Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R035XG707AZ
Clay Loam Upland 14-18" p.z.
Accessed: 11/23/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 035X–Colorado Plateau
AZ CRA 35.7 – Colorado Plateau Woodland – Grassland
Elevations range from 5000 to 7000 feet and precipitation averages 14 to 18 inches per year. Vegetation includes one-seed juniper, Colorado pinyon, Stansbury cliffrose, Apache plume, four-wing saltbush, green Mormon tea, needle and thread, sideoats grama, blue grama, black grama, galleta, bottlebrush squirreltail, and muttongrass. The soil temperature regime is mesic and the soil moisture regime is aridic ustic. This unit occurs within the Colorado Plateau Physiographic Province and is characterized by a sequence of flat to gently dipping sedimentary rocks eroded into plateaus, valleys and deep canyons. Sedimentary rock classes dominate the plateau with volcanic fields occurring for the most part near its margin.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
(1) Juniperus monosperma |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Krascheninnikovia lanata |
Herbaceous |
(1) Bouteloua gracilis |
Physiographic features
This site occurs in an upland position on gently sloping to steep mesas and hills, cinder cones, and plains. It neither benefits significantly from run-in moisture from adjacent areas nor does it suffer from excessive loss from run-off unless denuded of its vegetative cover. It occurs on all exposures. Soils are formed on basalt, volcanic debris and cinders.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Mesa
(2) Hill (3) Plain |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 5,500 – 7,000 ft |
Slope | 30% |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
This area receives 14-18" precipitation yearly. About 50% falls during Jul-Sep and is the most effective, dependable moisture. The remainder falls Nov-Feb as snow or light rain. High velocity winds during the winter and spring are common.
Mean temperatures for the hottest month (Jul)are 69F; coldest month (Jan) are 30F. Extreme temperatures of 100F and -30F have been recorded. Long periods of little or no effective moisture occur frequently.
Cool season plants start growth in early spring and mature early summer. Warm season plants take advantage of summer rains and are growing and nutritious Jul-Sep.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 170 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 170 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 18 in |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Soil features
Ate someSoils are moderately deep to deep. Surface texture ranges from loam to silty clay loam. Subsoil texture ranges from cobbly clay to gravelly clay loam. Cinders and time-cemented hardpan occur at depths of 20-40" in some soils. Small amounts of lime are present in the lower profile. pH ranges from 7.0-8.2.
Coarse fragments of gravel, cobble or stones range from 15-35% in the profile. This site is well drained. Soils can absorb most of the moisture supplied by the climate.
SSA-631 Coconino Central Area MU's 41 & 42 Showlow Gr fsl and 47 & 49 Thunderbird;
SSA-635 Apache County Central Part MU's TbC & TDB Thunderbird;
SSA-637 Yavapai County Western part MU's CdC & StB Thunderbird.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Loam (2) Silty clay loam |
---|---|
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Very slow to slow |
Soil depth | 20 – 60 in |
Available water capacity (0-40in) |
2.76 – 9.98 in |
Electrical conductivity (0-40in) |
2 mmhos/cm |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-40in) |
6.6 – 8.4 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
25% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
70% |
Ecological dynamics
The plant communities found on an ecological site are naturally variable. Composition and production will vary with yearly conditions, location, aspect, and the natural variability of the soils. The Historical Climax Plant Community represents the natural potential plant communities found on relict or relatively undisturbed sites. Other plant communities described here represent plant communities that are known to occur when the site is disturbed by factors such as fire, grazing, or drought.
Production data provided in this site description is standardized to air dry weight at the end of the summer growing season. The plant communities described in this site description are based on near normal rainfall years.
NRCS uses a Similarity Index to compare existing plant communities to the plant communities described here. Similarity index is determined by comparing the production and composition of a plant community to the production and composition of a plant community described in this site description. To determine Similarity index, compare the production (air dry weight) of each species to that shown in the plant community description. For each species, count no more than the maximum amount shown for the species, and for each group, count no more than the maximum amount shown for each group. Divide the resulting total by the total normal year production shown in the plant community description. If the rainfall has ben significantly above or below normal, use the total production shown for above or below normal years. If field data is not collected at the end of the summer growing season, then the field data must be corrected to the end of the year production before comparing it to the site description. The growth curve can be used as a guide for estimating production at the end of the summer growing season.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant Community
Community 1.1
Historic Climax Plant Community
This range site has a mixed plant community made up of junipers and pinyon pine and an understory of mid and short grasses, shrubs and a relatively small percentage of forbs. In the original plant community, there was a mixture of both cool and warm season grasses. Plant species most likely to invade or increase on this site when it deteriorates are broom snakeweed, annuals, cacti, rabbitbrush and groundsel. Continuous grazing during the winter and spring periods will decrease cool season grasses which are replaced by lower forage value grasses and shrubs.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 585 | – | 810 |
Forb | 45 | – | 135 |
Tree | 45 | – | 135 |
Shrub/Vine | 45 | – | 90 |
Total | 720 | – | 1170 |
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | 90–315 | |||||
western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 90–315 | – | ||
2 | 0–18 | |||||
needle and thread | HECOC8 | Hesperostipa comata ssp. comata | 0–18 | – | ||
3 | 45–135 | |||||
squirreltail | ELELE | Elymus elymoides ssp. elymoides | 45–135 | – | ||
4 | 0–36 | |||||
5 | 0–9 | |||||
New Mexico feathergrass | HENE5 | Hesperostipa neomexicana | 0–9 | – | ||
6 | 0–90 | |||||
muttongrass | POFE | Poa fendleriana | 0–90 | – | ||
7 | 0–45 | |||||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 0–45 | – | ||
8 | 45–135 | |||||
sideoats grama | BOCU | Bouteloua curtipendula | 45–135 | – | ||
9 | 0–36 | |||||
black grama | BOER4 | Bouteloua eriopoda | 0–36 | – | ||
10 | 0–9 | |||||
vine mesquite | PAOB | Panicum obtusum | 0–9 | – | ||
11 | 0–45 | |||||
spike muhly | MUWR | Muhlenbergia wrightii | 0–45 | – | ||
12 | 0–45 | |||||
common wolfstail | LYPH | Lycurus phleoides | 0–45 | – | ||
13 | 180–360 | |||||
blue grama | BOGR2 | Bouteloua gracilis | 180–360 | – | ||
14 | 0–27 | |||||
threeawn | ARIST | Aristida | 0–27 | – | ||
15 | 0–9 | |||||
sand dropseed | SPCR | Sporobolus cryptandrus | 0–9 | – | ||
16 | 0–18 | |||||
ring muhly | MUTO2 | Muhlenbergia torreyi | 0–18 | – | ||
17 | 45–135 | |||||
James' galleta | PLJA | Pleuraphis jamesii | 45–135 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
18 | 45–135 | |||||
Forb, annual | 2FA | Forb, annual | 45–135 | – | ||
Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 45–135 | – | ||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 45–135 | – | ||
globemallow | SPHAE | Sphaeralcea | 45–135 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
19 | 18–45 | |||||
winterfat | KRLA2 | Krascheninnikovia lanata | 18–45 | – | ||
20 | 0–18 | |||||
jointfir | EPHED | Ephedra | 0–18 | – | ||
21 | 9–18 | |||||
fourwing saltbush | ATCA2 | Atriplex canescens | 9–18 | – | ||
22 | 0–9 | |||||
Mexican cliffrose | PUME | Purshia mexicana | 0–9 | – | ||
23 | 0–9 | |||||
woolly groundsel | PACA15 | Packera cana | 0–9 | – | ||
24 | 0–45 | |||||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNAN5 | Ericameria nauseosa ssp. nauseosa var. nauseosa | 0–45 | – | ||
25 | 0–45 | |||||
Greene's rabbitbrush | CHGR6 | Chrysothamnus greenei | 0–45 | – | ||
26 | 0–9 | |||||
narrowleaf yucca | YUAN2 | Yucca angustissima | 0–9 | – | ||
27 | 9–45 | |||||
broom snakeweed | GUSA2 | Gutierrezia sarothrae | 9–45 | – | ||
28 | 0–45 | |||||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–45 | – | ||
29 | 0–18 | |||||
pricklypear | OPUNT | Opuntia | 0–18 | – | ||
30 | 0–9 | |||||
Fremont's mahonia | MAFR3 | Mahonia fremontii | 0–9 | – | ||
31 | 0–9 | |||||
skunkbush sumac | RHTR | Rhus trilobata | 0–9 | – | ||
32 | 45–135 | |||||
Utah juniper | JUOS | Juniperus osteosperma | 45–135 | – | ||
34 | 0–27 | |||||
alligator juniper | JUDE2 | Juniperus deppeana | 0–27 | – | ||
35 | 45–90 | |||||
twoneedle pinyon | PIED | Pinus edulis | 45–90 | – | ||
Tree
|
||||||
33 | 45–135 | |||||
oneseed juniper | JUMO | Juniperus monosperma | 45–135 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
This site is favorable for livestock grazing during most grazing periods except when snow cover restricts availability of forage. Planned grazing systems adapt well when this site is included in a ranching operation.
This site has fair to good diversity in the plant community. It provides important year-long food and cover for wildlife. Brush management practices should maximize edge effect, allow pockets near water and utilize corridors to and from water.
Recreational uses
This site occurs as rolling hills, meandering ridges and gradual slopes and is characterized by grasslands interspersed with trees. It has warm summers and cold winters with high winds common during the spring and summer. Recreational activities include hunting, hiking and horseback riding.
Other information
T&E Species: Golden eagles and/or prairie falcons may use this site for hunting.
Supporting information
Type locality
Location 1: Coconino County, AZ | |
---|---|
Township/Range/Section | T22 N. R2 E. S3 |
Location 2: Coconino County, AZ | |
Township/Range/Section | T22 N. R2 E. S6 |
Location 3: Navajo County, AZ | |
Township/Range/Section | T9 N. R29 E. S31 |
General legal description | Showlow Airport |
Location 4: Navajo County, AZ | |
Township/Range/Section | T15 N. R14 E. S16 |
General legal description | Top of Chevlon Butte. |
Contributors
Larry D. Ellicott
Stephen Cassady
Steve Barker
Unknown
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Karlyn Huling |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | NRCS Flagstaff Area Office |
Date | 05/15/2006 |
Approved by | S. Cassady |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
A few minor rills may form due to fine sandy loam and clay loam surface textures, slow permeability, and medium to rapid runoff, especially on steeper slopes. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Some water flow patterns may form due to slow permeability and medium to rapid runoff, especially on steeper slopes. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
A few pedestals and terracettes may form, but they should be very short. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
This site has an average available water capacity of 5 inches, so it has a moderate to high potential for the production of plant cover. Drought may cause an increase in bare ground. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Herbaceous and fine woody litter will be transported in water flow pathways. Coarse woody litter will remain under shrub and tree canopies. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface textures are fine sandy loam and clay loam. Most surface horizons have gravels, cobbles, or stones. When well vegetated or covered with rock armor, these soils have a high resistance to both water and wind erosion. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Surface structure is mostly granular (moderate to strong, very fine to fine), but some areas have a platy structure (weak to strong, thin to medium). Surface thickness is 2-3 inches. Color is variable depending upon parent materials. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
This site is characterized by a relatively uniform distribution of mostly grasses with some shrubs and a few forbs. Some of the areas may have up to 25% canopy cover of trees. Both canopy and basal cover values (especially canopy cover) decrease during prolonged drought. This type of plant community is moderately to highly effective at capturing and storing precipitation. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None. Due to fine sandy loam and clay loam surface textures, these soils may be easily compacted, but only within the top 3 inches. Many soils are protected from compaction by rock fragments. Some of the soils have a naturally platy surface structure. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
NoneSub-dominant:
warm season bunchgrasses >> cool season colonizing grasses = cool season bunchgrasses > forbs > trees = warm season colonizing grasses > shrubs > cacti = Agave familyOther:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
All plant functional groups are adapted to survival in all years except during the most severe droughts. Severe winter drought affects trees and shrubs most. Severe summer drought affects grasses the most. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Mostly herbaceous litter with some woody litter. Litter amounts increase during the first few years of drought, then decrease in later years. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
700-800 lbs/ac dry years; 800-1100 lbs/ac median years; 1100-1300 lbs/ac wet years. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Broom snakeweed, Greene rabbitbrush, Ericameria (rubber rabbitbrush), and Opuntia (pricklypear cactus) are all native to the site but have the ability to increase and dominate after heavy grazing. Utah, oneseed, and alligator juniper are also native to the site but also have the ability to increase and dominate after heavy grazing and/or fire exclusion. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All plants native to the site are adapted to the climate and are capable of producing seeds, stolons, and rhizomes in msot years except during the most severe droughts.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.