![5231](https://edit.jornada.nmsu.edu/uploads/large/es/pc/5231.jpg)
Clayey Overflow
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
- Transition T1 More details
- Transition T2a More details
- Transition T2b More details
- Restoration pathway R3 More details
-
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
This state represents the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of this ecological site (ES). This state was dominated by cool-season grass and grass-like species. In pre-European times, the primary disturbance mechanisms for this site in the reference condition included somewhat frequent fire and grazing by large herding ungulates. Timing of fires and grazing coupled with weather events dictated the dynamics that occurred within the natural range of variability. A combination of disturbances such as fire followed by grazing during below average precipitation periods, or a severe single disturbance such as extended periods of below average precipitation, would have caused a decline in sedges and green needlegrass. This would have resulted in a simplification of the plant community with dominance by western wheatgrass.
Submodel
Description
This state is similar to the reference state in terms dominant plant composition and production. However, the invasion of introduced cool-season sod grasses alters the natural range of variability for this ES. This state is still dominated by mid- and tall native cool-season grasses, but invasive introduced cool-season sod grasses are now present in all community phases of this state. The primary disturbance mechanisms for this state include grazing by domestic livestock and infrequent fires. Timing and intensity of grazing events coupled with weather dictate the dynamics that occur within this state. The cool-season native grass can decline and an increase in introduced sod grasses will occur. Many times, this state appears as a mosaic of community phases caused primarily by continuous season-long grazing.
This state represents the more common range of variability that exists with higher levels of grazing management but in the absence of periodic fire followed by short-term intensive grazing. This state is dominated by cool-season grasses, with warm-season grasses being subdominant. It can be found on areas that are properly managed with grazing and/or prescribed burning, and sometimes on areas receiving occasional short periods of rest.
Submodel
Description
This state is the result of invasion and dominance of introduced species. This state is characterized by the dominance of Kentucky bluegrass and an increasing thatch layer that effectively blocks introduction of other plants into the system. Plant litter accumulation tends to favor the more shade tolerant introduced grass species. The nutrient cycle is also impaired and the result is typically a higher level of nitrogen which also favors the introduced species. Increasing plant litter decreases the amount of sunlight reaching plant crowns thereby shifting competitive advantage to shade tolerant introduced grass species. Studies indicate that soil biological activity is altered and this shift apparently exploits the soil microclimate and encourages growth of the introduced grass species. Once the threshold is crossed, a change in grazing management alone cannot cause a reduction in the invasive grass dominance. Preliminary studies would tend to indicate this threshold may exist when Kentucky bluegrass exceeds 30 percent of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40 percent of the plant community composition.
Once the state is well established, even drastic events such as high intensity fires driven by high fuel loads of litter and thatch will not result in more than a very short term reduction of Kentucky bluegrass. These events may reduce the dominance of Kentucky bluegrass but due to the large amount of rhizomes in the soil there is no opportunity for the native species to establish and dominate before Kentucky bluegrass rebounds and again dominates the system.
Submodel
Mechanism
Encroachment of non-native grasses such as Kentucky bluegrass, and disruption of natural disturbance regimes such as periodic fire followed by short-term high intensity grazing would have led this plant community phase over a threshold to the Native/Invasive Grass State (State 2). This occurs as natural and/or management actions (altered grazing and/or fire regime) favored a decline in the composition of the native species and an increase in cool-season sod grasses. Chronic season-long or heavy continuous grazing facilitated this transition. Complete rest from grazing and no fire events could also have accelerated this transition.
Mechanism
Non-use and no fire for extended periods of time (typically for 10 or more years) will likely lead this state over a threshold resulting in the 3.1 Kentucky Bluegrass/Reed Canarygrass/Forbs Plant Community Phase within the Invaded Grass State (State 3).
Mechanism
Heavy continuous seasonal grazing (stocking levels well above carrying capacity for extended portions of the growing season and often at the same time of year each year) or heavy continuous season-long grazing will convert this plant community to the 3.2 Kentucky Bluegrass/Foxtail Barley/Forbs Plant Community Phase in the Invaded Grass State (State 3).
Mechanism
Long-term prescribed grazing (moderate stocking levels coupled with adequate recovery periods, or other grazing systems such as high-density, low-frequency intended to treat specific species dominance, or periodic light to moderate stocking levels possibly including periodic rest) coupled with prescribed burning and/or pest management (herbicide) may lead this plant community phase over a threshold to the Native/Invasive Grass State (State 2). This will likely take a long period of time, possibly up to 10 years or more, and recovery may not be attainable. Success depends on whether native reproductive propagules remain intact on the site.
Relevant conservation practices
Practice | External resources |
---|---|
Prescribed Grazing |
|
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) |
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.