Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Ecological site F114XA802IN

Eolian Forest

Last updated: 9/26/2024
Accessed: 12/21/2024

Home / Esd catalog / MLRA 114X / Ecological site F114XA802IN

USC

Metric

General information

Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.

MLRA notes

Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 114X–Southern Illinois and Indiana Thin Loess and Till Plain

MLRA 114 makes up about 4,550 square miles (11,795 square kilometers. The three parts of this MRLA are mostly in the Till Plains Section of the Central Lowland Province of the Interior Plains. The western third of the western part is in the Highland Rim Section of the Interior Low Plateaus Province of the Interior Plains. The eastern half of the eastern part is in the Kanawha Section of the Appalachian Plateaus Province of the Appalachian Highlands. Both large and small tributaries of the Ohio River dissect the nearly level to very steep glaciated uplands in this area. The major streams and rivers have well defined valleys with broad flood plains and numerous stream terraces. The flood plains along the smaller streams are narrow. Broad summits are nearly level to gently sloping. Elevation ranges from 320 feet (100 meters) on the southernmost flood plain along the Ohio River to 1,250 feet (380 meters) on the highest ridges. Local relief is mainly 10 to 50 feet (3 to 15 meters), but it can be 50 to 100 feet (15 to 30 meters) along drainageways and streams. Also, the Ohio River bluffs are as much as 300 feet (90 meters) above the river valley floor.

Classification relationships

USFS: 222 Eastern Broadleaf Forest (Continental) Province

Homoya's Natural Regions of Indiana: Bluegrass Region

The following NatureServe Explorer Ecological System has a high level of probability to match the ecological site found on these soils. Field verification is needed prior to using this information for conservation planning and/or restoration initiatives: North-Central Interior Dry Oak Forest and Woodland-Unique Identifier: CES202.047

Ecological site concept

Eolian Forest reference sites are a dry mixed oak woodland. Common trees include black oak, white oak, scarlet oak, sassafras, and multiple hickory species. These sandy sites have a variable water table depth depending on their landscape location. Shrub and understory plants will vary depending on fire regime and disturbance history. Few sites exist in MLRA 114A as most have been converted to agriculture or urban uses.

Associated sites

F114XA404IN	Outwash Upland Forest These soils are generally well drained and are found on outwash upland forest sites.

F114XA404IN

Outwash Upland Forest

These soils are generally well drained and are found on outwash upland forest sites.

Similar sites

F114XA404IN	Outwash Upland Forest Dry outwash upland forest sites will have many of the same oak and hickory species.

F114XA404IN

Outwash Upland Forest

Dry outwash upland forest sites will have many of the same oak and hickory species.

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Tree	(1) Quercus velutina (2) Quercus alba
Shrub	(1) Vaccinium
Herbaceous	(1) Prenanthes altissima (2) Danthonia spicata

Download full description

Physiographic features

These sites are on backslopes, shoulders, and summits of dunes and loess hills.

Figure 1. Physiographic image - Block diagram showing Bloomfield and Bobtown soils on the landscape.

Table 2. Representative physiographic features

Landforms	(1) Hills > Loess hill (2) Dune field > Dune
Runoff class	Negligible to medium
Flooding frequency	None
Ponding frequency	None to rare
Elevation	340 – 1,360 ft
Slope	15%
Water table depth	20 – 48 in
Aspect	W, NW, N, NE, E, SE, S, SW

Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)

Runoff class	Not specified
Flooding frequency	Not specified
Ponding frequency	Not specified
Elevation	Not specified
Slope	45%
Water table depth	Not specified

Climatic features

About 60 percent of the precipitation falls during the freeze-free period. Most of the rainfall occurs as high-intensity, convective thunderstorms during summer. Snowfall is common in winter. The freeze-free period averages about 180 days.

Table 4. Representative climatic features

Frost-free period (characteristic range)	154-160 days
Freeze-free period (characteristic range)	177-185 days
Precipitation total (characteristic range)	45-47 in
Frost-free period (actual range)	153-160 days
Freeze-free period (actual range)	176-190 days
Precipitation total (actual range)	43-47 in
Frost-free period (average)	157 days
Freeze-free period (average)	181 days
Precipitation total (average)	46 in

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 3. Monthly minimum temperature range

Characteristic range

Actual range

Bar

Line

Figure 4. Monthly maximum temperature range

Bar

Line

Figure 5. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature

Figure 6. Annual precipitation pattern

Figure 7. Annual average temperature pattern

Climate stations used

(1) NORTH VERNON 2 ESE [USC00126435], North Vernon, IN
(2) SEYMOUR 2 N [USC00127935], Seymour, IN
(3) SCOTTSBURG [USC00127875], Scottsburg, IN
(4) HILLSBORO [USC00333758], Hillsboro, OH

Soil features

Soils in this initial PES grouping are very deep, moderately well drained to somewhat excessively drained and formed in eolian deposits or sands. Series include Ayrshire, Bloomfield, Bobtown, and Priceton.

Table 5. Representative soil features

Parent material	(1) Eolian sands (2) Eolian deposits
Surface texture	(1) Fine sand (2) Fine sandy loam (3) Loamy fine sand (4) Sandy loam
Drainage class	Moderately well drained to somewhat excessively drained
Permeability class	Moderate to rapid
Soil depth	80 in
Surface fragment cover <=3"	Not specified
Surface fragment cover >3"	Not specified
Available water capacity (Depth not specified)	4 – 6 in
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (Depth not specified)	5 – 6.5
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified)	Not specified
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified)	Not specified

Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)

Drainage class	Not specified
Permeability class	Not specified
Soil depth	Not specified
Surface fragment cover <=3"	Not specified
Surface fragment cover >3"	Not specified
Available water capacity (Depth not specified)	3.8 – 6.5 in
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (Depth not specified)	Not specified
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified)	Not specified
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified)	Not specified

Ecological dynamics

These sites exhibit a dry oak forest alliance with a tree canopy that is moderately closed, often shrubby, and generally shades 60-80% of the forest floor. Black oak (Quercus velutina) is a common dominant along with white oak (Q. alba), shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), pignut hickory (Carya glabra) and scarlet oak (Q. coccinea). Other trees on site include sassafras (Sassafras albidum), hophornbeam (Ostrya virginiana), and red maple (Acer rubrum). Understory species are variable depending on seasonal depth to water table, available water capacity, canopy cover, site disturbances, fire regime, and available seed sources.

Grazing or frequent fires have the potential to temporarily modify the ecology by decreasing tree reproduction, decreasing canopy cover, and increasing shade-intolerant grass and herbaceous understory species. Fire dynamics on these sites are complex and need to be carefully evaluated prior to initiating a prescribed fire regime.

The majority of these sites in MLRA 114A have incurred repeated historic disturbances and most are now utilized as farmland or have been developed.

State and transition model

Custom diagram

Standard diagram

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text

Ecosystem states

1. Reference State

2. Disturbed-Invaded State

3. Agriculture State

T1A	-	Disturbance; invasion of non-native species
T1B	-	Clearing; site preparation; tillage; seeding; weed control; agricultural management
R2A	-	Brush/weed control; planting of desired species; long-term timber stand management
T2A	-	Clearing; site preparation; tillage; seeding; weed control; agricultural management
T3A	-	Abandonment

3.1.A	-	Site preparation; seeding; weed control; grassland management
3.2.A	-	Site preparation; tillage; seeding; weed control; row crop management

State 1
Reference State

Tree species on these dry oak sites may include black oak, white oak, scarlet oak, pignut hickory, shagbark hickory, blackgum, sassafras, dogwoods sassafras, and hophornbeam. Post oak and blackjack oak may be present on the drier sites. The shrub and understory layers are variable on these sites based on fire regime, anthropogenic disturbances, water table depth, and landscape position. With a natural fire regime, the understory was relatively dense since the wide tree spacing allowed for sunlight to support a variety of understory species.

Dominant plant species

black oak (Quercus velutina), tree
white oak (Quercus alba), tree
shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), tree
pignut hickory (Carya glabra), tree
blueberry (Vaccinium), shrub
poverty oatgrass (Danthonia spicata), grass
tall rattlesnakeroot (Prenanthes altissima), other herbaceous

Community 1.1
Dry Oak Woodland

Historically, numerous oak and hickory species may be found on these sites. Common dominants were black oak, shagbark hickory, pignut hickory, red oaks, and white oak. Shrub and understory species composition and density was dependent upon the natural fire frequency which was a principal driver for these sites.

Dominant plant species

black oak (Quercus velutina), tree
white oak (Quercus alba), tree
pignut hickory (Carya glabra), tree
shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), tree
blueberry (Vaccinium), shrub
rose (Rosa), shrub
blackberry (Rubus), shrub
poverty oatgrass (Danthonia spicata), grass
little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), grass
tall rattlesnakeroot (Prenanthes altissima), other herbaceous

State 2
Disturbed-Invaded State

Numerous disturbances can impact these sites including lack of natural fire regime, agricultural conversion, and woodland harvest. Large scale disturbance are often the precursor to an invasion of non-native plants. Species will depend upon available seed sources. Dense non-native shrub layers will negatively impact native plant and tree regeneration.

Dominant plant species

maple (Acer), tree
cottonwood (Populus), tree
locust (Gleditsia), tree
locust (Robinia), tree
autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata), shrub
honeysuckle (Lonicera), shrub
garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), other herbaceous

Community 2.1
Disturbed- Invaded Community

Numerous disturbance have impacted many of the remaining wooded sites. Lack of natural fires, clearing/selective harvest, adjacent ditching/tiling and unmanaged grazing alter the ecological community. Shade tolerant species such as sugar maple and the invasive Asian honeysuckles are often established after disturbances. An increase in the fire return interval leads to a higher tree density and the resulting increase in shade impacts tree regeneration and understory composition.

Dominant plant species

maple (Acer), tree
cottonwood (Populus), tree
locust (Gleditsia), tree
locust (Robinia), tree
honeysuckle (Lonicera), shrub
autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata), shrub
poverty oatgrass (Danthonia spicata), grass
little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), grass
garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), other herbaceous

State 3
Agriculture State

Many of these sites are now used for crop production, hay production, or forage. Species planted and management activities will depend on the owner goals and objectives.

Dominant plant species

tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus), grass
brome (Bromus), grass
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), grass
red clover (Trifolium pratense), other herbaceous
white clover (Trifolium repens), other herbaceous
corn (Zea mays), other herbaceous
soybean (Glycine max), other herbaceous

Community 3.1
Cropland

Crops grown will depend on landowner goals. Many crops can be grown on these sites.

Dominant plant species

corn (Zea mays), other herbaceous
soybean (Glycine max), other herbaceous

Community 3.2
Pastureland

Numerous cool and warm season grasses can be produced on these sites. Fescue is a common crop mixed with clover.

Dominant plant species

tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus), grass
red clover (Trifolium pratense), other herbaceous
white clover (Trifolium repens), other herbaceous

Pathway 3.1.A
Community 3.1 to 3.2

Transitioning a crop field to a pasture would require multiple management inputs including seeding desired species and weed control.

Pathway 3.2.A
Community 3.2 to 3.1

Transitioning a pasture to crop production will require multiple management inputs including site preparation, seeding, and weed control.

Transition T1A
State 1 to 2

Large scale disturbance such as clearing, selective harvest, unmanaged grazing, etc will alter the species composition and allow for invasive species to increase in dominance.

Transition T1B
State 1 to 3

Transitioning an oak woodland to a agricultural state would require multiple management inputs including clearing, brush removal, site preparation, seeding, and weed control.

Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1

Transitioning this State to a reference community would require long-term management inputs including planting of desired species, timber stand management activities, and brush/weed control.

Transition T2A
State 2 to 3

Transitioning an oak woodland to a agricultural state would require multiple management inputs including clearing, brush removal, site preparation, seeding, and weed control.

Transition T3A
State 3 to 2

When agriculture sites are abandoned, they move through a series of successional plant communities. Species will depend on previous uses; on-going disturbances; available seed sources; and natural disturbances such as fire. Eventually, tree species will gain dominance but often is a mix of fast growing species such as maples, poplars, locusts, and cedars.

Additional community tables

Supporting information

Inventory data references

No field monitoring was conducted as part of this PES development. Future ESD development may result in plant community edits, soil mapunits being added or removed from this grouping, and/or additions or modifications to the narratives, tables, vegetation descriptions and state and transition model.

Other references

Braun, E. Lucy. 200tional References:1. Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Caldwell, N.J.: Blackburn Press.

Homoya, M. A., Abrell, D. B., Aldrich, J. R., & Post, T. W. (1985). The Natural Regions of Indiana. Indiana Academy of Science , 94, 245-269.

Kartesz, J. T. (2011). Density Gradient Map Samples Produced From BONAP's Floristic Synthesis. Retrieved 12 12, 2011, from Biota of North America Program: http://bonap.org/diversity/diversity/diversity.html

NatureServe. (2011). An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. NatureServe, Arlington, VA, USA [Online: www. NatureServe. org/explorer] .

Jackson, Marion T. 1997. The Natural heritage of Indiana. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, published in association with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources and the Indiana Academy of Science.

USDA. (2007). Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections for the Conterminous United States. Washington, DC: USDA - Forest Service.

USDA. (2006). Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. U. S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.

USDA-NRCS. 2008. Hydrogeomorphic Wetland Classification System: An Overview and Modification to Better Meet the Needs of the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Technical Note No. 190–8–76. Washington D.C.

USGS. (2010). LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings. Retrieved from http://www.landfire.gov

Whitaker, John O., Charles J. Amlaner, Marion T. Jackson, George R. Parker, and Peter Evans Scott. 2012. Habitats and ecological communities of Indiana presettlement to present. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Approval

Greg Schmidt, 9/26/2024

Acknowledgments

PES documents developed for adjacent MLRAs in Indiana and Ohio served as a source of information as these MLRAs often split counties and/or shared similar soil series with MLRA 114A. USDA-NRCS county soil surveys for the counties within MLRA 114A where a valuable reference including tree species observed on site by NRCS staff. NRCS Indiana resource soil scientists contributed field observation, field notes, and extensive soil mapping expertise.

In accordance with Federal Civil Rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Civil Rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior credible activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.

To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)	A. Arends, ESI Specialist
Contact for lead author
Date	09/27/2024
Approved by	Greg Schmidt
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production

Indicators

Number and extent of rills:
Presence of water flow patterns:
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):

Dominant:

Sub-dominant:

Other:

Additional:
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial plant reproductive capability:

Download reference sheet

Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.

Ecosystem states

1. Reference State

2. Disturbed-Invaded State

3. Agriculture State

T1A	-	Disturbance; invasion of non-native species
T1B	-	Clearing; site preparation; tillage; seeding; weed control; agricultural management
R2A	-	Brush/weed control; planting of desired species; long-term timber stand management
T2A	-	Clearing; site preparation; tillage; seeding; weed control; agricultural management
T3A	-	Abandonment

State 1 submodel, plant communities

1.1. Dry Oak Woodland

State 2 submodel, plant communities

2.1. Disturbed- Invaded Community

State 3 submodel, plant communities

3.1. Cropland

3.2. Pastureland

3.1.A	-	Site preparation; seeding; weed control; grassland management
3.2.A	-	Site preparation; tillage; seeding; weed control; row crop management

Search

Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Ecological site F114XA802IN

Eolian Forest

Last updated: 9/26/2024 Accessed: 12/21/2024

General information

MLRA notes

Classification relationships

Ecological site concept

Associated sites

Similar sites

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Ecosystem states

State 1 submodel, plant communities

State 2 submodel, plant communities

State 3 submodel, plant communities

Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Last updated: 9/26/2024
Accessed: 12/21/2024