Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Ecological site F114XA103IN

Sloping Lacustrine Forest

Last updated: 9/26/2024
Accessed: 11/13/2024

Home / Esd catalog / MLRA 114X / Ecological site F114XA103IN

USC

Metric

General information

Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.

MLRA notes

Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 114X–Southern Illinois and Indiana Thin Loess and Till Plain

MLRA 114A makes up about 4,550 square miles (11,795 square kilometers). The three parts of this MRLA are mostly in the Till Plains Section of the Central Lowland Province of the Interior Plains. The western third of the western part is in the Highland Rim Section of the Interior Low Plateaus Province of the Interior Plains. The eastern half of the eastern part is in the Kanawha Section of the Appalachian Plateaus Province of the Appalachian Highlands. Both large and small tributaries of the Ohio River dissect the nearly level to very steep glaciated uplands in this area. The major streams and rivers have well defined valleys with broad flood plains and numerous stream terraces. The flood plains along the smaller streams are narrow. Broad summits are nearly level to gently sloping. Elevation ranges from 320 feet (100 meters) on the southernmost flood plain along the Ohio River to 1,250 feet (380 meters) on the highest ridges. Local relief is mainly 10 to 50 feet (3 to 15 meters), but it can be 50 to 100 feet (15 to 30 meters) along drainageways and streams. Also, the Ohio River bluffs are as much as 300 feet (90 meters) above the river valley floor.

Classification relationships

222 Eastern Broadleaf Forest (Continental) Province.
Bluegrass Natural Region of Indiana. Homoya's Natural Regions of Indiana.

The following NatureServe Explorer Ecological community has a high level of probability to match the ecological site reference community found on these soils. Field work is required for verification and conformation.
Quercus rubra - (Acer saccharum, Quercus alba) Forest
Translated Name: Northern Red Oak - (Sugar Maple, White Oak) Forest
Common Name: Red Oak - Sugar Maple - Elm Forest
Unique Identifier: CEGL005017

Ecological site concept

Historically, Sloping Lacustrine Forest sites were mature, high-quality, upland deciduous forests. Soils in this groups area generally formed in lacustrine parent materials and are moderately well drain to well drained. Sites occur on glacial lake plains, moraines, or high stream terraces often with slope or on a convex surface.

High quality reference site species include northern red oak, white oak, American beech, sugar maple, tulip polar, shagbark hickory, bitternut hickory, white ash, American elm, black walnut, basswood, black gum, and sassafras. Mid-canopy species may include flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), hophornbeam (Ostrya virginiana), and red maple (Acer rubrum). Shrubs include spicebush (Lindera benzoin) and mapleleaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium L.). Without disturbance, the understory community will be dense, with rich diversity, and numerous spring ephemerals.

On many sites, the dominant canopy trees are now American beech, sugar maple, and/or tulip poplar as oaks have historically been removed. Associate species may include basswood, white ash, yellow buckeye, hornbeam, and hop-hornbeam. On mature sites, a dense tree canopy will form a thick layer of ground-level humus and leaf litter. Understory plants will vary depending on available sunlight. Without post-harvest management, these sites will transition after large-scale disturbances from an oak-mixed hardwood forest to a post-disturbance maple-beech-poplar forest.

Associated sites

F114XA102IN	Lacustrine Terrace Forest Lacustrine Terrace Forest. Soils in this group are predominately somewhat poorly drained and have lower slopes.

F114XA102IN

Lacustrine Terrace Forest

Lacustrine Terrace Forest. Soils in this group are predominately somewhat poorly drained and have lower slopes.

Similar sites

F114XA102IN	Lacustrine Terrace Forest Lacustrine Terrace Forest. These sites share some similar species but have lower slopes.

F114XA102IN

Lacustrine Terrace Forest

Lacustrine Terrace Forest. These sites share some similar species but have lower slopes.

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Tree	(1) Quercus (2) Carya ovata
Shrub	(1) Lindera benzoin (2) Viburnum acerifolium
Herbaceous	(1) Sanicula (2) Botrychium virginianum

Download full description

Physiographic features

These soils are located on lacustrine soil and are often located on terraces and low hillsides.

Table 2. Representative physiographic features

Landforms	(1) Hills > Hillside (2) Lake plain > Hill (3) Valley > Terrace
Runoff class	Negligible to high
Flooding duration	Extremely brief (0.1 to 4 hours) to brief (2 to 7 days)
Flooding frequency	None to very rare
Ponding frequency	None
Elevation	340 – 1,200 ft
Slope	5 – 30%
Water table depth	18 – 72 in
Aspect	W, NW, N, NE, E, SE, S, SW

Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)

Runoff class	Not specified
Flooding duration	Not specified
Flooding frequency	Not specified
Ponding frequency	Not specified
Elevation	Not specified
Slope	40%
Water table depth	Not specified

Climatic features

About 60 percent of the precipitation falls during the freeze-free period. Most of the rainfall occurs as high-intensity, convective thunderstorms during summer. Snowfall is common in winter. The freeze-free period averages about 180 days.

Table 4. Representative climatic features

Frost-free period (characteristic range)	153-158 days
Freeze-free period (characteristic range)	178-181 days
Precipitation total (characteristic range)	46-47 in
Frost-free period (actual range)	153-159 days
Freeze-free period (actual range)	177-181 days
Precipitation total (actual range)	46-47 in
Frost-free period (average)	156 days
Freeze-free period (average)	179 days
Precipitation total (average)	46 in

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 1. Monthly precipitation range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range

Bar

Line

Figure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature

Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern

Figure 6. Annual average temperature pattern

Climate stations used

(1) SEYMOUR 2 N [USC00127935], Seymour, IN
(2) NORTH VERNON 2 ESE [USC00126435], North Vernon, IN
(3) MILFORD [USC00335268], Milford, OH

Soil features

The soils on these sites are very deep, moderately well drained to well drained, and have slow to moderate permeability. Soil series currently included in this group are Glenford, Elkinsville, Markland, Mentor, Millstone, and Shircliff.

Table 5. Representative soil features

Parent material	(1) Lacustrine deposits (2) Glaciolacustrine deposits (3) Alluvium (4) Loess
Surface texture	(1) Silt loam (2) Loam (3) Silty clay loam
Drainage class	Moderately well drained to well drained
Permeability class	Slow to moderate
Depth to restrictive layer	80 in
Soil depth	80 in
Surface fragment cover <=3"	Not specified
Surface fragment cover >3"	Not specified
Available water capacity (Depth not specified)	5 – 8 in
Calcium carbonate equivalent (Depth not specified)	23%
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (Depth not specified)	5 – 7.5
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified)	3%
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified)	Not specified

Ecological dynamics

The reference community is a high-quality, mature, deciduous forest with a substantial oak component. Species include northern red oak, white oak, shagbark hickory, sugar maple, American beech, black walnut, black oak, tulip poplar, basswood, and American elm. Subcanopy trees may include black cherry, sassafras, red maple, sugar maple, and American hophornbeam. Shrub layers are often quite variable depending on topography and aspect. Typical forest understory plants include Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), rattlesnake fern (Botrychium virginianum), tick trefoils (Desmodium spp.), bedstraws (Gallium spp.), and snakeroot (Sanicula spp.).

According to USDA-USFS LANDFIRE, full stand replacing disturbance events on these sites were uncommon. Small gap disturbance was the most common disturbance event that allowed propagation of these species. Disturbances without timber stand improvement will result in a dominance of sugar maple and tulip poplar with a subcomponent of red maple, white ash, and sassafras.

Remaining wooded sites have few oaks due to cutting , fire suppression, and invasive shrubs. Few high quality forest sites remain due to disturbance such as logging, agricultural conversion, and urban development.

State and transition model

Custom diagram

Standard diagram

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text

Ecosystem states

1. Reference State

2. Disturbed -Invaded State

3. Agricultural State

T1A	-	Non-native species invade site; no control efforts
T1B	-	Clearing of site; tillage; seeding; weed control; agricultural management
R2A	-	Brush and weed control; timber stand improvement activities
T2A	-	Clearing of trees and shrubs; site preparation; tillage; seeding; weed control
T3A	-	Site abandoned. No management inputs.

3.1A	-	Site preparation; seeding; weed control; grassland management
3.2A	-	Site preparation; tillage; seeding; weed control; row crop management

State 1
Reference State

Historically, these reference communities were mature, high-quality, upland hardwood forests. Tree species included northern red oak, sugar maple, white oak, American beech, tulip polar, shagbark hickory, bitternut hickory, white ash, American elm, black walnut, and basswood.. Mid-canopy species may include sassafras, flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), hophornbeam (Ostrya virginiana), and red maple (Acer rubrum). Shrubs vary depending on topography and aspect but often include spicebush (Lindera benzoin) and maple-leaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium L.). Due to lack of disturbance, the understory communities are dense, with rich diversity, and numerous spring ephemerals.

Dominant plant species

white oak (Quercus alba), tree
northern red oak (Quercus rubra), tree
shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), tree
sugar maple (Acer saccharum), tree
northern spicebush (Lindera benzoin), shrub
mapleleaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium), shrub
sanicle (Sanicula), other herbaceous
rattlesnake fern (Botrychium virginianum), other herbaceous
bedstraw (Galium), other herbaceous
ticktrefoil (Desmodium), other herbaceous

Community 1.1
Oak - Hickory Forest

Mixed hardwood forest with an oak (white oak, northern red oak) and hickory ( mockernut, shagbark) component. Other canopy trees may include sugar maple, American beech, tulip poplar, white ash, American elm, basswood, and black walnut. Numerous native species may be found in the understory including spring ephemerals.

Dominant plant species

white oak (Quercus alba), tree
shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), tree
northern red oak (Quercus rubra), tree
sugar maple (Acer saccharum), tree
northern spicebush (Lindera benzoin), shrub
mapleleaf viburnum (Viburnum acerifolium), shrub
sanicle (Sanicula), other herbaceous
rattlesnake fern (Botrychium virginianum), other herbaceous
bedstraw (Galium), other herbaceous
ticktrefoil (Desmodium), other herbaceous

State 2
Disturbed -Invaded State

This state is characterized by disturbances such as clearing, selective harvest, heavy grazing, or other soil disturbing activities. Often these disturbances result in the introduction, establishment and eventual dominance of invasive species, especially in the shrub layer and/or understory. This greatly reduces the tree, shrub and understory species richness and diversity of the site. Trees that are able to reproduce are the shade tolerant species such as maple and ash. Common invasives include, but are not limited to, Asian bush honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii), Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana Decne.), garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolate), Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus), Japanese chaff flower (Achyranthes japonica), and wintercreeper (Euonymus fortune).

Dominant plant species

maple (Acer), tree
ash (Fraxinus), tree
Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii), shrub
autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata), shrub
Nepalese browntop (Microstegium vimineum), grass
garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), other herbaceous
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), other herbaceous
winter creeper (Euonymus fortunei), other herbaceous

Community 2.1
Disturbed -Invaded Forest

The native community structure has been altered by substantial disturbances which have introduced invasive plants. Numerous species may be present. Common on these forested sites are garlic mustard, bush honeysuckle, and Japanese stiltgrass. The density of the bush honeysuckle impacts the regeneration of native plants.

Dominant plant species

maple (Acer), tree
ash (Fraxinus), tree
Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii), shrub
autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata), shrub
garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), other herbaceous
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), other herbaceous
winter creeper (Euonymus fortunei), other herbaceous

State 3
Agricultural State

This state is characterized by the conversion of the site to agricultural use. Most common practice is a corn and soybean rotation. A small portion of the historic acres are used for forage and pasture. Some mapunits in this group have slopes that preclude cropland use. Often these sites are in rough pasture.

Dominant plant species

tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus), grass
brome (Bromus), grass
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), grass
corn (Zea), other herbaceous
soybean (Glycine), other herbaceous

Community 3.1
Cropland

Lower slope sites in this group are mostly utilized for crop production. This phase is characterized by row crop agriculture of small grains, primarily corn and soybeans; however, numerous species can be grown depending on the landowner's goals and objectives.

Dominant plant species

corn (Zea), other herbaceous
soybean (Glycine), other herbaceous

Community 3.2
Pastureland

Planting of warm or cool season pasture/forage species will depend upon management goals and operation priorities. Numerous forbs may be included in the seeding mix and often include white clover and/or red clover.

Dominant plant species

tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus), grass
brome (Bromus), grass
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), grass
red clover (Trifolium pratense), other herbaceous
white clover (Trifolium repens), other herbaceous

Pathway 3.1A
Community 3.1 to 3.2

Shift in agricultural use from row crop production to grassland management.

Pathway 3.2A
Community 3.2 to 3.1

Transition from grassland management to cropland production.

Transition T1A
State 1 to 2

Establishment of invasive understory species with no management to control their abundance or distribution.

Transition T1B
State 1 to 3

Clearing of the site and management activities to prepare the site for planting of agricultural crops. Practices and species depend on management objectives.

Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1

Management inputs will include long-term chemical and mechanical treatments to remove non-native plant species. Planting of desired species may be needed. Timber stand improvement activities will include brush control, weed control, and selective thinning.

Transition T2A
State 2 to 3

Management inputs would include clearing of trees and brush and preparing the site for planting. Numerous crops can be grown on these sites. Currently, a crop rotation of corn-soybeans is most common with a smaller percentage of acres in pastureland.

Restoration pathway T3A
State 3 to 2

Agricultural sites that are abandoned will naturally transition to a shrub dominated successional state followed by an increase in tree species. Eventually the site will be forested but the species composition will be composted of low quality trees and non-native, weedy species.

Additional community tables

Supporting information

Other references

Braun, E. Lucy. 2001. Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Caldwell, N.J.: Blackburn Press.

Comer, P., D. Faber-Langendoen, R. Evans, S. Gawler, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, K. Snow, J. Teague, and R. White. 2003-present. Ecological systems of the United States: A working classification of U.S. terrestrial systems. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.

Faber-Langendoen, D., C. Hedge, M. Kost, S. Thomas, L. Smart, R. Smyth, J. Drake, and S. Menard. 2011. Assessment of wetland ecosystem condition across landscape regions: A multi-metric approach. NatureServe, Arlington VA. plus appendices.

Federal Geographic Data Committee. 2013. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. FGDC-STD-004-2013. Second Edition. Wetlands Subcommittee, Federal Geographic Data Committee and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC

Homoya, M. A., Abrell, D. B., Aldrich, J. R., & Post, T. W. (1985). The Natural Regions of Indiana. Indiana Academy of Science , 94, 245-269.

Kartesz, J. T. (2011). Density Gradient Map Samples Produced From BONAP's Floristic Synthesis. Retrieved 12 12, 2011, from Biota of North America Program: http://bonap.org/diversity/diversity/diversity.html

Lindsey, A.A., W.B. Crankshaw, and S.A. Qadir. 1965. Soil relationships and distribution map of the vegetation of presettlement Indiana. Botanical Monographs 31: 105-156.

Maxwell, R.H., and W.E. Thomas. 2033. Distribution records of southern Indiana vascular plants. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 112:22-28.

NatureServe. (2011). An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. NatureServe, Arlington, VA, USA [Online: www. NatureServe. org/explorer] .

Jackson, Marion T. 1997. The Natural heritage of Indiana. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, published in association with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources and the Indiana Academy of Science.

USDA. (2007). Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections for the Conterminous United States. Washington, DC: USDA - Forest Service.

USDA. (2006). Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. U. S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.

USDA-NRCS. 2008. Hydrogeomorphic Wetland Classification System: An Overview and Modification to Better Meet the Needs of the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Technical Note No. 190–8–76. Washington D.C.

USGS. (2010). LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings. Retrieved from http://www.landfire.gov

Whitaker, John O., Charles J. Amlaner, Marion T. Jackson, George R. Parker, and Peter Evans Scott. 2012. Habitats and ecological communities of Indiana presettlement to present. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Approval

Greg Schmidt, 9/26/2024

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)	A Arends, ESI Specialist.
Contact for lead author
Date	09/26/2024
Approved by	Greg Schmidt
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production

Indicators

Number and extent of rills:
Presence of water flow patterns:
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):

Dominant:

Sub-dominant:

Other:

Additional:
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial plant reproductive capability:

Download reference sheet

Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.

Ecosystem states

1. Reference State

2. Disturbed -Invaded State

3. Agricultural State

T1A	-	Non-native species invade site; no control efforts
T1B	-	Clearing of site; tillage; seeding; weed control; agricultural management
R2A	-	Brush and weed control; timber stand improvement activities
T2A	-	Clearing of trees and shrubs; site preparation; tillage; seeding; weed control
T3A	-	Site abandoned. No management inputs.

State 1 submodel, plant communities

1.1. Oak - Hickory Forest

State 2 submodel, plant communities

2.1. Disturbed -Invaded Forest

State 3 submodel, plant communities

3.1. Cropland

3.2. Pastureland

3.1A	-	Site preparation; seeding; weed control; grassland management
3.2A	-	Site preparation; tillage; seeding; weed control; row crop management

Search

Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Ecological site F114XA103IN

Sloping Lacustrine Forest

Last updated: 9/26/2024 Accessed: 11/13/2024

General information

MLRA notes

Classification relationships

Ecological site concept

Associated sites

Similar sites

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Ecosystem states

State 1 submodel, plant communities

State 2 submodel, plant communities

State 3 submodel, plant communities

Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Last updated: 9/26/2024
Accessed: 11/13/2024