Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Ecological site R042CY159NM

Shallow Loamy

Last updated: 10/21/2024
Accessed: 12/22/2024

Home / Esd catalog / MLRA 042C / Ecological site R042CY159NM

USC

Metric

General information

Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.

Click to explore map

Figure 1. Mapped extent

Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.

Ecological site concept

This site occurs on gently sloping to moderately sloping plains and terraces. Slopes range from 0 to 9 percent but average less than 5 percent.
The soils on this site well-drained and shallow to moderately deep. Surface textures are loams and cobbly loams. Soil depth is from 15 to 30 inches, but averages 20 inches over indurated caliche.

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Tree	Not specified
Shrub	Not specified
Herbaceous	(1) Bouteloua eriopoda (2) Bouteloua gracilis

Download full description

Physiographic features

This site occurs on gently sloping to moderately sloping plains and terraces. Slopes range from 0 to 9 percent but average less than 5 percent. Direction of slope varies and is not significant. Elevations range from 4,000 to 7,000 feet.

Table 2. Representative physiographic features

Landforms	(1) Plain (2) Terrace
Flooding frequency	None
Elevation	1,219 – 2,134 m
Slope	0 – 9%
Aspect	Aspect is not a significant factor

Climatic features

The climate of this area is “semi-arid continental.”

Annual average precipitation ranges from 11 to 19 inches. Variations of 5 inches, more or less, are not uncommon. Approximately 70 percent of this occurs from May through October. Most of the summer rain comes in the form of high-intensity, short-duration thunderstorms. Winter moisture is usually negligible.

Temperatures are characterized by distinct seasonal changes and large annual and diurnal temperature changes. The average annual temperature ranges from 55 degrees to 60 degrees, with extremes of 20 degrees below zero in the winter to 110 degrees in the summer not uncommon.

The average frost-free season is 170 to 189 days. The last killing frost being in early April and the first killing frost in mid-October.

Both temperature and precipitation favor warm-season perennial plant growth. However, sufficient late winter and early spring moisture allows cool season species to occupy a minor component within the plant community. Due to the depth of the soil, vegetation responds well to light rains. However, there is also enough depth to allow for some water storage. Strong winds from the west and southwest blow during February to June. This speeds up soil drying during a critical period for cool season plant growth.

Climate data was obtained from http://www.wrcc.sage.dri.edu/summary/climsmnm.html web site.
Data interpreted utilizing NM NRCS Climate Summarizer spreadsheet.

Table 3. Representative climatic features

Frost-free period (average)	189 days
Freeze-free period (average)	211 days
Precipitation total (average)	483 mm

Bar

Line

Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range

Bar

Line

Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature

Soil features

The soils on this site are moderately deep, well drained, loams and cobbly loams. Soil depth is from 15 to 30 inches, but average 20 inches in depth over indurated caliche. Permeability is moderate and water holding capacity is moderate. Wind and water erosion hazard can be severe.

Characteristic Soils are:
Petrocalcic Calciustolls, fine-loamy, mixed mesic
Ustallic Paleorthid, fine loamy, mixed thermic

Table 4. Representative soil features

Surface texture	(1) Loam (2) Cobbly loam
Drainage class	Well drained
Permeability class	Moderately slow to moderate
Soil depth	38 – 76 cm
Surface fragment cover <=3"	0 – 10%
Surface fragment cover >3"	0 – 15%

Ecological dynamics

MLRA-70, CP-4: Shallow Loamy

Overview
This site occurs in association with Shallow sites. The Shallow sites occur in repeating patterns of low elongated ridges adjacent to the Shallow Loamy site. The loamy textured soils and shallow depth to a petrocalcic horizon help to make this one of the most stable sites in the CP-4 resource unit. The loamy soils provide a favorable environment for grass production, and the petrocalcic horizon helps to store water and keep it perched and available to shallow rooted grasses.4 The historic plant community of the Shallow Loamy site has a grassland aspect with a fair amount of shrubs scattered across the site. Black grama and blue grama are the dominant grass species. Dispersal of littleleaf sumac fruits by birds and other wildlife may be important in the encroachment of this shrub.2 Overgrazing can reduce grass cover, effect a change in grass species dominance, and may facilitate the spread of shrubs. If fire was a natural component in the development of the historic plant community, then fire suppression may facilitate shrub increase.

State and transition model

Custom diagram

Standard diagram

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text

State 1
Grassland

This state represents the most ecologically stable conditions in terms of resistance to erosion. Moreover, this state has the highest potential for productivity and plant diversity.

Community 1.1
Grassland

Grassland: Black grama and blue grama are co-dominants and together can comprise up to 70 percent of the total annual production of grasses. Other high percentage grasses common to this site include sideoats grama and tobosa. Tobosa is more common on areas with relatively deeper soils and in depressions, while higher densities of sideoats grama tend to occur on the shallower soils of the site. Some of the shrubs that occur on this site include algerita, yucca species, fourwing saltbush, ephedra, cholla, pricklypear, creosotebush, broom snakeweed and juniper. If this site is overgrazed, there will be a decrease in black grama, sideoats grama, vine mesquite, fourwing saltbush, and winterfat. Species such as threeawns, burrograss, mat muhly, dropseeds, and broom snakeweed will increase in representation. The continued loss of grass cover and increases in bare patch size may facilitate the encroachment of shrubs. Diagnosis: Grass cover is uniform and evenly distributed, averaging 48 percent canopy cover. Black grama and blue grama are co-dominants. Slopes average less than 5 percent and litter movement is limited to smaller size class litter and short distances (

Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)

Table 5. Annual production by plant type

Plant type	Low (kg/hectare)	Representative value (kg/hectare)	High (kg/hectare)
Grass/Grasslike	824	841	942
Shrub/Vine	118	151	177
Forb	56	84	118
Total	998	1076	1237

Table 6. Ground cover

Tree foliar cover	0-5%
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover	0-5%
Grass/grasslike foliar cover	25-45%
Forb foliar cover	3-8%
Non-vascular plants	0%
Biological crusts	0%
Litter	15-40%
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3"	0%
Surface fragments >3"	0%
Bedrock	0%
Water	0%
Bare ground	15-27%

Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM4609, R070DY159NM Shallow Loamy Reference State. R070DY159NM Shallow Loamy Reference State.

Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
J	F	M	A	M	J	J	A	S	O	N	D
0	2	5	8	10	10	25	30	7	3	0	0

State 2
Grass/Shrub-Mix

This state is characterized by mix of grasses and shrubs.

Community 2.1
Grass/Shrub-Mix

Grass/Shrub-mix: This state is characterized by the notable presence of shrubs, especially creosotebush, littleleaf sumac, and broom snakeweed. However, grasses remain dominant. Black grama and blue grama typically remain as the dominant grass species, with threeawns as sub-dominant. The susceptibility of the Shallow Loamy site to encroachment by creosotebush may be higher when located adjacent to other sites with high densities of creosotebush. Diagnosis: Black grama and blue grama remain as the dominant grass species. Grass cover varies inversely with shrub density, ranging from uniform to patchy. Shrubs are found at increased densities relative to the grassland state, especially creosotebush, littleleaf sumac, or broom snakeweed. Transition to Grass/Shrub-mix (1a) Historically, fire may have kept creosotebush and other shrubs in check by completely killing some species, disrupting seed production cycles, and/or suppressing the establishment of shrub seedlings. Fire suppression combined with seed dispersal by birds and mammals are believed to be the factors responsible for the establishment and increase in shrubs.1 Loss of grass cover due to overgrazing, combined with prolonged periods of drought, increases the susceptibility of the site to shrub establishment. 3 Key indicators of approach to transition: Decrease or change in composition or distribution of grass cover. Increase in size and frequency of bare patches. Increase in amount of shrub seedlings. Transition back to Grassland (1b Brush control is necessary to initiate the transition back to the grassland state. If adequate fuel loads remain, possibly the reintroduction of fire as a management tool will assist in the transition, however, mixed results have been observed concerning the effects of fire on black grama grasslands.5 Littleleaf sumac is reported to be tolerant of fire due to its ability to root sprout, and fire may increase the germination rate of seeds stored in the soil.6 Prescribed grazing will help ensure adequate rest following brush control and will assist in the establishment and maintenance of grass cover capable of sustaining fire.

Additional community tables

Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition

Group	Common name	Symbol	Scientific name	Annual production (kg/hectare)	Foliar cover (%)
Grass/Grasslike
1				118–415
	blue grama	BOGR2	Bouteloua gracilis	118–412	–
2				118–415
	black grama	BOER4	Bouteloua eriopoda	118–412	–
3				62–118
	sideoats grama	BOCU	Bouteloua curtipendula	59–118	–
4				62–95
	ring muhly	MUTO2	Muhlenbergia torreyi	59–94	–
	burrograss	SCBR2	Scleropogon brevifolius	59–94	–
5				22–62
	vine mesquite	PAOB	Panicum obtusum	24–59	–
6				118–235
	tobosagrass	PLMU3	Pleuraphis mutica	118–235	–
7				11–62
	dropseed	SPORO	Sporobolus	11–59	–
8				34–95
	threeawn	ARIST	Aristida	36–94	–
9				34–95
	Hall's panicgrass	PAHA	Panicum hallii	36–94	–
10				11–34
	common wolfstail	LYPH	Lycurus phleoides	11–36	–
	tridens	TRIDE	Tridens	11–36	–
11	Other Grasses			62–118
	littleawn needlegrass	ACLO7	Achnatherum lobatum	59–118	–
	silver bluestem	BOSA	Bothriochloa saccharoides	59–118	–
	squirreltail	ELELE	Elymus elymoides ssp. elymoides	59–118	–
	plains lovegrass	ERIN	Eragrostis intermedia	59–118	–
	New Mexico feathergrass	HENE5	Hesperostipa neomexicana	59–118	–
	green sprangletop	LEDU	Leptochloa dubia	59–118	–
	curlyleaf muhly	MUSE	Muhlenbergia setifolia	59–118	–
	western wheatgrass	PASM	Pascopyrum smithii	59–118	–
	little bluestem	SCSC	Schizachyrium scoparium	59–118	–
	plains bristlegrass	SEVU2	Setaria vulpiseta	59–118	–
Shrub/Vine
12				22–84
	algerita	MATR3	Mahonia trifoliolata	24–83	–
13				22–62
	yucca	YUCCA	Yucca	24–59	–
14				22–62
	fourwing saltbush	ATCA2	Atriplex canescens	24–59	–
15				11–34
	tree cholla	CYIMI	Cylindropuntia imbricata var. imbricata	11–36	–
	jointfir	EPHED	Ephedra	11–36	–
16				11–34
	sumac	RHUS	Rhus	11–36	–
17				11–34
	winterfat	KRLA2	Krascheninnikovia lanata	11–36	–
18				11–34
	catclaw mimosa	MIACB	Mimosa aculeaticarpa var. biuncifera	11–36	–
19				11–34
	broom snakeweed	GUSA2	Gutierrezia sarothrae	11–36	–
20	Other Shrubs/Trees			11–62
	Bigelow sage	ARBI3	Artemisia bigelovii	11–59	–
	yerba de pasmo	BAPT	Baccharis pteronioides	11–59	–
	prairie clover	DALEA	Dalea	11–59	–
	Apache plume	FAPA	Fallugia paradoxa	11–59	–
	oneseed juniper	JUMO	Juniperus monosperma	11–59	–
	creosote bush	LATR2	Larrea tridentata	11–59	–
	pale desert-thorn	LYPA	Lycium pallidum	11–59	–
	twoneedle pinyon	PIED	Pinus edulis	11–59	–
	oak	QUERC	Quercus	11–59	–
Forb
21				11–34
	pricklyleaf dogweed	THAC	Thymophylla acerosa	11–36	–
22				11–22
	woolly groundsel	PACA15	Packera cana	11–24	–
23				11–22
	Goodding's tansyaster	MAPIG2	Machaeranthera pinnatifida ssp. gooddingii var. gooddingii	11–24	–
24				11–22
	croton	CROTO	Croton	11–24	–
25	Other Forbs			62–95
	dwarf desertpeony	ACNA2	Acourtia nana	11–36	–
	tarragon	ARDR4	Artemisia dracunculus	11–36	–
	woolly locoweed	ASMO7	Astragalus mollissimus	11–36	–
	cudweed	GNAPH	Gnaphalium	11–36	–
	woolly plantain	PLPA2	Plantago patagonica	11–36	–
	threadleaf ragwort	SEFL3	Senecio flaccidus	11–36	–
	globemallow	SPHAE	Sphaeralcea	11–36	–
	common mullein	VETH	Verbascum thapsus	11–36	–

Supporting information

Inventory data references

Data collection for this site was done in
conjunction with the progressive soil surveys
within the Pecos-Canadian Plains and Valleys Major Land Resource Area of New Mexico (MLRA 70).

This site has been mapped and correlated with soils in the following soil surveys:
Otero, Eddy, Chaves, Lincoln

Other references

References

1. Brooks, M.L. and D.A. Pyke. 2001. Invasive plants and fire in the deserts of North
America.Pages 1–14 in K.E.M. Galley and T.P. Wilson (eds.). Proceedings of the Invasive Species Workshop: the Role of Fire in the Control and Spread of Invasive Species.

2. Brinkman, K. A., 1974. Rhus L. sumac. In: Schopmeyer, C. S., technical coordinator. Seeds of
woody plants in the United States. Agric. Handb. 450. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 715-719.

3. Buffington, L.C., and C.H. Herbel. 1965. Vegetational changes on a semidesert grassland
range from 1858 to 1963. Ecol. Monog. 35: 139-164.

4. Hennessy, J.T., R.P. Gibbens, J.M. Tromble, and M. Cardenas. 1983. Water properties of
caliche. J. Range Manage. 36: 723-726.

5. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory (2002, September). Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [accessed 5/12/03]. Report: Black grama; Fire Effects

6. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory (2002, September). Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [accessed 5/12/03]. Report: Littleleaf sumac; Fire Effects

Contributors

David Trujillo
Don Sylvester
John Tunberg

Approval

Kendra Moseley, 10/21/2024

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)
Contact for lead author
Date	12/22/2024
Approved by	Kendra Moseley
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production

Indicators

Number and extent of rills:
Presence of water flow patterns:
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):

Dominant:

Sub-dominant:

Other:

Additional:
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial plant reproductive capability:

Download reference sheet

Search

Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Ecological site R042CY159NM

Shallow Loamy

Last updated: 10/21/2024 Accessed: 12/22/2024

General information

Figure 1. Mapped extent

Ecological site concept

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Ecosystem states

State 1 submodel, plant communities

State 2 submodel, plant communities

Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Last updated: 10/21/2024
Accessed: 12/22/2024