Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R241XY117AK
Alpine Dwarf Scrub Gravelly Summits
Last updated: 5/29/2025
Accessed: 12/20/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 241X–Seward Peninsula Highlands
The Seward Peninsula Highlands (MLRA 241X) occurs in Western Alaska, along the southernmost reaches of Land Resource Region Y, which describes the zone of continuous permafrost. This MLRA is approximately 13,700 square miles across the central Seward Peninsula. The terrain is defined by broad. extensive rolling hills and plains and solitary groups of rugged mountains expanding from sea level to a high point of 4,714 feet on Mount Osborn. Flood plains systems are common but generally narrow. This watershed drains into Kotzebue Sound and the Chukchi Sea to the north and the Bering Sea to the West. Major rivers include the Buckland, Kiwalik, Serpentine, Agiapuk-American, Kougarok, and Kuzitrin Rivers. The area is mostly undeveloped wild land that is sparsely populated. Residents use this remote area primarily for subsistence hunting, fishing, and gathering. Reindeer herding is a profitable enterprise and many areas of this MRLA are used for reindeer graze and subsistence activities. Parts of this MLRA were mined for gold during the Nome gold rush. Several mines still operate within this boundary (USDA, 2022). The largest communities in this predominantly inland MLRA are along the coast and include Teller and Brevig Mission. Federally managed lands in this MLRA include parts of the Selawik National Wildlife Refuge and parts of Bering Land Bridge National Preserve.
Geology and Soils
MLRA 241X was mostly unglaciated during the late Pleistocene. Glaciers were present during the middle and early Pleistocene in scattered areas such as the York Mountains in the west, the Kiglauik in the south, and the Upper Kiwalik River drainage. The present-day landscape is mantled with loess, colluvium, and slope alluvium (USDA, 2022). Modified glacial moraines are evident in areas of past glacial activity. Bedrock material is a mix of rock types, with areas of sedimentary, volcanic and igneous throughout the MLRA. Bedrock is at or near the surface in most upland areas of this MLRA, which is reflected in soil development and vegetative patterns.
This MLRA is in the zone of continuous permafrost. Frozen soils are common across the landscape, though may be absent from high energy systems on floodplains and around lakes. Permafrost is generally shallow to moderately deep (10 to 40 inches) and constitutes a restrictive layer that perches water and creates poorly drained or poorly drained soils. Alongside permafrost-supporting Gelisols, other common soil orders include soils with little to no development in the Entisol and Inceptisol orders. Periglacial features are common and include solifluction lobes, polygonal ground, and thermokarst pits (USDA, 2022). Non-soil areas (rock outcrop, riverwash, and surface water) make up approximated five percent of the MLRA surface.
Climate
Climate is predominantly continental arctic, with brief, cool summers and long, cold winters. Maritime conditions persist through the summer along the Bering Sea coast. Mean annual precipitation is 10 to 15 inches in the north and west, increasing to 20 to 40 inches in the mountainous areas in the south and east (USDA, 2022). Mean annual temperatures ranges from 20 to 26 degrees Fahrenheit (PRISM, 2018; SNAP, 2014).
Vegetation
Vegetation is mainly influence by site and soil characteristics such as temperature-degree days, exposure, soil depth, and soil hydrology. Dwarf scrublands are present across most of the upland, with vegetation further restricted on shallow soils. Lower elevations generally support more developed soils, and host willow-sedge scrublands, mixed ericaceous shrub scrublands, and herbaceous graminoid meadows. Tussock tundra is ubiquitous across much of the poorly drained, low-sloped landforms across the MRLA. Wetland communities dominate in closed depressions and drainages (USDA, 2022).
LRU notes
There are currently no Land Resource Areas (LRUs) delineated or described in MLRA 241X. There is potential for two or more LRUs along a climatic break between the lowlands and low-elevation hills of the north and west, and the higher, mountainous regions more prevalent in the south and east. However, vegetation and land management may not differ between these areas, as soils and vegetation are already restricted by cold annual temperatures even at low elevations.
Classification relationships
Alaska Vegetation Classification:
Dryas dwarf scrub (II.D.2 - level III) / Dryas-Lichen tundra (II.D.2.b – level IV)
(Viereck et al., 1992)
BioPhysical Settings: 6816850 – Alaska Arctic Acidic Sparse Tundra
(LANDFIRE, 2009)
Seward Rangesites
70 – Lichen Granitic Slope
(SCS, 1984; Swanson et al., 1985)
Ecological site concept
Ecological Site characteristics:
• Describes an alpine Dryas dwarf scrubland on mountain summits and shoulders
• There is no major disturbance affecting vegetation recorded for this ecological site
• The reference plant community is comprised primarily of alpine species and typically excludes ericaceous species
• Soils are gravelly, minimally developed Inceptisols
Associated sites
| R241XY118AK |
Arctic Tall Scrub Loamy Slopes R241XY118AK is on lower mountain slopes. Temperatures are warmer and soils are more developed. Site conditions support a taller mixed willow and alder scrubland. |
|---|---|
| R241XY119AK |
Alpine Scrub-Tussock Frozen Silty Slopes R241XY119AK describes a tussock scrubland on permafrost soil. Site hydrology and annual mean temperature support a different vegetative community on the associated here. |
| R241XY111AK |
Alpine Sedge-Scrub Frozen Loamy Slopes This ecological site is typically downslope of R241XY117AK. It supports a closed, low shrubland on moderate to shallowly steep backslopes. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
| Tree |
Not specified |
|---|---|
| Shrub |
(1) Dryas octopetala |
| Herbaceous |
(1) Carex bigelowii |
Physiographic features
This ecological site occurs on mountain summits and upper backslopes. It is in the alpine zone, starting above 1,000 feet above sea level. Slope gradients are moderately steep to steep (12 to 55 percent), and this site occurs at all aspects. Flooding and ponding do not occur. There may be a water table present, particularly on nearly level slopes.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
| Slope shape across |
(1) Convex (2) Linear |
|---|---|
| Slope shape up-down |
(1) Linear |
| Hillslope profile |
(1) Summit (2) Backslope |
| Landforms |
(1)
Mountains
> Mountain slope
(2) Mountains > Mountain slope |
| Runoff class | Low to medium |
| Flooding frequency | None |
| Ponding frequency | None |
| Elevation | 305 – 1,372 m |
| Slope | 12 – 55% |
| Water table depth | 152 cm |
| Aspect | W, NW, N, NE, E, SE, S, SW |
Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
| Runoff class | Not specified |
|---|---|
| Flooding frequency | Not specified |
| Ponding frequency | Not specified |
| Elevation | Not specified |
| Slope | Not specified |
| Water table depth | 71 – 89 cm |
Climatic features
The alpine climate of this ecological site includes short, cool growing seasons and long, cold winters. Mean annual temperature ranges from 17 to 29 degrees Fahrenheit, with temperatures typically below freezing from October through April. Approximately 35 percent of total precipitation occurs during the growing season months of June through August. Across the MLRA, snowfall ranges from 40 to 100 inches (USDA-NRCS, 2022).
Table 4. Representative climatic features
| Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 45-75 days |
|---|---|
| Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 35-65 days |
| Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 305-559 mm |
| Frost-free period (actual range) | 35-75 days |
| Freeze-free period (actual range) | 25-65 days |
| Precipitation total (actual range) | 279-686 mm |
| Frost-free period (average) | 60 days |
| Freeze-free period (average) | 50 days |
| Precipitation total (average) | 432 mm |
Figure 1. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6. Annual average temperature pattern
Influencing water features
This site is not associated with or influenced by streams or wetlands. Precipitation is the main source of water for this ecological site. Surface runoff and throughflow contribute water to downslope ecological sites.
Wetland description
This ecological site is not associated with wetlands.
Soil features
Soils are poorly developed Inceptisols formed in schist or acid igneous gravelly colluvium. Rock fragments greater than three inches on the soil surface are common. These are primarily mineral soils with an absent or very thin (1 inch maximum) organic cap. Soils are moderately deep to very deep. The major restriction type is paralithic bedrock. Subsurface rock fragment volume is high (40 to 70 percent). Soil pH is extremely to moderately acidic. Soils are moderately well to well drained. A moderately deep water table may be present.
Table 5. Representative soil features
| Parent material |
(1)
Colluvium
–
igneous rock
(2) Colluvium – schist (3) Eolian deposits |
|---|---|
| Surface texture |
(1) Silt loam (2) Channery silt loam |
| Drainage class | Moderately well drained to well drained |
| Permeability class | Moderately rapid |
| Depth to restrictive layer | 51 – 89 cm |
| Soil depth | 89 – 152 cm |
| Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0% |
| Surface fragment cover >3" | 17 – 58% |
| Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
5.33 – 9.4 cm |
| Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-25.4cm) |
4.2 – 5.8 |
| Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-152.4cm) |
38 – 51% |
| Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-152.4cm) |
3 – 17% |
Ecological dynamics
The dwarf scrub reference plant community is shaped by local factors including cold temperatures, exposure, and a short growing season. Summits and shoulder slopes are exposed to wind. Exposure and low temperature limits plant height.
Site and soil conditions result in one community. Cool temperatures and a shortened growing season support slow growing, often evergreen shrubs. Wind exposure limits plant height leading to most shrubs growing prostrate. Moderately deep depths to paralithic bedrock further restrict vegetation by limiting rooting depth. Soils are weakly developed and rocky. A high volume of subsurface rock fragments transfers and stores heat, preventing permafrost from developing within the top 60 inches of the soil surface.
There is no recognized disturbance that shifts community composition on this ecological site. Wind scouring and erosion shape the vegetation but do not result in a unique, post-disturbance community.
The information in this Ecological Dynamics section, including the state-and-transition model (STM), was developed based on current field data, professional experience, and a review of the scientific literature. As a result, all possible scenarios or plant species may not be included. Key indicator plant species, disturbances, and ecological processes are described to inform land management decisions.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
This reference state is developed and characterized using available vegetation models, most notably United States Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service range surveys (SCS, 1984; Swanson et al., 1985). The reference state describes one distinct vegetative community on alpine, granitic summits and shoulders. This community does not appear to be susceptible to fire. Exposure to wind and low annual temperatures restrict vegetation height. There is no indication of an alternate grazing state on this site. Targeted data collection may be able to address whether grazing or browsing in the reference state result in an alternate state.
Dominant plant species
-
eightpetal mountain-avens (Dryas octopetala), shrub
-
alpine azalea (Loiseleuria procumbens), shrub
-
skeletonleaf willow (Salix phlebophylla), shrub
-
alpine bearberry (Arctostaphylos alpina), shrub
-
black crowberry (Empetrum nigrum), shrub
-
Bigelow's sedge (Carex bigelowii), grass
-
spike sedge (Carex nardina), grass
-
alpine sweetgrass (Anthoxanthum monticola ssp. alpinum), grass
-
sheathed sedge (Carex vaginata), grass
-
cinquefoil (Potentilla), other herbaceous
-
locoweed (Oxytropis), other herbaceous
Community 1.1
Dryas octopetala - Loiseleuria procumbens / Carex bigelowii - Anthoxanthum monticola ssp. alpinum
This community is a Dryas-herbaceous tundra (Viereck et al., 1992). The major plant groups are low shrubs, dwarf shrubs, and medium graminoids (Swanson et al., 1985). Plant height is restricted by wind exposure. This community supports a mix of alpine and ericaceous shrubs. Lichens are the primarily component of ground cover. Other ground cover sources include litter, bare ground, surface rock fragments, and little to no moss. Tabular data for this community is from the 1984 Seward range site publication (SCS, 1984), with supplemental information from Swanson et al. (1985).
Forest understory. Live lichen and moss annual production cannot be measured accurately due to a lack of information on growth rates and/or slow annual growth rates. Lichen and moss biomass data below refers to total biomass, while vascular plants biomass refers to annual production.
Dominant plant species
-
eightpetal mountain-avens (Dryas octopetala), shrub
-
alpine bearberry (Arctostaphylos alpina), shrub
-
alpine azalea (Loiseleuria procumbens), shrub
-
skeletonleaf willow (Salix phlebophylla), shrub
-
lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea), shrub
-
marsh Labrador tea (Ledum palustre ssp. decumbens), shrub
-
black crowberry (Empetrum nigrum), shrub
-
Bigelow's sedge (Carex bigelowii), grass
-
alpine sweetgrass (Anthoxanthum monticola ssp. alpinum), grass
-
sheathed sedge (Carex vaginata), grass
-
cinquefoil (Potentilla), other herbaceous
-
blackish oxytrope (Oxytropis nigrescens), other herbaceous
-
arnica (Arnica), other herbaceous
-
milkvetch (Astragalus), other herbaceous
Figure 7. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 6. Annual production by plant type
| Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lichen | 1289 | 1547 | 1805 |
| Shrub/Vine | 230 | 269 | 303 |
| Grass/Grasslike | 28 | 34 | 39 |
| Forb | 17 | 22 | 28 |
| Moss | – | – | – |
| Total | 1564 | 1872 | 2175 |
Table 7. Ground cover
| Tree foliar cover | 0% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 25-50% |
| Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 0-6% |
| Forb foliar cover | 0-6% |
| Non-vascular plants | 25-55% |
| Biological crusts | 0% |
| Litter | 6-12% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 6-12% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 6-12% |
Additional community tables
Table 8. Community 1.1 plant community composition
| Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Undefined
|
||||||
| 1 | Vascular Plants | 280–370 | ||||
|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
| 2 | Shrub | 230–303 | ||||
| eightpetal mountain-avens | DROC | Dryas octopetala | 101–135 | – | ||
| alpine azalea | LOPR | Loiseleuria procumbens | 28–39 | – | ||
| skeletonleaf willow | SAPH | Salix phlebophylla | 22–34 | – | ||
| alpine bearberry | ARAL2 | Arctostaphylos alpina | 17–22 | – | ||
| bog blueberry | VAUL | Vaccinium uliginosum | 8–11 | – | ||
| lingonberry | VAVI | Vaccinium vitis-idaea | 9–11 | – | ||
| marsh Labrador tea | LEPAD | Ledum palustre ssp. decumbens | 8–10 | – | ||
| black crowberry | EMNI | Empetrum nigrum | 7–9 | – | ||
| white arctic mountain heather | CATE11 | Cassiope tetragona | 6–8 | – | ||
| pincushion plant | DILA | Diapensia lapponica | 7–8 | – | ||
| red fruit bearberry | ARRU | Arctostaphylos rubra | 4–6 | – | ||
| Kamchatka rhododendron | RHCA5 | Rhododendron camtschaticum | 4–6 | – | ||
| dwarf birch | BENA | Betula nana | 3–4 | – | ||
| Lapland rosebay | RHLA2 | Rhododendron lapponicum | 1–2 | – | ||
| rhododendron | RHODO | Rhododendron | 1 | – | ||
| willow | SALIX | Salix | 0–1 | – | ||
| arctic willow | SAAR27 | Salix arctica | 0–1 | – | ||
| bog rosemary | ANPO | Andromeda polifolia | 0–1 | – | ||
| Drummond's mountain-avens | DRDR | Dryas drummondii | 1 | – | ||
| polar willow | SAPO | Salix polaris | 0–1 | – | ||
| beauverd spirea | SPST3 | Spiraea stevenii | 0–1 | – | ||
|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
| 3 | Grass/Grasslike | 28–39 | ||||
| Bigelow's sedge | CABI5 | Carex bigelowii | 11–17 | – | ||
| alpine sweetgrass | ANMOA3 | Anthoxanthum monticola ssp. alpinum | 6–8 | – | ||
| spike sedge | CANA2 | Carex nardina | 4–6 | – | ||
| sheathed sedge | CAVA2 | Carex vaginata | 4–6 | – | ||
| entireleaf mountain-avens | DRIN4 | Dryas integrifolia | 1 | – | ||
| oatgrass | DANTH | Danthonia | 1 | – | ||
| tussock cottongrass | ERVA4 | Eriophorum vaginatum | 1 | – | ||
| Ramensk's sedge | CARA4 | Carex ramenskii | 1 | – | ||
| threadleaf sedge | CAFI | Carex filifolia | 1 | – | ||
| smallflowered woodrush | LUPA4 | Luzula parviflora | 0–1 | – | ||
| arctic bluegrass | POAR2 | Poa arctica | 0–1 | – | ||
|
Forb
|
||||||
| 4 | Forb | 17–28 | ||||
| cinquefoil | POTEN | Potentilla | 3–4 | – | ||
| blackish oxytrope | OXNI | Oxytropis nigrescens | 2–3 | – | ||
| locoweed | OXYTR | Oxytropis | 1–2 | – | ||
| milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 1–2 | – | ||
| arnica | ARNIC | Arnica | 1–2 | – | ||
| purple mountain saxifrage | SAOP | Saxifraga oppositifolia | 1–2 | – | ||
| moss campion | SIAC | Silene acaulis | 0–1 | – | ||
| Rocky Mountain goldenrod | SOMU | Solidago multiradiata | 0–1 | – | ||
| northern asphodel | TOCO | Tofieldia coccinea | 0–1 | – | ||
| boreal sagebrush | ARAR9 | Artemisia arctica | 0–1 | – | ||
| prairie sagewort | ARFR4 | Artemisia frigida | 0–1 | – | ||
| Pacific alpine wormwood | ARGL9 | Artemisia glomerata | 0–1 | – | ||
| larkspurleaf monkshood | ACDE2 | Aconitum delphiniifolium | 0–1 | – | ||
| pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 1 | – | ||
| mountain harebell | CALA7 | Campanula lasiocarpa | 0–1 | – | ||
| draba | DRABA | Draba | 0–1 | – | ||
| alpine sweetvetch | HEAL | Hedysarum alpinum | 0–1 | – | ||
| arctic lupine | LUAR2 | Lupinus arcticus | 1 | – | ||
| arctic stitchwort | MIAR3 | Minuartia arctica | 1 | – | ||
| rooted poppy | PARAA | Papaver radicatum ssp. alaskanum | 0–1 | – | ||
| Lapland poppy | PALA9 | Papaver lapponicum | 0–1 | – | ||
| lousewort | PEDIC | Pedicularis | 1 | – | ||
| Labrador lousewort | PELA | Pedicularis labradorica | 0–1 | – | ||
| twoflower cinquefoil | POBI8 | Potentilla biflora | 0–1 | – | ||
| Pacific silverweed | AREGE | Argentina egedii ssp. egedii | 0–1 | – | ||
| silverweed | POEL2 | Potentilla elegans | 1 | – | ||
| buttercup | RANUN | Ranunculus | 0–1 | – | ||
| nutty saw-wort | SANU | Saussurea nuda | 0–1 | – | ||
| yellowdot saxifrage | SABR6 | Saxifraga bronchialis | 0–1 | – | ||
| yellow marsh saxifrage | SAHI3 | Saxifraga hirculus | 0–1 | – | ||
|
Lichen
|
||||||
| 5 | Live lichen biomass | 1289–1805 | ||||
| reindeer lichen | CLAR60 | Cladina arbuscula | 168–235 | – | ||
| greygreen reindeer lichen | CLRA60 | Cladina rangiferina | 163–224 | – | ||
| bryocaulon lichen | BRDI60 | Bryocaulon divergens | 146–207 | – | ||
| witch's hair lichen | ALOC60 | Alectoria ochroleuca | 95–135 | – | ||
| witch's hair lichen | ALNI60 | Alectoria nigricans | 95–129 | – | ||
| island cetraria lichen | CEIS60 | Cetraria islandica | 73–101 | – | ||
| FLCU | Flavocetraria cucullata | 62–90 | – | |||
| FLNI | Flavocetraria nivalis | 56–78 | – | |||
| whiteworm lichen | THSU60 | Thamnolia subuliformis | 56–78 | – | ||
| Lichen | 2LICHN | Lichen | 50–67 | – | ||
| cup lichen | CLADO3 | Cladonia | 39–56 | – | ||
| cup lichen | CLGR13 | Cladonia gracilis | 39–56 | – | ||
| globe ball lichen | SPGL60 | Sphaerophorus globosus | 34–45 | – | ||
| star reindeer lichen | CLST60 | Cladina stellaris | 34–45 | – | ||
| reindeer lichen | CLMI60 | Cladina mitis | 34–45 | – | ||
| snow lichen | STPA60 | Stereocaulon paschale | 22–34 | – | ||
| snow lichen | STERE2 | Stereocaulon | 17–28 | – | ||
| cup lichen | CLUN60 | Cladonia uncialis | 10–15 | – | ||
| VUTI | Vulpicida tilesii | 7–9 | – | |||
| whiteworm lichen | THVE60 | Thamnolia vermicularis | 2–3 | – | ||
| arctic kidney lichen | NEAR60 | Nephroma arcticum | 1–2 | – | ||
| golden asahinea lichen | ASCH60 | Asahinea chrysantha | 1–2 | – | ||
| witch's hair lichen | ALECT3 | Alectoria | 1–2 | – | ||
| cetraria lichen | CETRA2 | Cetraria | 0–1 | – | ||
| cetraria lichen | CENI60 | Cetraria nigricans | 0–1 | – | ||
| arctic dactylina lichen | DAAR60 | Dactylina arctica | 0–1 | – | ||
|
Moss
|
||||||
| 6 | Moss / Clubmoss biomass | – | ||||
Interpretations
Animal community
Strong frequent winds and cold temperatures prevent all but a few low-growing plants from surviving on these sites. Caribou and rock ptarmigan are among the few wildlife species hardy enough to feed on the sparse vegetation. Natural cavities formed by large boulders and rock outcrops may provide sufficient cover for some small mammals such as tundra voles, as a result, small rodents may use some of the more protected and productive of these sites.
Recreational uses
Aesthetically this site provides the photographer and artist a picturesque landscape. It has potential for sightseeing since the general area includes canyons, rock formations, and sometimes abandoned gold and silver mines.
Wood products
No wood products available from this site.
Other products
Grazing
This site provides good value forage for winter range. Due to the presence of lichens this site should not be used for any other seasons. This site also is usually exposed to winds and is snow free during most of the winter allowing easy accessibility to the lichens.
Other information
These interpretive narratives were developed for USDA reports of range sites on the Seward Peninsula and appear here as written when originally published (SCS, 1984; Swanson et al., 1985).
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Vegetative communities and transitions are described using existing models and expert knowledge. There are no vegetation inventory data points in NASIS associated with this ecological site.
External data sources:
The Alaska Vegetation Classification (Viereck et al., 1992)
LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings Models (LANDFIRE, 2009)
Ecological site descriptions of the Seward Peninsula (SCS, 1984).
Range survey of the Seward Peninsula reindeer ranges (Swanson et al., 1985)
References
-
Viereck, L.A., C. T. Dyrness, A. R. Batten, and K. J. Wenzlick. 1992. The Alaska vegetation classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR-286..
Other references
Kautz, D.R., P. Taber, and S. Nield, editors. 2012. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of Alaska. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA–NRCS).
LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings. 2009. Biophysical Setting 6816850 – Alaska Arctic Acidic Sparse Tundra. In: LANDFIRE Biophysical Setting Model: Map zone 68, [Online]. In: Vegetation Dynamics Models. In: LANDFIRE. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory; U.S. Geological Survey; Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy (Producers). Available: https://www.landfire.gov/national_veg_models_op2.php. Accessed Sept 24, 2024
PRISM Climate Group. 2018. “Alaska – average monthly and annual precipitation and minimum, maximum, and mean temperature for the period 1981-2010.” Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. https://prism.oregonstate.edu/projects/alaska.php. Accessed Sept 17, 2024.
Raynolds, M.K., D.A. Walker and H.A Maier. 2006. Alaska Arctic Tundra Vegetation Map. Scale 1:4,000,000. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) Map No. 2, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
Scenarios network for Alaska and arctic planning (SNAP). 2014. “Historical Monthly Temperature – 1km, 1901-2009”. http://ckan.snap.uaf.edu/dataset/. Accessed Sept 17, 2024.
Scenarios network for Alaska and arctic planning (SNAP). 2014. “Historical monthly and derived precipitation products downscaled from CRU TS data via the delta methods – 2km, 1901-2009”. http://ckan.snap.uaf.edu/dataset/. Accessed Sept 17, 2024.
SCS (Soil Conservation Service). 1984. Ecological site descriptions, Seward Peninsula. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Alaska Field Office, Anchorage.
Swanson, J.D., M. Schuman, and P.C. Scorup. 1985. Range survey of the Seward Peninsula reindeer ranges, Alaska. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2022. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
Western Regional Climate Center. 2021. Climate of Alaska. Retrieved from https://wrcc.dri.edu/Climate/narrative_ak.php. Accessed November 15, 2024. April 9, 2021.
Contributors
Phil Barber
Blaine Spellman
Marji Patz
Steph Schmit
Karin Sonnen
Michael Singer
Acknowledgments
The described soil – ecological site correlations described in this document were reviewed during a February 2024 Provisional Ecological Site workshop in Wasilla, AK. Many thanks are given to the NRCS staff who have provided feedback regarding the MLRA 241X ecological site key and ESDs.
This ecological site description (ESD) fulfills the requirements of the Provisional Ecological Site (PES) national initiative. This ESD is published to fit current site-soil correlations as they are currently mapped and understood. Further data collection may provide the information to update this ESD from the provisional level to the approved level.
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
| Author(s)/participant(s) | |
|---|---|
| Contact for lead author | |
| Date | 12/20/2025 |
| Approved by | Blaine Spellman |
| Approval date | |
| Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.