Limestone Prairie
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
- Transition T1A More details
- Transition T1B More details
- Transition T1C More details
- Transition T2A More details
- Transition T2B More details
- Restoration pathway R2A More details
- Transition T3A More details
- Transition T3B More details
- Restoration pathway R3A More details
- Transition T4A More details
- Transition T4B More details
- Restoration pathway R4A More details
- Transition T5A More details
- Transition T5B More details
- Transition T5C More details
-
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
The reference plant community is categorized as a prairie community, dominated by herbaceous vegetation. The one community phase within the reference state is dependent on fire. The intensity and frequency alter species composition, cover, and extent. Drought and herbivory have more localized impacts in the reference state, but do contribute to overall species composition, diversity, cover, and productivity.
Submodel
Description
Long-term fire suppression can transition the reference prairie community into a woody-invaded shrub-prairie state. This state is evidenced by a well-developed shrub layer with an overstory of eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana L.) (LANDFIRE 2009). The establishment of woody species reduces the historic biodiversity thereby changing the vegetative community.
Submodel
Description
The forage state occurs when the reference state is converted to a farming system that emphasizes domestic livestock production known as grassland agriculture. Fire suppression, periodic cultural treatments (e.g., clipping, drainage, soil amendment applications, planting new species and/or cultivars, mechanical harvesting) and grazing by domesticated livestock transition and maintain this state (USDA-NRCS 2003). Early settlers seeded non-native species, such as smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyss.) and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), to help extend the grazing season. Over time, as lands were continuously harvested or grazed by herds of cattle, the non-native species were able to spread and expand across the landscape, reducing the native species diversity and ecological function.
Submodel
Description
The continuous use of tillage, row-crop planting, and chemicals (i.e., herbicides, fertilizers, etc.) has effectively eliminated the reference community and many of its natural ecological functions in favor of crop production. Corn and soybeans are the dominant crops for the site, and oats (Avena L.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) may be rotated periodically. These areas are likely to remain in crop production for the foreseeable future.
Submodel
Description
Prairie reconstructions have become an important tool for repairing natural ecological functions and providing habitat protection for numerous grassland dependent species. Because the historic plant and soil biota communities of the prairie were highly diverse with complex interrelationships, historic prairie replication cannot be guaranteed on landscapes that have been so extensively manipulated for extended timeframes (Kardol and Wardle 2010; Fierer et al. 2013). Therefore, ecological restoration should aim to aid the recovery of degraded, damaged, or destroyed ecosystems. A successful restoration will have the ability to structurally and functionally sustain itself, demonstrate resilience to the natural ranges of stress and disturbance, and create and maintain positive biotic and abiotic interactions (SER 2002). The reconstructed limestone prairie state is the result of a long-term commitment involving a multi-step, adaptive management process. Diverse, species-rich seed mixes are important to utilize as they allow the site to undergo successional stages that exhibit changing composition and dominance over time (Smith et al. 2010). On-going management via prescribed fire and/or light grazing can help the site progress from an early successional community dominated by annuals and some weeds to a later seral stage composed of native, perennial grasses, forbs, and a few shrubs. Establishing a prescribed fire regimen that mimics natural disturbance patterns can increase native species cover and diversity while reducing cover of non-native forbs and grasses. Light grazing alone can help promote species richness, while grazing accompanied with fire can control the encroachment of woody vegetation (Brudvig et al. 2007).
Submodel
Mechanism
Long-term fire suppression transitions the site to the fire-suppressed scrub state (2).
Mechanism
Cultural treatments to enhance forage quality and yield transitions the site to the forage state (3).
Mechanism
Tillage, seeding of agricultural crops, and non-selective herbicide transition the site to the cropland state (4).
Mechanism
Cultural treatments to enhance forage quality and yield transitions the site to the forage state (3).
Mechanism
Tillage, seeding of agricultural crops, and non-selective herbicide transition this site to the cropland state (4).
Mechanism
Site preparation, invasive species control, and seeding native species transition this site to the reconstructed limestone prairie state (5).
Mechanism
Long-term fire suppression and/or land abandonment transition the site to the fire-suppressed scrub state (2).
Mechanism
Tillage, seeding of agricultural crops, and non-selective herbicide transition this site to the cropland state (4).
Mechanism
Site preparation, non-native species control, and native seeding transition the site to the reconstructed limestone prairie state (5).
Mechanism
Land abandonment transitions the site to the fire-suppressed scrub state (2).
Mechanism
Cultural treatments to enhance forage quality and yield transitions the site to the forage state (3).
Mechanism
Site preparation, non-native species control, and native seeding transition the site to the reconstructed limestone prairie state (5).
Mechanism
Land abandonment transitions the site to the fire-suppressed scrub state (2).
Mechanism
Cultural treatments to enhance forage quality and yield transition the site to the forage state (3).
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.