Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site RX141X302
Mucky Swamp
Last updated: 10/03/2024
Accessed: 11/14/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 141X–Tug Hill Plateau
MLRA 141 is entirely in New York and makes up about 1,173 square kilometers (3,037 square kilometers). It consists of a relatively small but unique upland that lies just off the eastern end of Lake Ontario and west of the Black River Valley and Adirondack Mountain region. It is essentially a north- and east-facing glaciated cuesta scarp and is underlain by thick Wisconsin till and small areas of outwash. Most of the plateau is woodland, so forestry and recreation are the primary uses, but small isolated dairy operations and hobby farms are located around the perimeter.
The area is bordered on the east by the Black River Valley, on the north by the St. Lawrence Lowland, on the west by the Ontario Lowland, and on the south by the Upper Mohawk Valley. The northern and eastern boundaries of MLRA 141 are distinct where they contact the physiographically dissimilar southwestern part of MLRA 142 (St. Lawrence-Champlain Plain). The western and southern boundaries are also distinct where they contact the physiographically dissimilar MLRA 101 (Ontario-Erie Plain and Finger Lakes Region)
Ecological site concept
This site occurs in relatively flat areas (0-2% slopes) near the bottom of watersheds where water saturates deep organic muck deposits for most of the growing season. These organic soils are very poorly-drained and often underlain by mineral deposits at depths greater than 16 inches. The water table is within a few inches of the surface. This site often has pit and mound topography, with ponding typical in the pits, and slightly drier soil conditions on the mounds where most trees are rooted.
Northern white cedar is abundant, with balsam fir, black spruce, larch, black ash, and grey birch as common associates. Diverse herbs, shrubs, and bryophytes dominate the understory. Treethrow and altered hydrology are common disturbances on this site. Small openings created by treethrow, which is very common on these unstable soils, are typically colonized by species already present in the community and may persist as canopy openings dominated by herbaceous species for a long time.
Associated sites
RX141X110 |
Floodplain Riparian Complex Floodplain Riparian Complex may be adjacently located or surround Mucky Swamp ecological sites. |
---|---|
RX141X210 |
Marsh Wetland Complex Marsh Wetland Complex may be adjacently located or surround Mucky Swamp ecological sites. |
Similar sites
RX141X210 |
Marsh Wetland Complex Mucky Swamp ecological sites may have similar vegetative composition and can transition to a Marsh Wetland Complex under select environmental conditions and/or constraints. |
---|---|
RX141X301 |
Semi-rich Loamy Swamp Mucky Swamp ecological sites may have similar vegetative composition and can transition to a Semi-rich Loamy Swamps under select environmental conditions and/or constraints. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
(1) Thuja occidentalis |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Cornus sericea |
Herbaceous |
(1) Carex trisperma |
Legacy ID
F141XY302NY
Physiographic features
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Swamp or marsh
(2) Depression |
---|---|
Runoff class | Negligible |
Ponding frequency | Frequent |
Elevation | 177 – 610 m |
Slope | 2% |
Water table depth | 0 cm |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
Throughout the year precipitation is evenly distributed around most of this area with slightly less rainfall occurring around the lower margins of the plateau. Rainfall occurs as high-intensity, convective thunderstorms during the summer. Lake-effect snowfall is heavy from late autumn to early spring with the summit of the plateau having the lowest temperatures and the shortest freeze-free periods.
Climate stations Watertown and Old Forge are adjacent to the MLRA and were used to tabulate additional representative climate data.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 92-124 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 129-159 days |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 1,194-1,346 mm |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 86-131 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | 119-164 days |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 1,118-1,448 mm |
Frost-free period (average) | 108 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | 143 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 1,270 mm |
Figure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6. Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) BOONVILLE 4 SSW [USC00300785], Boonville, NY
-
(2) CAMDEN [USC00301110], Camden, NY
-
(3) WATERTOWN [USC00309000], Watertown, NY
-
(4) OLD FORGE [USC00306184], Eagle Bay, NY
Influencing water features
Wetland description
Water levels in these swamps typically fluctuate seasonally; they may be flooded in spring and relatively dry by late summer.
Soil features
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Organic material
|
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Loam |
Drainage class | Very poorly drained |
Permeability class | Slow |
Soil depth | 183 cm |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 0% |
Available water capacity (22.9-25.4cm) |
Not specified |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (13-18.5cm) |
Not specified |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0cm) |
Not specified |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0cm) |
Not specified |
Ecological dynamics
[Caveat: The vegetation information contained in this section and is only provisional, based on concepts, and future projects support validation through field work. *] The vegetation groupings described in this section are based on the terrestrial ecological system classification and vegetation associations developed by NatureServe (Comer 2003) and localized associations provided by the New York Natural Heritage Program (Edinger et al. 2014).
This site is dominated by northern white cedar, often with black spruce, balsam fir, red maple, yellow birch, white pine, and/or brown ash present in small amounts. Most trees are rooted in the poorly-drained soil mounds rather than the very poorly-drained soil depressions. The understory is diverse with sphagnum moss, creeping snowberry, and three-seed sedge common.
Treethrow and altered hydrology are common disturbances on this site. Small openings created by treethrow, which is very common on these unstable soils, are typically colonized by species already present in the community and may persist as canopy openings dominated by herbaceous species for a long time.
Persistent ponding caused by beavers, man-made structures (such as roads, dams, etc.), or increased runoff in the watershed above can cause water levels to rise and kill cedar trees, resulting in an open ponded or marsh condition. If hydrology is restored to reference conditions, the site is likely to transition through a marsh and/or early seral forest phase before eventually returning to cedar dominance.
Logging is limited on this site and requires winter harvest methods when the ground is frozen. Cedar removal may result in an early seral phase dominated by balsam fir, grey birch, red maple, and other colonizers before eventually reverting to cedar dominance. This may take a very long time to occur.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State (minimally-managed)
This site occurs in relatively flat areas (0-2% slopes) near the bottom of watersheds where water saturates deep organic muck deposits for most of the growing season. These organic soils are very poorly-drained and often underlain by mineral deposits at depths greater than 16 inches. The water table is within a few inches of the surface. This site often has pit and mound topography, with ponding typical in the pits, and slightly drier soil conditions on the mounds where most trees are rooted. This site is dominated by northern white cedar, often with black spruce, balsam fir, red maple, yellow birch, white pine, and/or brown ash present in small amounts. Most trees are rooted in the poorly-drained soil mounds rather than the very poorly-drained soil depressions. The understory is diverse with sphagnum moss, creeping snowberry, and three-seed sedge common.
Resilience management. Treethrow and altered hydrology are common disturbances on this site. Small openings created by treethrow, which is very common on these unstable soils, are typically colonized by species already present in the community and may persist as canopy openings dominated by herbaceous species for a long time. Persistent ponding caused by beavers, man-made structures (such as roads, dams, etc.), or increased runoff in the watershed above can cause water levels to rise and kill cedar trees, resulting in an open ponded or marsh condition. If hydrology is restored to reference conditions, the site is likely to transition through a marsh and/or early seral forest phase before eventually returning to cedar dominance. Logging is limited on this site and requires winter harvest methods when the ground is frozen. Cedar removal may result in an early seral phase dominated by balsam fir, grey birch, red maple, and other colonizers before eventually reverting to cedar dominance. This may take a very long time to occur.
Dominant resource concerns
-
Ponding and flooding
-
Seasonal high water table
-
Surface water depletion
-
Ground water depletion
-
Elevated water temperature
-
Plant productivity and health
-
Plant structure and composition
-
Plant pest pressure
-
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
-
Aquatic habitat for fish and other organisms
Community 1.1
Northern White Cedar Swamp
This site is a conifer or mixed swamp that occurs on organic soils in cool, poorly drained depressions in central and northern New York, and along lakes and streams in the northern half of the state. These swamps are often spring fed or enriched by seepage of cold, minerotrophic groundwater, resulting in a stable water table and continually saturated soils. Soils are often rich in calcium. At some sites these soils have developed above a marl substrate. The dominant tree is northern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis), which makes up more than 30% of the canopy cover. Thuja may form nearly pure stands, or it may be mixed with other conifers and hardwoods, including red maple (Acer rubrum), eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), balsam fir (Abies balsamea), tamarack (Larix laricina), yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis), white pine (Pinus strobus), spruces (Picea mariana, P. rubens, P. glauca), and black ash (Fraxinus nigra) which is a good indicator for this community when present. The shrub layer is usually sparse; characteristic species are northern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis), dwarf raspberry (Rubus pubescens), red osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), swamp fly honeysuckle (Lonicera oblongifolia), speckled alder (Alnus incana ssp. rugosa), and highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). The groundlayer is typically diverse, with many bryophytes and boreal herbs. There are typically many hummocks formed by decaying downed trees or tip-up mounds. Characteristic herbs on the hummocks include sedges (Carex leptalea, C. eburnea), oak fern (Gymnocarpium dryopteris), goldthread (Coptis trifolia), starflower (Trientalis borealis), bunchberry (Cornus canadensis), miterwort (Mitella nuda), Canada mayflower (Maianthemum canadense), blue bead lily (Clintonia borealis), snowberry (Gaultheria hispidula), partridge berry (Mitchella repens), and dwarf scouring rush (Equisetum scirpoides) which is a good indicator for this community when present. Characteristic herbs of hollows between the hummocks are the sedge Carex intumescens, sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), marsh fern (Thelypteris palustris), cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), royal fern (O. regalis), crested wood fern (Dryopteris cristata), showy lady's-slipper (Cypripedium reginae), yellow lady's-slipper (Cypripedium parviflorum var. pubescens), and golden ragwort (Packera aurea). Characteristic bryophytes are several peat mosses (Sphagnum spp.), feather mosses such as stair-step moss (Hylocomium splendens) and knight’s plume moss (Ptilium crista-castrensis), and leafy liverworts such as Bazzania trilobata and Trichocolea tomentella. (Edinger et al. 2014)
Resilience management. New York Natural Heritage Program State Rank: S2/S3 S2- Typically 6 to 20 occurrences, few remaining individuals (for species), acres, or miles of stream, or factors demonstrably making it very vulnerable in New York State. S3- Typically 21 to 100 occurrences, limited acreage, or miles of stream in New York State. Flooding by beaver is common and the community may oscillate between a tall shrubland and forest over long cycles of beaver flooding and abandonment
Dominant resource concerns
-
Ponding and flooding
-
Surface water depletion
-
Ground water depletion
-
Nutrients transported to surface water
-
Pesticides transported to surface water
-
Pathogens and chemicals from manure, biosolids, or compost applications transported to surface water
-
Petroleum, heavy metals, and other pollutants transported to surface water
-
Sediment transported to surface water
-
Elevated water temperature
-
Plant productivity and health
-
Plant structure and composition
-
Plant pest pressure
-
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
-
Aquatic habitat for fish and other organisms
Community 1.2
Red Maple - Tamarack Peat Swamp
A mixed swamp that occurs on organic soils (peat or muck) in poorly drained depressions. These swamps are often spring fed or enriched by seepage of minerotrophic groundwater resulting in a stable water table and continually saturated soil. Soils are often rich in calcium. The dominant trees are red maple (Acer rubrum) and tamarack (Larix laricina). These species usually form an open canopy (50 to 70% cover) with numerous small openings dominated by shrubs or sedges. Other less frequently occurring trees include black spruce (Picea mariana), white pine (Pinus strobus), black ash (Fraxinus nigra), American hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana), and northern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis). Characteristic shrubs are alders (Alnus incana ssp. rugosa, A. serrulata), winterberry (Ilex verticillata), various shrubby dogwoods, especially red osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), willows (Salix spp.), highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), dwarf raspberry (Rubus pubescens), along with many rich shrub fen species such as swamp birch (Betula pumila), alder-leaf buckthorn (Rhamnus alnifolia), poison sumac (Toxicodendron vernix), swamp fly honeysuckle (Lonicera oblongifolia), and shrubby cinquefoil (Dasiphora fruticosa ssp. floribunda). Other less frequently occurring shrubs include black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) and mountain holly (Nemopanthus mucronatus). The herb layer is often very diverse and usually includes calcium-rich indicator species. Characteristic herbs include sedges (Carex trisperma, C. interior, C. stricta, C. lacustris, C. leptalea), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), cinnamon fern (O. cinnamomea), marsh fern (Thelypteris palustris), crested wood fern (Dryopteris cristata), skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus), purple avens (Geum rivale), marsh marigold (Caltha palustris), and water horehound (Lycopus uniflorus). Other less frequently occurring herbs include cattail (Typha latifolia), goldthread (Coptis trifolia), flat-topped white aster (Doellingeria umbellata var. umbellata), fowl manna grass (Glyceria striata), water horsetail (Equisetum fluviatile), buckbean (Menyanthes trifoliata), starflower (Trientalis borealis), goldenrods (Solidago patula, S. uliginosa), golden ragwort (Packera aurea), and marsh cinquefoil (Comarum palustre). (Edinger et al. 2014)
Resilience management. Data on characteristic fauna are needed. These swamps are closely related to and often grade into rich shrub fens and rich graminoid fens. New York Natural Heritage Program State Rank: S2/S3 S2: Typically 6 to 20 occurrences, few remaining individuals (for species), acres, or miles of stream, or factors demonstrably making it very vulnerable in New York State. S3: Typically 21 to 100 occurrences, limited acreage, or miles of stream in New York State.
Pathway 1.1a
Community 1.1 to 1.2
The absence (removal or loss) of Thuja occidentalis as the dominant tree will result in shifts between reference sites.
Pathway 1.2a
Community 1.2 to 1.1
The presence (addition or increase of Thuja occidentalis as the dominant tree will result in shifts between reference sites.
State 2
Semi-natural State
Shifts in ecological site composition, functionality, and dynamics driven by natural disturbances, processes, and pressures (may have some anthropogenic drivers). More research is needed to determine the extent of the Semi-natural state associated with this ecological site.
Dominant resource concerns
-
Ponding and flooding
-
Elevated water temperature
-
Plant productivity and health
-
Plant structure and composition
-
Plant pest pressure
-
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
-
Aquatic habitat for fish and other organisms
Community 2.1
Invasiveness and Biological Introductions
Introduction of invasive species, pathogens, and/or pests resulting in shifts in ecological site composition, functionality, and dynamics. More research is needed to determine the extent of these effects on the semi-natural state associated with this ecological site.
Dominant resource concerns
-
Organic matter depletion
-
Ponding and flooding
-
Elevated water temperature
-
Plant productivity and health
-
Plant structure and composition
-
Plant pest pressure
-
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
Community 2.2
Ponded
A Shrub Swamp can be an example of a ponded site and is mostly a inland wetland dominated by tall shrubs that occurs along the shore of a lake or river, in a wet depression or valley not associated with lakes, or as a transition zone between a marsh, fen, or bog and a swamp or upland community. The substrate is usually mineral soil or muck. A few examples may have a shallow layer of sphagnous peat. This is a very broadly defined type that includes several distinct communities and many intermediates. Shrub swamps are very common and quite variable. They may be co-dominated by a mixture of species, or have a single dominant shrub species. Characteristic shrubs that are common in these and other types of shrub swamps include meadow-sweet (Spiraea alba var. alba and S. alba var. latifolia), hardhack (Spiraea tomentosa), gray dogwood (Cornus racemosa), swamp azalea (Rhododendron viscosum), highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), male-berry (Lyonia ligustrina), smooth alder (Alnus serrulata), spicebush (Lindera benzoin), willows (Salix bebbiana, S. discolor, S. lucida, S. petiolaris), wild raisin (Viburnum nudum var. cassinoides), and arrowwood (Viburnum dentatum var. lucidum). Scattered young trees may be present, such as red maple (Acer rubrum), American elm (Ulmus americana), and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica).(Edinger et al. 2014)
Resilience management. New York Natural Heritage Program State Rank: S5- Demonstrably secure in New York State.
Dominant resource concerns
-
Surface water depletion
-
Ground water depletion
-
Nutrients transported to surface water
-
Pesticides transported to surface water
-
Pathogens and chemicals from manure, biosolids, or compost applications transported to surface water
-
Petroleum, heavy metals, and other pollutants transported to surface water
-
Sediment transported to surface water
-
Elevated water temperature
-
Plant productivity and health
-
Plant structure and composition
-
Plant pest pressure
-
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
-
Aquatic habitat for fish and other organisms
Community 2.3
Transitional Marsh
Shallow emergent marshes typically occur in lake basins and along streams often intergrading with deep emergent marshes, shrub swamps, and sedge meadows, and they may occur together in a complex mosaic in a large wetland. This site occurs on mineral soil or deep muck soils, that are typically permanently saturated and seasonally flooded. Water depths may range from 15 cm to 1 m (6 in to 3.3 ft) during flood stages, but the water level usually drops by mid to late summer and the substrate is exposed during an average year. Shallow emergent marshes are common and variable, and may be dominated by a mixture of herbaceous vegetation or a single species. Shrubs may be scattered throughout marshes, though areas with greater than 50% shrub cover are classified as shrub swamps. The hydroperiod of these sites may determine species composition, with species dependent on differing hydrologic states (permanently saturated, seasonally flooded, or temporarily saturated). (Edinger et al. 2014) Sedge meadows are a wet meadow community that has organic soils (muck or fibrous peat). Soils are permanently saturated and seasonally flooded; there is usually little peat accumulation in the substrate and usually underlain by deep muck. Sparse shrubs may be present and the dominant herbaceous vegetation must be members of the sedge family (Cyperaceae), typically of the genus Carex. Sedge meadows typically occur along streams and near the inlets and outlets of lakes and ponds; they also occur in lake basins as a zone near the upland edge of a shallow emergent marsh. A sedge meadow does not typically form a floating mat, instead it is covered with water during flooding. When water levels are low, there is little or no open water. (Edinger et al. 2014)
Resilience management. New York Natural Heritage Program State Rank (Shallow emergent marsh): S5-Demonstrably secure in New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program State Rank (Sedge meadow): S4-Apparently secure in New York State. Species composition may be strongly influenced by annual and seasonal water levels. These sites may be found on found in agricultural or cleared land that may present issues related to agricultural runoff (pesticide, petroleum, waste, etc.) (Edinger et al. 2014)
Pathway 2.2a
Community 2.2 to 2.3
Remediation of hydrological alteration, decreased annual/decadal precipitation or flooding events.
Pathway 2.3a
Community 2.3 to 2.2
hydrological alteration (beaver or debris), increased annual/decadal precipitation or flooding events
State 3
Cultural State
Shifts in ecological site composition, functionality, and dynamics that are primary driven by anthropogenic disturbances and pressures (may have some associated natural drivers). More research is needed to determine the extent of the cultural state associated with this ecological site.
Dominant resource concerns
-
Surface water depletion
-
Ground water depletion
-
Plant productivity and health
-
Plant structure and composition
-
Plant pest pressure
-
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
-
Aquatic habitat for fish and other organisms
Community 3.1
Drained
Hydrological alteration of site resulting in depleted or drained surface or ground water
Dominant resource concerns
-
Surface water depletion
-
Ground water depletion
-
Naturally available moisture use
-
Plant productivity and health
-
Plant structure and composition
-
Plant pest pressure
-
Terrestrial habitat for wildlife and invertebrates
-
Aquatic habitat for fish and other organisms
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2
climate change, hydrological alteration, increased nutrients or chemicals (pesticide, herbicide, fertilizer) transported to surface water, significant increase in flooding events and annual precipitation, introduction of invasive species, pests, and pathogens
Conservation practices
Monitoring and Evaluation |
---|
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3
hydrologic alteration (barrier, obstruction, dam, diversion), landscape alteration, mechanical soil disturbance, landscape alteration
Conservation practices
Dam | |
---|---|
Land Clearing | |
Precision Land Forming | |
Irrigation Land Leveling | |
Land Smoothing | |
Drainage Water Management |
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1
remediation of hydrologic alteration, management of invasive species, pests, and pathogens, restoration of key native plant species, restoration of terrestrial and aquatic habitat
Conservation practices
Riparian Herbaceous Cover | |
---|---|
Riparian Forest Buffer | |
Aquatic Organism Passage | |
Obstruction Removal | |
Restoration and Management of Rare and Declining Habitats | |
Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management | |
Upland Wildlife Habitat Management | |
Shallow Water Development and Management | |
Early Successional Habitat Development/Management | |
Wetland Restoration | |
Wetland Enhancement | |
Restoration and Management of Natural Ecosystems | |
Native Plant Community Restoration and Management | |
Pathogen Management | |
Invasive Plant Species Control | |
Pathogen Management | |
Invasive Species Pest Management | |
Precision Pest Control Application | |
Shallow water habitat | |
Non-forested riparian zone enhancement for fish and wildlife | |
Riparian forest buffer, terrestrial and aquatic wildlife habitat | |
Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats | |
Multi-species Native Perennials for Biomass/Wildlife Habitat | |
Establish pollinator habitat | |
Habitat Development for Beneficial Insects for Pest Management | |
Biological suppression and other non-chemical techniques to manage brush, weeds and invasive species | |
Biological suppression and other non-chemical techniques to manage herbaceous weeds invasive species | |
Monitoring and Evaluation | |
Herbaceous Weed Control | |
Aquatic Organism Passage Barrier Removal |
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3
hydrologic alteration (barrier, obstruction, dam, diversion), landscape alteration, mechanical soil disturbance, landscape alteration
Conservation practices
Land Clearing | |
---|---|
Precision Land Forming | |
Irrigation Land Leveling | |
Land Smoothing | |
Drainage Water Management | |
Floodproofing |
Restoration pathway R3B
State 3 to 1
remediation of hydrologic alteration, seeding, planting, significant flooding events and increase in annual precipitation, compacted soil, establishment of key native plant species
Conservation practices
Critical Area Planting | |
---|---|
Obstruction Removal | |
Vegetated Treatment Area | |
Restoration and Management of Rare and Declining Habitats | |
Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management | |
Upland Wildlife Habitat Management | |
Shallow Water Development and Management | |
Early Successional Habitat Development/Management | |
Wildlife Watering Facility | |
Constructed Wetland | |
Wetland Restoration | |
Wetland Creation | |
Wetland Enhancement | |
Restoration and Management of Natural Ecosystems | |
Native Plant Community Restoration and Management | |
Shallow water habitat | |
Non-forested riparian zone enhancement for fish and wildlife | |
Riparian forest buffer, terrestrial and aquatic wildlife habitat | |
Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats | |
Multi-species Native Perennials for Biomass/Wildlife Habitat | |
Monitoring and Evaluation |
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 2
remediation of hydrologic alteration, seeding, planting, significant flooding events and increase in annual precipitation, compacted soil, establishment of key native plant species
Conservation practices
Obstruction Removal | |
---|---|
Restoration and Management of Rare and Declining Habitats | |
Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management | |
Upland Wildlife Habitat Management | |
Shallow Water Development and Management | |
Early Successional Habitat Development/Management | |
Constructed Wetland | |
Wetland Restoration | |
Wetland Creation | |
Wetland Enhancement | |
Restoration and Management of Natural Ecosystems | |
Native Plant Community Restoration and Management | |
Restoration of Compacted Soils | |
Shallow water habitat | |
Non-forested riparian zone enhancement for fish and wildlife | |
Riparian forest buffer, terrestrial and aquatic wildlife habitat | |
Restoration and Management of Rare or Declining Habitats | |
Multi-species Native Perennials for Biomass/Wildlife Habitat | |
Establish pollinator habitat | |
Monitoring and Evaluation |
Additional community tables
Interpretations
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Future work is needed, as described in a future project plan, to validate the information presented in this provisional ecological site description. Future work includes field sampling, data collection and analysis by qualified vegetation ecologists and soil scientists. As warranted, annual reviews of the project plan can be conducted by the Ecological Site Technical Team. A final field review, peer review, quality control, and quality assurance reviews of the ESD are necessary to approve a final document.
Other references
Comer, P., D. Faber-Langendoen, R. Evans, S. Grawler, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, M. Pyne, M. Reid, K. Schultz, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2003. Ecological Systems of the United States: A Working Classification of U.S. Terrestrial Systems. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia
Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero (editors). 2014. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke’s Ecological Communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.
Gawler, S. and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural Landscapes of Maine: A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation, Augusta, Maine.
NatureServe. 2021. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. https://explorer.natureserve.org/. (accessed 10 July. 2021).
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. Agricultural Handbook 296
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Official Soil Series Descriptions. Available online. (accessed 11 Aug. 2021).
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Climate Research Station Data. Available online. (accessed 23 June. 2021).
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for [MLRA 141, Maine]. Available online. (accessed 14 Oct. 2021).
USNVC [United States National Vegetation Classification]. 2017. United States National Vegetation Classification Database V2.01. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee, Washington DC. Available The U.S. National Vegetation Classification (usnvc.org) (accessed 2 July. 2021).
Contributors
Christopher Mann
Approval
Greg Schmidt, 10/03/2024
Acknowledgments
Nels Barrett and Nick Butler provided considerable review of this ecological site concept.
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | 11/14/2024 |
Approved by | Greg Schmidt |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.