Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site F134XY124LA
Baton Rouge Terrace Southern Loess Terrace - PROVISIONAL
Accessed: 12/22/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 134X–Southern Mississippi Valley Loess
MLRA 134, Southern Mississippi Valley Loess, is in Mississippi (39 percent), Tennessee (23 percent), Louisiana (15 percent), Arkansas (11 percent), Kentucky (9 percent), Missouri (2 percent), and Illinois (1 percent). It makes up about 26,520 square miles (68,715 square kilometers). The northern part of the area includes Paducah and Murray, Kentucky; Paragould, Jonesboro, and Forrest City, Arkansas; and Memphis, Dyersburg, Bartlett, and Germantown, Tennessee. The southern part includes Yazoo City, Clinton, and Jackson, Mississippi, and Baton Rouge, Opelousas, Lafayette, and New Iberia, Louisiana. This portion is the farthest southeast part of the MLRA in Louisiana. It is in the Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Section of the EPA Ecoregions in sub-section 74d, Baton Rouge Terrace. The dissected plains in this MLRA have a loess mantle that is thick at the valley wall and thins rapidly as distance from the valley wall increases. The Baton Rouge Terrace ecoregion occurs on the Pleistocene Prairie Terraces and is lower in elevation and has flatter topography than Ecoregion 74c to the north.
Classification relationships
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) and Land Resource Unit (LRU) (USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2006)
EPA Level IV Ecoregion
The Natural Communities of Louisiana - (Louisiana Natural Heritage Program - Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries)
Ecological site concept
Nearly Level Upland Terraces found on the higher elevation local landscape slopes can range up to above 6 percent in some areas. Drainage ranges from Moderately well to Somewhat poorly, with none to rare Flooding frequency. Some soils restrictions could include a brittle fragipan or a soils horizon with fragic properties and potentially soil sodium these restrictions when present will generally occur between 11 and 30 inches.
Associated sites
F134XY123LA |
Baton Rouge Terrace Southern Loess Low Terrace - PROVISIONAL Baton Rouge Terrace Southern Loess Low Terrace is found at the next lower elevation from this site in the Baton Rouge Terrace. |
---|
Similar sites
F134XY106MS |
Southern Rolling Plains Thin Loess Upland - PROVISIONAL Southern Rolling Plains Thin Loess Upland fits a similar site position on the landscape, however is found in the Rolling Plains and Bluff Hills Portion of the MLRA to the north. |
---|
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
Not specified |
Herbaceous |
Not specified |
Physiographic features
The Baton Rouge Terrace (EPA Level IV Ecoregions 74D) of the Southern Mississippi Valley Loess (MLRA 134) are located in southeast Louisiana, occurs on the Pleistocene Prairie Terraces and is lower in elevation and has flatter topography than Ecoregion 74c to the north. Similar to other parts of Ecoregion 74, loess is thicker to the west.
“Loess” is the geologic term of German origin that refers to widespread deposits of homogeneous layers of friable, porous silt mixed with minor amounts of clay or fine sand (Heinrich, 2008). The loess mantle, created by well-sorted windblown silt, was deposited during the Pleistocene age. Its source was glacial sediment from glacial meltwater that was flowing down an extensive braided stream system depositing large volumes of silt over the floodplain of the Mississippi River (Heinrich, 2008). Glacial meltwater ceased flowing when southern edges of ice sheets stopped melting in fall and winter, thereby creating dry conditions on the previously flooded Mississippi River Valley. Strong seasonal winds blew across dry floodplains and eroded large quantities of silt-sized sediment, and transported it out of the Mississippi alluvial valley and deposited it on adjacent uplands and terraces (Heinrich, 2008). Over thousands of years, the silt accumulations created loess deposits that are many feet thick (Heinrich, 2008).
Where blankets of loess are thicker than 6 feet, the soils formed entirely in loess. Where loess deposits are less than 6 feet thick, soils reflect the nature of the underlying parent material (McDaniel, 2001). Thick loess areas produce intensely dissected terrain with excessively steep slopes and ridge and ravine topography (McDaniel, 2001). The Bluff Hills tend to have deeper, calcareous loess and steeper, much more dissected topography than the Southern Rolling Plains to the east and Baton Rouge Terrace to the Southeast.
This Site occurs mainly on nearly level to depressional terrace uplands above the stream terraces and higher elevations on the Stream Terrace in the Southern Rolling Plains in Louisiana. Smaller areas of this site occur on similar landscape positions within the Bluff Hills of Louisiana. Slopes are level to nearly level to depressional (0 to 3 percent) some units can reach 8 percent slope.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Terrace
(2) Interfluve (3) Depression |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | None to rare |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 3 – 46 m |
Slope | 0 – 8% |
Water table depth | 15 – 152 cm |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
South Louisiana has a warm, humid climate, with fairly long summers and relatively short winters. The result is a long growing season and abundant plant growth. Water is a definitive part of the southern Louisiana landscape, largely due to the combination of low elevation and fairly abundant rainfall in most years. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 51 to 67 inches over this region, and is fairly well distributed throughout the year. There have been very few years when less than 50 inches of precipitation has fallen. Snow is a rarity, and little more than 1 inch typically falls every few years. Growing seasons are long, typically from late February to late November. Along the Gulf Coast, it is not unusual for the lowest winter temperature to be above 30 degrees. Inland, there have been occasional blasts of cold air that have dropped temperatures into the teens and 20s, but these are rare. Hurricanes and tropical storms are an important part of the climate of southern Louisiana, with some impact occurring nearly every year in some part of the region. However, devastating storms do not occur too often, and heavy rain and storm surge are usually the biggest concerns, compared to wind damage. The following climatic data are averages from the five weather stations listed below. Temperature and precipitation may vary considerably from that listed for each month. Site specific weather data should be used for land management decisions. For site specific weather conditions, obtain data from a weather station close to the site. Information can be accessed from specific weather stations at http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/coopmap/ or http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/summary/climsmla.html.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 245 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 292 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 1,575 mm |
Figure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 3. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 4. Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) BATON ROUGE RYAN AP [USW00013970], Baton Rouge, LA
-
(2) LSU BEN-HUR FARM [USC00165620], Baton Rouge, LA
-
(3) CLINTON 5 SE [USC00161899], Clinton, LA
Influencing water features
This site is moderately well to somewhat poorly drained, sheds runoff and the soils are slowly permeable. There is limited amounts of water that influence the site other than the rainfall that is intercepted and allowed to percolate into the soil profile. Some of the soils will develop a Fragipan or a slowly permeable horizon, these fragipan soils have a seasonal perched water table in winter and early spring in normal years.
Soil features
The soils listed in this section of the description may not be all inclusive. There may be other soils that fit this site concept, as well as in some areas where the listed soils are mapped they may not fit the site concept. Some soil map units and soil series included in this Provisional Ecological Site grouping were used as “best fit” for a particular soil-landscape catena during a specific era of soil mapping, regardless of origin of parent material or Major Land Resource Area. Therefore, these soil series may not be typical for MLRA 134, and those soil map units deserve further investigation in a joint ecological-soil survey project. When utilizing this description verify it is the correct site utilizing multiple parameters, the soils, the physiography and the location. If the site does not fit the particular location well utilize the Similar or Associated Sites listed in the Supporting Information section of this description to determine if another site may be a better fit to your location.
Soils are Somewhat Poorly to Moderately Well Drained, Rarely to Not Flooded, Aeric Epiaqualfs (Acy, Essen, Patoutville), Albic Glossic Natraqualfs Deerford), Aquic Fragiudalfs (Bude), Aquic Fraglossudalfs (Olivier), Fragiaquic Glossudalfs (Oprairie), Glossic Natraqualfs (Verdun), Oxyaquic Glossudalfs (Scotlandville) and Typic Argiaquolls (Jeanerette). These soils formed in the loess uplands of the Southern Mississippi Valley Loess (MLRA 134) with flat slopes to depressions. These deep and very deep, moderately to slowly permeable soils are found on the lowers landscape and first and second terraces at elevations above the floodplains.
The water table is at or within 1 to 2 feet of the surface during winter and spring months in normal years. These soils are subject to frequent to no flooding of brief to long duration, and can be subject none to frequent ponding of long duration.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Silt (2) Silt loam |
---|---|
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
Drainage class | Somewhat poorly drained to moderately well drained |
Permeability class | Very slow to moderately slow |
Soil depth | 104 – 203 cm |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 0% |
Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
22.86 – 38.1 cm |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-101.6cm) |
0 – 7% |
Electrical conductivity (0-101.6cm) |
0 – 8 mmhos/cm |
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-101.6cm) |
0 – 20 |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-101.6cm) |
4.1 – 7.8 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
0% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
0% |
Ecological dynamics
The pre settlement plant community of this site would have been mixed hardwood and pine species. Within this site there will be a gradient of wetness from frequent to no flooding. The wetness variations will dictate the species that are present and the composition of them within an area.
Chemical properties of the soil are potentially acid while the subsoil is potentially high in Na (Sodium). Some soils restrictions could include a brittle fragipan or a soils horizon with fragic properties and potentially soil sodium these restrictions when present will generally occur between 23 and 76 inches. Due to these as well as wetness, rooting depths of some species will be limited and due to this there is a potential for some trees to be uprooted by climatic events, such as strong winds or floods. With these events, openings in the canopy can occur which will set back succession and allow herbaceous and woody shrub species to colonize, these low stature communities are generally short lived and the upper canopy will close as tall growing trees mature. There is generally an age gradient within a forest stand from the herbaceous openings to mature bottomland hardwoods.
This site has been altered by human activity and is utilized for multiple production systems such as Cropland, Pasture and Tree Farms, for all of these alternative states wetness is a limitation for this site for productivity and management activities. Within the alternative uses of the site the transitions will be very similar and require the input of resources such as installation of infrastructure needs and establishment of the desired species.
State and transition model
Figure 5. 134XY124LA Southern Loess Terrace PES STM
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Community - Mixed Hardwoods and Pines
Historically Mixed Hardwoods and Pines
Community 1.1
Mixed Hardwoods and Pines
Pinus taeda (loblolly pine), Liquidambar styraciflua (sweetgum), Fagus grandifolia (American beech), Quercus nigra (water oak), Q. pagoda (cherrybark oak), Q. michauxii (cow oak), Q. alba (white oak), Liriodendron tulipifera (yellow poplar), Ulmus americana (American elm), Magnolia grandiflora (Southern magnolia), Acer rubrum (red maple), Carya glabra (pignut hickory)
State 2
Cropland
Cropland
Community 2.1
Cropland
Row Crop Production
State 3
Pastureland
Managed Pasture - PHG 8F, 8G or 8I
Community 3.1
Pasture
Pasture or Grassland This phase is characterized by a monoculture of or mixture of Forage species planted or allowed to establish from naturalized species, managed for forage production or as herbaceous ground cover. This Site fits into multiple Pasture & Hayland Groups: 8F, 8G or 8I • 8-Upland, deep, medium-textured soil • F – soils with restricted rooting depth because of fragipans, claypans and other slowly permeable layers which restrict growth and adaptation • G – unfavorable chemical properties such as excessive salts, high exchangeable sodium, unfavorable soil reaction or toxic materials From these bullet descriptions of the Groups this site would generally be described as a Deep, Medium textured soil on uplands. It has a range of limiting factors from root restricting layers to soil chemistry. Soils descriptions of some of the soils note a presence or a potential for a Fragipan or fragic layer, exchangeable Sodium (Na. 8F - Silty upland and stream terrace soils that formed in loess or silty alluvium. The soils have a silty surface layer and a silty or clayey subsoil. Somewhat poorly drained, acid soils of low or medium natural fertility. 0-5% slopes. 8G - Upland and stream terrace soils mostly with silty surface layers and silty or clayey subsoils. Mainly poorly drained, acid soils of low natural fertility. 0-3% slopes. Most slopes are 0-1%. 8I - Upland and terrace soils with silty surface layers and subsoils. Poorly drained and somewhat poorly drained, droughty, alkaline soils that have a concentration of sodium in the subsoil. Natural fertility is low or medium. 0-3% slopes. Most slopes are 0-1%. All soils need nitrogen fertilization for production when grasses are grown alone. To prevent extreme acidity in the subsoil when high rates of acidifying nitrogen is used, the surface soil should not be allowed to become more acid than 5.0 pH and lime should be applied at more frequent intervals. Adapted Grasses and Legumes Bahia and common bermuda are adapted. The adapted cool season legumes are white clover, winter peas, and vetch. White clover requires a higher level of calcium and phosphorus than peas or vetch. Without fertilization, these soils will normally support a cover of little bluestem, slender bluestem, threeawns, broomsedge and carpetgrass.
Figure 6. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 2130 | 3587 | 5492 |
Total | 2130 | 3587 | 5492 |
Figure 7. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). LA0012, Bahia. Bahiagrass.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 24 | 27 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
State 4
Tree Farm
Tree Farm
Community 4.1
Tree Farm
Hardwood or Pine Plantation: This phase is characterized by few or a monoculture of Hardwood or Pine species planted or allowed to regenerate from seed trees managed for wood production. This Site fits into multiple Woodland Suitability Groups (1w8, 2o7, 2w5, 2w8, 3w9) depending on the soil Mapunit. The first part of the symbol indicates potential productivity of the soils for important trees, very high (1) high (2), moderately high (3). The second part, a letter, indicates the major kind of soil limitation, limitation of excessive water in or on the soil (w). The third part of the symbol, a numeral, indicates the kind of trees for which the soils are best suited and the severity of the hazard or limitation. The numeral 5 indicate moderate limitations and suitability for broadleaf trees. The numerals 7, 8, and 9 indicate slight, moderate, and severe limitations, respectively, and suitability for both needleleaf and broadleaf trees. These groups would generally describe this site as high to moderately high productivity with moderate to severe limitations for wetness for the production of broadleaf and needle leaf species. WS 1 w 8 Slightly wet soils with very high productivity; moderate equipment limitations and slight to moderate seedling mortality; suitable for either pine or southern hardwoods. Site index for loblolly and slash pine 100, cottonwood 100-110, oaks and sweetgum 100. Potential is high for management of turkey and moderate high for deer, ducks, quail, and squirrels. WS 2 o 7 Well drained, loamy soils with high potential productivity; no serious management problems; well suited for either pine or southern hardwoods. Site index for loblolly and slash pine 90, oaks and sweetgum 90. Potential is high for management of quail and turkey, and moderately high for squirrels and deer. WS 2 w 5 Moderately wet, loamy and clayey soils with high potential productivity; moderate equipment limitations and slight to moderate seedling mortality due primarily to excess water; best suited for southern hardwoods. Site index for green ash 80, cottonwood 110, oaks and sweetgum 90. Potential is high for management of deer, turkey, squirrels and ducks WS 2 w 8 Slightly to moderately wet, acid, loamy and clayey soils with high potential productivity; moderate equipment limitations due primarily to excess water; well suited for either pines or southern hardwoods. Site index for loblolly and slash pine 90, oaks and sweetgum 90. Potential is high for management of turkey and moderately high for deer, ducks, quail and squirrels. WS 3 w 9 Wet, clayey soils with moderately high potential productivity; severe equipment limitations and moderate seedling mortality due primarily to excess water; suited for pine and southern hardwood. Site index for loblolly and slash pine 80, oaks and sweetgum 80. Potential is high for management of deer, squirrels and turkey, and moderately high for ducks.
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | 2130–5492 | |||||
bahiagrass | PANO2 | Paspalum notatum | 2690–5492 | – | ||
Bermudagrass | CYDA | Cynodon dactylon | 2130–3811 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
.
Hydrological functions
.
Recreational uses
.
Wood products
.
Other products
.
Other information
.
Supporting information
Other references
Autin, W. J., Burns, S. F., Miller, B. J., Saucier, R. T., & Snead, J. I. (1991). Quaternary geology of the lower Mississippi Valley. The Geology of North America, 2, 547-582.
Chapman, S.S, Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., Comstock, J.A., Beiser, M.C., and Johnson, D., 2004, Ecoregions of Mississippi, (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,000,000).
Cowardin, L. M., Carter, V., Golet, F. C., & LaRoe, E. T. (1979). Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. US Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS, 79(31), 131.
Daigle, J.J., Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., Faulkner, P.L., McCulloh, R.P., Handley, L.R., Smith, L.M., and Chapman, S.S., 2006, Ecoregions of Louisiana (color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,000,000).
Emerson, F. V. (1918). Loess-depositing winds in Louisiana. The Journal of Geology, 26(6), 532-541.
Ezell, A. W., & Hodges, J. D. (1995). Bottomland hardwood management: Species Site Relationships. MSU Extension Service Publication 2004.
Guyette, R. P., Stambaugh, M. C., Dey, D. C., & Muzika, R. M. (2012). Predicting fire frequency with chemistry and climate. Ecosystems, 15(2), 322-335.
Heinrich, P. V., (2008)_Loess Map of LA, Louisiana Geological Survey
Kochian, L. V., Pineros, M. A., & Hoekenga, O. A. (2005). The physiology, genetics and molecular biology of plant aluminum resistance and toxicity. In Root Physiology: From Gene to Function (pp. 175-195). Springer Netherlands.
Miller, B. J., Lewis, G. C., Alford, J. J. & Day, W. J. (1984) Loesses in Louisiana and at Vicksburg, Mississippi. Guidebook for Friends of the Pleistocene Field Trip.
Miller, B. J., Day, W. J., & Schumacher, B. A. (1986). Loesses and loess-derived soils in the Lower Mississippi Valley. Guidebook for soils-geomorphology tour.
Pettry, D. E., & Switzer, R. E. (1998). Sodium soils in Mississippi.
Rutledge, E.M., M.J. Guccione, H.W. Markewich, D.A. Wysocki, and L.B. Ward. 1996. Loess stratigraphy of the Lower Mississippi Valley. Engineering Geology 45: 167-183.
Saucier, Roger T. 1994. Geomorphology and Quaternary Geologic History of the Lower Mississippi Valley, Volume I & II. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS.
Schumacher, B. A., Miller, B. J., & Day, W. J. (1987). A chronotoposequence of soils developed in loess in central Louisiana. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51(4), 1005-1010.
Theriot, R. F. (1992). Flood tolerance of plant species in bottomland forests of the southeastern United States.
United States Salinity Laboratory Staff, USA, USDA (1954), Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils, USDA Agriculture Handbook 60,1954, 160 pp.
Contributors
D Charles Stemmans II
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | |
Approved by | |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.