Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R058AE018MT
Sands (Sa) RRU 58A-E 10-14" p.z.
Accessed: 11/21/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Associated sites
R058AE003MT |
Sandy (Sy) RRU 58A-E 10-14" p.z. |
---|---|
R058AE004MT |
Silty-Steep (SiStp) RRU 58A-E 10-14" p.z. |
R058AE006MT |
Sandy-Steep (SyStp) RRU 58A-E 10-14" p.z. |
R058AE019MT |
Shallow (Sw) RRU 58A-E 10-14" p.z. |
Similar sites
R058AE003MT |
Sandy (Sy) RRU 58A-E 10-14" p.z. The Sandy site differs mainly in texture. |
---|---|
R058AE006MT |
Sandy-Steep (SyStp) RRU 58A-E 10-14" p.z. The Sandy-Steep site occurs on slopes greater than 15%. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
Not specified |
Herbaceous |
Not specified |
Physiographic features
This ecological site occurs on nearly level to strongly sloping sedimentary plains, terraces, and fans. It often has a dune like topography. The slopes are 0-15%, but mainly are less than 8%. This site occurs on all exposures. Aspect is not significant.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Alluvial fan
(2) Dune (3) Plain |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 1,900 – 3,500 ft |
Slope | 15% |
Water table depth | 60 in |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
MLRAs 58A and 60B are considered to have a continental climate characterized by cold winters, hot summers, low humidity, light rainfall, and much sunshine. Extremes in temperature are typical. The climate is the result of this MLRA’s location in the geographic center of North America. There are few natural barriers on the northern Great Plains and the winds move freely across the plains and account for rapid changes in temperature. Seasonal precipitation is often limiting for plant growth. Annual fluctuations in species composition and total production are typical depending on the amount and timing of rainfall.
Temperatures can be very extreme in this part of Montana. Summer daytime temperatures are typically quite warm, generally averaging in the mid to upper 80º’s F for July and August. Summertime temperatures will typically reach in the 100º’s F at some point during the summer, and can reach 90º F any month between May and September. Conversely, winter temperatures can be cold, averaging in the mid teens to mid 20º’s F for December and January. There will typically be several days of below zero temperatures each winter. It is not uncommon for temperatures to reach 30–40º F below zero, or even colder, most any winter.
Spring can be windy throughout these MLRA’s, with winds averaging over 10 mph about 15 percent of the time. Speeds of 50 mph or stronger can occasionally occur as a weather system crosses this part of Montana.
MLRAs 58AE and 60BE have been divided into two distinct precipitation zones for the purpose of developing ecological site descriptions: 10–14” Mean Annual Precipitation (MAP) and 15–19” MAP.
10–14 inch zone:
The majority of the rangeland in these areas falls within the 11 to 13 inch range. During an average year, 70 to 75 percent of the annual precipitation falls between April and September, which are the primary growing season months.
Snowfall is not heavy in the area, averaging 28 total inches in the 10-14 inch MAP (Yellowstone Valley). Heavy snowfall occurs infrequently, usually late in the winter or early spring. Snow cover is typically 1 to 3 inches.
The frost free (32º F.) season averages about 105 to 145 days each year in the uplands, to nearly 170 days along the Yellowstone River Valley.
For local climate station information, refer to http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/cgibin/state.pl?state=mt.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 145 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 170 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 14 in |
Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils are sands and loamy sands more than 20 inches deep. These soils are very susceptible to wind erosion.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Sand (2) Loamy sand |
---|---|
Family particle size |
(1) Sandy |
Drainage class | Somewhat excessively drained |
Permeability class | Rapid |
Soil depth | 20 – 60 in |
Available water capacity (0-40in) |
3 – 5 in |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-40in) |
10% |
Electrical conductivity (0-40in) |
Not specified |
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-40in) |
Not specified |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-40in) |
7.4 – 8.4 |
Ecological dynamics
This site developed under Northern Great Plains climatic conditions, which included the natural influence of large herbivores and occasional fire. The plant community upon which interpretations are primarily based is the Historic Climax Plant Community (HCPC). This community is given as a reference to understand the original potential of this site, and is not always considered to be the management goal for every acre of rangeland. The following descriptions should enable the landowner or manager to better understand which plant communities occupy their land, and assist with setting goals for vegetation management. It can also be useful to understand the environmental and economic values of each plant community.
This site is considered highly resilient to disturbance as it has only minor soil limitations for plant growth. Changes may occur to the Historic Climax Plant Community due to management actions and/or climatic conditions. Under continued adverse impacts, a moderate decline in vegetative vigor and composition will occur. Under favorable vegetative management treatments, this site can more readily return to the Historic Climax Plant Community.
Continual adverse impacts to this site over a period of years will result in the decrease of the taller grasses such as big bluestem, sand bluestem, and prairie sandreed to medium bunch and sod grasses including needleandthread, dryland sedges, and prairie junegrass. Medium shrubs, such as yucca, will increase with continued disturbance. Warm and cool season tall or medium grasses (prairie sandreed, Indian ricegrass, sand dropseed) and a medium shrub (yucca) will also occur in sand dunes.
Plants that are not a part of the climax community that are most likely to invade are annual grasses and brittle cactus.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Plant Community 1: Tall and Medium Grasses/ Forbs/ Shrubs
Community 1.1
Plant Community 1: Tall and Medium Grasses/ Forbs/ Shrubs
This is the interpretive plant community and is considered to be the Historic Climax Plant Community (HCPC) for this site. This plant community contains a good diversity of tall warm season grasses such as big bluestem, sand bluestem, and prairie sandreed. There is a good diversity of medium and short grasses and sedges (little bluestem, Indian ricegrass, and needleandthread). A variety of forbs occur in small percentages. Shrubs that occur on this site include mainly yucca and prairie rose. This plant community is well adapted to the Northern Great Plains climatic conditions. The diversity in plant species and the presence of tall, deep-rooted perennial grasses allows for high drought tolerance. Individual species can vary greatly in production depending on growing conditions (timing and amount of precipitation and temperature). Plants on this site have strong, healthy root systems that allow production to increase significantly with favorable precipitation. Abundant plant litter is available for soil building and moisture retention. Plant litter is properly distributed with very little movement off-site and natural plant mortality is very low. This plant community provides for soil stability and a functioning hydrologic cycle. Good root systems and plant cover are critical for stability and erosion protection of this site due to the sandy soils. Removing the plant cover is the main reason areas of the Sands site are in dunes. Maintaining a healthy plant community provides for a properly functioning hydrologic cycle. Abundant plant litter is available for soil buildup and moisture retention.
Figure 2. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 675 | 1350 | 1800 |
Forb | 135 | 270 | 360 |
Shrub/Vine | 90 | 180 | 240 |
Total | 900 | 1800 | 2400 |
Table 6. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 50-60% |
Forb foliar cover | 5-10% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0-1% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 0% |
Table 7. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-2% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 15-20% |
Forb basal cover | 1-4% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 1-2% |
Litter | 40-49% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-4% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 15-20% |
Table 8. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (ft) | Tree | Shrub/Vine | Grass/ Grasslike |
Forb |
---|---|---|---|---|
<0.5 | – | – | – | – |
>0.5 <= 1 | – | – | – | – |
>1 <= 2 | – | 1-3% | 50-60% | 5-10% |
>2 <= 4.5 | – | – | – | – |
>4.5 <= 13 | – | – | – | – |
>13 <= 40 | – | – | – | – |
>40 <= 80 | – | – | – | – |
>80 <= 120 | – | – | – | – |
>120 | – | – | – | – |
State 2
Plant Community 2: Medium and Short Grasses/ Medium Shrubs
Community 2.1
Plant Community 2: Medium and Short Grasses/ Medium Shrubs
Slight degradation in the Historical Climax Plant Community usually results in a decrease of the larger bluestems and prairie sandreed and a slight increase in needleandthread, sand dropseed and the short grasses and sedges. Yucca, prairie rose, and fringed sagewort may increase in species composition. There are generally enough of the larger species remaining to allow the community to return to the HCPC fairly readily once management changes are implemented. Grass biomass production and litter become reduced on the site as the taller grasses disappear, increasing evaporation and reducing moisture retention. Additional open space in the community can result in undesirable invader species. This plant community provides for moderate soil stability.
State 3
Plant Community 3: Shrubs/ Medium and Short Grasses/ Half-shrubs
Community 3.1
Plant Community 3: Shrubs/ Medium and Short Grasses/ Half-shrubs
With continued heavy disturbance on Plant Communities 1 or 2, the plant community tends to become dominated by species such as yucca, needleandthread, threadleaf sedge, fringed and green sagewort, red threeawn, and annual grasses. There may still be small amounts of some species such as little bluestem and Indian ricegrass. Rest and/or seeding will be required to bring this site back across the ecological stability threshold. Because the soils associated with this site are very susceptible to blowing, special precautions will be needed when seeding. Using a cover crop, generally large seeded, warm season annuals (e.g., foxtail millet, sorghum-sudan grass) is usually necessary when trying to reseed these sandy soils.
State 4
Plant Community 4: Shrubs and Half-shrubs/ Short Grasses/ Cacti
Community 4.1
Plant Community 4: Shrubs and Half-shrubs/ Short Grasses/ Cacti
With continued heavy disturbance on Plant Community 3, the community often becomes dominated by yucca, green sagewort, red threeawn, Japanese brome, brittle cactus, plains pricklypear, and other annual grasses and forbs. This community is very unstable and sand dunes often develop. Plant Communities 3 and 4 are less productive than Plant Community 1 or 2. The lack of litter and short plant heights result in higher soil temperatures, poor water infiltration rates, and high evaporation. This community has lost many of the attributes of a healthy rangeland, including good infiltration, minimal erosion and runoff, nutrient cycling and energy flow. These communities have extremely reduced production. Significant economic inputs and time would be required to move this plant community toward a higher successional stage and a more productive plant community.
Additional community tables
Table 9. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | Native grasses and sedges | 665–1560 | ||||
big bluestem | ANGE | Andropogon gerardii | 180–960 | – | ||
prairie sandreed | CALO | Calamovilfa longifolia | 90–840 | – | ||
sand bluestem | ANHA | Andropogon hallii | 90–600 | – | ||
sun sedge | CAINH2 | Carex inops ssp. heliophila | 45–240 | – | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 45–240 | – | ||
needle and thread | HECOC8 | Hesperostipa comata ssp. comata | 45–240 | – | ||
little bluestem | SCSCS | Schizachyrium scoparium var. scoparium | 45–240 | – | ||
sand dropseed | SPCR | Sporobolus cryptandrus | 9–120 | – | ||
tufted wheatgrass | ELMA7 | Elymus macrourus | 0–120 | – | ||
2 | Native grasses and sedges | 9–240 | ||||
Grass, perennial | 2GP | Grass, perennial | 9–120 | – | ||
blue grama | BOGR2 | Bouteloua gracilis | 9–120 | – | ||
threadleaf sedge | CAFI | Carex filifolia | 9–120 | – | ||
plains reedgrass | CAMO | Calamagrostis montanensis | 9–120 | – | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 9–120 | – | ||
western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 9–120 | – | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 9–120 | – | ||
3 | Native grasses | 1–2 | ||||
purple threeawn | ARPUP6 | Aristida purpurea var. purpurea | 1–2 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
4 | Native forbs | 135–360 | ||||
Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 9–120 | – | ||
tarragon | ARDR4 | Artemisia dracunculus | 9–120 | – | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 9–120 | – | ||
white prairie clover | DACA7 | Dalea candida | 9–120 | – | ||
purple prairie clover | DAPU5 | Dalea purpurea | 9–120 | – | ||
blacksamson echinacea | ECAN2 | Echinacea angustifolia | 9–120 | – | ||
sanddune wallflower | ERCAC | Erysimum capitatum var. capitatum | 9–120 | – | ||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 9–120 | – | ||
American licorice | GLLE3 | Glycyrrhiza lepidota | 9–120 | – | ||
stiff sunflower | HEPA19 | Helianthus pauciflorus | 9–120 | – | ||
hairy false goldenaster | HEVI4 | Heterotheca villosa | 9–120 | – | ||
dotted blazing star | LIPU | Liatris punctata | 9–120 | – | ||
rush skeletonplant | LYJU | Lygodesmia juncea | 9–120 | – | ||
spiny phlox | PHHO | Phlox hoodii | 9–120 | – | ||
white milkwort | POAL4 | Polygala alba | 9–120 | – | ||
scurfpea | PSORA2 | Psoralidium | 9–120 | – | ||
Missouri goldenrod | SOMI2 | Solidago missouriensis | 9–120 | – | ||
scarlet globemallow | SPCO | Sphaeralcea coccinea | 9–120 | – | ||
prairie thermopsis | THRH | Thermopsis rhombifolia | 9–120 | – | ||
longbract spiderwort | TRBR | Tradescantia bracteata | 9–120 | – | ||
5 | Native forbs | 1–2 | ||||
white locoweed | OXSE | Oxytropis sericea | 1–2 | – | ||
deathcamas | ZIGAD | Zigadenus | 1–2 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
6 | Native shrubs and half-shrubs | 90–240 | ||||
Shrub, broadleaf | 2SB | Shrub, broadleaf | 9–40 | – | ||
silver sagebrush | ARCA13 | Artemisia cana | 9–40 | – | ||
prairie sagewort | ARFR4 | Artemisia frigida | 9–40 | – | ||
winterfat | KRLA2 | Krascheninnikovia lanata | 9–40 | – | ||
skunkbush sumac | RHTR | Rhus trilobata | 9–40 | – | ||
prairie rose | ROAR3 | Rosa arkansana | 9–40 | – | ||
snowberry | SYMPH | Symphoricarpos | 9–40 | – | ||
soapweed yucca | YUGL | Yucca glauca | 9–40 | – | ||
7 | Native shrubs and half-shrubs | 1–2 | ||||
brittle pricklypear | OPFR | Opuntia fragilis | 1–2 | – | ||
plains pricklypear | OPPO | Opuntia polyacantha | 1–2 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
Livestock Grazing Interpretations:
Managed livestock grazing is suitable on this site as it has the potential to produce an abundance of high quality forage. The abundance of warm season species makes
this site especially valuable for use during mid-summer when the cool season species are past their optimum period of quality forage.
Management objectives should include maintenance or improvement of the plant community. Shorter grazing periods and adequate re-growth after grazing are recommended for plant maintenance and recovery. Heavy stocking and season long use of this site can be detrimental and will alter the plant community composition and production over time.
Whenever Plant Community 2 occurs (medium and short grasses), grazing management strategies need to be implemented to avoid further deterioration. This community is still stable, productive, and healthy provided it receives proper management. This community will respond fairly quickly to improved grazing management including increased growing season rest of key forage plants. Grazing management alone can usually move this community back to one more similar to potential.
Plant Communities 3 or 4 have extremely limited forage production (< 600 pounds per acre), and a high percentage of non-preferred species for cattle and sheep. Once this site is occupied by these communities, it will be more difficult to restore it to a community that resembles the potential with grazing management alone. Additional growing season rest is often necessary for re-establishment of the desired species and to restore the stability and health of the site. Seeding may be necessary to restore desirable native perennial species.
Wildlife Interpretations:
The following is a description of habitat values for the different plant communities that may occupy the site:
Plant Community 1: Tall and Medium Grasses/Forbs/Shrubs (HCPC):
The predominance of grasses and sedges plus a diversity of forbs and half-shrubs in this community favors grazers and mixed feeders such as bison, pronghorn and elk. An abundance of warm season grasses extends the availability of nutritious forage throughout the summer. Suitable escape cover for mule deer is limited because of low shrub cover unless topographic features provide this habitat. The mix of tall and medium height grass residual cover along with abundant litter production creates favorable habitat for ground nesting birds including sharp-tailed grouse, upland sandpipers, vesper sparrows and grasshopper sparrows. Raptors are attracted to the diverse prey populations. A variety of forbs, grasses and half-shrubs attracts seed–eating small mammals like deer mice and pocket mice while heavy litter production favors herbivorous voles.
Plant Community 2: Medium and Short Grasses/ Medium Shrubs:
A reduction of warm-season grasses shortens the green feed period for grazers. Habitat value for ground-nesting birds and herbivorous small mammals is reduced as litter and residual grass production declines. Reduction of vegetative structural complexity decreases general habitat value for a variety of wildlife species.
Plant Community 3: Shrubs/ Medium and Short Grasses/ Half-shrubs:
Habitat value is poor for most wildlife species. Further reduction of litter and residual grass production limits ground-nesting bird habitat, although species favoring sparse cover, including long-billed curlews, McCown’s longspur and horned larks may nest in this community. Annual grass and forb production may support populations of deer mice.
Plant Community 4: Shrubs and Half-shrubs/ Short Grasses/ Cacti:
Unstable dunes provide poor habitat values for the majority of wildlife species. After stabilization by tall and medium warm and cool season grasses, habitat values may be similar to Plant Community 1, above.
Hydrological functions
The soils associated with this ecological site are generally in Hydrologic Soil Group A. The infiltration rates for these soils will normally be rapid to very rapid. The runoff potential for this site is very low. Runoff curve numbers generally range from 47 to 77.
Good hydrologic conditions exist on rangelands if plant cover (grass, litter, and brush canopy) is greater than 70%. Fair conditions exist when cover is between 30 and 70%, and poor conditions exist when cover is less than 30%. Sites in high similarity to HCPC (Plant Communities 1and 2) generally have enough plant cover and litter to optimize infiltration, minimize runoff and erosion, and have a good hydrologic condition. The
deep root systems of the potential vegetation help maintain or increase infiltration rates and reduce runoff.
Sites in low similarity (Plant Communities 3 and 4) are generally considered to be in poor hydrologic condition as the majority of plant cover is from shallow-rooted annuals and shrubs. Erosion is minor for sites in high similarity. Rills and gullies should not be present. Water flow patterns, if present, will be barely observable. Plant pedestals are essentially non-existent. Plant litter remains in place and is not moved by erosion. Soil surfaces should not be compacted or crusted. Plant cover and litter helps retain soil moisture for use by the plants. Maintaining a healthy stand of perennial vegetation will optimize the amount of precipitation that is received. (Reference: Engineering Field Manual, Chapter 2 and Montana Supplement 4).
Recreational uses
This site provides recreational opportunities for big game and upland bird hunting, and hiking. The forbs have flowers that appeal to photographers. This site provides valuable open space and visual aesthetics. Travel across this site can be difficult because of the loose sand.
Other information
The following is an example of how to calculate the recommended stocking rate. This example does not use production estimates from this specific ecological site. You will need to adjust the annual production values and run the calculations using total annual production values from the ecological sites encountered on each individual ranch/pasture. Before making specific recommendations, an on-site evaluation must be made.
Example of total annual production amounts by type of year:
Favorable years = 2200 lbs/acre
Normal years = 1480 lbs/acre
Unfavorable years = 1200 lbs/acre
It is recommended that on slopes of 30% or less, stocking rate should be derived from the total annual production pounds minus 500 pounds for residual dry matter and 25% harvest efficiency. On slopes over 30%, stocking rate is derived from total annual production pounds minus 800 pounds for residual dry matter and 25% harvest efficiency. Refer to the NRCS National Range and Pasture Handbook for a list of Animal Unit Equivalents.
Sample Calculations using Favorable Year production amounts:
< 30% slopes: AUM/AC = [(2200-500)(0.25)]/915 lbs/month for one AU = 0.46 AUM/AC
AC/AUM = (1.0 AU)/(0.46AUM/AC) = 2.2 AC/AUM
> 30% slopes: AUM/AC = [(2200-800)(0.25)]/915 lbs/month for one AU = 0.38 AUM/AC
AC/AUM = (1.0 AU)/(0.38 AUM/AC) = 2.6 AC/AUM
NOTE: 915 lbs/month for one Animal Unit is used as the baseline for maintenance requirements. This equates to 30 lbs/day of air-dry forage (1200 lb cow at 2.5% of body weight).
Supporting information
Inventory data references
NRCS-Production & Composition Record for Native Grazing Lands (Range-417): 6
BLM-Soil & Vegetation Inventory Method (SVIM) Data: 10
NRCS-Range Condition Record (ECS-2): 8
NRCS-Range/Soil Correlation Observations & Soil 232 notes: 11
Contributors
Bob Leinard
JVF, REL, RSN, MJR, SKW, SVF, POH
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | T. DeCock; R Kilian |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | Tammy DeCock |
Date | 06/11/2014 |
Approved by | Jon Siddoway |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
None on slopes less than 9 %. On slopes over 9% water flow patterns up to 4 inches wide and 2 feet long. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Pedestals up to one inch high are common. Pedestals up to 0.5 inch high are common. On slopes greater than 9% Terracettes may be present but should be less than 0.75 inches high. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground is < 20%. Bare ground will occur as small areas less than 3 inches in diameter. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Active gullies should not be present. Existing gullies should be “healed” with a good vegetative cover. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Active blowouts should not be present. Historic blowouts should be “healed” with a good vegetative cover. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Small herbaceous litter may be moved short distances (4inches) on slopes greater than 9%. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Surface Soil Aggregate Stability under plant canopy should typically be 5 or greater. Surface Soil Aggregate Stability not under plant canopy should typically be 5 or slightly less. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Use soil survey series description. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
High grass canopy and basal cover and small gaps between plants should reduce raindrop impact and slow overland flow, providing increased time for infiltration to occur. A combination of shallow and deep rooted species has a positive effect on infiltration. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
No compaction layer or soil surface crusting should be evident -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Warm season, tall-stature, rhizomatous grassesSub-dominant:
Warm season, mid-stature, bunch grasses > forbs> Cool season, mid-stature, rhizomatous grasses = Cool season, short-stature, bunch grasses = Cool season, short-stature, rhizomatous grasses and sedges = shrubs and half shrubsOther:
Minor components: Warm season, short-stature, rhizomatous grassesAdditional:
(Blue grama should be grouped with warm season, short-stature, rhizomatous grasses due to its growth form) -
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Very low. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Litter cover is in contact with soil surface. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
2100 to 2400 #/acre (13 to 14 inch precip. Zone) 900 to 1800 #/ac (10 to 12 inch precip. Zone). -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Sulphur cinquefoil, common tansy, oxeye daisy, Leafy spurge, knapweeds, whitetop, Dalmatian toadflax, yellow toadflax, St. Johnswort, perennial pepperweed. Kentucky bluegrass and smooth brome can be invasive on the eastern boarder of Montana for these MLRAs. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All species are capable of reproducing.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.