Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R058AC614MT
Coarse Clay (CC) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z.
Last updated: 6/14/2023
Accessed: 11/21/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Associated sites
| R058AC041MT |
Clayey (Cy) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. |
|---|---|
| R058AC052MT |
Shale (Sh) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. |
| R058AC059MT |
Shallow Clay (SwC) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. |
Similar sites
| R058AC052MT |
Shale (Sh) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. The Shale site differs by being very sparse and low producing, and having a much different plant community. |
|---|---|
| R058AC059MT |
Shallow Clay (SwC) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. The Shallow Clay site differs by having a different plant community. |
| R058AC042MT |
Sandy (Sy) RRU 58A-C 11-14" p.z. The Sandy site often has a somewhat similar plant community, but is much more productive, and occurs on sandy soils instead of shales. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
| Tree |
Not specified |
|---|---|
| Shrub |
(1) Eriogonum microthecum |
| Herbaceous |
(1) Calamovilfa longifolia |
Physiographic features
This site is associated with hard, acidic shales that act like sand (dunes can occur). Outcroppings of the shales are common.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
| Landforms |
(1)
Plain
(2) Hill |
|---|---|
| Flooding frequency | None |
| Ponding frequency | None |
| Elevation | 686 – 1,372 m |
| Slope | 0 – 8% |
| Ponding depth | 0 cm |
| Water table depth | 152 cm |
| Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 58AC in Montana is considered to have a continental climate characterized by cold winters, hot summers, low humidity, light rainfall, and much sunshine. Extremes in temperature are typical. The climate is the result of this MLRA’s location in the geographic center of North America. There are few natural barriers on the northern Great Plains and the winds move freely across the plains and account for rapid changes in temperature. Seasonal precipitation is often limiting for plant growth. Annual fluctuations in species composition and total production are typical depending on the amount and timing of rainfall.
Temperatures can be very extreme in this part of Montana. Summer daytime temperatures are typically quite warm, generally averaging in the mid to upper 80º’s F for July and August. Summertime temperatures will typically reach in the 100º’s F at some point during the summer, and can reach 90º F any month between May and September. Conversely, winter temperatures can be cold, averaging in the mid teens to mid 20º’s F for December and January. There will typically be several days of below zero temperatures each winter. It is not uncommon for temperatures to reach 30–40º F below zero, or even colder, most any winter.
Spring can be windy throughout this MLRA, with winds averaging over 10 mph about 15 percent of the time. Speeds of 50 mph or stronger can occasionally occur as a weather system crosses this part of Montana.
The majority of the rangeland in MLRA 58AC is within the 11 to 14 inch Mean Annual Precipitation (MAP) range. During an average year, 70 to 75 percent of the annual precipitation falls between April and September, which are the primary growing season months.
Snowfall is not heavy in the area, averaging 28 total inches in the Yellowstone Valley. Heavy snowfall occurs infrequently, usually late in the winter or early spring. Snow cover is typically 1 to 3 inches.
The frost-free (32º F.) season averages about 105 to 145 days each year in the uplands, to nearly 170 days along the Yellowstone River Valley.
For local climate station information, refer to http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/cgibin/state.pl?state=mt.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
| Frost-free period (average) | 135 days |
|---|---|
| Freeze-free period (average) | 155 days |
| Precipitation total (average) | 356 mm |
Influencing water features
Soil features
Silt clay loam, silty clay, or clay, to a depth of 40 inches. They are often dark colored due to the color of the shale parent material. There may be up to 60% shale fragments in the upper part of the soil. The characteristics of the shales cause these soils to respond similar to Sands, and have a similar plant community composition. However, they are significantly less productive.
Available water holding capacity to 40 inches is less than 4 inches. Reaction (pH) (1:1 water): extremely acid to slightly acid (3.5 –6.5) mainly because of sodium sulfate.
Table 4. Representative soil features
| Surface texture |
(1) Silty clay loam (2) Silty clay (3) Clay |
|---|---|
| Soil depth | 51 – 102 cm |
| Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0 – 5% |
| Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
0 – 10.16 cm |
| Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-101.6cm) |
3.5 – 6.5 |
Ecological dynamics
The following are descriptions of several plant communities that may occupy this site:
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Tall and Medium Grasses/ Forbs/ Shrubs (HCPC)
Community 1.1
Tall and Medium Grasses/ Forbs/ Shrubs (HCPC)
Figure 2. 58AC Coarse Clay 11-14" MAP Plant Community 1
The physical aspect of this site is that of sparse grassland or savannah dominated by warm-season grasses with scattered Ponderosa pine, and/or Rocky Mountain juniper in some locations. Approximately 70–80% of the annual production is from grasses and sedges, 5–10% from forbs, and 15–20% is from shrubs and half-shrubs. This plant community is dominated by species that also commonly occur on a sandy site. Warm season grasses (prairie sandreed) are a major component. Cool season species such as bluebunch wheatgrass, needleandthread, Indian ricegrass, sun sedge, and thickspike/western wheatgrass are the major sub-dominants. Few forbs occur in small amounts. A number of shrubs occur in small percentages, including longleaf sagebrush, prairie rose, yucca, rubber rabbitbrush, and Wyoming big sagebrush. This plant community is well adapted to the Northern Great Plains climatic conditions. The diversity in plant species and presence of tall, deep-rooted perennial grasses allows for drought tolerance. Plants on this site have strong, healthy root systems that allow production to increase significantly with favorable moisture conditions. Abundant plant litter is available for soil building and moisture retention. Plant litter is properly distributed with very little movement off-site and natural plant mortality is very low. This plant community provides for soil stability and a functioning hydrologic cycle.
Figure 3. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
| Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grass/Grasslike | 409 | 538 | 717 |
| Shrub/Vine | 90 | 135 | 157 |
| Forb | 34 | 67 | 78 |
| Total | 533 | 740 | 952 |
Table 6. Ground cover
| Tree foliar cover | 0-10% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 5-10% |
| Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 30-50% |
| Forb foliar cover | 1-5% |
| Non-vascular plants | 0% |
| Biological crusts | 0% |
| Litter | 0% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 0% |
Table 7. Soil surface cover
| Tree basal cover | 0-1% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0-1% |
| Grass/grasslike basal cover | 3-7% |
| Forb basal cover | 1-2% |
| Non-vascular plants | 0% |
| Biological crusts | 0-1% |
| Litter | 15-25% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-5% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 60-80% |
Table 8. Canopy structure (% cover)
| Height Above Ground (m) | Tree | Shrub/Vine | Grass/ Grasslike |
Forb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <0.15 | – | – | – | – |
| >0.15 <= 0.3 | – | – | – | – |
| >0.3 <= 0.6 | – | 5-10% | 30-50% | 1-5% |
| >0.6 <= 1.4 | – | – | – | – |
| >1.4 <= 4 | – | – | – | – |
| >4 <= 12 | 0-10% | – | – | – |
| >12 <= 24 | – | – | – | – |
| >24 <= 37 | – | – | – | – |
| >37 | – | – | – | – |
State 2
Medium and Short Grasses and Sedges/ Shrubs and Half-shrubs
Community 2.1
Medium and Short Grasses and Sedges/ Shrubs and Half-shrubs
This community occurs due to minor climate shifts or slight variations in soils and/or topography or disturbance, including non-prescribed grazing. Dominants include medium and short grasses and sedges such as thickspike/western wheatgrass, needleandthread, prairie junegrass, and threadleaf sedge. Most of the taller and more palatable grasses (prairie sandreed, bluebunch wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass) will still be present but in smaller amounts. Shrubs and half-shrubs such as Wyoming big sagebrush, longleaf sage, slenderbush eriogonum, yucca, and Rocky Mountain juniper become more common. Palatable and nutritious forbs will begin to be replaced by less desirable and more aggressive species such as prairie thermopsis and green sagewort. Grass biomass production and litter become reduced on Community 2 as the taller grasses become less prevalent, increasing evaporation and reducing moisture retention. Additional open space in the community can result in undesirable invader species. These plant communities provide for moderate soil stability.
State 3
Shrubs, Short Grasses
Community 3.1
Shrubs, Short Grasses
This is a disturbance induced community, with dominants including shrubs, short grasses and sedges such as Rocky Mountain juniper, Wyoming big sagebrush, longleaf sage, yucca, slenderbush eriogonum, prairie rose, threadleaf sedge, perennial forbs, and prairie junegrass. Undesirable species such as red or Fendler’s threeawn can become more abundant. There may still be remnant amounts of some of the late and mid-seral species such as prairie sandreed, bluebunch wheatgrass, thickspike/ western wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass, and needleandthread present, usually underneath the shrubs. Palatable forbs will be mostly absent. Broom snakeweed and plains pricklypear may begin to become common.
State 4
Trees and Large Shrubs
Community 4.1
Trees and Large Shrubs
In the absence of fire, probably coupled with continual adverse disturbances, this community can shift to one that is nearly all Rocky Mountain juniper and/or ponderosa pine. There is typically very little understory vegetation in this situation, primarily because of the droughty nature of the soils. The understory that is present is typically comprised of species such as broom snakeweed, annual grasses plus a few remnant species such as threadleaf sedge, needleandthread, thickspike/western wheatgrass, and prairie junegrass. (When the canopy cover of trees exceeds 10 percent, the forested guide "Ponderosa Pine Series, Dry Environment" should be used.) Plant Communities 3 and 4 are much less productive than Plant Communities 1 or 2, and have lost many of the attributes of a healthy rangeland. The loss of deep perennial root systems reduces total available moisture for plant growth. Reduction of plant litter will result in higher surface soil temperatures and increased evaporation losses. Annual species are often aggressive and competitive with seedlings of perennial plants. This community can respond positively to improved grazing management but it will take additional inputs to move it towards a community similar in production and composition to that of Plant Community 1 or 2. The landscape features often associated with this ecological site as well as the droughty nature of the soils severely limits the use of most common str
Additional community tables
Table 9. Community 1.1 plant community composition
| Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
| 1 | Native grasses and sedges | 370–667 | ||||
| prairie sandreed | CALO | Calamovilfa longifolia | 163–476 | – | ||
| sun sedge | CAINH2 | Carex inops ssp. heliophila | 50–140 | – | ||
| bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 50–140 | – | ||
| tufted wheatgrass | ELMA7 | Elymus macrourus | 28–95 | – | ||
| needle and thread | HECOC8 | Hesperostipa comata ssp. comata | 0–95 | – | ||
| western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 28–95 | – | ||
| little bluestem | SCSCS | Schizachyrium scoparium var. scoparium | 0–45 | – | ||
| 2 | Native grasses and sedges | 6–95 | ||||
| Grass, perennial | 2GP | Grass, perennial | 6–45 | – | ||
| Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 6–45 | – | ||
| threadleaf sedge | CAFI | Carex filifolia | 6–45 | – | ||
| plains reedgrass | CAMO | Calamagrostis montanensis | 6–45 | – | ||
| prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 6–45 | – | ||
| Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 6–45 | – | ||
| 3 | Native grasses | 0–1 | ||||
| Fendler's threeawn | ARPUF | Aristida purpurea var. fendleriana | 0–1 | – | ||
|
Forb
|
||||||
| 4 | Native forbs | 28–95 | ||||
| Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 6–45 | – | ||
| common yarrow | ACMI2 | Achillea millefolium | 6–45 | – | ||
| tarragon | ARDR4 | Artemisia dracunculus | 6–45 | – | ||
| milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 6–45 | – | ||
| bastard toadflax | COUM | Comandra umbellata | 6–45 | – | ||
| buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 6–45 | – | ||
| hairy false goldenaster | HEVI4 | Heterotheca villosa | 6–45 | – | ||
| dotted blazing star | LIPU | Liatris punctata | 6–45 | – | ||
| desertparsley | LOMAT | Lomatium | 6–45 | – | ||
| spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 6–45 | – | ||
| scurfpea | PSORA2 | Psoralidium | 6–45 | – | ||
| Missouri goldenrod | SOMI2 | Solidago missouriensis | 6–45 | – | ||
| prairie thermopsis | THRH | Thermopsis rhombifolia | 6–45 | – | ||
| American vetch | VIAM | Vicia americana | 6–45 | – | ||
|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
| 5 | Native shrubs and half-shrubs | 78–191 | ||||
| Shrub, broadleaf | 2SB | Shrub, broadleaf | 6–45 | – | ||
| longleaf wormwood | ARLO7 | Artemisia longifolia | 6–45 | – | ||
| Wyoming big sagebrush | ARTRW8 | Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis | 6–45 | – | ||
| slender buckwheat | ERMI4 | Eriogonum microthecum | 6–45 | – | ||
| rubber rabbitbrush | ERNAN5 | Ericameria nauseosa ssp. nauseosa var. nauseosa | 6–45 | – | ||
| creeping juniper | JUHO2 | Juniperus horizontalis | 6–45 | – | ||
| skunkbush sumac | RHTR | Rhus trilobata | 6–45 | – | ||
| prairie rose | ROAR3 | Rosa arkansana | 6–45 | – | ||
| soapweed yucca | YUGL | Yucca glauca | 6–45 | – | ||
| 6 | Native shrubs and half-shrubs | 0–1 | ||||
| broom snakeweed | GUSA2 | Gutierrezia sarothrae | 0–1 | – | ||
| plains pricklypear | OPPO | Opuntia polyacantha | 0–1 | – | ||
Interpretations
Animal community
Livestock Grazing Interpretations:
Managed livestock grazing is suitable on this site as it has the potential to produce high quality forage. However, forage production can be severely limited by the soil properties. Management objectives should include maintenance or improvement of the plant community. Shorter grazing periods and adequate re-growth after grazing are recommended for plant maintenance and recovery. Heavy stocking and season-long use of this site can be detrimental and will alter the plant community composition and production over time.
Whenever Plant Community 2 (medium and short grasses and sedges) occurs, grazing management strategies need to be implemented to avoid further deterioration. This community is still stable, productive, and healthy provided it receives proper management. This community will respond fairly quickly to improved grazing management, including increased growing season rest of key forage plants. Grazing management alone can usually move this community back towards the potential community.
Plant Communities 3 and 4 have substantially reduced forage production, and a high percentage of aggressive, non-palatable species. Once these plant communities become established, it will be much more difficult to restore the site to a community that resembles the potential with grazing management alone. Additional growing season rest is often necessary for re-establishment of the desired species and to restore the stability and health of the site. Practices such as range seeding or mechanical treatment are generally not recommended on this site.
Wildlife Interpretations:
Although not as productive as many sites, the Coarse Clay ecological site provides habitat diversity in an otherwise fairly uniform landscape. Historically, mule deer, pronghorn and a variety of song birds were probably the most conspicuous wildlife species using this site as they are today. Trees, shrubs and a relatively sparse herbaceous layer form a relatively complex vertical structure that is unavailable in adjacent grasslands. Topographic diversity, combined with a number of nutritious browse plants, provides mule deer and pronghorn with winter range habitat. A variety of birds find perch sites and nesting habitat in pine and juniper trees and shrubs in the middle canopy layer.
Plant Community 1: Tall Grasses / Forbs / Shrubs (HCPC):
The diversity of plant life forms and seasonality provides habitat for a variety of pollinating insects. The short-horned lizard and prairie rattlesnake are representative reptiles. Ground-nesting bird habitat value is limited because of the high proportion of bare soil. Common nighthawks
may nest on the sparsely covered surface. Scattered pines, junipers and bur oak provide valuable habitat for a variety of raptors and songbirds including American kestrels, Townsend’s solitaires, chipping sparrows, field sparrows, lark sparrows and white-crowned sparrows. Mountain bluebirds may nest in tree cavities and mourning doves on tree branches. Although this community has relatively low productivity, the diversity of warm and cool season grasses and sedges, forbs, shrubs and half-shrubs provides a high plane of nutrition for grazers and mixed feeders throughout the growing season and beyond. Mule deer and pronghorn will use the variety of browse species throughout the year. Small mammal populations are dominated by seed-eaters such as deer mice and the least chipmunk
Plant Community 2: Medium and Short Grasses and Sedges / Shrubs and Half-shrubs:
Insect diversity may decline as the variety of grasses and forbs is reduced. Structural habitat diversity for a wide range of non-game species is also decreased. An increase in shrubs and half-shrubs provides seasonal browse for mule deer and pronghorn although nutritional value declines with a partial loss of shrub diversity.
Plant Community 3: Shrubs, Short Grasses:
General wildlife habitat values have declined significantly at this stage. Very little forage is available for ungulates, although an increase in shrubs and half-shrubs provides fall-spring browse for mule deer and pronghorn. Habitat structure has been greatly simplified which reduces small mammal and song bird diversity.
Plant Community 4: Trees and Large Shrubs:
Pollinating insect diversity is considerably reduced as the plant community is simplified. A significant increase in ponderosa pine, juniper or, in some cases, bur oak, benefits some songbird species such as those listed in #1, above. Ground-nesting bird and small mammal habitat values are very significantly reduced with the loss of ground cover.
Hydrological functions
The soils associated with this ecological site are generally in Hydrologic Soil Group D. The infiltration rates for these soils will normally be moderate. The runoff potential for this site is moderate to very high, depending on slope and ground cover/health. Runoff curve numbers generally range from 84 to 93.
Other information
The following is an example of how to calculate the recommended stocking rate. This example does not use production estimates from this specific ecological site. You will need to adjust the annual production values and run the calculations using total annual production values from the ecological sites encountered on each individual ranch/pasture. Before making specific recommendations, an on-site evaluation must be made.
Example of total annual production amounts by type of year:
Favorable years = 2200 lbs/acre
Normal years = 1480 lbs/acre
Unfavorable years = 1200 lbs/acre
It is recommended that on slopes of 30% or less, stocking rate should be derived from the total annual production pounds minus 500 pounds for residual dry matter and 25% harvest efficiency. On slopes over 30%, stocking rate is derived from total annual production pounds minus 800 pounds for residual dry matter and 25% harvest efficiency. Refer to the NRCS National Range and Pasture Handbook for a list of Animal Unit Equivalents.
Sample Calculations using Favorable Year production amounts:
< 30% slopes: AUM/AC = [(2200-500)(0.25)]/915 lbs/month for one AU = 0.46 AUM/AC
AC/AUM = (1.0 AU)/(0.46AUM/AC) = 2.2 AC/AUM
> 30% slopes: AUM/AC = [(2200-800)(0.25)]/915 lbs/month for one AU = 0.38 AUM/AC
AC/AUM = (1.0 AU)/(0.38 AUM/AC) = 2.6 AC/AUM
NOTE: 915 lbs/month for one Animal Unit is used as the baseline for maintenance requirements. This equates to 30 lbs/day of air-dry forage (1200 lb cow at 2.5% of body weight).
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Supporting Data for Site Development:
NRCS Production & Composition Record for Native Grazing Lands (Range-417): 8
BLM Soil & Vegetation Inventory Method (SVIM) Data: 2
NRCS Range Condition Record (ECS-2): 25
NRCS Range/Soil Correlation Observations & Soil 232 notes: 13
Ecological Site Reference: NRCS 417 No.: Golden Valley County 520
Field Offices where this site occurs within the state:
Big Sandy
Big Timber
Billings
Chinook
Columbus
Crow Agency
Fort Belknap
Hardin
Harlowton
Joliet
Lewistown
Malta
Roundup
Stanford
White Sulphur Springs
Winnett
Other references
Authors:
Original: NRCS, 1983
Revised: Matthew J. Ricketts, Robert E. Leinard, Rhonda Sue Noggles, Peter O. Husby, 2003
Contributors
MJR, REL, RSN, POH
RSN
Approval
Kirt Walstad, 6/14/2023
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
| Author(s)/participant(s) | Loretta Metz |
|---|---|
| Contact for lead author | |
| Date | 04/10/2005 |
| Approved by | Kirt Walstad |
| Approval date | |
| Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Minor rills (less than 2.0 inches in depth; less than 3 feet long) may be present in the reference state when slopes are greater than 8%. Plant community 2 has more rills than Plant community 1. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Water flow patterns are generally not evident in the reference state. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
These should not be evident in the reference state. Do not confuse these features with normal frost heave actions that occur on applicable soils. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground is less than 80% in the reference state. In HCPC, bare ground should not exceed 65%. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Gully erosion is not evident in the reference state. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Under normal climatic conditions, these should not be evident in the reference state. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Litter movement varies by size and depth of litter. In the reference state, litter should be coarse perennial grass leaves, anywhere from 1.5 inches up to 4 inches in length, plus small shrub leaves and minimal forb litter. Litter will not move more than a couple of inches from where it originated. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Stability values of 4-5 in plant interspaces. Stability values of 5-6 under plant canopies and at plant bases. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Granular surface structure; brown to dark brown color. Organic matter approx 2-4%. Coarse fragments on surface are less than 5% by volume. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Deep-rooted native perennial grasses optimize infiltration and runoff. Perennial plants (grasses, forbs and shrubs) should be spaced approximately 3 to 5 feet apart in the reference state. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
No compaction layer present in reference state. Do not mistake the naturally occurring clay increase in the soil profile for a compaction layer. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
cool season, mid-height, native perennial bunchgrasses >> native shrubs > native perennial and annual forbs >= warm season, short-height, native perennial grasses.Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Plant mortality is very low; decadence is minimal except in prolonged periods of drought. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
475 – 850 #/acre. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Rocky Mountain juniper, Wyoming big sagebrush, broom snakeweed, plains pricklypear, threeawn species, annual grasses (cheatgrass, Japanese brome, others), etc. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
This is not impaired in the reference state.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.