Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R038XB110NM
Sandy
Accessed: 11/13/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
| Tree |
Not specified |
|---|---|
| Shrub |
Not specified |
| Herbaceous |
Not specified |
Physiographic features
This site usually occurs on level to gently sloping or undulating piedmont slopes or plains. Slopes may range to 15 percent but will average less than 10 percent. Elevation range from about 5,000 to 6,500 feet above sea level.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
| Landforms |
(1)
Fan piedmont
(2) Plain |
|---|---|
| Elevation | 5,000 – 6,500 ft |
| Slope | 15% |
| Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
Average annual precipitation varies from about 12 inches to just over 16 inches. Substantial fluctuations from year to year are common, ranging from a low of about 6 inches to a high of over 30 inches. Approximately one-half of the annual precipitation comes in the form of rainfall during the months of July, August, and September, although wintertime precipitation in the form of snow, sleet, or rain is sometimes significant. Spring and late fall months are normally dry.
The average frost-free period ranges from about 165 to 190 days and extends from approximately the third or fourth week in April to mid October. Average annual air temperatures are about 56 degrees F. Summer maximums can exceed 100 degrees F and winter minimums on occasion go below zero. Monthly mean temperatures generally exceed 70 degrees F for the period of June through August.
Growing conditions favor warm-season perennial vegetation, although late winter and late summer precipitation is adequate to foster a significant cool-season component in the potential plant community. Occasional wet springs also create good conditions for annual forb production, but frequent winds from the west and southwest are common during this time of year and tend to deplete soil moisture at a critical time for the growth of theses plants.
Climate data was obtained from http://www.wrcc.sage.dri.edu/summary/climsmnm.html web site using 50% probability for freeze-free and frost-free seasons using 28.5 degrees F and 32.5 degrees F respectively.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
| Frost-free period (average) | 187 days |
|---|---|
| Freeze-free period (average) | 211 days |
| Precipitation total (average) | 16 in |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
This site is not influenced by water from a wetland or stream.
Soil features
The soils are moderately deep to deep and well drained. Typically, the surface layer is a fine sandy loam to loamy fine sand more than 5 inches thick over sandy clay loam, clay loam, fine sandy loam, or very fine sandy loam. The soils have moderately slow to moderately rapid permeability with moderate to high water-holding capacity.
Due to their sandy surface textures, these soils are subject to soil blowing when the surface is not adequately protected by plant cover and may become duned or hummocky where natural vegetation has declined.
Table 4. Representative soil features
| Surface texture |
(1) Sandy loam (2) Loamy sand (3) Loamy fine sand |
|---|---|
| Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
| Drainage class | Well drained |
| Permeability class | Moderately slow |
| Soil depth | 60 – 72 in |
| Available water capacity (0-40in) |
6 – 12 in |
Ecological dynamics
This site has a grassland aspect characterized by short and mid-grasses. Black grama and blue grama co-dominate, with lesser amounts of sand dropseed, threeawns, sideoats grama, tobosa, and spike dropseed typically present. Soaptree yucca, Mormon-tea, and occasionally sacahuista are the principal woody or shrub-like species. Annual buckwheats, filaree, globemallow, and desert baileya are common in minor amounts. Broom snakeweed is most common in certain wet years and as the plant community deteriorates from its potential.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant Community
Community 1.1
Historic Climax Plant Community
This site has a grassland aspect characterized by short and mid-grasses. Black grama and blue grama co-dominate, with lesser amounts of sand dropseed, threeawns, sideoats grama, tobosa, and spike dropseed typically present. Soaptree yucca, Mormon-tea, and occasionally sacahuista are the principal woody or shrub-like species. Annual buckwheats, filaree, globemallow, and desert baileya are common in minor amounts. Broom snakeweed is most common in certain wet years and as the plant community deteriorates from its potential.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
| Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grass/Grasslike | 260 | 470 | 680 |
| Forb | 26 | 47 | 68 |
| Total | 286 | 517 | 748 |
Table 6. Ground cover
| Tree foliar cover | 0% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 7% |
| Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 0% |
| Forb foliar cover | 0% |
| Non-vascular plants | 0% |
| Biological crusts | 0% |
| Litter | 10% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 71% |
Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM0610, R038XB110NM Sandy HCPC. R038XB110NM Sandy HCPC Mixed short/mid-grassland with scattered shrubs and a minor forb component..
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
| 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
| Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
| 1 | 176–206 | |||||
| black grama | BOER4 | Bouteloua eriopoda | 176–206 | – | ||
| 2 | 88–118 | |||||
| blue grama | BOGR2 | Bouteloua gracilis | 88–118 | – | ||
| 3 | 6–29 | |||||
| sideoats grama | BOCU | Bouteloua curtipendula | 6–29 | – | ||
| 4 | 6–18 | |||||
| hairy grama | BOHI2 | Bouteloua hirsuta | 6–18 | – | ||
| 5 | 29–59 | |||||
| spike dropseed | SPCO4 | Sporobolus contractus | 29–59 | – | ||
| sand dropseed | SPCR | Sporobolus cryptandrus | 29–59 | – | ||
| 6 | 18–47 | |||||
| threeawn | ARIST | Aristida | 18–47 | – | ||
| ring muhly | MUTO2 | Muhlenbergia torreyi | 18–47 | – | ||
| 7 | 6–29 | |||||
| tobosagrass | PLMU3 | Pleuraphis mutica | 6–29 | – | ||
| 8 | 6–29 | |||||
| bush muhly | MUPO2 | Muhlenbergia porteri | 6–29 | – | ||
| 9 | 6–18 | |||||
| common wolfstail | LYPH | Lycurus phleoides | 6–18 | – | ||
| 10 | 6–29 | |||||
| cane bluestem | BOBA3 | Bothriochloa barbinodis | 6–29 | – | ||
| Arizona cottontop | DICA8 | Digitaria californica | 6–29 | – | ||
| plains bristlegrass | SEVU2 | Setaria vulpiseta | 6–29 | – | ||
| 11 | 6–18 | |||||
| Grass, annual | 2GA | Grass, annual | 6–18 | – | ||
| low woollygrass | DAPU7 | Dasyochloa pulchella | 6–18 | – | ||
|
Forb
|
||||||
| 12 | 6–29 | |||||
| desert marigold | BAMU | Baileya multiradiata | 6–29 | – | ||
| croton | CROTO | Croton | 6–29 | – | ||
| redstem stork's bill | ERCI6 | Erodium cicutarium | 6–29 | – | ||
| buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 6–29 | – | ||
| globemallow | SPHAE | Sphaeralcea | 6–29 | – | ||
| 13 | 6–18 | |||||
| herb sophia | DESO2 | Descurainia sophia | 6–18 | – | ||
| locoweed | OXYTR | Oxytropis | 6–18 | – | ||
| Russian thistle | SAKA | Salsola kali | 6–18 | – | ||
| threadleaf ragwort | SEFLF | Senecio flaccidus var. flaccidus | 6–18 | – | ||
| 14 | 6–29 | |||||
|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
| 15 | 6–29 | |||||
| soaptree yucca | YUEL | Yucca elata | 6–29 | – | ||
| 16 | 6–18 | |||||
| mormon tea | EPVI | Ephedra viridis | 6–18 | – | ||
| sacahuista | NOMI | Nolina microcarpa | 6–18 | – | ||
| 17 | 6–29 | |||||
| sand sagebrush | ARFI2 | Artemisia filifolia | 6–29 | – | ||
| broom snakeweed | GUSA2 | Gutierrezia sarothrae | 6–29 | – | ||
| 18 | 6–29 | |||||
| fourwing saltbush | ATCA2 | Atriplex canescens | 6–29 | – | ||
| winterfat | KRLA2 | Krascheninnikovia lanata | 6–29 | – | ||
| 19 | 6–18 | |||||
Interpretations
Animal community
Habitat for Wildlife:
This ecological site provides habitat which can support a resident animal community characterized by pronghorn antelope, black-tailed jackrabbit, Botta’s pocket gopher, plains pocket mouse, white-footed mouse, cactus mouse, Northern grasshopper mouse, Ord’s kangaroo rat, Southern plains woodrat, kit fox, badger, roadrunner, burrowing owl, loggerhead shrike, Scott’s oriole, cactus wren, scaled quail, mourning dove, lesser earless lizard, leopard lizard, desert spiny lizard, round-tailed horned lizard, plains spadefoot toad, and black-headed snake.
Where large soaptree yucca, cholla cactus, and woody shrubs are present Scott’s oriole, cactus wren, and mourning dove nest. Chestnut-collared longspur winters on this site.
Hydrological functions
The runoff curve numbers are determined by field investigations using hydrologic cover conditions and hydrologic soil groups.
Soil Series-----------------Hydrologic Group
Ellicott----------------------------A
Clovis------------------------------?
Harvey------------------------------?
Palma-------------------------------?
Penistaja---------------------------?
Recreational uses
This site offers limited recreation potential for hiking, horseback riding, picnicking, camping, nature observation, photography, and hunting for pronghorn antelope, scaled quail, and mourning dove. When favorable spring moisture conditions occur, a colorful display of wildflowers may be seen.
Wood products
This site has no significant value for wood products.
Other products
Grazing:
This site, at its potential, is suitable for grazing in all seasons of the year. Although green forage is produced to some extent in the spring by annual forbs and a few early season grasses, the major production begins in early July and extends through September. The site is best adapted for cattle and possibly sheep and horses. It is less suitable for goats except in the lower condition classes where woody plants tend to take over. Site deterioration caused by inadequately managed livestock grazing is characterized by a decline in black grama and blue grama and an increase in threeawns, ring muhly, dropseeds, and tobosa. Moderate to heavy mesquite stands and hummocking may characterize serious retrogression. Brush control may be needed to affect a reasonable rate of recovery.
Other information
Guide to Suggested Initial Stocking Rate Acres per Animal Unit Month
Similarity Index-----------------Ac/AUM
100 - 76------------------------3.6 – 4.5
75 – 51-------------------------4.3 – 7.0
50 – 26-------------------------6.7 – 11.5
25 – 0--------------------------11.5+
Supporting information
Type locality
| Location 1: Grant County, NM | |
|---|---|
| Location 2: Hidalgo County, NM | |
| Location 3: Socorro County, NM |
Other references
Data collection for this site was done in conjunction with the progressive soil surveys within the New Mexico and Arizona Plateaus and Mesas 36 Major Land Resource Area of New Mexico. This site has been mapped and correlated with soils in the following soil surveys: Socorro, Sierra, Grant, Hidalgo, Catron.
Characteristic Soils Are:
Ellicott
Other Soils included are: Clovis, Harvey, Palma, Penistaja
Contributors
Brandon Bestelmeyer
Don Sylvester
John Tunberg
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
| Author(s)/participant(s) | |
|---|---|
| Contact for lead author | |
| Date | |
| Approved by | |
| Approval date | |
| Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.