Wet Terrace Savanna
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
- Transition T1A More details
- Transition T1B More details
- Transition T1C More details
- Restoration pathway R2A More details
- Restoration pathway R2B More details
- Transition T3A More details
- Restoration pathway R3A More details
- Restoration pathway T4A More details
- Restoration pathway R4A More details
- Transition T5A More details
- Restoration pathway T5B More details
- Transition T5C More details
-
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
The reference plant community is categorized as a wet-mesic bottomland oak woodland. The two community phases within the reference state are dependent on seasonal flooding regimes and infrequent fires. The amount of water occurring at flood stages and fire intensity affects species composition, cover, and extent. Windthrow events and pest outbreaks have more localized impacts in the reference phases, but do contribute to overall plant community composition, diversity, cover, and productivity.
Submodel
Description
Periodic fire maintained a moderate tree canopy and an understory more reminiscent of a wet prairie. However, the past 150 years of fire suppression efforts have transitioned the reference oak savanna community into a closed-canopy woodland state. Along with fire suppression, the channelization of streams and rivers and the development of reservoirs has also contributed to a closing of the canopy as well as causing a significant shift in species composition. (Nelson 2010; NatureServe 2015).
Submodel
Description
The cool-season pasture state occurs when the reference state has been anthropogenically-altered for livestock production. Early settlers harvested the trees for timber and fuel and seeded such non-native cool-season species as Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), converting the woodland to pasture (Smith 1998; IDNR 2013). Over time, as lands were continually grazed by large herds of cattle, the non-native species were able to spread and expand across the site, reducing the native species diversity. However, these sites are difficult to maintain due to frequent flooding and low available water capacity.
Submodel
Description
The Midwest is well-known for its highly-productive agricultural soils, and as a result, much of the MLRA has been converted to cropland, including portions of this ecological site. The continuous use of tillage, row-crop planting, and chemicals (i.e., herbicides, fertilizers, etc.) have effectively eliminated the reference community and many of its natural ecological functions in favor of crop production. Corn (Zea mays L.) and soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) are the dominant crops for the site. These areas are likely to remain in crop production for the foreseeable future.
Submodel
Description
The combination of natural and anthropogenic disturbances occurring today has resulted in a number of ecosystem health issues, and restoration back to the historic reference condition is likely not possible. Many natural lowland communities are being stressed by non-native diseases and pests, habitat fragmentation, permanent changes in hydrologic regimes, fire suppression, and overabundant deer populations on top of naturally-occurring disturbances (severe weather and native pests) (Flickinger 2010; Nelson 2010). However, these habitats provide multiple ecosystem services including carbon sequestration; clean air and water; soil conservation; biodiversity support; as well as a variety of cultural activities (e.g., hiking, hunting) (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005; Flickinger 2010). Therefore, conservation of lowland savannas should still be pursued. Habitat reconstructions are an important tool for repairing natural ecological functioning and providing habitat protection for numerous species of Wet Terrace Savannas. Therefore ecological restoration should aim to aid the recovery of degraded, damaged, or destroyed ecosystems. A successful restoration will have the ability to structurally and functionally sustain itself, demonstrate resilience to the ranges of stress and disturbance, and create and maintain positive biotic and abiotic interactions (SER 2002). The reconstructed savanna state is the result of a long-term commitment involving a multi-step, adaptive management process.
Submodel
Mechanism
Fire suppression and hydrologic alterations transition this site to the fire-suppressed woodland state (2).
Mechanism
Woody species reduction, interseeding of non-native, cool-season grasses, and continuous grazing transition this site to the cool-season pasture state (3).
Mechanism
Installation of drain tiles, tillage, seeding of agricultural crops, and non-selective herbicide transition this site to the cropland state (4).
Mechanism
Selective tree thinning and prescribed fire is used to restore this site to the reference state (1).
Mechanism
Site preparation, invasive species control (native and non-native), tree planting, and prescribed fire transition this site to the reconstructed savanna state (5).
Mechanism
Installation of drain tiles, tillage, seeding of agricultural crops, and non-selective herbicide transition this site to the cropland state (4).
Mechanism
Site preparation, invasive species control (native and non-native), tree planting, and prescribed fire transition this site to the reconstructed savanna state (5).
Mechanism
Non-selective herbicide, seeding of non-native cool-season grasses, and continuous grazing transitions the site to the cool-season pasture state (3).
Mechanism
Site preparation, invasive species control (native and non-native), tree planting, and prescribed fire transition this site to the reconstructed savanna state (5).
Mechanism
Fire (or fire surrogate) suppression efforts transition this site to the fire-suppressed forest state (2).
Mechanism
Tree removal and interseeding non-native cool-season grasses transition this site to the cool-season pasture state (3).
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.