Saline Lowland (SLL)
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
-
Transition T1A
Introduction of non-native invasive species such as introduced forbs, or noxious weeds.
More details -
Transition T2A
Improper grazing, hydrologic alteration, or a combination of these factors
More details -
Transition T2B
Displacement of native species by non-native invasive species (introduced forbs, noxious weeds, etc.)
More details -
Transition T2C
Conversion to cropland
More details -
Restoration pathway R3A
Range seeding, grazing land mechanical treatment, timely moisture, proper grazing management (management intensive and costly)
More details -
Transition T3B
Conversion to cropland
More details -
Transition T4A
Conversion to cropland
More details -
Transition T5A
Cessation of annual cropping
More details -
Transition T6A
Conversion to cropland
More details -
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
The Historic Reference State (1) contains one community phase characterized by mid-statured rhizomatous wheatgrasses and sodium tolerant bunchgrasses. This state is considered extinct and is included here for historical reference purposes. It evolved under the combined influences of climate, grazing, and fire, with climatic variation having the greatest influence on cover and production. In general, this state was resilient to grazing; however, localized areas likely received heavy grazing, which resulted in the species composition shifting to short-statured species. Fire most likely resulted in short-term shifts in species composition to more warm-season grasses such as blue grama and fewer cool-season bunchgrasses.
Submodel
Description
The Contemporary Reference State (2) contains two community phases characterized by mid-statured rhizomatous wheatgrasses, sodium tolerant bunchgrasses, and, in some areas, mid-statured, warm-season grasses. It evolved under the combined influences of climate, grazing, and fire, with climatic variation having the greatest influence on cover and production. This state differs from the historical reference state in that it is influenced by introduced plant species and has altered fire and grazing regimes. In general, this state is resilient to grazing and fire, although these factors can influence species composition in localized areas.
Submodel
Description
The Altered State (3) consists of one community phase. The dynamics of this state are driven by improper grazing management, hydrologic alteration, or a combination of these factors. Foxtail barley and unpalatable forbs increase at the expense of rhizomatous grasses. Hydrologic alterations that raise the water table may also cause a decline in rhizomatous grasses and an increase in foxtail barley. Proper grazing management or hydrologic restoration can reduce foxtail barley cover and increase the cover of rhizomatous wheatgrasses. This recovery may take decades, especially if soil properties are substantially altered.
Submodel
Description
The Invaded State (4) occurs when invasive plant species invade adjacent native grassland communities and displace the native species. Data suggest that native species diversity declines significantly when invasive species exceed 30 percent of the plant community. Invasive species dynamics on this site are not well understood, but potential invasive species on this site are curly dock, knotweed, and kochia.
Noxious weeds such as leafy spurge and Canada thistle are not widespread in MLRA 53A, but they can be a concern in localized areas. These species are very aggressive perennials. They typically displace native species and dominate ecological function when they invade a site. In some cases, these species can be suppressed through intensive management (herbicide application, biological control, or intensive grazing management). Control efforts are unlikely to eliminate noxious weeds, but their density can be sufficiently suppressed so that species composition and structural complexity are similar to that of the Contemporary Reference State (2). However, cessation of control methods will most likely result in recolonization of the site by the noxious species.
Submodel
Description
The Cropland State (5) occurs when land is put into cultivation. This site is poorly suited to crops; however, many acres are cultivated despite its limitations. Occasionally, cereal grains such wheat, and barley are attempted, but this site is poorly suited to such crops and cereal grain production is generally unsuccessful. Most frequently, the site is planted to non-native perennial species for production of hay.
Submodel
Description
The Post-Cropland State (6) occurs when cultivated cropland is abandoned and allowed to either revegetate naturally or is seeded back to perennial species for grazing or wildlife use. This state can transition back to the Cropland State (5) if the site is put back into cultivation.
Submodel
Mechanism
Introduction of non-native grass species occurred in the early 20th century. The naturalization of these species in relatively undisturbed grasslands, coupled with changes in fire and grazing regimes, transitions the Reference State (1) to the Contemporary Reference State (2).
Mechanism
Improper grazing practices, hydrologic alteration, or a combination of these factors weaken the resilience of the Contemporary Reference State (2) and drive its transition to the Altered State (3).
Mechanism
The Contemporary Reference State (2) transitions to the Invaded State (4) when aggressive introduced species or noxious weeds displace native species. The most common concerns on this site are introduced forbs such as curly dock and noxious weeds. The precise triggers of this transition are not clear and further investigation is needed. In addition, other rangeland health attributes, such as reproductive capacity of native grasses and soil quality, have been substantially altered.
Mechanism
Tillage or application of herbicide followed by seeding of cultivated crops such as wheat, barley or introduced hay, transitions the Contemporary Reference State (2) to the Cropland State (5).
Mechanism
A reduction in livestock grazing pressure alone may not be sufficient to restore the Altered State (3) to the Contemporary Reference State (2). Practices such as range seeding (Hart et al., 1985) or restoration of the natural hydrology may be necessary, but these are management intensive and costly. Therefore, returning the Altered State (3) to the Contemporary Reference State (2) can require considerable energy and cost and may not be feasible within a reasonable amount of time.
Relevant conservation practices
| Practice | External resources |
|---|---|
|
Prescribed Grazing |
|
|
Grazing Land Mechanical Treatment |
|
|
Range Planting |
Mechanism
Tillage or application of herbicide followed by seeding of cultivated crops such as wheat, barley or introduced hay, transitions the Altered State (3) to the Cropland State (5).
Mechanism
Tillage or application of herbicide followed by seeding of cultivated crops such as wheat, barley or introduced hay, transitions the Invaded State (4) to the Cropland State (5).
Mechanism
The transition from the Cropland State (5) to the Post-Cropland State (6) occurs with the cessation of cultivation. The site may also be seeded to perennial forage species. Such seedings may be comprised of introduced grasses and legumes, or a mix of native species.
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase (
) icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.