest average growth rate of the stand in the units specified.
Woodland Uses and Interpretations
Equipment Suitability:
Harvesting: all kinds - no limitations
Site Preparation: all kinds
Tree Planting: all kinds - shallow soils limits certain equipment
Precommercial thinning: all kinds
Equipment Limitations:
Slope: none
Unsurfaced roads: when wet could get stuck
Stoniness/Rock Outcrop: Slight (some rock outcrop present)
Water Table/Flooding: None
Erosion potentials:
Cutover areas/bare ground: Water - moderate
Wind - high to moderate
Roads/Trails/Landings: Water - moderate
Wind - high to moderate
Soil Management:
Compaction potential: Fair
Rutting potential: Some rutting may occur when wet
Revegetation potential: Fair - shallow soils
Silviculture potentials & limitations:
Harvest Cutting: harvest mature trees on a sustained yield basis.
Final removal cuts and intermediate cuts are desirable.
Thinning & Improvement: Thick stands need thinned to improve growth rates of trees left.
Prescribed burning: Periodic ground fires will reduce any understory build up.
Mechanical Tree Removal: Shallow soils would prohibit getting tree root.
Pest Control: Control pests to prevent tree damage & loss
Fire Hazard: Fire hazard may become extreme if understory fuel load builds up on this shallow soil.
Suitability for replanting: Fair (soils are shallow)
Seedling Mortality: Moderate limitation due to shallow soil.
Natural Regeneration: Slow (because of shallow soil)
Seedling Protection: Seedlings should be protected from grazing and trampling
Plant competition: Dense grass and forb cover may impede regeneration.
Windthrow Hazard: Severe (shallow soils - rooting depth limited)
Other information
Table 9. Representative site productivity
| Common name | Symbol | Site index low | Site index high | CMAI low | CMAI high | Age of CMAI | Site index curve code | Site index curve basis | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ponderosa pine | PIPO | 75 | 80 | 400 | 414 | – | – | 100BH | Edminster, Carleton B. and Lewis H. Jump. 1976. Site index curves for Douglas-fir in New Mexico. USDA, Forest Service. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Note RM-326. |
| ponderosa pine | PIPO | 75 | 80 | 400 | 414 | 75 | 601 | – | |
| quaking aspen | POTR5 | 75 | 79 | 250 | 280 | – | – | 100BH | Edminster, Carleton B. and Lewis H. Jump. 1976. Site index curves for Douglas-fir in New Mexico. USDA, Forest Service. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Note RM-326. |
| Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir | PSMEG | 65 | 71 | 250 | 280 | – | – | 100BH | Edminster, Carleton B. and Lewis H. Jump. 1976. Site index curves for Douglas-fir in New Mexico. USDA, Forest Service. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Note RM-326. |
| Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir | PSMEG | 70 | 71 | 200 | 280 | 70 | 775 | – | |
| quaking aspen | POTR5 | 75 | 79 | 200 | 280 | 75 | 735 | – |
Supporting information
Type locality
| Location 1: San Juan County, NM | |
|---|---|
| Township/Range/Section | T22N R20W S23 |
| General legal description | Toadlena Quad - Chuska Mountains - Navajo Reservation Section 23, T22N, R20W, New Mexico. |
Other references
Updates and revisions for this ESD were conducted as part of a 2007-2012 Interagency Technical Assistance Agreement between the Bureau of Indian Affairs–Navajo Region and the NRCS-Arizona.
Contributors
Dan Carrol
Karlynn Huling
Larry D. Ellicott
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
| Author(s)/participant(s) | |
|---|---|
| Contact for lead author | |
| Date | |
| Approved by | |
| Approval date | |
| Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.