Wet Lacustrine Forest
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
-
Transition T1A
Clearing; selective harvest; large scale natural disturbance
More details -
Transition T1B
Tree and brush removal; tillage; seeding; cropping system maintained
More details -
Restoration pathway R2A
timber stand improvement activities; brush and weed control
More details -
Transition T2A
Tree/brush removal; tillage; cropping system maintained
More details -
Restoration pathway T3A
Abandonment of site. Successional ruderal vegetation.
More details -
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
Historic reference communities on these sites exhibited a complex and diverse mosaic of wetland and wet-mesic species based on microtopography, soils, flooding regime, and natural disturbances. Canopy species often included pin oak (Quercus palustris) and/ or swamp white oak (Quercus bicolor) in the wetter portions of these sites. Other hardwood trees include silver maple (Acer saccharinum), green ash (Fagus pennsylvanica), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Acer rubrum). Areas of slightly high topography would exhibit more mesic forest species such as white oak (Quercus alba), northern red oak (Q. rubra), white ash (Fraxinus americana), sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica). Depending on microtopography and flooding/ponding regimes, the understory composition of these communities would vary. . Common species for the wetter sites include dogwoods, willows (Salix spp.), Osmunda, buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), alders (Alnus spp.) and hollies (Ilex spp.). A more wet-mesic understory community would be found on the higher portions of these sites. Natural influences to these communities include flooding, windthrow, drought, and fire which would cause temporary changes to the community structure.
Today, most sites have been disturbed (farmed, grazed, cleared, drained) and show a variety of ruderal/successional forest communities which often include maples, boxelder, hackberry, poplar,s willows and ashes. Mature, high-quality trees have usually been removed over the years and shade-tolerant, fast-growing species such as maple, and ash have become common on these sites. Diverse understory communities of native plants are rare due to the repeated disturbances which has spread invasive species.
Submodel
Description
This state reflects areas that have had anthropogenic disturbances such as clearing, selective harvest, unmanaged grazing, with no timber stand improvement management implemented. Quick growing trees such as maples and ashes quickly dominant these sites. Invasive non-native plant species are often found on these sites.
Management activities such as weed control, brush control, and planting of desired tree species will improve the quality of these sites;; however, restoration to the reference condition would require long-term management inputs.
Submodel
Description
These sites are subject to clearing, draining, and utilization for agricultural uses.
Sites can be managed as cropland or pastureland.
Numerous species may be planted depending on the landowners objectives.
The most common agricultural uses are cool season grass production (managed or unmanaged grazing regimes), hay production, or row crop production (corn - soybean rotation). The natural hydrology of these sites are often modified through ditching and tiling.
Submodel
Mechanism
The mechanism of this transition is a large scale disturbance of the reference community. Often the transitional disturbance is forest clearing or selective timber harvest that removed the mature, high-value trees with no post-harvest management inputs.
Mechanism
The site is converted to agriculture via clearing, tillage, weed control, seeding, and continual intensive management. Natural hydrology is often modified through ditching and tiling.
Mechanism
Timber stand improvement activities include long-term management activities including planting of desired tree species , brush control, selective thinning, weed control, etc.
Mechanism
Clearing of trees and shrubs and planting of desired agricultural cropland or pastureland species. Natural hydrology may be modified through installation of ditches and/or tiling.
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.