Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R035XD410AZ
Saline Upland 7-11" p.z. Loamy
Accessed: 11/23/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 035X–Colorado Plateau
AZ CRA 35.4 – Colorado Plateau Cold Sagebrush – Grasslands
Elevations range from 4200 to 5100 feet and precipitation averages 7 to 11 inches. Vegetation includes winterfat, fourwing saltbush, buckwheat species, needlegrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, Indian ricegrass, black grama, blue grama, sideoats grama, gyp dropseed, and galleta. The soil temperature regime is mesic and the soil moisture regime is typic aridic. This unit occurs within the Colorado Plateau Physiographic Province and is characterized by a sequence of flat to gently dipping sedimentary rocks eroded into plateaus, valleys and deep canyons. Sedimentary rock classes dominate the plateau with volcanic fields occurring for the most part near its margin.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Atriplex canescens |
Herbaceous |
(1) Pascopyrum smithii |
Physiographic features
This site occurs in an upland position as entrenched alluvial fans and low stream terraces. Historically, this site was primarily bottoms and floodplains; but through deep gully erosion, they no longer benefit from excess run-in moisture. Some irrigation induced water tables may exist at about 20"-40" during some times of the year.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Alluvial fan
(2) Stream terrace |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | None to rare |
Ponding frequency | None to rare |
Elevation | 1,158 – 1,615 m |
Slope | 0 – 5% |
Water table depth | 51 – 152 cm |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
Winter-Summer moisture ratios are typically 70:30 on the west side of this LRU and shift to 60:40 on the east side. Late spring is usually the driest period, and early fall moisture can be sporadic. Summer rains fall June-September; moisture originates in the Gulf of Mexico and creates convective, usually brief, intense thunderstorms. Cool season moisture October-May tends to be frontal; it originates in the Pacific and the Gulf of California and falls in widespread storms with longer duration and lower intensity. Precipitation generally comes as snow December-February. Accumulations above 10 inches are not common, but can occur. Snow usually lasts 3-4 days, but can persist much longer. Summer daytime temperatures are commonly 95-100 F and, on occasion, exceed 105F. Winter air temperatures can regularly go below 15 F and have been recorded below -15 F.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 220 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 150 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 279 mm |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Soil features
Soils characterizing this site are deep and well-drained. Surface textures range from sandy to silty clay loam and subsurface textures range from sandy loam to silty clay loam. Salts are in the profile in varying amounts and conductivity ranges from 5 - 20 mmhos/cc. Water erosion hazard is sever unless a good cover of vegetation is maintained.
Some taxonomic units included are;
SSA625 - Mohave County NE part MU 18 Jocity
SSA629 - Coconino County North Kaibab part MU 16 Glenyon.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Alluvium
–
sandstone and shale
|
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Sandy clay loam (2) Silty clay loam (3) Sand |
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
Drainage class | Moderately well drained to well drained |
Permeability class | Moderately slow to moderately rapid |
Soil depth | 102 – 152 cm |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0 – 5% |
Electrical conductivity (0-101.6cm) |
5 – 20 mmhos/cm |
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-101.6cm) |
5 – 30 |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-101.6cm) |
7.6 – 8.8 |
Ecological dynamics
The plant communities found on an ecological site are naturally variable. Composition and production will vary with yearly conditions, location, aspect, and the natural variability of the soils. The historical climax plant community represents the natural potential plant communities found on relict or relatively undisturbed sites. Other plant communities described here represent plant communities that are known to occur when the site is disturbed by factors such as grazing, fire, or drought.
Production data provided in this site description is standardized to air-dry weight at the end of the summer growing season. The plant communities described in this site description are based on near normal rainfall years.
NRCS uses a Similarity Index to compare existing plant communities to the plant communities described here. Similarity Index is determined by comparing the production and composition of a plant community to the production and composition of a plant community described in this site description. To determine Similarity Index, compare the production (air-dry weight) of each species to that shown in the plant community description. For each species, count no more than the maximum amount shown for the species, and for each group, count no more than the maximum shown for the group. Divide the resulting total by the total normal year production shown in the plant community description. If rainfall has been significantly above or below normal, use the total production shown for above or below normal years. If field data is not collected at the end of the summer growing season, then the field data must be corrected to the end of the year production before comparing it to the site description. The growth curve can be used as a guide for estimating production at the end of the summer growing season.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant Community
Community 1.1
Historic Climax Plant Community
This site is composed of grasses intermixed with shrubs. This plant community has the potential for a mixture of cool season and warm season species. Plants most likely to increase on the site through disturbance are greasewood, saltgrass, and rabbitbrush. Annuals such as cheatgrass and russian thistle will invade these areas.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 538 | 605 | 673 |
Shrub/Vine | 179 | 224 | 269 |
Forb | 9 | 27 | 45 |
Total | 726 | 856 | 987 |
Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ0004, 35.4 7-11" p.z. fourwing saltbush. Some growth in spring, most growth in summer to early fall rainy season..
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 30 | 40 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 6. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ0005, 35.4 7-11" p.z. Indian ricegrass. Most growth occurs in the spring, some growth occurs in the fall..
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 10 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 7. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3541, 35.4 7-11" p.z. all sites. Most growth occurs in the spring and during the summer rainy season..
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 1 | 9 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 16 | 25 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Figure 8. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3562, 35.4 7-11" p.z. bottlebrush squirreltail. Most growth occurs in the spring, plants may remain green during the winter..
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 5 | 30 | 35 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
0 | 179–269 | |||||
fourwing saltbush | ATCA2 | Atriplex canescens | 90–224 | – | ||
greasewood | SAVE4 | Sarcobatus vermiculatus | 45–90 | – | ||
shadscale saltbush | ATCO | Atriplex confertifolia | 18–63 | – | ||
rabbitbrush | CHRYS9 | Chrysothamnus | 9–45 | – | ||
broom snakeweed | GUSA2 | Gutierrezia sarothrae | 0–27 | – | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
0 | 538–673 | |||||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 45–179 | – | ||
saltgrass | DISP | Distichlis spicata | 45–179 | – | ||
western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 45–179 | – | ||
needle and thread | HECOC8 | Hesperostipa comata ssp. comata | 45–135 | – | ||
squirreltail | ELELE | Elymus elymoides ssp. elymoides | 45–90 | – | ||
blue grama | BOGR2 | Bouteloua gracilis | 45–90 | – | ||
James' galleta | PLJA | Pleuraphis jamesii | 9–45 | – | ||
spike dropseed | SPCO4 | Sporobolus contractus | 9–45 | – | ||
alkali sacaton | SPAI | Sporobolus airoides | 0–27 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
0 | 9–45 | |||||
Forb, annual | 2FA | Forb, annual | 9–45 | – | ||
Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 9–45 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
This site is suitable for year-long grazing by domestic livestock and is easily traversed. This site is very susceptible to erosion, particularly overgrazed areas, old roads, cattle trails and concentration areas.
Diversity on this site is fair for wildlife. Cover is good in the potential plant community. Open water is lacking except where seasonal livestock waters are maintained. Some wildlife species are pronghorn, mule deer, and cottontail rabbits.
Recreational uses
This site occurs as floodplains and eroded bottoms. The general appearance of the site is a grassland interspersed with shrubs. The landscape has good texture and form and is pleasing to the eye.
Winters are cold and summers are quite warm. Spring and fall are the dry seasons and are typically cool and windy.
Recreational activities most likely to occur are hunting, cross-country riding, and wildlife observation.
Other information
Threatened and Endangered Species: Golden eagles and Prairie falcons occasionally use the site for feeding areas.
Supporting information
Type locality
Location 1: Coconino County, AZ | |
---|---|
Township/Range/Section | T41N R2W S8 |
General legal description | About 1/4 mile north of Fredonia, AZ; Coconino County; Section 8, T41N, R2W. |
Contributors
Larry D. Ellicott
Steve Barker
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | |
Approved by | |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.