Clayey Overflow
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
- Transition T1A More details
- Transition T5A More details
- Transition T2A More details
- Transition T5A More details
- Restoration pathway R3A More details
- Transition T5A More details
-
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
This State represents the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of this ecological site. This State was dominated by cool- season grasses. In pre-European times, the primary disturbance mechanisms for this site in the Reference condition included somewhat frequent fire and grazing by large herding ungulates. Timing of fires and grazing coupled with weather events dictated the dynamics that occurred within the natural range of variability. A combination of disturbances such as fire followed by grazing during below average precipitation periods, or a severe single disturbance such as extended periods of below average precipitation would have caused a decline in tall warm-season grasses and green needlegrass. This would have resulted in a simplification of the plant community with dominance by western wheatgrass.
The Reference State may be difficult to locate in this MLRA with the introduction of non-native cool-season grasses. Plant Community Phase 2.1 is most similar to the Reference Plant Community but because of the persistence of non-native cool-season grasses, a restoration pathway to the Reference State is not believed to be achievable.
Submodel
Description
This State is similar to the Reference State in terms of dominant plant composition and production. However, the invasion of introduced non-native cool-season sodgrasses alters the natural range of variability for this ecological site. This state is still dominated by mid- and tall native warm- and cool-season grasses, but invasive introduced cool-season sodgrasses are now present in all community phases of this state. The primary disturbance mechanisms for the Native/Invaded State include grazing by domestic livestock and infrequent fires. Timing and intensity of grazing events coupled with weather dictate the dynamics that occur within this state. The cool-season native grass can decline and an increase in introduced sodgrasses will occur. Many times, this state appears as a mosaic of community phases caused primarily by continuous season-long grazing.
This state represents the more common range of variability that exists with higher levels of grazing management but in the absence of periodic fire followed by short-term intensive grazing. This state is dominated by cool-season grasses, with warm-season grasses being subdominant. It can be found on areas that are properly managed with grazing and/or prescribed burning, and sometimes on areas receiving occasional short periods of rest.
Submodel
Description
This State is the result of invasion and dominance of introduced species. This state is characterized by the dominance of Kentucky bluegrass and smooth brome, and an increasing thatch layer that effectively blocks introduction of other plants into the system. Plant litter accumulation tends to favor the more shade tolerant, introduced grass species. The nutrient cycle is also impaired, and the result is typically a higher level of nitrogen which also favors the introduced species. Increasing plant litter decreases the amount of sunlight reaching plant crowns thereby shifting competitive advantage to shade tolerant, introduced grass species. Studies indicate that soil biological activity is altered, and this shift apparently exploits the soil microclimate and encourages growth of the introduced grass species. Once the threshold is crossed, a change in grazing management alone cannot cause a reduction in the invasive grass dominance. Preliminary studies would tend to indicate this threshold may exist when Kentucky bluegrass exceeds 30 percent of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40 percent of the plant community composition. Plant communities dominated by Kentucky bluegrass have significantly less cover and diversity of native grasses and forb species (Toledo, D. et al., 2014).
Submodel
Description
This State can be transitioned from any Plant Community. The two separate vegetative Plant Communities are highly variable in nature. They are derived through different management scenarios, and are not related successionally. Infiltration, runoff, and soil erosion varies depending on the vegetation present on the site.
Submodel
Mechanism
Continuous season-long grazing (grazing at light to moderate stocking levels for a majority of or the entire growing season), or heavy, continuous seasonal grazing (stocking levels well above carrying capacity at the same time of year each year), or long-term light grazing, or excessive haying, invasion of non-native cool-season grasses will convert this plant community to the Native/Invaded State (2.0). Non-use and no fire for extended periods of time (typically for 10 or more years) can also lead to a transition to the Invaded State (2.0).
Mechanism
Heavy disturbance including soil erosion, tillage, abandoned cropland, or seeding to improved pasture species result in a transition to the Disturbed State (4.0).
Mechanism
Heavy, continuous seasonal grazing (stocking levels well above carrying capacity for extended portions of the growing season, and often at the same time of year each year), or long-term light grazing, or excessive haying will convert this plant community to the Invaded State (3.0).
Or
Non-use and no fire for extended periods of time (typically for 10 or more years) can also lead to a transition to the Invaded State (3.0).
Mechanism
Heavy disturbance including soil erosion, tillage, abandoned cropland, or seeding to improved pasture species result in a transition to the Disturbed State (4.0).
Mechanism
Long-term prescribed grazing (moderate stocking levels coupled with adequate recovery periods, or other grazing systems such as high-density, low-frequency intended to treat specific species dominance, or periodic light to moderate stocking levels possibly including periodic rest) coupled with prescribed burning and/or herbaceous weed control (herbicide) may lead this plant community back to the Native/Invasive State (2.0). This will likely take a long period of time, possibly up to 10 years or more, and recovery may not be attainable. Success depends on whether native reproductive propagules remain intact on the site.
Relevant conservation practices
Practice | External resources |
---|---|
Prescribed Burning |
|
Prescribed Grazing |
|
Herbaceous Weed Control |
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.