Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R002XN613WA
Cool Wet Prairie
Last updated: 5/09/2024
Accessed: 11/21/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 002X–Willamette and Puget Sound Valleys
Major Land Resource Area-[MLRA][LRU]: 002X N Willamette and Puget Sound Valleys, North Puget. The Land Resource Unit (LRU) is described in detail in the reference Washington NRCS Pasture TN-101 Forage Zones available on the eFOTG. For more information on MLRA’s, refer to the following web site: http://www.essc.psu.edu/soil_info/soil_lrr/. Additional information on Common Resource Areas is available on the eFOTG for NRCS Washington: http://efotg.nrcs.usda.gov/efotg_locator.aspx?map=WA and the following website: http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/cra.html. This ecological site occurs in the following Common Resource Areas: 2.10 - Fraser Lowland; 2.11 - Eastern Puget Riverine Lowlands; 2.11 - Eastern Puget Mountain River Valleys; 2.12 - San Juan Islands; 2.13 - Olympic Rainshadow; 2.5 - Eastern Puget Uplands; and 2.6 - Central Puget Lowland
Table 1. Dominant plant species
| Tree |
Not specified |
|---|---|
| Shrub |
Not specified |
| Herbaceous |
(1) Deschampsia caespitosa |
Physiographic features
The soils which support this native plant community typically occur on floodplains or in depressional areas with high water tables, often remnant shallow lake basins or other waterlaid sediments.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
| Landforms |
(1)
Valley
(2) Valley flat (3) Depression |
|---|---|
| Flooding frequency | None |
| Ponding duration | Brief (2 to 7 days) to very long (more than 30 days) |
| Ponding frequency | Occasional to frequent |
| Elevation | 0 – 61 m |
| Slope | 0 – 5% |
| Ponding depth | 0 – 20 cm |
| Water table depth | 0 – 20 cm |
| Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
The average annual precipitation ranges from 18 to 60 inches, although most areas range from 30 to 50 inches. Annual precipitation less than 30 inches occurs in the rainshadow of the Olympic Mountains along the western border of this area and in the San Juan Islands. Higher average annual precipitation, 50 to 60 inches, occurs next to the foothills of the surrounding mountains. Most of the precipitation occurs as low intensity, Pacific frontal storms. The distribution is 75% in the fall and winter, 15% in the spring and 10% in the summer. Rain turns to snow at the higher elevations, although accumulations are usually small and of short duration. The number of days with snow on the ground varies from 0 to 9, with an averge of 3 days. Summers are cool and dry. This ecosite occurs in areas with cooler spring weather and cooler summer nights, resulting in fewer available heat units for plant growth and soil warming. Recorded temperature extremes range from -1 degrees to 90 degrees fahrenheit. See the climate tables in this document for information on temperatures and frost-free periods.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
| Frost-free period (average) | 243 days |
|---|---|
| Freeze-free period (average) | 302 days |
| Precipitation total (average) | 1,524 mm |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils generally have a water table at or near the soil surface for much of the winter and spring, and the water table is often within a few feet of the soil surface for the remainder of the year. A soil series this site may occur on is Coupeville, which is a deep, poorly drained soil formed in glacial drift over dense glaciomarine deposits in drainageways and valleys of glacial drift plains.
Table 4. Representative soil features
| Surface texture |
(1) Loam |
|---|---|
| Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
| Drainage class | Poorly drained to somewhat poorly drained |
| Permeability class | Slow to moderate |
| Soil depth | 102 – 152 cm |
| Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0 – 5% |
| Surface fragment cover >3" | 0% |
| Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
13.46 – 20.57 cm |
| Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-101.6cm) |
5.6 – 6.5 |
| Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
0 – 5% |
| Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
0% |
Ecological dynamics
These areas were historically kept free of extensive brush and tree cover by burning. Typical native plant species include Tufted Hairgrass (Deschampsia caespitosa), Great Camas (Camassia leichtlinii), and various sedge species (Carex spp.). Some disturbance is natural in these plant communities, including: fire, both natural and human caused; soil perturbation resulting from causes such as small mammals, earthworms, root activity; freeze-thaw cycles; and harvest of bulbs and rhizomes; and wildlife grazing. Disturbances can be reduced or eliminated through actions such as fire control, or cessation of activities such as mowing, soil disturbance, livestock grazing or vehicle access. If no disturbance occurs, this plant community will be invaded by shrub and tree species. Typical shrub and tree species include snowberry, rose, Douglas fir and lodgepole pine. Disturbance will affect the different plant classes in varying ways. Timing of disturbance will also affect shifts in plant communities. The Disturbance Effects on Plant Classes table summarizes some of these effects.
If nonnative species are present in the area, these will invade the site whether or not disturbance is maintained, increased, or eliminated. Their dominance in the community will be affected by the type and intensity of disturbance, as will the dominance of the different plant classes. If disturbance such as tillage, herbicide use, or intensive vehicle traffic eliminates the plant community, then a nonnative plant community will be established, either through planting, or invasion of introduced seral species.
Restoration – It’s possible to reestablish plant communities on suitable soils. Native species can be replanted and the site managed to maintain or increase the percentage cover of these species. The Disturbance Effects table lists appropriate types of disturbance to help establish the desired plant community. If nonnatives are present on the site, there will always be a presence in the community as these species are adapted to a wide range of soils, climates and disturbance regimes. However, the management of disturbance types can affect the balance of species on a site.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
The soils which support this native plant community typically occur on floodplains or in depressional areas with high water tables, often remnant shallow lake basins or other waterlaid sediments. The soils generally have a water table at or near the soil surface for much of the winter and spring, and the watertable is often within a few feet of the soil surface for the remainder of the year. A soil series this site may occur on is Coupeville. These areas were historically kept free of extensive brush and tree cover by burning. These ecosites occur in areas with warmer spring weather and warmer summer nights, resulting in more available heat units for plant growth and soil warming. Typical native plant species include Tufted Hairgrass (Deschampsia caespitosa), Great Camas (Camassia leichtlinii), and various sedge species (Carex spp.)
Community 1.1
Herbaceous Prairie
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
| Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grass/Grasslike | 1345 | 1681 | 2018 |
| Forb | 785 | 981 | 1177 |
| Shrub/Vine | 90 | 112 | 135 |
| Tree | 22 | 28 | 34 |
| Total | 2242 | 2802 | 3364 |
Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). WA0225, Winter Water Table. Winter water table within ~12" of soil surface for significant period between Nov 1 - April 1.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 22 | 20 | 18 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.2
Native Shrub/Herbaceous Prairie
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2
No fire or other disturbance – This pathway/transition occurs when disturbances, either natural or man-made, are reduced or eliminated through actions such as fire control, or cessation of activities such as mowing, soil perturbation grazing or vehicle access.
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1
Fire, Brush Control or Other Disturbance – This pathway occurs when controlled disturbance is restored to the system, through methods such as prescribed fire, brush control, invasive plant control, mowing, thatching, grazing, and/or soil aeration.
State 2
Introduced Invaded State
Community 2.1
Introduced/Native Herbaceous Prairie
Community 2.2
Introduced/Native Shrub/Herbaceous Prairie
Pathway 2.1A
Community 2.1 to 2.2
No fire or other disturbance – This pathway/transition occurs when disturbances, either natural or man-made, are reduced or eliminated through actions such as fire control, or cessation of activities such as mowing, soil perturbation grazing or vehicle access.
Pathway 2.2A
Community 2.2 to 2.1
Fire, Brush Control or Other Disturbance – This pathway occurs when controlled disturbance is restored to the system, through methods such as prescribed fire, brush control, invasive plant control, mowing, thatching, grazing, and/or soil aeration.
State 3
Conifer Invaded State
Community 3.1
F002XN904WA
Transition 1A
State 1 to 2
This transition occurs when uncontrolled disturbance is persistent in the system, such as: overgrazing; mowing in the wrong season, wrong height, or at the wrong frequency; vehicle use which causes vegetation damage; or too-frequent fire. In addition, non-native plant seeds or propagules or present on or near the site.
Transition 1B
State 1 to 3
No fire or other disturbance – This pathway/transition occurs when disturbances, either natural or man-made, are reduced or eliminated through actions such as fire control, or cessation of activities such as mowing, soil perturbation grazing or vehicle access.
Restoration pathway 2A
State 2 to 1
Restoration – removal of non-native species and restoration or the original plant community through methods such as prescribed fire, brush control, invasive plant control, mowing, thatching, grazing, and/or soil aeration and reseeding.
Transition 2A
State 2 to 3
No fire or other disturbance – This pathway/transition occurs when disturbances, either natural or man-made, are reduced or eliminated through actions such as fire control, or cessation of activities such as mowing, soil perturbation grazing or vehicle access.
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
| Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
| 1 | Perennial Grasses | – | ||||
| tufted hairgrass | DECE | Deschampsia cespitosa | – | – | ||
| blue wildrye | ELGL | Elymus glaucus | – | – | ||
| slender wheatgrass | ELTR7 | Elymus trachycaulus | – | – | ||
| red fescue | FERU2 | Festuca rubra | – | – | ||
| meadow barley | HOBR2 | Hordeum brachyantherum | – | – | ||
| prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | – | – | ||
| 2 | Perennial Grasslike | – | ||||
| sedge | CAREX | Carex | – | – | ||
| spikerush | ELEOC | Eleocharis | – | – | ||
| rush | JUNCU | Juncus | – | – | ||
| Pacific woodrush | LUCO6 | Luzula comosa | – | – | ||
| 3 | Annual Grasses | – | ||||
| Howell's bluegrass | POHO6 | Poa howellii | – | – | ||
|
Forb
|
||||||
| 6 | Bulbs | – | ||||
| tapertip onion | ALAC4 | Allium acuminatum | – | – | ||
| crown brodiaea | BRCO3 | Brodiaea coronaria | – | – | ||
| large camas | CALE5 | Camassia leichtlinii | – | – | ||
| small camas | CAQU2 | Camassia quamash | – | – | ||
| checker lily | FRAFA2 | Fritillaria affinis var. affinis | – | – | ||
| Idaho blue-eyed grass | SIIDI | Sisyrinchium idahoense var. idahoense | – | – | ||
| meadow deathcamas | ZIVE | Zigadenus venenosus | – | – | ||
| 7 | – | |||||
| darkthroat shootingstar | DOPU | Dodecatheon pulchellum | – | – | ||
| hookedspur violet | VIAD | Viola adunca | – | – | ||
| 8 | biscuitroots | – | ||||
| barestem biscuitroot | LONU2 | Lomatium nudicaule | – | – | ||
| common lomatium | LOUT | Lomatium utriculatum | – | – | ||
| 10 | Perennial Forbs | – | ||||
| common yarrow | ACMI2 | Achillea millefolium | – | – | ||
| field chickweed | CEAR4 | Cerastium arvense | – | – | ||
| Menzies' larkspur | DEME | Delphinium menziesii | – | – | ||
| common woolly sunflower | ERLA6 | Eriophyllum lanatum | – | – | ||
| Virginia strawberry | FRVI | Fragaria virginiana | – | – | ||
| western buttercup | RAOC | Ranunculus occidentalis | – | – | ||
| Oregon buttercup | RAOR | Ranunculus oreogenes | – | – | ||
| 11 | Ferns | – | ||||
| western brackenfern | PTAQ | Pteridium aquilinum | – | – | ||
| 12 | Perennial Legume | – | ||||
| cows clover | TRWO | Trifolium wormskioldii | – | – | ||
| American vetch | VIAM | Vicia americana | – | – | ||
| 13 | Annual | – | ||||
| giant blue eyed Mary | COGR2 | Collinsia grandiflora | – | – | ||
| 14 | Annual Legume | – | ||||
| desert deervetch | LOMI | Lotus micranthus | – | – | ||
|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
| 20 | Shrubs | – | ||||
| California phacelia | PHCA | Phacelia californica | – | – | ||
| Nootka rose | RONU | Rosa nutkana | – | – | ||
| rose spirea | SPDO | Spiraea douglasii | – | – | ||
|
Tree
|
||||||
| 25 | Tree | – | ||||
| lodgepole pine | PICO | Pinus contorta | – | – | ||
| Sitka spruce | PISI | Picea sitchensis | – | – | ||
| western redcedar | THPL | Thuja plicata | – | – | ||
Interpretations
Supporting information
Contributors
Martha Chaney
Approval
Kirt Walstad, 5/09/2024
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
| Author(s)/participant(s) | |
|---|---|
| Contact for lead author | |
| Date | 11/21/2024 |
| Approved by | Kirt Walstad |
| Approval date | |
| Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.