Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Ecological site R058BY106WY

Clayey Overflow (CyO) 10-17” PZ

Last updated: 10/04/2023
Accessed: 04/16/2024

Home / Esd catalog / MLRA 058B / Ecological site R058BY106WY

USC

Metric

General information

Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.

Click to explore map

Figure 1. Mapped extent

Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.

MLRA notes

Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 058B–Northern Rolling High Plains, Southern Part

MLRA 58B is located in northeastern Wyoming (95 percent) and extreme southeastern Montana (5 percent). It is comprised of sedimentary plains, scoria hills, and river valleys. The major rivers include the Powder, Tongue, Belle Fourche, Cheyenne, and North Platte. Tributaries include the Little Powder River, Little Missouri River, Clear Creek, Crazy Woman Creek, and others. This MLRA is traversed by Interstates 25 and 90, and U.S. Highways 14 and 16. The extent of MLRA 58B covers approximately 12.3 million acres. Major land uses include rangeland (approximately 93 percent), cropland, pasture, and hayland (approximately 2 percent), and forest, urban, and miscellaneous uses (approximately 5 percent). Cities include Buffalo, Casper, Sheridan, and Gillette, WY. Land ownership is mostly private. Federal lands include the Thunder Basin National Grassland (U.S. Forest Service) and lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management. Areas of interest in MLRA 58B in Wyoming include Fort Phil Kearny State Historic Site, Glendo State Park, and Lake DeSmet. The elevations in MLRA 58B increase gradually from north to south and range from approximately 2,900 to 5,900 feet. A few buttes are higher than 6,800 feet. The average annual precipitation in this area ranges from 10 to 17 inches per year. Precipitation occurs mostly during the growing season, often during rapidly developing thunderstorms. Mean annual air temperature is 46 degrees Fahrenheit. Summer temperatures may exceed 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Winter temperatures may drop to below zero. Snowfall averages 45 inches per year, but varies from 25 to over 70 inches in some locales.

Classification relationships

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS):
Land Resource Region – G Western Great Plains Range and Irrigation; Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) – 58B Northern Rolling High Plains, Southern Part (USDA, 2006)

Relationship to Other Classifications:

USDA Forest Service (FS) Classification Hierarchy:

Province – 331 Great Plains-Palouse Dry Steppe; Section – 331G-Powder River Basin; Subsections – 331Gb Montana Shale Plains, 331Ge Powder River Basin, 331Gf South Powder River Basin-Scoria Hills (Cleland et al, 1997)

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Classification Hierarchy:

Level III Ecoregion – 43 Northwestern Great Plains; Level IV Ecoregion – 43p Scoria Hills, 43q Mesic-Dissected Plains, 43w Powder River Basin (EPA, 2013)
https://www.epa.gov/eco-research/ecoregions

Ecological site concept

This ecological site occurs in swales and drainageways and on stream terraces where it receives additional moisture from flooding or run-in from adjacent areas. The streams associated with this site are ephemeral, meaning they flow only in direct response to a precipitation event or snow melt. This site occurs at elevations ranging from 2,900 to 5,900 feet and on slopes ranging from 0 to 5 percent. This site occurs on all aspects, although aspect is not a significant factor. The soils of this ecological site are deep to very deep and are well drained. The soil surface textures on this site typically range from fine sandy loam to silty clay loam but can have a wide variation since these soils typically result from water deposition.

Associated sites

R058BY104WY	Clayey (Cy) 10-14” PZ The Clayey 10-14 ecological site occurs on slopes of 0 to 15 percent, has soils with greater than 35 percent clay content, and has lower total annual production. The Clayey 10-14 ecological site is positioned above the Clayey Overflow 10-14 ecological site. The Clayey 10-14 ecological site does not receive additional moisture from flooding or run-in from adjacent areas.
R058BY122WY	Loamy (Ly) 10-14” PZ The Loamy 10-14 ecological site occurs on slopes of 0 to 15 percent and has lower total annual production. The Loamy 10-14 ecological site is positioned above the Clayey Overflow 10-14 ecological site. The Loamy 10-14 ecological site does not receive additional moisture from flooding or run-in from adjacent areas.
R058BY128WY	Lowland (LL) 10-14” PZ Lowland 10-14 ecological site occurs on slopes of 0 to 6 percent and has higher total annual production. The Lowland 10-14 ecological site occurs on similar landform positions as the Clayey Overflow 10-14 ecological site.
R058BY130WY	Overflow (Ov) 10-14” PZ Overflow 10-14 ecological site occurs on slopes of 0 to 6 percent and has similar overall production to the Clayey Overflow 10-14 ecological site. The Overflow 10-14 ecological site occurs on similar landform positions as the Clayey Overflow 10-14 ecological site.

Similar sites

R058BY138WY	Saline Lowland (SL) 10-14” PZ The Saline Lowland 10-14 ecological site occurs on similar slopes and landform positions and has similar total annual production as the Clayey Overflow 10-14 ecological site, but the Saline Lowland 10-14 ecological site is dominated by salt tolerant species. The Saline Lowland 10-14 ecological site does not receive additional moisture from flooding or run-in from adjacent areas.
R058BY130WY	Overflow (Ov) 10-14” PZ Overflow 10-14 ecological site occurs on slopes of 0 to 6 percent and has similar overall production to the Clayey Overflow 10-14 ecological site. The Overflow 10-14 ecological site occurs on similar landform positions as the Clayey Overflow 10-14 ecological site.

R058BY138WY

Saline Lowland (SL) 10-14” PZ

The Saline Lowland 10-14 ecological site occurs on similar slopes and landform positions and has similar total annual production as the Clayey Overflow 10-14 ecological site, but the Saline Lowland 10-14 ecological site is dominated by salt tolerant species. The Saline Lowland 10-14 ecological site does not receive additional moisture from flooding or run-in from adjacent areas.

R058BY130WY

Overflow (Ov) 10-14” PZ

Overflow 10-14 ecological site occurs on slopes of 0 to 6 percent and has similar overall production to the Clayey Overflow 10-14 ecological site. The Overflow 10-14 ecological site occurs on similar landform positions as the Clayey Overflow 10-14 ecological site.

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Tree	Not specified
Shrub	(1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis
Herbaceous	(1) Leymus cinereus (2) Pascopyrum smithii

Download full description

Physiographic features

This ecological site occurs on nearly level areas that receive additional moisture from overflow of intermittent streams or runoff from adjacent slopes. The streams associated with this site are intermittent, meaning the streams have a well-defined channel that contains water for only part of the year, typically during winter and spring when the aquatic bed is below the water table. The flow may be heavily supplemented by stormwater runoff. The site occurs at elevations ranging from 2,900 to 5,900 feet and on slopes ranging from 0 to 6 percent. This site occurs on all aspects, although aspect is not a significant factor.

Table 2. Representative physiographic features

Landforms	(1) Flood plain (2) Drainageway (3) Draw
Runoff class	Medium to very high
Flooding duration	Very brief (4 to 48 hours) to brief (2 to 7 days)
Flooding frequency	Rare to frequent
Ponding frequency	None
Elevation	2,900 – 5,900 ft
Slope	6%
Ponding depth	Not specified
Water table depth	80 in
Aspect	Aspect is not a significant factor

Climatic features

The average annual precipitation ranges from 10 to 17 inches per year across MLRA 58B. There are two Precipitation Zones (PZ). The 10 to 14 inch precipitation zone is predominant across the MLRA, including portions of Sheridan, Johnson, and Natrona Counties; portions of Campbell and Converse Counties; and smaller portions of Weston and Niobrara Counties. The 15 to 17 inch precipitation zone occurs in northern and eastern portions of the MLRA, including portions of Sheridan, Campbell, and western Crook Counties. Wide fluctuations in precipitation may occur from year to year, and occasional periods of extended drought (longer than one year in duration) can be expected. Two-thirds of the annual precipitation occurs during the growing season from May through September. Mean Annual Air Temperature (MAAT) is 46 degrees Fahrenheit. Cold air outbreaks from Canada in winter move rapidly from northwest to southeast and account for extreme minimum temperatures. Chinook winds may also occur in winter and bring rapid rises in temperature. Extreme storms may occur during the winter, but most severely affect ranching operations during late winter and spring. High-intensity afternoon thunderstorms may occur during the summer. Annual wind speeds average about 5 mph. Daytime winds are generally stronger than nighttime winds. Occasional strong storms may bring brief periods of high winds with gusts of more than 75 mph. The average length of the freeze-free period (28 degrees Fahrenheit) is 125 days and generally occurs from May 16 to September 19. The average frost-free period (32 degrees Fahrenheit) is 101 days and generally occurs from June 1 to September 9.

The growth of native cool-season plants begins in late April to early May with peak growth occurring in mid to late June. Native warm-season plants begin growth in late May to early June and continue into August. Regrowth of cool-season plants occurs in September in most years, depending upon moisture.

Note: The climate described here is based on historic climate station data and is averaged to provide an overview of the annual precipitation, temperatures, and growing season. Future climate is beyond the scope of this document. However, research to determine the effects of elevated CO2 and heating on mixed-grass prairie ecosystems, and how it may relate to future plant communities, is ongoing.

For detailed information, or to find a specific climate station, visit the Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC) website: Western Regional Climate Center, Historical Data, Western U.S. Climate summaries, NOAA Coop Stations, Wyoming (Note: Montana climate stations are also listed under the Wyoming link).
https://wrcc.dri.edu/summary/Climsmwy.html

Wind speed averages can be found at the WRCC home page, under the Specialty Climate tab: https://wrcc.dri.edu/

The following tables represent area-wide climate data for the 10 to 14 inch precipitation zone:

Table 3. Representative climatic features

Frost-free period (characteristic range)	92-103 days
Freeze-free period (characteristic range)	121-128 days
Precipitation total (characteristic range)	12-13 in
Frost-free period (actual range)	86-107 days
Freeze-free period (actual range)	116-129 days
Precipitation total (actual range)	10-14 in
Frost-free period (average)	101 days
Freeze-free period (average)	125 days
Precipitation total (average)	13 in

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range

Bar

Line

Figure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature

Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern

Figure 7. Annual average temperature pattern

Climate stations used

(1) SHERIDAN CO AP [USW00024029], Sheridan, WY
(2) CASPER NATRONA CO AP [USW00024089], Casper, WY
(3) DULL CTR 1SE [USC00482725], Douglas, WY
(4) KAYCEE [USC00485055], Kaycee, WY
(5) MIDWEST [USC00486195], Midwest, WY
(6) WESTON 1 E [USC00489580], Weston, WY
(7) BUFFALO [USC00481165], Buffalo, WY
(8) WRIGHT 12W [USC00489805], Gillette, WY
(9) GLENROCK 5 ESE [USC00483950], Glenrock, WY

Influencing water features

This ecological site receives additional moisture through surface runoff and from stream overflow. Hydrology is typical of upper stream terraces in that the site contributes recharge to the stream reach during peak precipitation cycles (May through June). The site receives additional moisture from surrounding uplands that saturates the soil profile then enters the stream as either surface flow or subsurface flow. During major flood events, the site may be flooded for brief durations. Sometimes, a seasonal groundwater table deeper than 40 inches below the soil surface is present, particularly during spring runoff.

Wetland description

N/A

Soil features

The soils associated with this ecological site are typically very deep, well drained, that formed from alluvium derived from shale. The depth to a soil restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches from the soil surface. The soil surface layer ranges from a depth of 2 to 5 inches in thickness. The soil surface horizon textures are typically clay, clay loam, silty clay loam, or silty clay. The subsoil horizons are typically clay, clay loam, silty clay loam, or silty clay. Soils on this ecological site typically have carbonates within 10 inches of the soil surface. The soil moisture regime is typically ustic aridic. The soil temperature regime is mesic.

The major soil series correlated to this ecological site is the Lohmiller series.

The attributes listed below represent 0 to 40 inches in depth or to the first restrictive layer.

Table 4. Representative soil features

Parent material	(1) Alluvium – shale
Surface texture	(1) Clay loam (2) Silty clay loam (3) Silty clay (4) Clay
Drainage class	Well drained
Permeability class	Slow to moderately slow
Depth to restrictive layer	60 – 80 in
Soil depth	60 – 80 in
Surface fragment cover <=3"	Not specified
Surface fragment cover >3"	Not specified
Available water capacity (0-40in)	5.2 – 8.4 in
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-40in)	5%
Clay content (0-40in)	35 – 60%
Electrical conductivity (0-40in)	4 mmhos/cm
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-40in)	5
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-40in)	6.6 – 8.4
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-40in)	Not specified
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-40in)	Not specified

Ecological dynamics

The Reference State is the plant community in which interpretations are primarily based and is used as a reference in order to understand the original potential of the site. The Reference State evolved under the combined influences of climatic conditions, periodic fire activity, grazing by large herbivores, and impacts from small mammals and insects. Changes may occur to the Reference State due to climatic conditions such as drought, natural events such as multiple fires in close succession, grazing management such as continuous season-long or year-long grazing, heavier stocking rates, or a combination of these
factors. The reference plant community for this ecological site is dominated by a diversity of tall and medium height, cool-season and warm-season grasses which are tightly intermixed and well distributed over the site. Various forbs, half-shrubs, and shrubs are common on this site. The Reference Plant Community is not necessarily the management goal, as other vegetative states may be considered desired plant communities as long as critical resource concerns are met.

In addition to the Reference State, other plant communities can occur on this site and are usually the result of historic management practices. Grazing practices such as continuous season-long or year-long grazing, heavier stocking rates, or a combination of these factors on this ecological site results in a decrease of tallgrasses, mid-grasses, and more palatable forbs and in an increase of shortgrasses, sedges, and less palatable forbs. Half-shrubs and shrubs increase in the absence of prescribed fire and wildfire. More frequent fire intervals decreases the shrub component resulting in a site dominated by herbaceous species. There are various transitional stages which may occur on this ecological site. The information presented is representative of a dynamic set of plant communities that illustrate the complex interaction of several ecological processes.

State and transition model

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text

Ecosystem states

1. Reference State

2. Sod-Bound State

3. Increased Bare Ground State

T1A	-	Prolonged drought, heavier stocking rates, or a combination of these factors
R2A	-	Lighter stocking rates in combination with rangeland seeding, grazing land mechanical treatment, and timely moisture (management intensive and costly)
T2A	-	Introduction of non-native, invasive species (annual bromes, noxious weeds, other invasive plant species)

State 1 submodel, plant communities

1.1. Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis/Leymus cinereus-Nassella viridula (Wyoming big sagebrush/basin wildrye-green needlegrass)

1.2. Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis/Leymus cinereus-Bouteloua gracilis (Wyoming big sagebrush/basin wildrye-blue grama)

P1.1A	-	Prolonged drought, heavier stocking rates
P1.2A	-	Normal or above-normal precipitation, lighter stocking rates

State 2 submodel, plant communities

2.1. Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis/Bromus inermis-Poa pratensis (Wyoming big sagebrush/smooth brome-Kentucky bluegrass)

State 3 submodel, plant communities

3.1. Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis/Bromus inermis-Bromus tectorum (Wyoming big sagebrush/smooth brome-cheatgrass)

State 1
Reference State

The Reference State (1) evolved under the combined influences of climatic conditions, periodic fire activity, grazing by large herbivores, and impacts from small mammals and insects. The Reference State (1) is the plant community in which interpretations are primarily based and is used as a reference in order to understand the original potential of the site. The Reference State (1) for this ecological site consists of 2 community phases.

Community 1.1
Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis/Leymus cinereus-Nassella viridula (Wyoming big sagebrush/basin wildrye-green needlegrass)

Community Phase 1.1 is characterized by rhizomatous wheatgrasses, bunchgrasses, and Wyoming big sagebrush. The predominant grass species include western wheatgrass, green needlegrass, and basin wildrye. Other grasses and sedge species include thickspike wheatgrass, Cusick's bluegrass, Canada wildrye, needle and thread, mat muhly, prairie junegrass, Sandberg bluegrass, plains reedgrass, blue grama, and threadleaf sedge. Forbs such as American vetch, upright prairie coneflower, desertparsley, large Indian breadroot, two-grooved milkvetch, American licorice, scarlet beeblossom, purple prairie clover, white prairie clover, tapertip hawksbeard, and scarlet globemallow are present. The dominant shrub species is Wyoming big sagebrush. Other shrub and subshrub species which occur at lower canopy cover may include western snowberry, winterfat, and prairie sagewort. The potential vegetation is approximately 72 percent grasses, 9 percent forbs, and 19 percent shrubs. The total annual production (air-dry weight) is approximately 1,800 pounds per acre during an average year but can range from approximately 1,200 pounds per acre in below average years to approximately 2,200 pounds per acre in above average years.

Figure 8. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)

Table 5. Annual production by plant type

Plant type	Low (lb/acre)	Representative value (lb/acre)	High (lb/acre)
Grass/Grasslike	864	1296	1584
Shrub/Vine	228	342	418
Forb	108	162	198
Total	1200	1800	2200

Figure 9. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). WY1402, 10-14NP extra water sites.

Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
J	F	M	A	M	J	J	A	S	O	N	D
0	0	0	5	20	30	15	10	15	5	0	0

Community 1.2
Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis/Leymus cinereus-Bouteloua gracilis (Wyoming big sagebrush/basin wildrye-blue grama)

Community Phase 1.2 is characterized by an increasing dominance of shortgrasses such as blue grama, prairie junegrass, and Sandberg bluegrass and a decrease in cool-season, rhizomatous wheatgrasses and mid-statured bunchgrasses such as western wheatgrass, thickspike wheatgrass, green needlegrass, and Canada wildrye. Shrub and subshrub species such as Wyoming big sagebrush, western snowberry, and prairie sagewort are present.

Pathway P1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2

Prolonged drought, grazing management such as continuous season-long or year-long grazing, heavier stocking rates, or a combination of these factors can shift Community Phase 1.1 to Community Phase 1.2.

Pathway P1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1

Normal or above-normal precipitation and lighter stocking rates transitions Community Phase 1.2 back to Community Phase 1.1.

State 2
Sod-Bound State

The dynamics of the Sod-Bound State (2) are driven by long-term drought, grazing management such as continuous season-long or year-long grazing, heavier stocking rates, or a combination of these factors. The Sod-Bound State (2) for this ecological site consists of 1 community phase.

Community 2.1
Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis/Bromus inermis-Poa pratensis (Wyoming big sagebrush/smooth brome-Kentucky bluegrass)

Community Phase 2.1 is characterized by a dominance of introduced, invasive, perennial grasses such smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass. Native, cool-season bunchgrasses such as basin wildrye, green needlegrass, and Canada wildrye and rhizomatous wheatgrasses such as western wheatgrass and thickspike wheatgrass are rare or absent. This plant community occurs when site conditions decline due to long-term drought, grazing management such as continuous season-long or year-long grazing, heavier stocking rates, or a combination of these factors. Shrub and subshrub species such as Wyoming big sagebrush, western snowberry, and prairie sagewort are present.

State 3
Increased Bare Ground State

The dynamics of the Increased Bare Ground State (3) are driven by long-term drought, grazing management such as continuous season-long or year-long grazing, heavier stocking rates, or a combination of these factors. The Increased Bare Ground State (3) for this ecological site consists of 1 community phase.

Community 3.1
Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis/Bromus inermis-Bromus tectorum (Wyoming big sagebrush/smooth brome-cheatgrass)

Community Phase 3.1 is characterized by a dominance of introduced, invasive, perennial grasses such smooth brome and introduced, annual grasses such as cheatgrass. Cool-season rhizomatous wheatgrasses and mid-statured bunchgrasses such as western wheatgrass, thickspike wheatgrass, green needlegrass, and Canada wildrye are rare or absent. Shrub and subshrub species such as Wyoming big sagebrush, western snowberry, and prairie sagewort are present.

Transition T1A
State 1 to 2

Prolonged drought, grazing practices such as continuous season-long or year-long grazing, heavier stocking rates, or a combination of these factors weaken the resilience of the Reference State (1) and drive its transition to the Sod-Bound State (2). The Reference State (1) transitions to the Sod-Bound State (2) when mid-statured grasses are greatly reduced and sod-forming species such as smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass dominate the plant community.

Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1

Sod-forming species such as smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass can resist displacement by other species. A reduction in livestock grazing pressure alone may not be sufficient to reduce the cover of these species in the Sod-Bound State (2) and mechanical treatments may be necessary. Therefore, returning the Sod-Bound State (2) to the Reference State (1) can require considerable cost, energy, and time.

Transition T2A
State 2 to 3

The Sod-Bound State (2) transitions to the Increased Bare Ground State (3) when non-native grasses such as cheatgrass, noxious weeds, and other invasive plants invade the Sod-Bound State (2). Exotic plant species increase substantially on the site in terms of cover and production. Site resilience has been significantly reduced.

Additional community tables

Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition

Group	Common name	Symbol	Scientific name	Annual production (lb/acre)	Foliar cover (%)
Grass/Grasslike
1	Cool-Season Rhizomatous Grasses			180–330
	western wheatgrass	PASM	Pascopyrum smithii	180–330	10–15
	thickspike wheatgrass	ELLAL	Elymus lanceolatus ssp. lanceolatus	180–330	10–15
2	Cool-Season Bunchgrasses			1080–1980
	basin wildrye	LECI4	Leymus cinereus	600–1100	40–50
	green needlegrass	NAVI4	Nassella viridula	240–440	15–20
	Cusick's bluegrass	POCU3	Poa cusickii	120–220	5–10
	Canada wildrye	ELCA4	Elymus canadensis	120–220	5–10
3	Miscellaneous Grasses			120–220
	Grass, perennial	2GP	Grass, perennial	60–110	1–5
	blue grama	BOGR2	Bouteloua gracilis	60–110	1–5
	buffalograss	BODA2	Bouteloua dactyloides	60–110	1–5
	threadleaf sedge	CAFI	Carex filifolia	60–110	1–5
	plains reedgrass	CAMO	Calamagrostis montanensis	60–110	1–5
	needle and thread	HECO26	Hesperostipa comata	60–110	1–5
	mat muhly	MURI	Muhlenbergia richardsonis	60–110	1–5
	prairie Junegrass	KOMA	Koeleria macrantha	60–110	1–5
	Sandberg bluegrass	POSE	Poa secunda	60–110	1–5
	sedge	CAREX	Carex	60–110	1–5
Forb
4	Forbs			180–330
	aster	ASTER	Aster	60–110	1–5
	yarrow	ACHIL	Achillea	60–110	1–5
	twogrooved milkvetch	ASBI2	Astragalus bisulcatus	60–110	1–5
	milkvetch	ASTRA	Astragalus	60–110	1–5
	scarlet beeblossom	GACO5	Gaura coccinea	60–110	1–5
	American licorice	GLLE3	Glycyrrhiza lepidota	60–110	1–5
	desertparsley	LOMAT	Lomatium	60–110	1–5
	large Indian breadroot	PEES	Pediomelum esculentum	60–110	1–5
	upright prairie coneflower	RACO3	Ratibida columnifera	60–110	1–5
	purple prairie clover	DAPU5	Dalea purpurea	60–110	1–5
	white prairie clover	DACA7	Dalea candida	60–110	1–5
	bluebells	MERTE	Mertensia	60–110	1–5
	tapertip hawksbeard	CRAC2	Crepis acuminata	60–110	1–5
	textile onion	ALTE	Allium textile	60–110	1–5
	American vetch	VIAM	Vicia americana	60–110	1–5
	scurfpea	PSORA2	Psoralidium	60–110	1–5
	scarlet globemallow	SPCO	Sphaeralcea coccinea	60–110	1–5
	larkspur	DELPH	Delphinium	60–110	1–5
	white sagebrush	ARLU	Artemisia ludoviciana	60–110	1–5
	Cuman ragweed	AMPS	Ambrosia psilostachya	60–110	1–5
	field sagewort	ARCA12	Artemisia campestris	60–110	1–5
	Forb, perennial	2FP	Forb, perennial	60–110	1–5
Shrub/Vine
5	Shrubs			120–220
	Wyoming big sagebrush	ARTRW8	Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis	120–220	5–10
6	Miscellaneous Shrubs			240–440
	prairie sagewort	ARFR4	Artemisia frigida	60–110	1–5
	western snowberry	SYOC	Symphoricarpos occidentalis	60–110	1–5
	winterfat	KRLA2	Krascheninnikovia lanata	60–110	1–5
	Shrub (>.5m)	2SHRUB	Shrub (>.5m)	60–110	1–5
	Subshrub (<.5m)	2SUBS	Subshrub (<.5m)	60–110	1–5

Interpretations

Animal community

Rhizomatous wheatgrass/ basin wildrye: The predominance of grasses in this plant community favors grazers and mixed-feeders, such as bison, elk, and antelope. Suitable thermal and escape cover for deer may be limited due to the low quantities of woody plants. However, topographical variations could provide some escape cover. When found adjacent to sagebrush dominated states, this plant community may provide brood rearing/foraging areas for sage grouse, as well as lek sites. Other birds that would frequent this plant community include western meadowlarks, horned larks, and golden eagles. Many grassland obligate small mammals would occur here.

Western wheatgrass/Green needlegrass: The predominance of grasses in this plant community favors grazers and mixed-feeders, such as bison, elk, and antelope. Suitable thermal and escape cover for deer may be limited due to the low quantities of woody plants. However, topographical variations could provide some escape cover. When found adjacent to sagebrush dominated states, this plant community may provide brood rearing/foraging areas for sage grouse, as well as lek sites. Other birds that would frequent this plant community include western meadowlarks, horned larks, and golden eagles. Many grassland obligate small mammals would occur here.

Mixed Sagebrush/Grass: The combination of an overstory of sagebrush and an understory of grasses and forbs provide a very diverse plant community for wildlife. The crowns of sagebrush tend to break up hard crusted snow on winter ranges, so mule deer and antelope may use this state for foraging and cover year-round, as would cottontail and jack rabbits. It provides important winter, nesting, brood-rearing, and foraging habitat for sage grouse. Brewer’s sparrows’ nest in big sagebrush plants, and hosts of other nesting birds utilize stands in the 20-30% cover range.

Animal Community – Grazing Interpretations

The following table lists suggested stocking rates for cattle under continuous season-long grazing under normal growing conditions. These are conservative estimates that should be used only as guidelines in the initial stages of the conservation planning process. Often, the current plant composition does not entirely match any particular plant community (as described in this ecological site description). Because of this, a field visit is recommended, in all cases, to document plant composition and production. More precise carrying capacity estimates should eventually be calculated using this information along with animal preference data, particularly when grazers other than cattle are involved. Under more intensive grazing management, improved harvest efficiencies can result in an increased carrying capacity. If distribution problems occur, stocking rates must be reduced to maintain plant health and vigor.

Plant Community Production Carrying Capacity*
(lb./ac) (AUM/ac)
Reference Plant Community 1200-2200 .6
Western wheatgrass/Green needlegrass 1000-2200 .5
Mixed Sagebrush/Grass 800-1500 .4

* - Continuous, season-long grazing by cattle under average growing conditions.

Grazing by domestic livestock is one of the major income-producing industries in the area. Rangeland in this area may provide yearlong forage for cattle, sheep, or horses. During the dormant period, the forage for livestock use needs to be supplemented with protein because the quality does not meet minimum livestock requirements.

Hydrological functions

Water is the principal factor limiting forage production on this site. This site is dominated by soils in hydrologic group B and C, with localized areas in hydrologic group D. Infiltration rate is moderately slow to slow. Runoff potential for this site varies from moderate to high depending on soil hydrologic group and ground cover. In many cases, areas with greater than 75% ground cover have the greatest potential for high infiltration and lower runoff. An example of an exception would be where short-grasses form a strong sod and dominate the site. Areas where ground cover is less than 50% have the greatest potential to have reduced infiltration and higher runoff (refer to Part 630, NRCS National Engineering Handbook for detailed hydrology information).
Rills and gullies should not typically be present. Water flow patterns should be barely distinguishable if at all present. Pedestals are only slightly present in association with increased flow or flooding events. Litter typically falls in place, and signs of movement are not common. Chemical and physical crusts are rare to non-existent. Cryptogamic crusts are present, but only cover 1-2% of the soil surface.

Recreational uses

This site provides hunting opportunities for upland game species. The wide variety of plants which bloom from spring until fall have an esthetic value that appeals to visitors.

Wood products

No appreciable wood products are present on the site.

Other products

None noted.

Other information

Site Development & Testing Plan

General Data (MLRA and Revision Notes, Hierarchical Classification, Ecological Site Concept, Physiographic, Climate, and Water Features, and Soils Data):

Updated. All “Required” items complete to Provisional level.

Community Phase Data (Ecological Dynamics, STM, Transition & Recovery Pathways, Reference Plant Community, Species Composition List, Annual Production Table):

Updated. All “Required” items complete to Provisional level.

Annual Production Table is from the “Previously Approved” ESD (2001).

The Annual Production Table and Species Composition List will be reviewed for future updates at the Approved level.

Each Alternative State/Community:

Complete to Provisional level.

Supporting Information (Site Interpretations, Assoc. & Similar Sites, Inventory Data References, Agency/State Correlation, References):

Updated. All “Required” items complete to Provisional level.

Wildlife Interpretations: Narrative is from “Previously Approved” ESD (2001). Wildlife species will need to be updated at the next Approved level.

Livestock Interpretations: Plant community names and stocking rates updated.

Hydrology, Recreational Uses, Wood Products, and Other Products carried over from previously “Approved” ESD (2001).

Existing NRI Inventory Data References updated. More field data collection is needed to support this site concept.

Reference Sheet
Rangeland Health Reference Sheet carried over from previously “Approved” ESD (2005).
It will be updated at the next “Approved” level.

“Future work, as described in a project plan, to validate the information in this provisional ecological site description is needed. This will include field activities to collect low and medium intensity sampling, soil correlations, and analysis of that data. Annual field reviews should be done by soil scientists and vegetation specialists. A final field review, peer review, quality control, and quality assurance reviews of the ESD will be needed to produce the final document.” (NI 430_306 ESI and ESD, April 2015)

Supporting information

Inventory data references

Inventory information has been derived from data collection on private and federal lands by the following methods:
• Double Sampling (Determining Vegetation Production and Stocking Rates, WY-ECS-1)
• Rangeland Health (Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health, Version 4, 2005)
• Soil Stability (Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health, Version 4, 2005)
• Line Point Intercept (Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland, and Savanna Ecosystems, Volume II, 2005)
• Soil Pedon Descriptions (Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils, Version 3, 2012)
• SCS-RANGE-417 (Production & Composition Record for Native Grazing Lands)

USDA - Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
Thunder Basin National Grassland
Plant Community Responses to Historical Wildfire in a Shrubland/Grassland Ecotone
• Number of Records: 140
• Sample Period: 2014-2021
• State: Wyoming
• Counties: Campbell, Converse, Crook, Niobrara, and Weston

Additional reconnaissance data collection includes ocular estimates and other inventory data; vegetative clipping data for NRCS program support; field observations from experienced rangeland personnel

Data collection for this ecological site was done in conjunction with the progressive soil surveys within MLRA 58B Northern Rolling High Plains (Southern Part)

Note: Revisions to soil surveys are on-going. For the most recent updates, visit the Web Soil Survey, the official site for soils information: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx

Other references

Cleland, D.T., et al. 1997. National hierarchical framework of ecological units. In: M.S. Boyce and A. Haney (eds.) Ecosystem Management Applications for Sustainable Forest and Wildlife Resources, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

DeKeyser, E.S., M. Meehan, G. Clambey, and K. Krabbenhoft. 2013. Cool season invasive grasses in northern Great Plains natural areas. Natural Areas Journal 33:81-90.

Dormaar, J.F., and S. Smoliak. 1985. Recovery of vegetative cover and soil organic matter during revegetation of abandoned farmland in a semiarid climate. Journal of Range Management 38:487-491.

Federal Geographic Data Committee. 2008. The National Vegetation Classification Standard, Version 2. FGDC Vegetation Subcommittee. FGDC-STD-005-2008 (Version 2). pp. 126.

Herrick JE, Van Zee J, Havstad K, Burkett LM, Whitford WG. 2005. Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland, and Savanna Ecosystems, Volume II. Tucson, AZ. University of Arizona Press – Distributor.

Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. USDA Handbook 296. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006.

McNab, W.H., et al. 2007. Description of Ecological Sub-Regions: Sections of the Conterminous United States. USDA Forest Service. General Technical Report WO-76B.

Pellant M., Shaver P., Pyke D., Herrick JE. 2005. Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health, Version 4.0. Technical Reference 1734-6. Denver, CO. USDI Bureau of Land Management, NSTC, Division of Science Integration, Branch of Publishing Services.

Samuel, M.J., and R.H. Hart. 1994. Sixty-one years of secondary succession on rangelands of the Wyoming High Plains. Journal of Range Management 47:184-191.

Schoeneberger, Wysocki, Benham, and Soil Science Division Staff. 2012. Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils, Version 3. Washington, DC. United States Government Publishing Office (GPO).

Soil Science Division Staff. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2014. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th Edition.

Soil Science Division Staff. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2017. Soil Survey Manual, Agriculture Handbook No. 18.

Soil Science Division Staff. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2019. National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 (Accessed 16 January, 2018).

Soil Science Division Staff. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. National Soil Information System (NASIS) Database. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/survey/geo/?cid=nrcs142p2_053552 (Accessed 30 October, 2017).

Soil Science Division Staff. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Official Soil Series Descriptions. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053587 (Accessed 15 November, 2017).

Soil Science Division Staff. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database.

Soil Science Division Staff. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm (Accessed 15 February, 2018).

Stubbendieck, James, S.L. Hatch, and L.M. Landholt. 2003. North American Wildland Plants. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln and London.

Toledo, D., M. Sanderson, K. Spaeth, J. Hendrickson, and J. Printz. 2014. Extent of Kentucky bluegrass and its effect on native plant species diversity and ecosystem services in the Northern Great Plains of the United States. Invasive Plant Science and Management 7:543-552.

United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Cooperative Climatological Data Summaries. NOAA Western Regional Climate Center, Reno, NV. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/climatedata/climsum (Accessed 16 November, 2017).

United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey. LANDFIRE 1.1.0 Existing Vegetation Types. 2011. http://landfire.cr.usgs.gov/viewer/.

United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey. LANDFIRE 1.1.0 Vegetation Dynamics Models. 2008. http://landfire.cr.usgs.gov/viewer/.

United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory. 2013. Level III Eco-Regions of the Continental United States. https://www.epa.gov/eco-research/ecoregions (Accessed 30 January, 2019).

USDA Forest Service. Fire Effects Information System.http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/shrub/amealn/all.html.

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA Forest Service, USDI Bureau of Land Management. January 2013. Interagency Ecological Site Handbook for Rangelands.

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. USDA Handbook 296.

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Climate Data. National Water and Climate Center. https://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/climate (Accessed 13 October, 2017).

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms. National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI, Part 629.02c. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 (Accessed 16 January, 2018).

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. National Cooperative Soil Survey. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/soils/survey/partnership/ncss/.

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. National Ecological Site Handbook, Title 190. March 2017. https://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/ (Accessed 15 September, 2017).

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. National Range and Pasture Handbook. 1997, Revised 2003. http://www.glti.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/publications/nrph.html (Accessed 26 February, 2018).

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. NRCS Plants Database. https://plants.usda.gov/java/.

Contributors

Everett Bainter
Glenn Mitchell

Approval

Kirt Walstad, 10/04/2023

Acknowledgments

Project Staff:

Kimberly Diller, Ecological Site Specialist, NRCS MLRA SSO, Pueblo CO
Mike Leno, Project Leader, NRCS MLRA SSO, Buffalo WY

Partners/Contributors:

Joe Dyer, Soil Scientist, NRCS MLRA SSO, Buffalo WY
Arnie Irwin, Soil Scientist, BLM, Buffalo WY
Blaine Horn, Rangeland Extension Educator, UW Extension, Buffalo WY
Isabelle Giuliani, Resource Soil Scientist, NRCS, Douglas WY
Mary Jo Kimble, Project Leader, NRCS MLRA SSO, Miles City MT
Ryan Murray, Area Rangeland Management Specialist, NRCS, Buffalo WY
Lauren Porensky, PhD, Ecologist, ARS, Fort Collins CO
Chadley Prosser, Rangeland Program Manager, USFS, Bismarck ND
Bryan Christensen, Ecological Site Specialist, NRCS MLRA SSO, Pinedale WY
Marji Patz, Ecological Site Specialist, NRCS MLRA SSO, Powell WY
Rick Peterson, Ecological Site Specialist, NRCS MLRA SSO, Rapid City SD
Jeff Fenton, Ecological Site Specialist, NRCS MLRA SSO, Buffalo WY

Program Support:

John Hartung, WY State Rangeland Management Specialist (QC), NRCS, Casper WY
David Kraft, Senior Regional Ecological Site Specialist (QA), NRCS, Emporia KS
Carla Green Adams, Editor, NRCS-SSR5, Denver CO
Chad Remley, Regional Director, Northern Central Soil Survey Region, Salina KS

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)
Contact for lead author
Date	10/05/2023
Approved by	Kirt Walstad
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production