Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R035XG124NM
Hills
Accessed: 11/24/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
| Tree |
(1) Juniperus monosperma |
|---|---|
| Shrub |
(1) Quercus gambelii |
| Herbaceous |
(1) Bouteloua gracilis |
Physiographic features
This site is characterized by rolling to steep hills and mountain footslopes. Slopes average 25 percent or more but range in extremes from 15 percent to 75 percent. Exposure or direction of slope is variable. Rock outcrops, exposed ledges, and occasional boulders are not uncommon. Elevations range from about 6000 to 7800 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
| Landforms |
(1)
Hill
(2) Mountain slope (3) Scarp slope |
|---|---|
| Flooding frequency | None |
| Ponding frequency | None |
| Elevation | 1,829 – 2,377 m |
| Slope | 15 – 75% |
| Water table depth | 183 cm |
| Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
Average annual precipitation varies from about 10 inches to just over 16 inches. Fluctuations ranging from about 5 inches to 25 inches are not uncommon. The overall climate is characterized by cold dry winters in which winter moisture is less than summer. As much as half or more of the annual precipitation can be expected to come during the period of July through September. Thus, fall conditions are often more favorable for good growth of cool-season perennial grasses, shrubs, and forbs than are those of spring.
The average frost-free season is about 120 days and extends from approximately mid-May to early or mid-September. Average annual air temperatures are 50 degrees F or lower and summer maximums rarely exceed 100 degrees F. Winter minimums typically approach or go below zero. Monthly mean temperatures exceed 70 degrees F for the period of July and August.
Rainfall patterns generally favor warm-season perennial vegetation, while the temperature regime tends to favor cool-season vegetation. This creates a somewhat complex community of plants on a given range site which is quite susceptible to disturbance and is at or near its productive potential only when both natural warm- and cool- season dominants are present.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
| Frost-free period (average) | 171 days |
|---|---|
| Freeze-free period (average) | 252 days |
| Precipitation total (average) | 406 mm |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
This site is not influenced by water from wetlands or streams.
Soil features
Soils characterizing this site are typically shallow over acid igneous bedrock, although pockets of deeper soils also occur in saddles, between ledges, and lower side slopes. They may be loams, clay loams, or sandy loams, and are usually stony, gravelly or cobbly. Permeability is moderate to moderately slow, and the available water capacity is low due to shallow depth. Characteristic soils are Chimayo stony loam, Dusty gravelly loam, and Santa Fe very gravelly loam.
Table 4. Representative soil features
| Surface texture |
(1) Stony loam (2) Gravelly clay loam (3) Cobbly sandy loam |
|---|---|
| Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
| Drainage class | Well drained to excessively drained |
| Permeability class | Very slow to moderately rapid |
| Soil depth | 25 – 183 cm |
| Surface fragment cover <=3" | 20 – 30% |
| Surface fragment cover >3" | 15 – 25% |
| Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
2.54 – 12.7 cm |
| Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-101.6cm) |
1 – 10% |
| Electrical conductivity (0-101.6cm) |
0 – 4 mmhos/cm |
| Sodium adsorption ratio (0-101.6cm) |
0 – 5 |
| Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-101.6cm) |
6.1 – 8.4 |
| Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
10 – 35% |
| Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
5 – 10% |
Ecological dynamics
Deterioration of the potential plant community due to inadequately managed grazing is most often typified by a decline in such desirable plants as sideoats grama, black grama, cool-season grasses, mountainmahogany, and winterfat. As these plants decline, they are replaced by pinyon, juniper, broom snakeweed, and lesser-value grasses such as threeawns and galleta. Because mechanical seeding and brush control are seldom justifiable on this site, the mixed use of both browsing and grazing kinds of livestock may be the best means of maintaining a healthy balance of woody and herbaceous vegetation.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant Community
Community 1.1
Historic Climax Plant Community
The potential plant community of this site has a mixed shrub-grassland aspect with scattered tree-type junipers and pinyon pines. The shrub and tree component is more visually prevalent on the cooler, north- and east-facing slopes, while low-growing shrubs and grasses prevail on south- and west- facing slopes. Dominant grasses include sideoats grama, blue grama, species of Muhlenbergia, and sometimes black grama (south-facing slopes). Cool-season species, such as New Mexico feathergrass, and needle-and-thread, are most common on north-facing slopes. Green sprangletop, little bluestem, and bullgrass are typical aspect grasses on this site. Shrubs include skunkbush sumac, mountainmahogany and species of oak.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
| Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grass/Grasslike | 315 | 536 | 757 |
| Forb | 12 | 21 | 303 |
| Tree | 56 | 101 | 112 |
| Shrub/Vine | 28 | 45 | 90 |
| Total | 411 | 703 | 1262 |
Table 6. Ground cover
| Tree foliar cover | 2-5% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 0% |
| Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 15-20% |
| Forb foliar cover | 2-5% |
| Non-vascular plants | 0% |
| Biological crusts | 0% |
| Litter | 10-15% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 20-30% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 15-25% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 15-20% |
Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM0315, R035XG124NM-Hills-HCPC. Mixed warm/cool season grassland with shrubs and scattered trees..
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
| 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
| Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
| 1 | 108–143 | |||||
| blue grama | BOGR2 | Bouteloua gracilis | 108–143 | – | ||
| 2 | 143–178 | |||||
| needle and thread | HECO26 | Hesperostipa comata | 143–178 | – | ||
| New Mexico feathergrass | HENE5 | Hesperostipa neomexicana | 143–178 | – | ||
| bullgrass | MUEM | Muhlenbergia emersleyi | 143–178 | – | ||
| mountain muhly | MUMO | Muhlenbergia montana | 143–178 | – | ||
| little bluestem | SCSC | Schizachyrium scoparium | 143–178 | – | ||
| 3 | 0–36 | |||||
| black grama | BOER4 | Bouteloua eriopoda | 0–36 | – | ||
| 4 | 72–108 | |||||
| threeawn | ARIST | Aristida | 72–108 | – | ||
| pine dropseed | BLTR | Blepharoneuron tricholepis | 72–108 | – | ||
| squirreltail | ELEL5 | Elymus elymoides | 72–108 | – | ||
| Arizona fescue | FEAR2 | Festuca arizonica | 72–108 | – | ||
| sheep fescue | FEOV | Festuca ovina | 72–108 | – | ||
| 5 | 36–72 | |||||
| sideoats grama | BOCU | Bouteloua curtipendula | 36–72 | – | ||
| 6 | 7–36 | |||||
| threeawn | ARIST | Aristida | 7–36 | – | ||
| common wolfstail | LYPH | Lycurus phleoides | 7–36 | – | ||
| spike muhly | MUWR | Muhlenbergia wrightii | 7–36 | – | ||
| James' galleta | PLJA | Pleuraphis jamesii | 7–36 | – | ||
| sand dropseed | SPCR | Sporobolus cryptandrus | 7–36 | – | ||
| 7 | 7–36 | |||||
| prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 7–36 | – | ||
| green sprangletop | LEDU | Leptochloa dubia | 7–36 | – | ||
| western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 7–36 | – | ||
|
Tree
|
||||||
| 8 | 36–108 | |||||
| juniper | JUNIP | Juniperus | 36–108 | – | ||
| twoneedle pinyon | PIED | Pinus edulis | 36–108 | – | ||
|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
| 9 | 7–72 | |||||
| Fendler's ceanothus | CEFE | Ceanothus fendleri | 7–72 | – | ||
| mountain mahogany | CERCO | Cercocarpus | 7–72 | – | ||
| Mexican cliffrose | PUME | Purshia mexicana | 7–72 | – | ||
| antelope bitterbrush | PUTR2 | Purshia tridentata | 7–72 | – | ||
| oak | QUERC | Quercus | 7–72 | – | ||
| skunkbush sumac | RHTR | Rhus trilobata | 7–72 | – | ||
| 10 | 7–21 | |||||
| Apache plume | FAPA | Fallugia paradoxa | 7–21 | – | ||
| broom snakeweed | GUSA2 | Gutierrezia sarothrae | 7–21 | – | ||
| winterfat | KRLA2 | Krascheninnikovia lanata | 7–21 | – | ||
|
Forb
|
||||||
| 11 | 21–36 | |||||
| Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 21–36 | – | ||
| 12 | 7–21 | |||||
| Forb, annual | 2FA | Forb, annual | 7–21 | – | ||
Interpretations
Animal community
This range site provides habitats which support a resident animal community that is characterized by mule deer, gray fox, bobcat, desert cottontail, cliff chipmunk, white- hroated woodrat, pinyon mouse, harlequin quail, red-shafted flicker, scrub jay, pinyon jay, common raven, bridled titmouse, common bushtit, rufous-sided towhee, chipping sparrow, Eastern fence lizard, plateau whiptail, tree lizard, desert horned lizard, mountain patch-nose snake, and black-tailed rattlesnake.
Hydrological functions
Hydrology Functions:
The runoff curve numbers are determined by field investigations using hydrologic cover conditions and hydrologic soil groups.
Hydrologic Interpretations
Soil Series----------------Hydrologic Group
Chimayo-------------------------D
Recreational uses
This site offers good potential for hiking, horseback riding, hunting, nature observation, and photography. It has low to moderate potential for improved picnicking and camping sites, depending upon how steep the topography is. It provides natural beauty typical of the mountain foothills of the area in which it is formed.
Wood products
This site has a limited potential for wood products that is restricted almost entirely to fence posts and firewood production.
Other products
This site is well suited for grazing by multiple kinds and classes of livestock. Where slopes are steep, however, accessibility may become limited and stocking rates need to be properly adjusted. Deterioration of the potential plant community due to inadequately managed grazing is most often typified by a decline in such desirable plants as sideoats grama, black grama, cool-season grasses, mountainmahogany, and winterfat. As these plants decline, they are replaced by pinyon, juniper, broom snakeweed, and lesser-value grasses such as threeawns and galleta. Because mechanical seeding and brush control are seldom justifiable on this site, the mixed use of both browsing and grazing kinds of livestock may be the best means of maintaining a healthy balance of woody and herbaceous vegetation.
Other information
Guide to Suggested Initial Stocking Rate Acres per Animal Unit Month
Similarity Index-------------Ac/AUM
100 - 76-------------------3.6 - 4.8
75 – 51--------------------4.5 - 6.5
50 – 26--------------------6.0 - 12.5
25 – 0---------------------12.5 +
Supporting information
Contributors
Brenda Simpson
Christine Bishop
Don Sylvester
John Tunberg
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
| Author(s)/participant(s) | |
|---|---|
| Contact for lead author | |
| Date | |
| Approved by | |
| Approval date | |
| Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.