Western Wet Loess Terrace - PROVISIONAL
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
- Transition T1A More details
- Transition T1B More details
- Transition T2A More details
- Transition T2B More details
- Restoration pathway R3A More details
- Transition T3A More details
- Restoration pathway R4A More details
- Transition T4A More details
- Transition T4B More details
-
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
Exemplary examples of the full range of plant communities and ecological processes that were once commonplace on this ecological site no longer exist. Vestiges of this once vast system are primarily relegated to abandoned woodlots and narrow, roadway corridors that now hold the only remaining example of native prairie vegetation that was once part of the greater ecological system. However, there is one example where the soils of this site occur in complex with other ecological sites forming a mosaic of wet hardwood flats (this ecological site), loblolly pine flats, and alkali flatwoods within a relatively confined area. It is from this example and remaining remnants, mostly abandoned woodlots, that we draw a greater understanding of the “perceived” reference conditions for this ecological site.
Klimas et al. (2012) identified this site as “hardwood flats (wet phase).” The saturated, poorly drained soils during winter and spring supports conditions suitable for more lowland species such as willow oak, overcup, and pin oak – the latter two more typical of vernal pools. The drying of the soils by summer create conditions suitable for more upland species, the principal species of which is delta post oak and/or post oak. To the south, loblolly pine is locally a dominant species. However, loblolly pine has a fairly restricted range in the Western Lowlands and is not a characteristic species through the northern portions of this ecological site (T. Foti, personal communication).
Embedded among the woodlands of this site were prairies and savannas, some of which were likely extensive. Vegetation of the open areas would have been quite similar to that of the Grand Prairie to the south. It is generally held that areas of prairie extended or “fingered” northward from the Grand Prairie province well into the Western Lowlands (T. Foti, personal communication).
Two community phases are recognized for representing the reference state of this ecological site: 1) the open structure of the flatwoods and 2) prairie and savanna.
Of the utmost concern, this site has incurred tremendous alteration to drainage. Any attempt to reestablish perceived reference conditions of a stand or a local site must first restore the natural hydrology of that site, which may entail removing drainage structures. If not, management may improve stand structure and even composition to a degree, but the site, overall, will remain in an altered state relative to the reference state. Retaining drainage structures (either pulling excessive water off or retaining water for rice) will directly influence the types of vegetation that colonize the site, which may be entirely different than reference conditions.
Submodel
Description
This state is representative of sites that have been converted to and maintained in pasture and forage cropland, typically a grass – legume mixture. For pastureland, planning or prescribing the intensity, frequency, timing, and duration of grazing can help maintain desirable forage mixtures at sufficient density and vigor (USDA-NRCS, 2010; Green et al., 2006). Overgrazed pastures can lead to soil compaction and numerous bare spots, which may then become focal points of colonization by undesirable plants or weeds. Soils exhibiting the core concepts of this site have a pronounced period of wetness followed by droughty conditions. Limitations may pertain mainly to periods of extreme wetness.
Planning or prescribing the intensity, frequency, timing, and duration of grazing can help maintain desirable forage mixtures at sufficient density and vigor (USDA-NRCS, 2010; Green et al., 2006). Because of the limitations of this site, grazing may be limited to small intervals within the appropriate season(s). It is strongly advised that consultation with State Grazing Land Specialists and District Conservationists at local NRCS Service Centers be sought when assistance is needed in developing management recommendations or prescribed grazing practices on this site.
Submodel
Description
Agriculture production on this site is somewhat limited due to seasonal wetness. However, the vast majority of the acreage in this ecological site is in agriculture production. Where idle woodlots occur today, those sites were very likely cropped at some point in the past.
Submodel
Description
Most, if not all, of the woodlots and local patches of woodlands occurring on this site represent this state. These stands still support some of the components that characterizes the community. The structure of these stands are typically denser than a late development, fire-influenced stand. However, the co-occurrence of upland and lowland taxa and a moderately open understory provide indications of hydroxeric influences. Restoration potential of these sites back to reference conditions is possible, provided that the appropriate management regime is initiated and maintained. Before this can happen, the natural hydrology of the area of interest must first be restored, which may entail removing drainage structures. If not, management may improve stand structure and even composition to a degree, but the site, overall, will remain in an altered state relative to the reference state.
Submodel
Mechanism
This pathway represents an attempt to convert the woodland community to pasture or forage production. Actions include clearing, stump removal, herbicide application, seedbed preparation, and the establishment of desired plants (State 2).
Mechanism
Actions include mechanical removal of vegetation and stumps; herbicide treatment of residual plants; and preparation for planting. May include the installation of drainage control structures (State 3).
Mechanism
Actions include removal of vegetation or pasturage; herbicide treatment of residual plants; and preparation for planting.
Mechanism
Abandonment of grassland/pastureland management and allowing natural succession to proceed beyond the old field stage to canopy development of the young woodland.
Mechanism
Seedbed preparation and establishment of desired forage/grassland mixture.
Mechanism
Abandonment of cropland management and allowing natural succession to proceed to canopy development of the young woodland.
Mechanism
This pathway represents restoration back to perceived reference conditions. The period required for this transition to take place likely varies by location and is dependent upon local site conditions. In some cases, a return to the reference state may not be possible without considerable management effort. That effort may involve exotic species control, restoration of the natural hydrologic regime of a given locality, and the reestablishment of components considered characteristic of the reference state.
Mechanism
This pathway represents an attempt to convert the woodland community to pasture or forage production. Actions include clearing, stump removal, herbicide application, seedbed preparation, and the establishment of desired plants (State 2).
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.