Shallow (Sw) 10-14" p.z.
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
-
Transition T1A
Extended drought (greater than 7 years), non-prescribed grazing, no fire
More details -
Restoration pathway R2A
Prescribed grazing with favorable precipitation, fire if enough fuel
More details -
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Submodel
Mechanism
Extended drought (greater than 7 years), non-prescribed grazing, no fire
Transitions from State 1 (Plant Community B) to State 2 occur under prolonged, heavy continuous grazing. Prolonged drought exacerbates the retrogression, and lack of the natural fire regime also facilitates the transition.
Mechanism
Prescribed grazing with favorable precipitation, fire (natural interval 10 to 12 years) if enough fuel
This plant community (State 2) is resistant to change. Blue grama and clubmoss form a thick sod which provides a competitive advantage for limited precipitation. Although the sod appears to prevent seedling establishment of high-successional species, recent research indicates the absence of seedlings within a mat of clubmoss is due to an inadequate seed bank in the soil (Romo and Bai 2004). When clubmoss cover is more than 20-25%, succession is not expected to occur within a reasonable length of time. However, significant succession may occur if the top soil is intact and if clubmoss is no more than a minor component of the plant community. Succession would be favored by prescribed grazing, an extended period of favorable precipitation and the re-implementation of the natural fire regime. The potential for succession is depicted by the dashed line in the diagram.
Significant economic inputs and time are required to move this plant community toward a higher successional state (those communities found in State #1) when the plant community is dominated by clubmoss, or if the soil surface has been lost to erosion. Production on a Shallow 10-14” p.z. ecological site is 40-50% less than it is on ecological sites with soils > 20 inches deep (eg, Silty 10-14” p.z., Clayey 10-14” p.z., and Sandy 10-14” p.z.). The lower response potential from mechanical treatment has a proportionate effect on the potential economic benefits. Therefore, mechanical treatments and range seeding are not normally recommended on shallow sites. In comparison to “normal” sites, environmental risks (such as erosion) are greater while economic benefits are less.
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.