Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R042CY154NM
Swale
Last updated: 10/21/2024
Accessed: 11/21/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Ecological site concept
This site occurs in concave or depressional positions of valleys along drainageways or as sinkholes. As such, it receives significant runoff from adjacent sites. Slopes vary from 0 to 4 percent.
The soils on this site are very deep and well-drained. Surface textures are loam, very fine sandy loam, silt loam, and silty clay loam. Subsurface textures are silt loam and silty clay loam.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
Not specified |
Herbaceous |
(1) Bouteloua curtipendula |
Physiographic features
This site occurs in concave or depressional positions of valleys along drainageways or as sinkholes. This site receives significant runoff from adjacent sites to increase the effective moisture. This site transports water from higher, upland sites to lower, bottomland sites. Slopes vary from 0 to 4 percent. Direction of slope varies and is not significant. Elevations range from 4,000 to 7,000 feet above sea level.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Depression
(2) Valley floor |
---|---|
Elevation | 1,219 – 2,134 m |
Slope | 0 – 4% |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
The climate of this area is “semi-arid continental.”
Annual average precipitation ranges from 11 to 19 inches. Variations of 5 inches, more or less, are not uncommon. Approximately 70 percent of the precipitation occurs from May through October. Most of the summer rain comes in the form of high-intensity, short- uration thunderstorms. Winter moisture is usually negligible.
Temperatures are characterized by distinct seasonal changes and large annual and dirnal temperature changes. The average annual temperature ranges from 55 degrees F to 60 degrees F, with extremes of 20 degrees F below zero in the winter to 110 degrees F in the summer not uncommon.
The average frost-free season is 170 to 189 days. The last killing frost is in early April and the first killing frost is in mid October.
Both temperature and precipitation favor a warm-season perennial plant community. However, because of the position of this site, water and cold air drainage, conditions are good for an important cool season component on this site. Winds that blow from the west and southwest from February through June tend to dry the soil during a critical period for cool season plant growth.
Climate data was obtained from http://www.wrcc.sage.dri.edu/summary/climsmnm.html web site.
Data interpreted utilizing NM NRCS Climate Summarizer spreadsheet.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 189 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 211 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 483 mm |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
This is an upland site, and is not associated with water features or wetlands. During heavy rain events, this site may receive run-on moisture from landforms above and contribute runoff to landforms below.
Soil features
The soils on this site are very deep and well-drained. The surface textures are loam, very fine sandy loam, silt loam, and silty clay loam. Subsurface textures are silt loam and silty clay loam. Permeability is moderate to slow and water-holding capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. These soils, once wetted, can store water for relatively long periods. Soil blowing hazard is moderate and water erosion hazard could be severe. Organic matter in the surface soil is significant for this area.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Silt loam (2) Loam (3) Fine sandy loam |
---|---|
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Very slow to moderate |
Soil depth | 152 – 183 cm |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0 – 15% |
Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
22.86 – 30.48 cm |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-101.6cm) |
6.6 – 7.8 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
0 – 25% |
Ecological dynamics
This site is associated with Limestone Hills, Very Shallow and Bottomland sites. The Swale site occurs along drainageways of intermittent streams, flanked by Limestone Hills or Very Shallow sites. This site receives and transports water from these higher upland sites to lower Bottomland sites. The aspect of this site is grassland with a few shrubs scattered throughout. production and composition can vary considerably with elevation. Dominant grasses of the historic plant community include blue grama, sideoats grama, tobosa, western wheatgrass, and vine mesquite. This site is subject to encroachment by woody species, such as juniper, littleleaf sumac, and Apache plume. Wind dispersal of Apache plume seed, and dispersal of juniper and littleleaf sumac fruits by birds and other wildlife may be important in facilitating the encroachment of these shrubs. Fire suppression may also contribute to shrub encroachment. This site is also susceptible to erosion caused by flood events, loss of grass cover, or a combination of the two.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
This state represents the most ecologically stable conditions in terms of resistance to erosion. Moreover, this state has the highest potential for productivity and plant diversity.
Community 1.1
Reference Plant Community
Grassland: Sideoats grama, blue grama, western wheatgrass, and vine mesquite are the dominant grasses at mid to higher elevations, with tobosa, blue grama, and vine mesquite dominant at lower to mid-elevations. Alkali sacaton, giant sacaton, silver and cane bluestem are also present across the range of elevations as sub-dominants in the historic community. Some of the shrubs characteristic of this site include sumac species, juniper species, Apache plume, fourwing saltbush, yucca, and catclaw acacia. Typically shrubs are confined to the margins of the swale. Under continuous heavy grazing, there will typically be a decrease in sideoats grama, western wheatgrass, vine mesquite, and fourwing saltbush. Blue grama can increase and become dominant at higher elevations, and tobosa may dominate at lower elevations. Threeawns, dropseeds, and mat muhly will also increase with heavy grazing. Transitions to a Grass/Shrub-Mix may occur in response to a lack of fire, or dispersal and successful establishment of shrub seed. Flood events and loss of grass cover can increase erosion and facilitate the transition to a gullied state. Diagnosis: Grass cover is uniform and evenly distributed. Sideoats grama, western wheatgrass, blue grama, or tobosa are the dominant grasses. Grass and litter cover are high and litter movement is limited to smaller size class litter and short distances (<1m), except following flood events. Shrub canopy cover is low averaging less than 5 percent. Other grasses, which would appear on this site, include: plains bristlegrass, green sprangletop, big bluestem, Indiangrass, switchgrass, Canadian wildrye, plains lovegrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, and wolftail. Other shrubs include: broom baccharis, desert willow, winterfat, tarbush, broom snakeweed, sumac spp., and juniper. Other forbs include: desert holly, blanket flower, threadleaf groundsel, cudweed, and mullin.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 1054 | 1401 | 1749 |
Forb | 45 | 56 | 67 |
Total | 1099 | 1457 | 1816 |
Table 6. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 0% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 0% |
Forb foliar cover | 0% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 30% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 8-12% |
Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM4604, R070DY154NM Swale Reference State. R070DY154NM Swale Reference State Mixed mid and tall grassland with scattered shrubs. .
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 25 | 30 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
State 2
Grass/Shrub-Mix
Community 2.1
Grass/Shrub-Mix
Additional States: Grass/Shrub-mix: This state is characterized by the notable increase of shrubs relative to the grassland state, especially juniper, littleleaf sumac, or Apacheplume. However, grasses remain dominant. Shrubs are no longer confined to the margins of the swale, instead tending to occur in motts scattered throughout the site. Sideoats grama-blue grama-juniper communities occur at mid to higher elevations, and tobosa- littleleaf sumac, and blue grama-Apache plume communities are more typical of lower to mid elevations. Grass cover on swale sites may remain relatively high for extended periods when associated with light to moderate densities of littleleaf sumac, Apache plume, or juniper species. Diagnosis: Shrubs are found at increased densities relative to the grassland state, especially juniper, littleleaf sumac, or Apacheplume. Grass cover is variable, ranging from uniformly distributed to patchy. Typically sideoats grama, blue grama or tobosa remain as the dominant grass species. Transition to Grass/Shrub-mix (1a) Fire suppression and seed dispersal are believed to facilitate the increase and encroachment of shrubs on Swale sites. Historically, fire may have kept shrubs in check by completely killing some species, disrupting seed production cycles, and/or suppressing the establishment of shrub seedlings.1 Wildlife (especially birds) are instrumental in the dispersal of littleleaf sumac and juniper seeds.2, 4 Apacheplume produces abundant feathery seed and the dispersal mechanism is mainly wind.3 Key indicators of approach to transition: Indicators are limited as transitions occur slowly over time and may only require seed dispersal mechanisms. Decrease or change in distribution or composition of grass cover. Increase in amount of shrub seedlings. Transition back to Grassland (1b) Brush control is necessary to initiate the transition back to the grassland state. Possibly, the reintroduction of fire as a management tool may assist in the transition back to the Grassland state, if adequate fuel loads remain. The effectiveness of fire varies by species. Oneseed juniper is susceptible to fire and generally considered a non-sprouting species. Alligator juniper, Pinchot juniper, littleleaf sumac, and Apache plume are reported to be tolerant of fire due to their ability to root sprout and may recover or increase following fire. Prescribed grazing will help ensure adequate rest following brush control and will assist in the establishment and maintenance of grass cover.
State 3
Gullied State
Community 3.1
Gullied State
Gullied State: Loss of grass cover, accelerated erosion, and gully formation characterize this state. Sideoats grama, blue grama, or tobosa are the dominant grass species. Shrub densities are the same as in the Grassland state if the transition is caused by major flood events. If the transition was from the Grass/Shrub-Mix to the Gullied state, then shrubs are found at increased densities, especially juniper, littleleaf sumac, or Apacheplume. Diagnosis: Grass cover is typically patchy with large bare areas present. Erosion is evident by the presence of water flow patterns, litter dams, rills, and gullies. Transition to Gullied State (2a,3) Transitions to the gullied state may occur in response to flood events, and/or loss of grass cover (on or off site), and subsequent erosion. As grass cover decreases, organic matter and surface soil stability decrease. 5,6 Erosion may occur due to increased water flow volume and rate, alongside decreased soil surface stability, and reduced infiltration. Key indicators of approach to transition: Reduction in grass cover (on site, or on surrounding uplands) and increase in size and frequency of bare patches.
Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | 90–628 | |||||
blue grama | BOGR2 | Bouteloua gracilis | 90–628 | – | ||
2 | 179–359 | |||||
sideoats grama | BOCU | Bouteloua curtipendula | 179–359 | – | ||
3 | 359–538 | |||||
tobosagrass | PLMU3 | Pleuraphis mutica | 359–538 | – | ||
4 | 179–359 | |||||
western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 179–359 | – | ||
5 | 179–359 | |||||
vine mesquite | PAOB | Panicum obtusum | 179–359 | – | ||
6 | 90–269 | |||||
cane bluestem | BOBA3 | Bothriochloa barbinodis | 90–269 | – | ||
silver bluestem | BOSA | Bothriochloa saccharoides | 90–269 | – | ||
7 | 179–269 | |||||
alkali sacaton | SPAI | Sporobolus airoides | 179–269 | – | ||
big sacaton | SPWR2 | Sporobolus wrightii | 179–269 | – | ||
8 | 54–90 | |||||
threeawn | ARIST | Aristida | 54–90 | – | ||
9 | 54–90 | |||||
dropseed | SPORO | Sporobolus | 54–90 | – | ||
10 | 90–179 | |||||
Hall's panicgrass | PAHA | Panicum hallii | 90–179 | – | ||
11 | 54–90 | |||||
mat muhly | MURI | Muhlenbergia richardsonis | 54–90 | – | ||
burrograss | SCBR2 | Scleropogon brevifolius | 54–90 | – | ||
12 | 54–90 | |||||
Graminoid (grass or grass-like) | 2GRAM | Graminoid (grass or grass-like) | 54–90 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
13 | 17–34 | |||||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 18–36 | – | ||
14 | 17–56 | |||||
sagebrush | ARTEM | Artemisia | 18–54 | – | ||
15 | 17–34 | |||||
verbena | VEPO4 | Verbena polystachya | 18–36 | – | ||
16 | 17–56 | |||||
Forb (herbaceous, not grass nor grass-like) | 2FORB | Forb (herbaceous, not grass nor grass-like) | 18–54 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
17 | 56–90 | |||||
fourwing saltbush | ATCA2 | Atriplex canescens | 54–90 | – | ||
18 | 56–90 | |||||
catclaw acacia | ACGR | Acacia greggii | 54–90 | – | ||
19 | 90–146 | |||||
Apache plume | FAPA | Fallugia paradoxa | 90–143 | – | ||
20 | 56–90 | |||||
yucca | YUCCA | Yucca | 54–90 | – | ||
21 | 56–90 | |||||
Shrub, deciduous | 2SD | Shrub, deciduous | 54–90 | – |
Table 8. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) |
---|
Interpretations
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Data collection for this site was done in conjunction with the progressive soil surveys within the Pecos-Canadian Plains and Valleys (MLRA 70) Major Land Resource Area of New Mexico. This site has been mapped and correlated with soils in the following soil surveys: Otero, Eddy, Chaves, Lincoln.
Other references
Data collection for this site was done in conjunction with the progressive soil surveys within the Pecos-Canadian Plains and Valleys 70 Major Land Resource Area of New Mexico. This site has been mapped and correlated with soils in the following soil surveys: Otero, Eddy, Chaves, Lincoln.
1. Brooks, M.L. and D.A. Pyke. 2001. Invasive plants and fire in the deserts of North America.Pages 1–14 in K.E.M. Galley and T.P. Wilson (eds.). Proceedings of the Invasive Species Workshop: the Role of Fire in the Control and Spread of Invasive Species.
2. Brinkman, K. A., 1974. Rhus L. sumac. In: Schopmeyer, C. S., technical coordinator. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Agric. Handb. 450. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 715-719.
3. Deitschman, G.H., K. R. Jorgensen, and A. P. Plummer. 1974. Fallugia paradoxa (Don) Endel. Apache-plume. Agricultural Handbook 450. Washington D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture. 3 p.
4. Phillips, Frank J. 1910. The dissemination of junipers by birds. Forestry Quarterly. 8: 60-73. (From Expt. Sta. Rec. 22: 644.)
5. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2001. Soil Quality Information Sheet. Rangeland Soil Quality—Aggregate Stability. Rangeland Sheet 3, [Online]. Available: http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/survey/SQI/range.html
6. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2001. Soil Quality Information Sheet. Rangeland Soil Quality—Organic Matter. Rangeland Sheet 6, [Online]. Available: http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/survey/SQI/range.html
Characteristic Soils Are:
Dev, Gabaldon, Pima, Shanta
Contributors
David Trujillo
Don Sylvester
Elizabeth Wright
John Tunberg
Approval
Kendra Moseley, 10/21/2024
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | 11/21/2024 |
Approved by | Kendra Moseley |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.