Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site VX162X01X500
Isohyperthermic Forest
Accessed: 04/23/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 162X–Humid and Very Humid Organic Soils on Lava Flows
This MLRA occurs in the State of Hawaii on the Big Island of Hawaii on the southeastern slopes of Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea volcanoes. Elevation ranges from sea level to 4000 feet (0 to 1200 meters). Slopes follow the undulating to very steep topography of the lava flows. The flows are basaltic aa or pahoehoe lava, which are covered by a very shallow layer of organic material or in limited areas by recent volcanic ash. Climate is mostly wet tropical. Average annual precipitation typically ranges from 60 to 235 inches (1500 to 5875 millimeters), increasing with elevation and to the north. Rainfall occurs mostly from November through April in udic areas and is evenly distributed throughout the year in perudic areas. Average annual temperatures range from 54 to 73 degrees F (12 to 23 degrees C), with little seasonal variation. Soils are mostly Udifolists with isothermic or isohyperthermic soil temperature regimes. Very young lava flows may have no soil covering. Native vegetation consists of moderate to tall stature rain forests, low stature dry forests, and “savannas” dominated by dense thickets of uluhe ferns.
Classification relationships
This ecological site occurs within Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 162 - Humid and Very Humid Organic Soils on Lava Flows.
Ecological site concept
This ecological site is the moist, moderate stature forest that follows both sides of Route 11 from Hilo south to Keaau and then Route 130 from Keaau through Pahoa to mauka of Kalapana. It starts just inland from the coast, existing where very young lava flows have not covered the slightly more developed soils of this ecological site. Much of the area is private land, with large areas held by Kamehameha Schools and the State of Hawaii. Most of this forest is heavily impacted by introduced plant species.
The central concept of the Isohyperthermic Forest is of well to somewhat excessively drained, very shallow to shallow soils formed in deposits of highly decomposed plant material over pahoehoe (flat lava flows) or within the spaces of aa (cobbly lava flows). Lava flows are young, ranging from 400 to 1500 years old. Annual air temperatures and rainfall create hot (isohyperthermic), moist (udic) soil conditions. These soils support a forest an overstory up to 80 feet (25 meters) tall of ohia lehua (Metrosideros polymorpha), a secondary canopy from 25 to 40 feet (8 to 12 meters) tall of multiple tree species, an open tree fern or hapuu (Cibotium spp.) canopy 10 to 16 feet (3 to 5 meters) tall, and a diverse understory of ferns, shrubs, and vines. Tahitian screw pine (Pandanus tectorius) trees are common near the coast but decline in abundance inland.
Associated sites
| VX162X01X503 |
Udic Isothermic Forest F162XY503 Udic Isothermic Forest borders F162XY500 at higher elevations that receive more rainfall. |
|---|---|
| VX162X01X504 |
Pahoehoe Organic Fern Savanna F162XY504 Pahoehoe Organic Fern Savanna adjoins F162XY500 on very shallow, young, organic soils. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
| Tree |
(1) Metrosideros polymorpha |
|---|---|
| Shrub |
Not specified |
| Herbaceous |
Not specified |
Legacy ID
F162XY500HI
Physiographic features
This ecological site occurs on lava flows on sloping mountainsides of shield volcanoes. Lava flows are aa (loose, cobbly) or pahoehoe (smooth, relatively unbroken). Volcanic ash flows range from very shallow to deep on the underlying lava.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
| Landforms |
(1)
Shield volcano
(2) Lava flow |
|---|---|
| Flooding duration | Brief (2 to 7 days) |
| Flooding frequency | None to occasional |
| Ponding duration | Brief (2 to 7 days) |
| Ponding frequency | None to occasional |
| Elevation | 20 – 1,200 ft |
| Slope | 3 – 25% |
| Water table depth | 60 in |
| Aspect | NE, E |
Climatic features
Average annual precipitation ranges from 100 to 160 inches (2500 to 4000 millimeters). Most of the precipitation falls from November through April. Average annual temperature is about 66 to 72 degrees F (19 to 22 degrees C).
Air temperature in Hawai`i is buffered by the surrounding ocean so that the range in temperature through the year is narrow. This creates “iso-“ soil temperature regimes in which mean summer and winter temperatures differ by less than 6 degrees C (11 degrees F).
Hawaii lies within the trade wind zone. Significant amounts of moisture are picked up from the ocean by trade winds up to an altitude of more than 6000 feet (very roughly 2000 meters). As the trade winds from the northeast are forced up the mountains of the island their moisture condenses, creating rain on the windward slopes; the leeward side of the island receives little of this moisture.
On the windward side of the island, cool, moist air at higher elevations descends toward the ocean where it meets the trade winds; this process brings night-time rainfall to lower elevation areas.
In winter, low pressure systems often approach the island from the west, producing extensive rainstorms that primarily affect the leeward sides of the island.
Reference: Giambelluca and Schroeder 1998.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
| Frost-free period (average) | 365 days |
|---|---|
| Freeze-free period (average) | 365 days |
| Precipitation total (average) | 127 in |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 4. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 5. Annual average temperature pattern
Climate stations used
-
(1) HILO INTL AP [USW00021504], Hilo, HI
Influencing water features
There are no water features influencing this ecological site.
Soil features
Soils in this ecological site are of two types: (1) highly decomposed plant materials in aa or on pahoehoe or (2) hydrous (high water holding capacity) loam formed from volcanic ash. Landscape surfaces in this ecological site are young (generally 400 to 1,500 years old). Soil temperature regime is isohyperthermic. Soil moisture regime is udic (in most years, not dry for as long as 90 cumulative days).
The soil phase "Hakuma highly organic hydrous loam, occasionally flooded," is a very shallow soil that occurs in kipukas surrounded by slightly higher parts of the landscape. Runoff from the adjoining landscape enters the kipukas to cause occasional flooding.
The volcanic ash soils of the Island of Hawaii are derived mostly from basaltic ash that varies relatively little in chemical composition (Hazlett and Hyndman 1996; Vitousek 2004). Most of these volcanic ash soils are classified as Andisols, which have these general management characteristics: ion exchange capacity that varies with pH, but mostly retaining anions such as nitrate; high phosphorus adsorption, which restricts phosphorus availability to plants; excellent physical properties (low bulk density, good friability, weak stickiness, stable soil aggregates) for cultivation, seedling emergence, and plant root growth; resistance to compaction and an ability to recover from compaction following repeated cycles of wetting and drying; and high capacity to hold water that is available to plants. These characteristics are due to the properties of the parent material, the clay-size noncrystalline materials formed by weathering, and the soil organic matter accumulated during soil formation (Shoji et al. 1993).
Andisols formed on pahoehoe lava can be very shallow to very deep. Pahoehoe is referred to as a “lithic contact,” which is a boundary between soil and underlying material that is coherent, continuous, difficult to dig with a spade, and contains few cracks that can be penetrated by roots (Soil Survey Staff 1999). Pahoehoe is typically very limiting to root penetration due to the spacing and size of cracks. However, this characteristic of pahoehoe is variable, and there are many instances of stands of large trees growing on very shallow and shallow ash soils over pahoehoe.
The lava rock fragments that constitute aa range in size from gravel (2 mm to 76 mm, or up to 3 inches) to stones (250 mm to 600 mm, or 10 to 25 inches), but are primarily gravel and cobbles (76 mm to 250 mm, or 3 to 10 inches). Below the layer of rock fragments is massive lava called “bluerock.” The interstices between rock fragments of Andisols formed in aa are filled with soil from the surface to the blue rock at the bottom of the soil. Some Andisols in aa have few or no rock fragments in the upper horizons, while others may have large amounts of rock fragments in all horizons and on the soil surface.
Soils that are moderately deep (20 to 40 inches, or 50 to 100 cm) or deeper over underlying lava appear to present few or no limits on native, pasture, or weedy vegetation, and it seems to make no difference whether the lava rock is pahoehoe or aa. However, these soils may present some tillage difficulties when formed in aa and containing significant amounts of coarse rock fragments near the surface. Very shallow and shallow ash soils over pahoehoe are sometimes ripped to break up the underlying lava and create a deeper rooting zone.
The organic soils of the Island of Hawaii are classified as Histosols. They were formed mainly in organic material consisting of highly decomposed leaves, twigs, and wood with small amounts of basic volcanic ash, cinders, and weathered lava; this is called highly decomposed parent material. Some of these soils contain slightly or moderately decomposed parent material, especially at or near the soil surface.
Unlike many organic soils such as peat or muck that form in long-term water-saturated conditions, these organic soils form by accumulation and transformation of litter on dry surfaces of lava rock or in gaps between lava rocks. These organic soils are referred to as litter or an O horizon.
All of the Histosols on the Big Island are classified as “euic,” which means they have relatively high base saturation as indicated by a pH of 4.5 or higher; most Big Island Histosols have pH well above this minimum.
Histosols on pahoehoe lava tend to be shallow (less than 20 inches or 50 centimeters) or very shallow (less than 10 inches or 25 centimeters). Pahoehoe is referred to as a “lithic contact,” which is a boundary between soil and underlying material that is coherent, continuous, difficult to dig with a spade, and contains few cracks that can be penetrated by roots (Soil Survey Staff 1999). Pahoehoe is typically very limiting to root penetration due to the spacing and size of cracks. However, this characteristic of pahoehoe is variable, and there are many instances of large trees growing on very shallow and shallow soils over pahoehoe. When depth of soil to pahoehoe is less than 18 cm (7.2 inches), the soil is referred to as “micro.”
The lava rock fragments that constitute aa range in size from gravel (2 mm to 76 mm, or up to 3 inches) to stones (250 mm to 600 mm, or 10 to 25 inches), but are primarily gravel and cobbles (76 mm to 250 mm, or 3 to 10 inches). Below the layer of rock fragments is massive lava called “bluerock.” The interstices between rock fragments of Histosols formed in aa are filled with soil material from the surface to a particular depth, often moderately deep (20 to 40 inches, or 50 to 100 centimeters), but sometimes shallower or deeper depending on the soil series. Between this soil material-filled horizon and the bluerock the interstices contain little or no soil material. However, live roots are often present in this horizon. These soils often support dense forests with large trees despite their unusual conformation. In order to observe the natural state of the soil, one must carefully disassemble the lava rock fragments so as not to allow the soil materials to fall into the gaps below.
Ripping and crushing lava by heavy machinery transforms these organic soils into Arents, which basically means sandy (the “Ar” or arenic; think of a sandy arena) soils with little or no natural horizon development (the “ents” or Entisols). Ripping pahoehoe lava eliminates the root-limiting layer of the lava. Crushing of ripped pahoehoe fragments or aa reduces the size of the fragments and the gaps between them and creates some finer, sand-sized particles. As much as 50% of the original organic matter can be lost in this process due to oxidation, but the resulting Arents are more suitable for agricultural operations. Arents are very susceptible to weed invasion, but there have been apparently successful attempts at restoration of native plant species.
Table 4. Representative soil features
| Parent material |
(1)
Organic material
–
pahoehoe lava
(2) Basaltic volcanic ash – aa lava |
|---|---|
| Surface texture |
(1) Hydrous silty clay loam |
| Drainage class | Moderately well drained to well drained |
| Permeability class | Very slow to rapid |
| Soil depth | 10 – 60 in |
| Surface fragment cover <=3" | 50% |
| Surface fragment cover >3" | 60% |
| Available water capacity (0-40in) |
1 – 5 in |
| Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-40in) |
Not specified |
| Electrical conductivity (0-40in) |
2 mmhos/cm |
| Sodium adsorption ratio (0-40in) |
Not specified |
| Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-40in) |
5.1 – 5.7 |
| Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
65% |
| Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
95% |
Ecological dynamics
The information in this ecological site description (ESD), including the state-and-transition model (STM), was developed using archaeological and historical data, professional experience, and scientific studies. The information is representative of a complex set of plant communities. Not all scenarios or plants are included. Key indicator plants, animals, and ecological processes are described to inform land management decisions.
States and community phases within this ecological site were differentiated by inspection of data; ordination programs were not available. They were verified by professional consensus and observation of examples in the field.
Natural Disturbances
The natural (not human-caused) disturbances most important for discussion in this ecological site are lava flows, natural fires, volcanic ash falls, and wind throw.
A lava flow obviously destroys all the vegetation it covers. Regrowth of vegetation through primary succession and formation of new soil proceed at widely varying rates depending on flow age, local climate, lava type (aa or pahoehoe), and proximity of vegetation seed sources. Flows located in warm, moist climates are rapidly colonized the nitrogen-fixing lichen Stereocaulon vulcani, followed soon by vascular plants including ohia lehua (Metrosideros polymorpha) trees. In these environments, considerable vegetation can be established in periods measured in decades. Cooler locations at higher elevations revegetate more slowly. Cobbly aa lava provides safe sites for seed germination as well as sites that promote plant rooting and soil accumulation in the gaps between cobbles. This is a more favorable situation for revegetation and soil development than flat, bare pahoehoe lava. Where lava flows are narrow or where kipukas (“islands” of surfaces not covered by lava) occur, revegetation is hastened by the proximity of seed sources from intact vegetation stands nearby.
Heat from nearby lava flows sears and kills vegetation and can ignite wildfires that may carry to some extent. These effects can be seen in vegetation growing near the edges of recent flows. Natural wildfire caused by lava or possibly by lightning is probably a widespread disturbance in this ecological site given the frequency of lava flows. Most of the surfaces within this ecological site consist of lava flows that are from 400 to 1500 years old.
Vegetation can be killed by erupted layers of ash from volcanic vents, depending on the temperature of the ash and the depth of accumulation. However, vegetation sometimes survives ash flows (Vitousek 2004). Vegetation rapidly recovers because ash flow deposits possess physical and chemical properties favorable to plant growth including high water holding capacity, high surface area, rapid weathering, and favorable mineral nutrient content. New soils develop very rapidly in ash deposits, and further soil development is facilitated in turn by the rapidly-developing vegetation (Shoji et al. 1993).
Wind throw of vegetation can occur during hurricanes or other high wind events. As some of the soils of this ecological site are shallow, wind throw may occasionally occur.
Human Disturbances
Human-related disturbances have been much more important than natural disturbances in this ecological site since the arrival of Polynesians and, later, Europeans. These reflected in the State and Transition Model Diagram.
Humans arrived in the Hawaiian Islands 1200 to 1500 years ago. Their population gradually increased so that by 1600 AD at least 80% of all the lands in Hawaii below about 1500 feet (roughly 500 meters) in elevation had been extensively altered by humans (Kirch 1982); some pollen core data suggest that up to 100% of lowlands may have been altered (Athens 1997). By the time of European contact late in the 18th century, the Polynesians had developed high population densities and placed extensive areas under intensive agriculture (Cuddihy and Stone 1990).
Prehistoric native lowland forest disturbance can be attributed to clearing for agriculture by hand or by fire, introduction of new plants and animals, and wood harvesting Higher elevation forests would have been much less affected, but may have been affected by factors such as inadvertently introduced plant diseases and seed predation the introduced Pacific rat (Athens 1997).
It seems likely that early agriculture in this area would have been concentrated in areas, mostly kipukas, that have deeper volcanic ash soils that have not recently been covered by fresh lava. Individual Polynesian crop plants can still be encountered in many locations.
After the arrival of Europeans, documentary evidence attests to accelerated and extensive deforestation, erosion, siltation, and changes in local weather patterns (Kirch 1983) due to more intensive land use, modern tools, and introduction of more plant, animal, and microbe species.
The Polynesians introduced dogs, Pacific rats, and small pigs to the islands. Cattle, sheep, horses, goats, and larger European pigs were introduced in the final decade the 18th century. These animals ranged free on the islands, becoming very numerous and destructive by the early decades of the 19th century.
Native forests were damaged by the extensive harvesting of tree ferns (hapuu) for pulu in the mid-1800s. Pulu is a soft fiber that covers the base of fronds of the hapuu was exported to the west coast of America to be used in pillows and mattresses.
By the early 20th century, concerns over watershed conditions due to destruction of forests led to establishment of forest reserves and efforts to replant forests. Introduced tree species were often planted because they were considered to be hardier or more valuable than native species. The introduced tree species christmasberry or Brazil peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolius) was selected for planting in Hawaii because it is apparently worthless; the reasoning was that no one would be tempted to cut down worthless trees. Seeds of introduced species were often sown in the mountains by airplanes (Little and Skolmen 1989). Some of these species have proven to be highly invasive. In addition to direct competitive effects, introduced tree species (e.g., tropical ash or shamel ash (Fraxinus uhdei) and nitrogen-fixing species albizia or peacocks plume (Falcataria moluccana) produce litter that is very different in chemical composition or physical form from native plant litter, bringing about changes in nutrient cycling and physical conditions in soils and on the forest floor (Vitousek 2004).
Through the 20th and into the 21st centuries, increases in human populations with attendant land development, as well as accelerated introduction of non-native mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, invertebrates, plants, and microorganisms, have brought about dramatic changes to wild ecosystems in Hawaii. This ecological site evolved without the presence of large mammals or human-caused fires. The native plant community in many areas been highly disturbed and in some places destroyed due to agriculture, urban development, domestic and feral ungulate foraging, and invasion by introduced plant and animal species.
Foraging by feral cattle and pigs or forest clearing and abandonment facilitate invasion by weeds. However, introduced weeds appear able to successfully invade native stands regardless of human or ungulate disturbances. Among the major weeds are strawberry guava or waiawi (Psidium cattleianum), Koster’s curse or soapbush (Clidemia hirta), Asian melastome (Melastoma candida), and introduced grasses.
State and transition model
Figure 6. STM F162XY500
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 4 submodel, plant communities
State 5 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
This state consists of one community phase. The general aspect is a forest with a tall (to about 80 feet or 25 meters), closed to open overstory, a secondary canopy of diverse trees species 25 to 40 feet (8 to 12 meters) tall, an open tree fern canopy 10 to 15 feet (3 to 4.5 meters) tall, and a diverse understory of shrubs, vines, and ferns. When cleared by machinery or long-term, heavy ungulate browsing, this state transitions to State 4 Naturalized Grassland. Gradual invasion by weedy, introduced plant species brings a transition to State 2 Invaded Understory.
Community 1.1
`Ohi`a lehua lama/hapu`u/`ie`ie
Figure 7. Reference community phase. 6/2/06 D Clausnitzer MU659
Figure 8. Reference community phase. 6/2/06 D Clausnitzer MU659
The tall overstory consists of ohia lehua (Metrosideros polymorpha). The secondary tree canopy consists of a mix of wet environment species and dry environment species. Joseph Rock (1913) described this in the early 20th Century: “Diospyros (lama tree) in lowland forest is especially common back of Hilo along the road to Olaa” (=Keaau), and “Immediately back of Hilo is a somewhat mixed forest composed of species of trees peculiar to the dry and wet regions.” Tree ferns are common. Vines are moderately abundant, particularly ieie (Freycenetia arborea), both on the ground and on trees. Large bird’s nest ferns (Asplenium nidus) are common on trees and on the ground, but mostly at lower elevations. The mid-canopy is dominated by pandanus or Tahitian screwpine (Pandanus tectoria) trees near the coast; this species becomes less common with distance from the coast. Pandanus seems to be moderately invasive, and may be more common on previously disturbed sites or where it was encouraged by the Polynesians in the past. The forests of this ecological site have standing live timber of 500 to 8000 cubic feet per acre, with a representative value of about 1500 cubic feet per acre.
Forest overstory. The tall overstory consists of ohia lehua that typically range from 75 to 100 feet (23 to 30 meters) tall. The secondary tree canopy today consists mostly of lama (Diospyros sandwicensis) to 50 feet (15 meters) tall and olapa (Cheirodendron trigynum) to 40 feet (12 meters) tall. Pandanus grows to 30 feet (9 meters) tall.
Forest understory. Tree ferns, or hapuu (Cibotium glaucum) and hapuu li (Cibotium menziesii) are common, forming an open canopy up to about 13 feet (4 meters) tall; C. glaucum is by far the more common species of the two. Ieie (Freycenetia arborea) is abundant, growing both on the ground and on trees to heights of about 40 feet (12 meters). Cyrtandra species are common in places, along with kanawao (Broussaisia arguta). At least 14 small fern and fern-ally species are commonly found growing on the ground and on tree trunks.
Table 5. Soil surface cover
| Tree basal cover | 2-5% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-2% |
| Grass/grasslike basal cover | 0% |
| Forb basal cover | 0% |
| Non-vascular plants | 20-50% |
| Biological crusts | 0% |
| Litter | 30-40% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-40% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 0-40% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 0-1% |
Table 6. Woody ground cover
| Downed wood, fine-small (<0.40" diameter; 1-hour fuels) | – |
|---|---|
| Downed wood, fine-medium (0.40-0.99" diameter; 10-hour fuels) | – |
| Downed wood, fine-large (1.00-2.99" diameter; 100-hour fuels) | – |
| Downed wood, coarse-small (3.00-8.99" diameter; 1,000-hour fuels) | 1-2% |
| Downed wood, coarse-large (>9.00" diameter; 10,000-hour fuels) | 1-3% |
| Tree snags** (hard***) | – |
| Tree snags** (soft***) | – |
| Tree snag count** (hard***) | 1-2 per acre |
| Tree snag count** (hard***) | 1-5 per acre |
* Decomposition Classes: N - no or little integration with the soil surface; I - partial to nearly full integration with the soil surface.
** >10.16cm diameter at 1.3716m above ground and >1.8288m height--if less diameter OR height use applicable down wood type; for pinyon and juniper, use 0.3048m above ground.
*** Hard - tree is dead with most or all of bark intact; Soft - most of bark has sloughed off.
Table 7. Canopy structure (% cover)
| Height Above Ground (ft) | Tree | Shrub/Vine | Grass/ Grasslike |
Forb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <0.5 | 0% | 1-2% | – | 0% |
| >0.5 <= 1 | 0% | 3-5% | – | 1-3% |
| >1 <= 2 | 1-1% | 3-5% | – | 5-10% |
| >2 <= 4.5 | 1-2% | 0-1% | – | 1-1% |
| >4.5 <= 13 | 15-25% | 0-2% | – | – |
| >13 <= 40 | 15-25% | 0-1% | – | – |
| >40 <= 80 | 35-40% | – | – | – |
| >80 <= 120 | 0-10% | – | – | – |
| >120 | – | – | – | – |
State 2
Invaded Understory State
This state consists of one community phase. Native ohia lehua trees still dominate the overstory. However, introduced trees, shrubs, vines, and ferns produce a dense layer of low, competitive vegetation that severely inhibits reproduction of native species. Many native species are still present in this plant community but their abundance is much reduced. Activity of feral pigs and cattle further reduces native plant abundance and produces bare, disturbed soil patches that promote weed invasion. Eventually, this state transitions to State 3 Invaded Overstory and Understory through growth of introduced tree species.
Community 2.1
`Ohi`a lehua - strawberry guava/hapu`u/Asian melastome
Figure 9. Invaded understory behind cleared plot. 12/8/05 D Clausnitzer MU628
Figure 10. Introduced fern understory. D Clausnitzer generic photo
Figure 11. Melastome understory. 1/18/07 D Clausnitzer generic photo
While native trees still dominate the overstory, introduced tree species are beginning to grow into the secondary overstory. Litter from nitrogen-fixing albizia (Falcataria moluccana) produces a favorable environment for fast-growing introduced species. Smaller, shade-tolerant introduced trees and shrubs gradually produce extremely dense canopies and root systems that exclude other species. Dense stands of introduced ferns form a layer that inhibits reproduction of native species.
Forest overstory. Tall ohia lehua still dominate the overstory, and the more common native trees are still present in the secondary canopy. However, trees with the potential grow at least as tall as ohia lehua, such as albizia or peacocks plume (Falcataria moluccana), octopus tree (Schefflera actinophylla), Oriental trema (Trema orientalis), and trumpet tree (Cecropia obtusifolia) are present in the secondary canopy and increasing in abundance.
Forest understory. Strawberry guava (Psidium cattleianum) is increasingly abundant, gradually forming extremely dense stands with dense, intertwined root systems. The introduced ferns scaly swordfern (Nephrolepis hirsutula), Deparia petersonii, and parasitic maiden fern (Thelypteris parasitica) form dense stands under 3 feet (1 meter) tall. Native tree ferns may still be common. The melastomes Koster’s curse or soapbush (Clidemia hirta), Asian melastome (Melastoma candidum), and velvet tree (Miconia calvescens) are present and increasing in abundance.
Table 8. Soil surface cover
| Tree basal cover | 1-2% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0-1% |
| Grass/grasslike basal cover | 0% |
| Forb basal cover | 0% |
| Non-vascular plants | 15-25% |
| Biological crusts | 0% |
| Litter | 65-75% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-30% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 0-30% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 1-5% |
Table 9. Woody ground cover
| Downed wood, fine-small (<0.40" diameter; 1-hour fuels) | – |
|---|---|
| Downed wood, fine-medium (0.40-0.99" diameter; 10-hour fuels) | – |
| Downed wood, fine-large (1.00-2.99" diameter; 100-hour fuels) | – |
| Downed wood, coarse-small (3.00-8.99" diameter; 1,000-hour fuels) | 1-2% |
| Downed wood, coarse-large (>9.00" diameter; 10,000-hour fuels) | 2-3% |
| Tree snags** (hard***) | – |
| Tree snags** (soft***) | – |
| Tree snag count** (hard***) | 1-2 per acre |
| Tree snag count** (hard***) | 2-3 per acre |
* Decomposition Classes: N - no or little integration with the soil surface; I - partial to nearly full integration with the soil surface.
** >10.16cm diameter at 1.3716m above ground and >1.8288m height--if less diameter OR height use applicable down wood type; for pinyon and juniper, use 0.3048m above ground.
*** Hard - tree is dead with most or all of bark intact; Soft - most of bark has sloughed off.
Table 10. Canopy structure (% cover)
| Height Above Ground (ft) | Tree | Shrub/Vine | Grass/ Grasslike |
Forb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <0.5 | 0% | 0-1% | 0-1% | 1-2% |
| >0.5 <= 1 | 0% | 1-5% | 0-1% | 10-20% |
| >1 <= 2 | 0-1% | 1-5% | – | 20-25% |
| >2 <= 4.5 | 0-1% | 20-25% | – | 0-1% |
| >4.5 <= 13 | 10-35% | 20-25% | – | – |
| >13 <= 40 | 15-25% | 1-5% | – | – |
| >40 <= 80 | 35-45% | – | – | – |
| >80 <= 120 | 0-10% | – | – | – |
| >120 | – | – | – | – |
State 3
Invaded Overstory and Understory State
This state consists of one community phase dominated by introduced species in both the overstory and understory. Some tall native trees may persist for a long time, and a few native species appear able to reproduce and maintain low populations. The diversity of weedy trees, shrubs, vines, ferns, and herbs is high. Conversion to State 4 Naturalized Grassland is possible by using heavy machinery and applying aggressive weed control measures.
Community 3.1
Strawberry guava/peacocksplume (albizia)/Asian melastome
Figure 12. Invaded over- and understory. D Clausnitzer generic photo
Tall ohia lehua (Metrosideros polymorpha) persist until they die but do not successfully reproduce. A few native species including kopiko, tree ferns, pandanus, and bird’s nest ferns are able to reproduce and maintain low populations. The introduced species present on different sites varies, but strawberry guava, melastomes, and albizia are typically present.
Forest overstory. Species composition varies from site to site, but the overstory is often dominated by albizia or peacocksplume (Falcataria moluccana), which grows rapidly and is able to overtop all other tree species. Besides remnant ohia lehua, introduced trees such as Oriental trema (Trema orientalis), trumpet tree (Cecropia obtusifolia), melaleuca or punktree (Melaleuca quinquenervia), and octopus tree (Schefflera actinophylla) may be present. Ironwood or beach sheoak trees (Casuarina equisetifolia) are common near the coast. Strawberry guava (Psidium cattleianum) typically dominates the secondary canopy.
Forest understory. Koster’s curse or soapbush (Clidemia hirta) and Asian melastome (Melastoma candidum) may be abundant along with introduced fern species.
Table 11. Soil surface cover
| Tree basal cover | 1-3% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0.5-1.0% |
| Grass/grasslike basal cover | 0.0-0.5% |
| Forb basal cover | 0% |
| Non-vascular plants | 10-20% |
| Biological crusts | 0% |
| Litter | 65-75% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-20% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 0-25% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 0-1% |
Table 12. Woody ground cover
| Downed wood, fine-small (<0.40" diameter; 1-hour fuels) | – |
|---|---|
| Downed wood, fine-medium (0.40-0.99" diameter; 10-hour fuels) | – |
| Downed wood, fine-large (1.00-2.99" diameter; 100-hour fuels) | – |
| Downed wood, coarse-small (3.00-8.99" diameter; 1,000-hour fuels) | 1-2% |
| Downed wood, coarse-large (>9.00" diameter; 10,000-hour fuels) | 1-3% |
| Tree snags** (hard***) | – |
| Tree snags** (soft***) | – |
| Tree snag count** (hard***) | 1-2 per acre |
| Tree snag count** (hard***) | 2-3 per acre |
* Decomposition Classes: N - no or little integration with the soil surface; I - partial to nearly full integration with the soil surface.
** >10.16cm diameter at 1.3716m above ground and >1.8288m height--if less diameter OR height use applicable down wood type; for pinyon and juniper, use 0.3048m above ground.
*** Hard - tree is dead with most or all of bark intact; Soft - most of bark has sloughed off.
Table 13. Canopy structure (% cover)
| Height Above Ground (ft) | Tree | Shrub/Vine | Grass/ Grasslike |
Forb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <0.5 | 0% | 0% | 0-2% | 1-3% |
| >0.5 <= 1 | 0-1% | 0-1% | 1-3% | 10-20% |
| >1 <= 2 | 1-1% | 1-1% | – | 10-30% |
| >2 <= 4.5 | 5-10% | 15-25% | – | – |
| >4.5 <= 13 | 15-25% | 15-25% | – | – |
| >13 <= 40 | 25-35% | 0-1% | – | – |
| >40 <= 80 | 1-5% | – | – | – |
| >80 <= 120 | 1-2% | – | – | – |
| >120 | – | – | – | – |
State 4
Naturalized Grassland State
This state consists of two community phases dominated by introduced grass species. Continuous grazing results in increased abundance of less desirable forage species and presence of weedy shrubs, as represented by the phase change from 4.1 Californiagrass to 4.2 Hilograss – broomsedge bluestem/sourbush. Longer-term overgrazing and lack of weed control measures results in a transition to State 5 Weed-Invaded Grassland.
Community 4.1
Californiagrass
Figure 13. Californiagrass is dominant in foreground. D Clausnitzer generic photo
Landowners choose to establish a dominant forage grass species from the options of suitable species for this community phase. Dominance of desired forage species is maintained by prescribed grazing techniques that allow desired species time to recover from grazing and trampling, but includes periods of grazing of sufficient intensity to suppress invasion of weedy shrubs and trees. Invasion by weedy beardgrass, also called Colombian bluestem (Schizachyrium condensatum) and broomsedge bluesedge (Andropogon virginicus) is minimized by mowing these species before they set seed and by liming. Failure to properly maintain the selected forage species results in this community phase shifting to community phase 4.2.
Forest overstory. There typically is no overstory in this community.
Forest understory. Commonly planted forage species are Californiagrass, also called para grass (Urochloa mutica), digitgrass, also called pangolagrass (Digitaria eriantha), or limpograss (Hemarthria altissima) in mixture with desmodium legume species (Desmodium intortum, D. incanum, D. sandwicense, and D. triflorum).
Figure 14. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Community 4.2
Hilograss - broomsedge bluestem/sourbush
Figure 15. Hilograss and shrub-invaded grassland. 4/19/05 D Clausnitzer generic photo
This community phase is dominated by grasses of lower forage value. Desirable forage legumes largely have been grazed out, and weedy forbs and shrubs have increased. It can be shifted back to phase 4.1 by using a prescribed grazing plan.
Forest overstory. Scattered albizia trees are sometimes present.
Forest understory. Narrowleaf carpetgrass (Axonopus fissifolius), hilograss (Paspalum conjugatum), and broomsedge bluestem (Andropogon virginicus) are typically the most abundant grasses. Sourbush or cure for all (Pluchea carolinensis), and tarweed or Colombian waxweed (Cuphea carthagenensis) also are common.
Table 14. Soil surface cover
| Tree basal cover | 0% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0.0-0.5% |
| Grass/grasslike basal cover | 30-35% |
| Forb basal cover | 0.0-0.5% |
| Non-vascular plants | 0-1% |
| Biological crusts | 0% |
| Litter | 60-70% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 5-10% |
Table 15. Canopy structure (% cover)
| Height Above Ground (ft) | Tree | Shrub/Vine | Grass/ Grasslike |
Forb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <0.5 | – | 0% | 15-20% | 0-1% |
| >0.5 <= 1 | – | 0-1% | 20-25% | 1-5% |
| >1 <= 2 | – | 1-1% | 10-20% | 1-2% |
| >2 <= 4.5 | 0-1% | 5-10% | 20-40% | 1-2% |
| >4.5 <= 13 | 0-1% | – | – | – |
| >13 <= 40 | 0-1% | – | – | – |
| >40 <= 80 | 0-1% | – | – | – |
| >80 <= 120 | – | – | – | – |
| >120 | – | – | – | – |
Pathway 4.1A
Community 4.1 to 4.2
Phase 4.1 changes to phase 4.2 by long-term continuous grazing. Remnant high-quality forages have been greatly reduced in abundance and largely replaced by lower-value species. Weedy forbs and shrubs are increasing.
Pathway 4.2A
Community 4.2 to 4.1
A grazing plan is needed that provides for intensive but temporary grazing of pastures to ensure that cattle consume some low-value forage species along with preferred forages and to allow preferred forages time to recover from defoliation. Desirable grass species are competitive and able to recover with proper management. The grazing plan may require splitting the herd, creating additional water sources, and creating multiple pastures by cross-fencing. Weed control may be necessary to eliminate some species such as inedible shrubs. Broomsedge and/or beardgrass are controlled by increasing soil pH through lime applications and by mowing before seed set.
State 5
Weed-Invaded Grassland State
This state consists of one community phase consisting primarily of weedy shrubs. Weedy grasses and forbs dominate between shrub patches. Introduced tree species are present and will attain dominance if fire does not set them back. Average annual rainfall is relatively high, producing large amounts of fine fuels that present a fire danger in dry periods.
Community 5.1
Strawberry guava/Asian melastome/hilograss - broomsedge bluestem
Figure 16. Open weedy site. D Clausnitzer generic photo
This community phase has a wide diversity of mostly introduced species. Some locations are nearly covered by dense stands of large shrubs. Native uluhe fern (Dicranopteris linearis) often forms dense thickets.
Forest overstory. Large albizia or peacocksplume (Falcataria moluccana) is the most common species.
Forest understory. Numerous small ohia lehua (Metrosideros polymorpha) trees are present on some sites. Strawberry guava (Psidium cattleianum) is becoming common and is poised to expand rapidly. Asian melastome (Melastoma candidum), Koster’s curse or soapbush (Clidemia hirta), and sourbush or cure for all (Pluchea carolinensis) are abundant. Thickets of uluhe or Old World forkedfern (Dicranopteris linearis) are often present. Scaly swordfern (Nephrolepis hirsutula) is abundant. An assortment of introduced forbs and grasses is present.
Table 16. Soil surface cover
| Tree basal cover | 0.0-0.5% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 0.5-1.0% |
| Grass/grasslike basal cover | 10-15% |
| Forb basal cover | 1-2% |
| Non-vascular plants | 0-1% |
| Biological crusts | 0% |
| Litter | 60-70% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-1% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 0-1% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 3-5% |
Table 17. Woody ground cover
| Downed wood, fine-small (<0.40" diameter; 1-hour fuels) | – |
|---|---|
| Downed wood, fine-medium (0.40-0.99" diameter; 10-hour fuels) | – |
| Downed wood, fine-large (1.00-2.99" diameter; 100-hour fuels) | – |
| Downed wood, coarse-small (3.00-8.99" diameter; 1,000-hour fuels) | 0-1% |
| Downed wood, coarse-large (>9.00" diameter; 10,000-hour fuels) | 0-1% |
| Tree snags** (hard***) | – |
| Tree snags** (soft***) | – |
| Tree snag count** (hard***) | |
| Tree snag count** (hard***) |
* Decomposition Classes: N - no or little integration with the soil surface; I - partial to nearly full integration with the soil surface.
** >10.16cm diameter at 1.3716m above ground and >1.8288m height--if less diameter OR height use applicable down wood type; for pinyon and juniper, use 0.3048m above ground.
*** Hard - tree is dead with most or all of bark intact; Soft - most of bark has sloughed off.
Table 18. Canopy structure (% cover)
| Height Above Ground (ft) | Tree | Shrub/Vine | Grass/ Grasslike |
Forb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <0.5 | 0% | 0-1% | 0-1% | 1-5% |
| >0.5 <= 1 | 0% | 1-2% | 10-20% | 5-10% |
| >1 <= 2 | 0-1% | 1-2% | 10-20% | 10-20% |
| >2 <= 4.5 | 3-5% | 5-10% | 5-10% | 1-2% |
| >4.5 <= 13 | 5-10% | 25-35% | – | – |
| >13 <= 40 | 1-5% | – | – | – |
| >40 <= 80 | 0-2% | – | – | – |
| >80 <= 120 | – | – | – | – |
| >120 | – | – | – | – |
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2
This state transitions to State 2 Invaded Understory by the very aggressive, introduced weed species present in this ecological site invading intact native forest and gradually replacing native species in the understory. This invasion is greatly facilitated by feral pigs and cattle that damage and consume native plants, disturb the soil, and spread weed seeds.
Transition T1B
State 1 to 4
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1
This state may be restored to a facsimile of State 1 Reference. Pig-proof fence and removal of all ungulates are necessary. Intensive weed control must then be initiated and maintained in the long term. In some cases, large amounts of dead weed biomass must be dealt with by removal or decomposition. Reintroduction of missing native species is likely to be necessary.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3
This state transitions to State 3 Invaded Over and Understory through the process of fast-growing weeds inhibiting reproduction of native plants and gradually replacing them. This process is accelerated by feral pigs and cattle directly damaging native plants and promoting the spread of weeds by disturbing the soil and spreading weed seeds.
Transition T2B
State 2 to 4
This state can transition to State 4 Naturalized Grassland by clearing the forest with heavy machinery and planting desirable forage species. Native forest may be cleared gradually by allowing cattle access to the forest. Cattle eventually eat or destroy understory ferns, forbs, shrubs, and saplings, opening up the forest so that introduced forage species will thrive. On shallow soils over lava substrates, underlying lava rock may be ripped and crushed by heavy machinery. Ripping and crushing produces fine mineral particles and small, abundant gaps between the rock fragments. When this is done on organic soils, about 50% of the soil organic matter may be lost in the process due to exposure to air and higher temperatures.
Transition R3A
State 3 to 4
This state can be converted to State 4 Naturalized Grassland by clearing vegetation using heavy machinery, applying aggressive weed control measures, and planting desirable forage species. On shallow soils over lava substrates, underlying lava rock may be ripped and crushed by heavy machinery. Ripping and crushing produces some fine mineral particles and small, abundant gaps between the rock fragments. When this is done on organic soils, about 50% of the soil organic matter may be lost in the process due to exposure to air and higher temperatures.
Transition T4A
State 4 to 5
This state transitions to State 5 Weed Invaded Grassland by long-term continuous grazing and lack of weed control measures. Remnant desirable forages have been grazed out and replaced entirely by weedy grasses, forbs, shrubs, and small trees.
Transition T5A
State 5 to 3
This state transitions to State 3 Invaded Over and Understory due to the presence of fast-growing, introduced tree species; wildfire may prevent this from occurring.
Restoration pathway R5A
State 5 to 4
This state can be restored to State 4 Naturalized Grassland by brush management, re-establishment of desirable forage species, persistent weed control, and prescribed grazing.
Additional community tables
Table 19. Community 1.1 forest overstory composition
| Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | Diameter (in) | Basal area (square ft/acre) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tree
|
|||||||
| 'ohi'a lehua | MEPO5 | Metrosideros polymorpha | Native | 40–75 | 35–55 | – | – |
| wild coffee | PSYCH | Psychotria | Native | 13–30 | 10–20 | – | – |
| Tahitian screwpine | PATE2 | Pandanus tectorius | Native | 13–30 | 0–20 | – | – |
| 'ohi'a lehua | MEPO5 | Metrosideros polymorpha | Native | 75–100 | 0–10 | 10–40 | – |
| 'ohi'a lehua | MEPO5 | Metrosideros polymorpha | Native | 13–40 | 0–5 | – | – |
| olapalapa | CHTR2 | Cheirodendron trigynum | Native | 13–40 | 0–2 | – | – |
| lama | DISA10 | Diospyros sandwicensis | Native | 13–40 | 0–2 | – | – |
| kolea lau nui | MYLE2 | Myrsine lessertiana | Native | 13–35 | 0–1 | – | – |
| hapu'u | CIGL | Cibotium glaucum | Native | 13–18 | 0–1 | – | – |
| ha'a | ANPL2 | Antidesma platyphyllum | Native | 13–20 | 0–0.5 | – | – |
| 'ahakea | BOTI | Bobea timonioides | Native | 13–20 | – | – | – |
| Remy's gardenia | GARE | Gardenia remyi | Native | 13–18 | – | – | – |
| Hawai'i pritchardia | PRAF | Pritchardia affinis | Native | 13–30 | – | – | – |
| lama | DISA10 | Diospyros sandwicensis | Native | 40–50 | – | – | – |
| tetraplasandra | TETRA11 | Tetraplasandra | Native | 13–40 | – | – | – |
| grand devil's-claws | PIGR6 | Pisonia grandis | Native | 30–40 | – | – | – |
|
Tree Fern
|
|||||||
| hapu'u li | CIME8 | Cibotium menziesii | Native | 13–18 | 0–1 | – | – |
Table 20. Community 1.1 forest understory composition
| Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Forb/Herb
|
||||||
| twinsorus fern | DIPLA2 | Diplazium | Native | 1–2 | 0–1 | |
| peperomia | PEPER | Peperomia | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
|
Fern/fern ally
|
||||||
| Hawai'I birdnest fern | ASNI | Asplenium nidus | Native | 2–6 | 0–5 | |
| Old World forkedfern | DILI | Dicranopteris linearis | Native | 1–3 | 0–1 | |
| narrow swordfern | NECO3 | Nephrolepis cordifolia | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
| Hudson's air fern | PNHU | Pneumatopteris hudsoniana | Native | 1–3 | 0–1 | |
| whisk fern | PSNU | Psilotum nudum | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
| Cretan brake | PTCR2 | Pteris cretica | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
| wahini noho mauna | ADTA | Adenophorus tamariscinus | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
| Old World adderstongue | OPPEP | Ophioglossum pendulum ssp. pendulum | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
| staghorn clubmoss | LYCE2 | Lycopodiella cernua | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
| waimakanui | PTEX | Pteris excelsa | Native | 1–2 | 0–0.5 | |
| Chinese creepingfern | ODCH | Odontosoria chinensis | Native | 1–2 | 0–0.5 | |
| vandenboschia | VANDE | Vandenboschia | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
| royal tonguefern | ELCR2 | Elaphoglossum crassifolium | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
| stiff shoestring fern | VIEL3 | Vittaria elongata | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
| clubmoss | HUPER | Huperzia | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
|
Shrub/Subshrub
|
||||||
| cyrtandra | CYRTA | Cyrtandra | Native | 2–4 | 0–10 | |
| kanawao | BRAR6 | Broussaisia arguta | Native | 2–6 | 1–5 | |
| po'ola | CLSA | Claoxylon sandwicense | Native | 2–8 | – | |
| Waimea pipturus | PIAL2 | Pipturus albidus | Native | 2–8 | – | |
| puna cyanea | CYPL7 | Cyanea platyphylla | Native | 2–4 | – | |
|
Tree
|
||||||
| ha'a | ANPL2 | Antidesma platyphyllum | Native | 2–13 | 1–5 | |
| Tahitian screwpine | PATE2 | Pandanus tectorius | Native | – | 0–5 | |
| olapalapa | CHTR2 | Cheirodendron trigynum | Native | – | 1–2 | |
| wild coffee | PSYCH | Psychotria | Native | 2–13 | 0–2 | |
| lama | DISA10 | Diospyros sandwicensis | Native | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| kolea lau nui | MYLE2 | Myrsine lessertiana | Native | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| Remy's gardenia | GARE | Gardenia remyi | Native | 2–13 | 0–0.5 | |
|
Tree Fern
|
||||||
| hapu'u | CIGL | Cibotium glaucum | Native | 2–13 | 15–25 | |
| hapu'u li | CIME8 | Cibotium menziesii | Native | 2–13 | 0–2 | |
|
Vine/Liana
|
||||||
| 'ie'ie | FRAR | Freycinetia arborea | Native | 1–40 | 1–10 | |
| queen coralbead | COOR11 | Cocculus orbiculatus | Native | 1–4 | 0–1 | |
| Maile | ALST11 | Alyxia stellata | Native | 1–2 | 0–1 | |
Table 21. Community 2.1 forest overstory composition
| Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | Diameter (in) | Basal area (square ft/acre) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tree
|
|||||||
| 'ohi'a lehua | MEPO5 | Metrosideros polymorpha | Native | 40–80 | 35–45 | – | – |
| strawberry guava | PSCA | Psidium cattleianum | Introduced | 13–20 | 10–25 | – | – |
| wild coffee | PSYCH | Psychotria | Native | 13–30 | 5–20 | – | – |
| 'ohi'a lehua | MEPO5 | Metrosideros polymorpha | Native | 80–105 | 0–10 | – | – |
| Tahitian screwpine | PATE2 | Pandanus tectorius | Native | 13–25 | 0–5 | – | – |
| olapalapa | CHTR2 | Cheirodendron trigynum | Native | 13–30 | 0–1 | – | – |
| lama | DISA10 | Diospyros sandwicensis | Native | 13–50 | 0–1 | – | – |
| 'ohi'a lehua | MEPO5 | Metrosideros polymorpha | Native | 13–40 | 0–1 | – | – |
| guava | PSGU | Psidium guajava | Introduced | 13–18 | 0–1 | – | – |
| peacocksplume | FAMO | Falcataria moluccana | Introduced | 13–25 | 0–0.5 | – | – |
| trumpet tree | CEOB | Cecropia obtusifolia | Introduced | 13–20 | – | – | – |
| hierba del soldado | MEUM3 | Melochia umbellata | Introduced | 13–20 | – | – | – |
| octopus tree | SCAC2 | Schefflera actinophylla | Introduced | 13–25 | – | – | – |
| Oriental trema | TROR | Trema orientalis | Introduced | 13–25 | – | – | – |
| beach sheoak | CAEQ | Casuarina equisetifolia | Introduced | 13–25 | – | – | – |
|
Tree Fern
|
|||||||
| hapu'u | CIGL | Cibotium glaucum | Native | 13–16 | 0–1 | – | – |
Table 22. Community 2.1 forest understory composition
| Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)
|
||||||
| basketgrass | OPHI | Oplismenus hirtellus | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
|
Forb/Herb
|
||||||
| pinklady | DIRO2 | Dissotis rotundifolia | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
| peperomia | PEPER | Peperomia | Native | 0.5–1 | – | |
|
Fern/fern ally
|
||||||
| hammock fern | BLOC | Blechnum occidentale | Introduced | 1–2 | 1–10 | |
| parasitic maiden fern | THPA4 | Thelypteris parasitica | Introduced | 1–2 | 5–10 | |
| scaly swordfern | NEHI | Nephrolepis hirsutula | Introduced | 1–2 | 5–10 | |
| golden polypody | PHAU6 | Phlebodium aureum | Introduced | 1–2 | 1–5 | |
| Hawai'I birdnest fern | ASNI | Asplenium nidus | Native | 2–6 | 0–5 | |
| Old World forkedfern | DILI | Dicranopteris linearis | Native | 2–3 | 0–1 | |
| vandenboschia | VANDE | Vandenboschia | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
| staghorn clubmoss | LYCE2 | Lycopodiella cernua | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
| whisk fern | PSNU | Psilotum nudum | Native | 0.2–0.5 | – | |
| Cretan brake | PTCR2 | Pteris cretica | Native | 0.5–1 | – | |
| Chinese creepingfern | ODCH | Odontosoria chinensis | Native | 1–2 | – | |
| royal tonguefern | ELCR2 | Elaphoglossum crassifolium | Native | 0.5–1 | – | |
| wahini noho mauna | ADTA | Adenophorus tamariscinus | Native | 0.5–1 | – | |
|
Shrub/Subshrub
|
||||||
| Asian melastome | MECA9 | Melastoma candidum | Introduced | 2–13 | 5–30 | |
| soapbush | CLHI3 | Clidemia hirta | Introduced | 2–4 | 5–15 | |
| lantana | LACA2 | Lantana camara | Introduced | 2–6 | 0–1 | |
|
Tree
|
||||||
| Tahitian screwpine | PATE2 | Pandanus tectorius | Native | 2–13 | 0–10 | |
| strawberry guava | PSCA | Psidium cattleianum | Introduced | 2–13 | 1–5 | |
| hierba del soldado | MEUM3 | Melochia umbellata | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| guava | PSGU | Psidium guajava | Introduced | 6–13 | 0–1 | |
| lama | DISA10 | Diospyros sandwicensis | Native | 4–13 | 0–1 | |
| olapalapa | CHTR2 | Cheirodendron trigynum | Native | 6–13 | – | |
| peacocksplume | FAMO | Falcataria moluccana | Introduced | 2–13 | – | |
| wild coffee | PSYCH | Psychotria | Native | 2–13 | – | |
| velvet tree | MICA20 | Miconia calvescens | Introduced | 2–13 | – | |
| beach sheoak | CAEQ | Casuarina equisetifolia | Introduced | 2–13 | – | |
| Waimea pipturus | PIAL2 | Pipturus albidus | Native | 2–10 | – | |
| octopus tree | SCAC2 | Schefflera actinophylla | Introduced | 2–13 | – | |
| Oriental trema | TROR | Trema orientalis | Introduced | 2–13 | – | |
| trumpet tree | CEOB | Cecropia obtusifolia | Introduced | 2–13 | – | |
| pengua | MAMA28 | Macaranga mappa | Introduced | 2–13 | – | |
|
Tree Fern
|
||||||
| hapu'u | CIGL | Cibotium glaucum | Native | 2–13 | 5–30 | |
| hapu'u li | CIME8 | Cibotium menziesii | Native | 5–13 | 0–1 | |
|
Vine/Liana
|
||||||
| 'ie'ie | FRAR | Freycinetia arborea | Native | 1–30 | 1–20 | |
| stinkvine | PAFO3 | Paederia foetida | Introduced | 1–6 | 0–1 | |
| queen coralbead | COOR11 | Cocculus orbiculatus | Native | 1–3 | 0–1 | |
| West Indian raspberry | RURO | Rubus rosifolius | Introduced | 1–2 | 0–1 | |
| fiveleaf yam | DIPE2 | Dioscorea pentaphylla | Introduced | 2–10 | 0–0.5 | |
Table 23. Community 3.1 forest overstory composition
| Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | Diameter (in) | Basal area (square ft/acre) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tree
|
|||||||
| strawberry guava | PSCA | Psidium cattleianum | Introduced | 13–25 | 25–35 | – | – |
| peacocksplume | FAMO | Falcataria moluccana | Introduced | 13–40 | 5–20 | – | – |
| peacocksplume | FAMO | Falcataria moluccana | Introduced | 40–110 | 1–10 | 8–48 | – |
| 'ohi'a lehua | MEPO5 | Metrosideros polymorpha | Native | 30–80 | 0–10 | – | – |
| wild coffee | PSYCH | Psychotria | Native | 13–25 | 0–5 | – | – |
| Oriental trema | TROR | Trema orientalis | Introduced | 13–50 | 1–3 | – | – |
| Tahitian screwpine | PATE2 | Pandanus tectorius | Native | 13–25 | 0–2 | – | – |
| octopus tree | SCAC2 | Schefflera actinophylla | Introduced | 13–35 | 0–2 | – | – |
| beach sheoak | CAEQ | Casuarina equisetifolia | Introduced | 13–50 | 0–2 | – | – |
| trumpet tree | CEOB | Cecropia obtusifolia | Introduced | 13–40 | 0–2 | – | – |
| pengua | MAMA28 | Macaranga mappa | Introduced | 13–25 | 0–2 | – | – |
| Alexandra palm | ARAL | Archontophoenix alexandrae | Introduced | 13–30 | 0–2 | – | – |
| punktree | MEQU | Melaleuca quinquenervia | Introduced | 13–35 | 0–1 | – | – |
| lama | DISA10 | Diospyros sandwicensis | Native | 20–50 | 0–1 | – | – |
| Java plum | SYCU | Syzygium cumini | Introduced | 13–30 | 0–1 | – | – |
| Malabar plum | SYJA | Syzygium jambos | Introduced | 13–30 | 0–1 | – | – |
| velvet tree | MICA20 | Miconia calvescens | Introduced | 13–20 | – | – | – |
Table 24. Community 3.1 forest understory composition
| Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)
|
||||||
| basketgrass | OPHI | Oplismenus hirtellus | Introduced | 1–2 | 1–5 | |
| palmgrass | SEPA6 | Setaria palmifolia | Introduced | 1–2 | 0–1 | |
|
Forb/Herb
|
||||||
| Kahila garland-lily | HEGA | Hedychium gardnerianum | Introduced | 2–4 | 0–2 | |
| Philippine ground orchid | SPPL | Spathoglottis plicata | Introduced | 1–2 | 0–2 | |
| pinklady | DIRO2 | Dissotis rotundifolia | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
|
Fern/fern ally
|
||||||
| scaly swordfern | NEHI | Nephrolepis hirsutula | Introduced | 1–2 | 5–15 | |
| parasitic maiden fern | THPA4 | Thelypteris parasitica | Introduced | 1–2 | 5–10 | |
| hammock fern | BLOC | Blechnum occidentale | Introduced | 1–2 | 3–5 | |
| golden polypody | PHAU6 | Phlebodium aureum | Introduced | 1–2 | 3–5 | |
| Hawai'I birdnest fern | ASNI | Asplenium nidus | Native | 2–5 | 0–1 | |
| Old World forkedfern | DILI | Dicranopteris linearis | Native | 1–3 | – | |
| royal tonguefern | ELCR2 | Elaphoglossum crassifolium | Native | 0.5–1 | – | |
| staghorn clubmoss | LYCE2 | Lycopodiella cernua | Native | 0.5–1 | – | |
| whisk fern | PSNU | Psilotum nudum | Native | 0.2–0.5 | – | |
| Cretan brake | PTCR2 | Pteris cretica | Native | 0.2–0.5 | – | |
| Chinese creepingfern | ODCH | Odontosoria chinensis | Native | 1–2 | – | |
| vandenboschia | VANDE | Vandenboschia | Native | 0.2–0.5 | – | |
|
Shrub/Subshrub
|
||||||
| Asian melastome | MECA9 | Melastoma candidum | Introduced | 2–13 | 25–35 | |
| soapbush | CLHI3 | Clidemia hirta | Introduced | 2–13 | 5–15 | |
|
Tree
|
||||||
| strawberry guava | PSCA | Psidium cattleianum | Introduced | 2–13 | 25–35 | |
| Tahitian screwpine | PATE2 | Pandanus tectorius | Native | 2–13 | 0–5 | |
| peacocksplume | FAMO | Falcataria moluccana | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| trumpet tree | CEOB | Cecropia obtusifolia | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| wild coffee | PSYCH | Psychotria | Native | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| guava | PSGU | Psidium guajava | Introduced | 5–13 | 0–1 | |
| velvet tree | MICA20 | Miconia calvescens | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| pengua | MAMA28 | Macaranga mappa | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| Alexandra palm | ARAL | Archontophoenix alexandrae | Introduced | 5–13 | 0–1 | |
| octopus tree | SCAC2 | Schefflera actinophylla | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| Java plum | SYCU | Syzygium cumini | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| Malabar plum | SYJA | Syzygium jambos | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| Oriental trema | TROR | Trema orientalis | Introduced | 2–13 | – | |
| hierba del soldado | MEUM3 | Melochia umbellata | Introduced | 5–13 | – | |
| beach sheoak | CAEQ | Casuarina equisetifolia | Introduced | 2–13 | – | |
|
Tree Fern
|
||||||
| hapu'u | CIGL | Cibotium glaucum | Native | 2–13 | 0–2 | |
| Oriental vessel fern | ANEV | Angiopteris evecta | Introduced | 2–8 | – | |
|
Vine/Liana
|
||||||
| 'ie'ie | FRAR | Freycinetia arborea | Native | 2–10 | 0–1 | |
| centipede tongavine | EPPI | Epipremnum pinnatum | Introduced | 1–10 | 0–1 | |
| stinkvine | PAFO3 | Paederia foetida | Introduced | 1–20 | 0–1 | |
| West Indian raspberry | RURO | Rubus rosifolius | Introduced | 1–3 | 0–1 | |
| queen coralbead | COOR11 | Cocculus orbiculatus | Native | 1–2 | – | |
| fiveleaf yam | DIPE2 | Dioscorea pentaphylla | Introduced | 2–8 | – | |
Table 25. Community 4.1 plant community composition
| Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
| 1 | 2550–3000 | |||||
| digitgrass | DIER | Digitaria eriantha | 2550–3000 | – | ||
| limpograss | HEAL5 | Hemarthria altissima | 2550–3000 | – | ||
| para grass | URMU | Urochloa mutica | 2550–3000 | – | ||
| torpedo grass | PARE3 | Panicum repens | 0–60 | – | ||
| Vasey's grass | PAUR2 | Paspalum urvillei | 0–30 | – | ||
| glenwoodgrass | SAIN | Sacciolepis indica | 0–30 | – | ||
| Colombian bluestem | SCCO10 | Schizachyrium condensatum | 0–30 | – | ||
| marsh bristlegrass | SEPA10 | Setaria parviflora | 0–30 | – | ||
| smut grass | SPIN4 | Sporobolus indicus | 0–30 | – | ||
| shortleaf spikesedge | KYBR | Kyllinga brevifolia | 0–30 | – | ||
| hilograss | PACO14 | Paspalum conjugatum | 0–30 | – | ||
| dallisgrass | PADI3 | Paspalum dilatatum | 0–30 | – | ||
| violet crabgrass | DIVI2 | Digitaria violascens | 0–30 | – | ||
| broomsedge bluestem | ANVI2 | Andropogon virginicus | 0–30 | – | ||
| common carpetgrass | AXFI | Axonopus fissifolius | 0–30 | – | ||
| Oahu flatsedge | CYHY2 | Cyperus hypochlorus | 0–30 | – | ||
|
Forb
|
||||||
| 2 | Naturalized Forbs | 150–300 | ||||
| climbing dayflower | CODI5 | Commelina diffusa | 30–90 | – | ||
| greenleaf ticktrefoil | DEIN2 | Desmodium intortum | 0–60 | – | ||
| zarzabacoa comun | DEIN3 | Desmodium incanum | 0–60 | – | ||
| Hawai'i ticktrefoil | DESA81 | Desmodium sandwicense | 0–60 | – | ||
| threeflower ticktrefoil | DETR4 | Desmodium triflorum | 0–30 | – | ||
| shameplant | MIPU8 | Mimosa pudica | 0–30 | – | ||
| scaly swordfern | NEHI | Nephrolepis hirsutula | 0–30 | – | ||
| light-blue snakeweed | STJA | Stachytarpheta jamaicensis | 0–30 | – | ||
| Colombian waxweed | CUCA4 | Cuphea carthagenensis | 0–30 | – | ||
| tropical whiteweed | AGCO | Ageratum conyzoides | 0–30 | – | ||
| bamboo orchid | ARGR6 | Arundina graminifolia | 0–30 | – | ||
| sensitive partridge pea | CHNI2 | Chamaecrista nictitans | 0–30 | – | ||
|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
| 3 | Naturalized Shrubs | 30–150 | ||||
| soapbush | CLHI3 | Clidemia hirta | 0–30 | – | ||
| strawberry guava | PSCA | Psidium cattleianum | 0–30 | – | ||
| guava | PSGU | Psidium guajava | 0–30 | – | ||
Table 26. Community 4.2 forest overstory composition
| Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | Diameter (in) | Basal area (square ft/acre) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tree
|
|||||||
| peacocksplume | FAMO | Falcataria moluccana | Introduced | 30–60 | 0–1 | – | – |
Table 27. Community 4.2 forest understory composition
| Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)
|
||||||
| broomsedge bluestem | ANVI2 | Andropogon virginicus | Introduced | 2–3 | 25–35 | |
| hilograss | PACO14 | Paspalum conjugatum | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 25–35 | |
| common carpetgrass | AXFI | Axonopus fissifolius | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 15–25 | |
| Colombian bluestem | SCCO10 | Schizachyrium condensatum | Introduced | 2–3 | 5–10 | |
| digitgrass | DIER | Digitaria eriantha | Introduced | 1–2 | 3–5 | |
| torpedo grass | PARE3 | Panicum repens | Introduced | 1–2 | 3–5 | |
| smut grass | SPIN4 | Sporobolus indicus | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 3–5 | |
| para grass | URMU | Urochloa mutica | Introduced | 1–2 | 3–5 | |
| Job's tears | COLA | Coix lacryma-jobi | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
| violet crabgrass | DIVI2 | Digitaria violascens | Introduced | 2–3 | 0–1 | |
| shortleaf spikesedge | KYBR | Kyllinga brevifolia | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
| glenwoodgrass | SAIN | Sacciolepis indica | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
| marsh bristlegrass | SEPA10 | Setaria parviflora | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
| dallisgrass | PADI3 | Paspalum dilatatum | Introduced | 2–3 | 0–1 | |
| Vasey's grass | PAUR2 | Paspalum urvillei | Introduced | 1–2 | 0–1 | |
|
Forb/Herb
|
||||||
| Colombian waxweed | CUCA4 | Cuphea carthagenensis | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 3–5 | |
| light-blue snakeweed | STJA | Stachytarpheta jamaicensis | Introduced | 2–3 | 0–1 | |
| tropical whiteweed | AGCO | Ageratum conyzoides | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
| sensitive partridge pea | CHNI2 | Chamaecrista nictitans | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
| shameplant | MIPU8 | Mimosa pudica | Introduced | 0.2–0.5 | 0–1 | |
| climbing dayflower | CODI5 | Commelina diffusa | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
| bamboo orchid | ARGR6 | Arundina graminifolia | Introduced | 1–2 | 0–1 | |
| threeflower ticktrefoil | DETR4 | Desmodium triflorum | Introduced | 0.2–0.5 | – | |
| zarzabacoa comun | DEIN3 | Desmodium incanum | Introduced | 0.5–1 | – | |
| Hawai'i ticktrefoil | DESA81 | Desmodium sandwicense | Introduced | 0.5–1 | – | |
|
Fern/fern ally
|
||||||
| scaly swordfern | NEHI | Nephrolepis hirsutula | Introduced | 1–2 | 0–1 | |
|
Shrub/Subshrub
|
||||||
| cure for all | PLCA10 | Pluchea carolinensis | Introduced | 2–6 | 1–10 | |
| soapbush | CLHI3 | Clidemia hirta | Introduced | 1–3 | 0–2 | |
|
Tree
|
||||||
| guava | PSGU | Psidium guajava | Introduced | 2–8 | 0–2 | |
| strawberry guava | PSCA | Psidium cattleianum | Introduced | 2–6 | 0–2 | |
|
Vine/Liana
|
||||||
| greenleaf ticktrefoil | DEIN2 | Desmodium intortum | Introduced | 0.5–1 | – | |
Table 28. Community 5.1 forest overstory composition
| Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | Diameter (in) | Basal area (square ft/acre) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tree
|
|||||||
| peacocksplume | FAMO | Falcataria moluccana | Introduced | 13–40 | 1–10 | – | – |
| peacocksplume | FAMO | Falcataria moluccana | Introduced | 40–80 | 0–5 | – | – |
| strawberry guava | PSCA | Psidium cattleianum | Introduced | 13–20 | 0–2 | – | – |
| trumpet tree | CEOB | Cecropia obtusifolia | Introduced | 13–25 | 0–1 | – | – |
| punktree | MEQU | Melaleuca quinquenervia | Introduced | 13–20 | 0–1 | – | – |
| fig | FITH2 | Ficus thonningii | Introduced | 13–25 | 0–1 | – | – |
| 'ohi'a lehua | MEPO5 | Metrosideros polymorpha | Native | 13–40 | 0–1 | – | – |
| octopus tree | SCAC2 | Schefflera actinophylla | Introduced | 13–25 | 0–1 | – | – |
| Oriental trema | TROR | Trema orientalis | Introduced | 13–35 | 0–1 | – | – |
| Alexandra palm | ARAL | Archontophoenix alexandrae | Introduced | 13–20 | 0–1 | – | – |
| pengua | MAMA28 | Macaranga mappa | Introduced | 13–20 | 0–1 | – | – |
Table 29. Community 5.1 forest understory composition
| Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Nativity | Height (ft) | Canopy cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/grass-like (Graminoids)
|
||||||
| common carpetgrass | AXFI | Axonopus fissifolius | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 10–20 | |
| hilograss | PACO14 | Paspalum conjugatum | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 10–20 | |
| broomsedge bluestem | ANVI2 | Andropogon virginicus | Introduced | 2–3 | 5–10 | |
| smut grass | SPIN4 | Sporobolus indicus | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 3–5 | |
| Colombian bluestem | SCCO10 | Schizachyrium condensatum | Introduced | 2–3 | 3–5 | |
| molassesgrass | MEMI2 | Melinis minutiflora | Introduced | 1–2 | 3–5 | |
| para grass | URMU | Urochloa mutica | Introduced | – | 3–5 | |
| torpedo grass | PARE3 | Panicum repens | Introduced | 1–2 | 0.5–1 | |
| shortleaf spikesedge | KYBR | Kyllinga brevifolia | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0.5–1 | |
| glenwoodgrass | SAIN | Sacciolepis indica | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
| marsh bristlegrass | SEPA10 | Setaria parviflora | Introduced | 1–2 | 0–1 | |
| violet crabgrass | DIVI2 | Digitaria violascens | Introduced | 1–2 | 0–1 | |
| Vasey's grass | PAUR2 | Paspalum urvillei | Introduced | 1–2 | 0–1 | |
| Job's tears | COLA | Coix lacryma-jobi | Introduced | 1–2 | 0–0.5 | |
| Hawai'i nutrush | SCTE6 | Scleria testacea | Native | 0.2–0.5 | 0–0.5 | |
| dallisgrass | PADI3 | Paspalum dilatatum | Introduced | 2–3 | 0–0.5 | |
|
Forb/Herb
|
||||||
| sensitive partridge pea | CHNI2 | Chamaecrista nictitans | Introduced | 0.2–0.5 | 0.5–2 | |
| shameplant | MIPU8 | Mimosa pudica | Introduced | 0.2–0.5 | 0.5–2 | |
| tropical whiteweed | AGCO | Ageratum conyzoides | Introduced | 1–2 | 1–2 | |
| bamboo orchid | ARGR6 | Arundina graminifolia | Introduced | 1–2 | 1–2 | |
| Philippine ground orchid | SPPL | Spathoglottis plicata | Introduced | 1–2 | 1–2 | |
| Colombian waxweed | CUCA4 | Cuphea carthagenensis | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0.5–1 | |
| light-blue snakeweed | STJA | Stachytarpheta jamaicensis | Introduced | 2–3 | 0.5–1 | |
| climbing dayflower | CODI5 | Commelina diffusa | Introduced | 0.5–1 | 0–1 | |
| Hawai'i ticktrefoil | DESA81 | Desmodium sandwicense | Introduced | 0.5–1 | – | |
|
Fern/fern ally
|
||||||
| Old World forkedfern | DILI | Dicranopteris linearis | Native | 1–5 | 5–15 | |
| scaly swordfern | NEHI | Nephrolepis hirsutula | Introduced | 1–2 | 5–15 | |
| staghorn clubmoss | LYCE2 | Lycopodiella cernua | Native | 0.5–1 | 0–0.5 | |
| Cretan brake | PTCR2 | Pteris cretica | Native | 1–2 | – | |
| Chinese creepingfern | ODCH | Odontosoria chinensis | Native | 1–2 | – | |
|
Shrub/Subshrub
|
||||||
| Asian melastome | MECA9 | Melastoma candidum | Introduced | 2–13 | 5–30 | |
| cure for all | PLCA10 | Pluchea carolinensis | Introduced | 2–6 | 1–10 | |
| soapbush | CLHI3 | Clidemia hirta | Introduced | 2–5 | 1–10 | |
| lantana | LACA2 | Lantana camara | Introduced | 2–4 | 0–1 | |
|
Tree
|
||||||
| strawberry guava | PSCA | Psidium cattleianum | Introduced | 2–13 | 1–10 | |
| shoebutton | AREL4 | Ardisia elliptica | Introduced | 2–10 | 1–5 | |
| guava | PSGU | Psidium guajava | Introduced | 2–13 | 1–2 | |
| peacocksplume | FAMO | Falcataria moluccana | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| fig | FITH2 | Ficus thonningii | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| 'ohi'a lehua | MEPO5 | Metrosideros polymorpha | Native | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| Tahitian screwpine | PATE2 | Pandanus tectorius | Native | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| wild coffee | PSYCH | Psychotria | Native | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| trumpet tree | CEOB | Cecropia obtusifolia | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| octopus tree | SCAC2 | Schefflera actinophylla | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| Oriental trema | TROR | Trema orientalis | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| Alexandra palm | ARAL | Archontophoenix alexandrae | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| pengua | MAMA28 | Macaranga mappa | Introduced | 2–13 | 0–1 | |
| punktree | MEQU | Melaleuca quinquenervia | Introduced | 2–13 | – | |
|
Vine/Liana
|
||||||
| yellow Himalayan raspberry | RUEL3 | Rubus ellipticus | Introduced | 1–4 | 0–2 | |
| West Indian raspberry | RURO | Rubus rosifolius | Introduced | 1–4 | 0–2 | |
| stinkvine | PAFO3 | Paederia foetida | Introduced | 1–20 | 0–1 | |
Interpretations
Animal community
Few native wildlife species are present in this low elevation ecological site. High populations of mosquitoes carrying avian malaria limit the numbers and species of native birds that can survive in this ecological site. However, the Io or Hawaiian hawk (Buteo solitarius) has been sighted here. There are many introduced animals including pigs, mongoose, turkeys, and khalij pheasants.
Grazing Interpretations
The following table lists suggested initial stocking rates for cattle under the Forage Value Rating system for community phase 4.1 only. These are conservative estimates that should be used only as guidelines in the initial stages of the conservation planning process. Often, the current plant composition does not entirely match any particular plant community (described in this ecological site description). Because of this, a field visit is recommended, in all cases, to document plant composition and production. More precise carrying capacity estimates should eventually be calculated using the following stocking rate information along with animal preference data, particularly when grazers other than cattle are involved. Under more intensive grazing management, improved harvest efficiencies can result in an increased carrying capacity.
Forage Value Rating (note 1)
Very High (note 2) 0.40-0.59 acre/AUM (note 3) 2.56-1.70 AUM/acre
High 0.59-0.78 acre/AUM 1.70-1.28 AUM/acre
Moderate 0.78-1.56 acre/AUM 1.28-0.64 AUM/acre
Low 1.56-+ acre/AUM 0.64-+ AUM/acre
(note 1) The Forage Value Rating System is not an ecological evaluation of community phase 4.1. It is a utilitarian rating of the existing forage value of a specific tract of naturalized pastureland.
(note 2) Conservationists must use considerable judgment, because in places Very High forage class could be producing less than normal volumes of forage, and adjustments would need to be made in the initial stocking rate.
(note 3) Stocking rates vary in accordance with such factors as kind and class of livestock or wildlife, season of use, and fluctuations in climate. Actual use records and on-site inventories for individual naturalized pasture ecological sites, together with a determination of the degree to which the sites have been grazed, offer the most reliable basis for developing initial stocking rates.
This community phase is suitable for grazing by all kinds and classes of livestock, at any season, particularly cattle. However, this site is best utilized for late spring and summer grazing as this is the major plant growth period. This site is suited for grazing by both cow-calf operations and stocker operations. However, sheep can be grazed on this site as well. This site is poorly suited to continuous year-long use if the interpretive naturalized plant community is to be maintained.
Hydrological functions
High amounts of runoff occur where soils are very shallow to shallow over pahoehoe lava. This runoff can cause localized flooding in low-lying kipukas and ponding in low spots on the pahoehoe.
The water permeability of pahoehoe is highly variable due to variable cracking and uplift of the lava. However, most areas of pahoehoe in this ecological site have relatively little cracking.
Recreational uses
Hunting is the most common recreational use.
Wood products
None.
Other products
None.
Other information
Definitions
These definitions have been greatly simplified for brevity and do not cover every aspect of each topic.
Aa lava: A type of basaltic lava having a rough, jagged, clinkery surface and a vesicular interior.
Alluvial: Materials or processes associated with transportation and/or deposition by running water.
Aquic soil moisture regime: A regime in which the soil is free of dissolved oxygen because it is saturated by water. This regime typically exists in bogs or swamps.
Aridic soil moisture regime: A regime in which defined parts of the soil are, in normal years, dry for more than half of the growing season and moist for less than 90 consecutive days during the growing season. In Hawaii it is associated with hot, dry areas with plants such as kiawe, wiliwili, and buffelgrass. The terms aridic and torric are basically the same.
Ash field: a land area covered by a thick or distinctive deposit of volcanic ash that can be traced to a specific source and has well defined boundaries. The term “ash flow” is erroneously used in the Physiographic section of this ESD due to a flaw in the national database.
Ashy: A “soil texture modifier” for volcanic ash soils having a water content at the crop wilting point of less than 30 percent; a soil that holds relatively less water than “medial” and “hydrous” soils.
Available water capacity: The amount of soil water available to plants to the depth of the first root-restricting layer.
Basal area or basal cover: The cross sectional area of the stem or stems of a plant or of all plants in a stand.
Blue rock: The dense, hard, massive lava that forms the inner core of an aa lava flow.
Bulk density: the weight of dry soil per unit of volume. Lower bulk density indicates a greater amount of pore space that can hold water and air in a soil.
CaCO3 equivalent: The amount of free lime in a soil. Free lime exists as solid material and typically occurs in regions with a dry climate.
Canopy cover: The percentage of ground covered by the vertical projection downward of the outermost perimeter of the spread of plant foliage. Small openings within the canopy are included.
Community pathway: A description of the causes of shifts between community phases. A community pathway is reversible and is attributable to succession, natural disturbances, short-term climatic variation, and facilitating practices, such as grazing management.
Community phase: A unique assemblage of plants and associated dynamic soil properties within a state.
Dominant species: Plant species or species groups that exert considerable influence upon a community due to size, abundance, or cover.
Drainage class: The frequency and duration of a water table in a soil. There are seven drainage classes, ranging from “excessively drained” (soils with very rare or very deep water tables) to “well drained” (soils that provide ample water for plant growth but are not so wet as to inhibit root growth) to “very poorly drained” (soils with a water table at or near the surface during much of the growing season that inhibits growth of most plants).
Electrical conductivity (EC): A measure of the salinity of a soil. The standard unit is deciSiemens per meter (dS/m), which is numerically equivalent to millimhos per centimeter (mmhos/cm). An EC greater than about 4 dS/m indicates a salinity level that is unfavorable to growth of most plants.
Friability: A soil consistency term pertaining to the ease of crumbling of soils.
Hydrous: A “soil texture modifier” for volcanic ash soils having a water content at the crop wilting point of 100 percent or more; a soil that holds more water than “medial” or “ashy” soils.
Ion exchange capacity: The ability of soil materials such as clay or organic matter to retain ions (which may be plant nutrients) and to release those ions for uptake by roots.
Isohyperthermic soil temperature regime: A regime in which mean annual soil temperature is 72 degrees F (22 degrees C) or higher and mean summer and mean winter soil temperatures differ by less than 11 degrees F (6 degrees C) at a specified depth.
Isomesic soil temperature regime: A regime in which mean annual soil temperature is 47 degrees F (8 degrees C) or higher but lower than 59 degrees F (15 degrees C) and mean summer and mean winter soil temperatures differ by less than 11 degrees F (6 degrees C) at a specified depth.
Isothermic soil temperature regime: A regime in which mean annual soil temperature is 59 degrees F (15 degrees C) or higher but lower than 72 degrees F (22 degrees C) and mean summer and mean winter soil temperatures differ by less than 11 degrees F (6 degrees C) at a specified depth.
Kipuka: An area of land surrounded by younger (more recent) lava. Soils and plant communities within a kipuka are older than, and often quite different from, those on the surrounding surfaces.
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): A geographic area defined by NRCS that is characterized by a particular pattern of soils, climate, water resources, and land uses. The island of Hawaii contains nine MLRAs, some of which also occur on other islands in the state.
Makai: a Hawaiian word meaning “toward the sea.”
Mauka: a Hawaiian word meaning “toward the mountain” or “inland.”
Medial: A “soil texture modifier” for volcanic ash soils having a water content at the crop wilting point of 30 to 100 percent; a soil that holds an amount of water intermediate to “hydrous” or “ashy” soils.
Naturalized plant community: A community dominated by adapted, introduced species. It is a relatively stable community resulting from secondary succession after disturbance. Most grasslands in Hawaii are in this category.
Pahoehoe lava: A type of basaltic lava with a smooth, billowy, or rope-like surface and vesicular interior.
Parent material: Unconsolidated and chemically weathered material from which a soil is developed.
Perudic soil moisture regime: A very wet regime found where precipitation exceeds evapotranspiration in all months of normal years. On the island of Hawaii, this regime is found on top of Kohala and on parts of the windward side of Mauna Kea.
pH: The numerical expression of the relative acidity or alkalinity of a soil sample. A pH of 7 is neutral; a pH below 7 is acidic and a pH above 7 is basic.
Phosphorus adsorption: The ability of soil materials to tightly retain phosphorous ions, which are a plant nutrient. Some volcanic ash soils retain phosphorus so strongly that it is partly unavailable to plants.
Reference community phase: The phase exhibiting the characteristics of the reference state and containing the full complement of plant species that historically occupied the site. It is the community phase used to classify an ecological site.
Reference state: A state that describes the ecological potential and natural or historical range of variability of an ecological site.
Restoration pathway: A term describing the environmental conditions and practices that are required to recover a state that has undergone a transition.
Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR): A measure of the amount of dissolved sodium relative to calcium and magnesium in the soil water. SAR values higher than 13 create soil conditions unfavorable to most plants.
Soil moisture regime: A term referring to the presence or absence either of ground water or of water held at a tension of less than 1500 kPa (the crop wilting point) in the soil or in specific horizons during periods of the year.
Soil temperature regime: A defined class based on mean annual soil temperature and on differences between summer and winter temperatures at a specified depth.
Soil reaction: Numerical expression in pH units of the relative acidity or alkalinity or a soil.
State: One or more community phases and their soil properties that interact with the abiotic and biotic environment to produce persistent functional and structural attributes associated with a characteristic range of variability.
State-and-transition model: A method used to display information about relationships between vegetation, soil, animals, hydrology, disturbances, and management actions on an ecological site.
Torric soil moisture regime: See Aridic soil moisture regime.
Transition: A term describing the biotic or abiotic variables or events that contribute to loss of state resilience and result in shifts between states.
Udic soil moisture regime: A regime in which the soil is not dry in any part for as long as 90 cumulative days in normal years, and so provides ample moisture for plants. In Hawaii it is associated with forests in which hapuu (tree ferns) are usually moderately to highly abundant.
Ustic soil moisture regime: A regime in which moisture is limited but present at a time when conditions are suitable for plant growth. In Hawaii it usually is associated with dry forests and subalpine shrublands.
Supporting information
Type locality
| Location 1: Hawaii County, HI | |
|---|---|
| Latitude | 19° 25′ 12″ |
| Longitude | 154° 57′ 7″ |
| General legal description | Hawaii County, Island of Hawaii, USGS Quad: Pahoa South. From Pahoa drive south 5.5 miles on Hwy. 130. Park at intersection of highway with Upper Puna Road. Walk 0.13 mile east into Keauohana Forest Reserve. |
Other references
Armstrong RW. 1973. Atlas of Hawaii. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.
Athens JS. Ch. 12 Hawaiian Native Lowland Vegetation in Prehistory in Historical Ecology in the Pacific Islands – Prehistoric Environmental and Landscape Change. Kirch PV and TL Hunt, eds. 1997. Yale U. Press, New Haven.
Burney DA, HF James, LP Burney, SL Olson, W Kikuchi, WL Wagner, M Burney, D McCloskey, D Kikuchi, FV Grady, R Gage II, and R Nishek. 2001. Fossil evidence for a diverse biota from Kauai and tis transformation since human arrival. Ecological Monographs 71:615-641.
Craighill ES and EG Handy. 1991. Native Planters in Old Hawaii – Their Life, Lore, and Environment. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 233, Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu, HI
Cuddihy LW and CP Stone. 1990. Alteration of Native Hawaiian Vegetation: Effects of Humans, Their Activities and Introductions. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Cooperative National Park Resources Study Unit.
Hazlett RW and DW Hyndman. 1996. Roadside Geology of Hawaii. Mountain Press Publishing Company, Missoula MT.
Henke LA. 1929. A Survey of Livestock in Hawaii. Research Publication No. 5. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
Jacobi JD. 1989. Vegetation Maps of the Upland Plant Communities on the Islands of Hawaii, Maui, Molokai, and Lanai. Technical Report 68. Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, University of Hawaii at Manoa and National Park Service.
Kirch PV. 1982. The impact of the prehistoric Polynesians in the Hawaiian ecosystem. Pacific Science 36(1):1-14.
Kirch PV. 1985. Feathered Gods and Fishhooks: An Introduction to Hawaiian Archaeology and Prehistory. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Kirch PV. 2000. On the Road of the Winds: An Archaeological History of the Pacific Islands Before European Contact. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Little EL Jr. and RG Skolmen. 1989. Common Forest Trees of Hawaii (Native and Introduced). US Department of Agriculture-US Forest Service Agriculture Handbook No. 679. (out of print). Available at www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/misc/ah679.pdf
Maly K and O Maly. 2004. He Moolelo Aina: A Cultural Study of the Puu O Umi Natural Area Reserve and Kohala-Hamakua Mountain Lands, Districts of Kohala and Hamakua, Island of Hawaii. Kumu Pono Associates, Hilo HI.
Mueller-Dombois D and FR Fosberg. 1998. Vegetation of the Tropical Pacific Islands. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
Palmer DD. 2003. Hawaii’s Ferns and Fern Allies. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.
Pratt HD. 1998. A Pocket Guide to Hawaii’s Trees and Shrubs. Mutual Publishing, Honolulu.
Ripperton JC and EY Hosaka. 1942. Vegetation zones of Hawaii. Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 89:1-60.
Rock JF. The Indigenous Trees of the Hawaiian Islands. 1st edition 1913, reprinted 1974, Charles E. Tuttle Company, Rutland, VT and Tokyo, Japan.
Shoji SD, M Nanzyo, and R Dahlgren. 1993. Volcanic Ash Soils: Genesis, Properties and Utilization. Elsevier, New York.
Sohmer SH. and R Gustafson. 2000. Plants and Flowers of Hawaii. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.
Steadman DW. 1995. Prehistoric extinctions of Pacific island birds: biodiversity meets zooarchaeology. Science 267:1123-1131.
USDA-NRCS-PIA T&E Species GIS files. Not publicly available.
USDI-USGS. 2006. A GAP Analysis of Hawaii. Final Report and Data.
Vitousek P. 2004. Nutrient Cycling and Limitation: Hawaii as a Model Ecosystem. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
Wagner WL, DR Herbst, and SH Sohmer. 1999. Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawaii, Revised Edition. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu.
Whistler WA. 1995. Wayside Plants of the Islands: a Guide to the Lowland Flora of the Pacific Islands. Isle Botanica, Honolulu.
Contributors
Dr. David Clausnitzer
Loretta Metz
Joseph May
Acknowledgments
Assistance, advice, review, and/or insights:
Mick Castillo
Michael Constantinides, NRCS-PIA
Susan Cordell, USFS
Gordon Cran, Kapapala Ranch
David Leonard, volunteer
JB Friday, UH Forestry Extension
Rick Gordon
Basil Hansen, The Nature Conservancy
Jennifer Higashino, USFWS and NRCS
Flint Hughes, USFS
Chris Jasper, NRCS Soil Survey
Mel Johansen, The Nature Conservancy
Kathy Kawakami, US Army Pohakuloa Training Ground
Rhonda Loh, Volcanoes National Park
Kamehameha Schools/Bishop Estate
Miles Nakahara, Hawaii DOFAW
Laura Nelson, The Nature Conservancy and NRCS
Patrick Niemeyer, NRCS Soil Survey
Billy Paris, rancher
John Pipan
Jon Price, USGS
John Replogle, The Nature Conservancy
Paul Scowcroft, USFS
Earl Spence, grazing consultant
Jim Thain
Mike Tomich
Quentin Tomich
Tim Tunison, Volcanoes National Park
Jill Wagner, consultant, Future Forests
Rick Warschauer
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
| Author(s)/participant(s) | |
|---|---|
| Contact for lead author | |
| Date | |
| Approved by | |
| Approval date | |
| Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.