Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R009XY004OR
Fan 14-17 PZ
Accessed: 12/04/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Associated sites
R009XY013OR |
Loamy 17-22 PZ Loamy 14-17 PZ |
---|---|
R009XY015OR |
Clayey 14-17 PZ Clayey 14-17 PZ |
R009XY029OR |
South 14-17 PZ South 14-17 PZ |
R009XY040OR |
North 14-17 PZ North 14-17 PZ |
Similar sites
R009XY003OR |
Fan 10-15 PZ Fan 10-15 PZ (lower elevation and production) |
---|
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
Not specified |
Herbaceous |
Not specified |
Physiographic features
This site occurs along lower slopes and on fans at outlet of perrenial and ephemeral streams. Braiding at stream outlets and fan coalescence is often common. Slopes range from o to 15%. Elevation varies from 2700 to 3400 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Fan
|
---|---|
Elevation | 823 – 1,036 m |
Slope | 0 – 15% |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
The annual precipitation ranges from 14 to 17 inches. Limited deep seasonal subsurface flows augment the precipitation. The precipitation occurs as rain and snow during the months of November through March. Localized, occasionally severe, convection storms occur during the summer. The mean annual air temperature is approximately 48 degrees F. Extreme temperatures range from 100 degrees F. to -20 degrees F. Soil temperature regimes are mesic. The frost-free period ranges from April through mid July.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 130 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 0 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 432 mm |
Figure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils of this site are formed in deep alluvium, colluvium and loess. They are deep to very deep. Typically the surface layer is a silt loam or gravelly silt loam over a loamy to cobbly clay loam subsoil. Stoniness is variable. Soil permeability is moderate. The available water holding capacity (AWC) is 6 to 10 inches. Localized, deep, seasonal subsurface flows augment the available water. The erosion potential is moderate.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Silt loam (2) Very gravelly silt loam |
---|---|
Family particle size |
(1) Clayey |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Moderate |
Ecological dynamics
Range in Characteristics:
Variablity in plant compostion and yeild is dependant on soil depth and the extent of lateral subsurface water flow. Basin wildrye, shrubs and production increases with longer duration subsurface flows. Bluebunch wheatgrasss increases on drier south facing fans. Idaho fescue increases on north exposures.
Response to Disturbance:
If the condition of the site deteriorates as a result of overgrazing, basin wildrye, Idaho fescue and bluebunch wheatgrass decrease along with palatable understory forbs. Bluegrass, unpalatable forbs and annuals invade. With furthwer deterioration annuals strongly invade, production decreases, seasonal availability of quality forage decreases and soil erosion accelerates.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant Community
Community 1.1
Historic Climax Plant Community
The potential native plant community is dominated by basin wildrye. Bluebunch wheatgrass and Idaho fescue are prominant. A variatey of forbs are present along with aminor amount of shrubs. The potential vegetative composition is approximately 90 percent grass, 5 percent forbs and 5 percent shrubs.
Figure 3. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 2791 | 3615 | 4439 |
Shrub/Vine | 101 | 185 | 269 |
Forb | 67 | 168 | 269 |
Total | 2959 | 3968 | 4977 |
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | Perennial Deep-rooted Dominant | 1681–2354 | ||||
basin wildrye | LECI4 | Leymus cinereus | 1681–2354 | – | ||
2 | Perennial Deep-rooted Dominant | 1009–1681 | ||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 673–1009 | – | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 336–673 | – | ||
5 | PPGG | 26–101 | ||||
squirreltail | ELEL5 | Elymus elymoides | 26–101 | – | ||
needle and thread | HECO26 | Hesperostipa comata | 26–101 | – | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 26–101 | – | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 26–101 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
9 | PPFF | 8–30 | ||||
common yarrow | ACMI2 | Achillea millefolium | 8–30 | – | ||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 8–30 | – | ||
fleabane | ERIGE2 | Erigeron | 8–30 | – | ||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 8–30 | – | ||
aster | EUCEP2 | Eucephalus | 8–30 | – | ||
hawkweed | HIERA | Hieracium | 8–30 | – | ||
desertparsley | LOMAT | Lomatium | 8–30 | – | ||
lupine | LUPIN | Lupinus | 8–30 | – | ||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 8–30 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
15 | 17–45 | |||||
Saskatoon serviceberry | AMAL2 | Amelanchier alnifolia | 17–45 | – | ||
hawthorn | CRATA | Crataegus | 17–45 | – | ||
chokecherry | PRVI | Prunus virginiana | 17–45 | – | ||
currant | RIBES | Ribes | 17–45 | – | ||
rose | ROSA5 | Rosa | 17–45 | – | ||
common snowberry | SYAL | Symphoricarpos albus | 17–45 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
Livestock Grazing:
This site is suited to spring, summer and fall use by cattle, sheep and horses under a planned grazing system. The key species is basin wildrye. Basin wildrye can be damaged if heavily grazed during periods of flowering and seed formation when root reserves and soil temperature is low. Use in the spring should be postponed until the soils are firm enough to prevent trampling damage, soil compaction and streambank sloughing. As a sediment depositon area, adequate plant cover should be left in the fall to catch sediment and protect streambanks and secondary overflow channels during the spring runoff events.
Wildlife:
When the ecological condidtion is high this site provides food and cover for deer, elk, other mammals and upland birds. It is an important wintering area for deer and elk.
Native Wildlife Associated With The Potential Climax Community:
Mule deer, Whitetail deer, elk, rodents and a variety of upland birds use this site for food and cover.
Hydrological functions
The soils of this site have excellent waterholding capacities providing late season water for plant growth. As a site which often occurs at stream outlets in deposition areas the site is inherently unstable. In natural undisturbed condidtions, it supports a braided stream pattern, one with numerous secondary Overflow channels. This pattern functions in reducing stream energy and allowing sediment deposition. The depostion potential of the stie should be considered in hydrologic analysis and developing planning alternatives. The hydrological cover condidtion is excellent when the ecological condition is high.
Other information
When in poor condition the site has potential for mechanical range seeding. When incised channels are present, rehabilitation will markedly improve production, reduce downstream sedimentation and improve hydrologic characteristics.
Supporting information
Contributors
AV Bahn
Justin Gredvig
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Jeff Repp, Bruce Franssen |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | 07/10/2007 |
Approved by | Bob Gillaspy |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None to some, moderate sheet & rill erosion hazard
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
Occasional flooding with seasonal high water table.
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
None
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
5-10%
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Poor resistance to erosion when cover is lacking - subject to incision and downcutting.
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None, slight wind erosion hazard
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine - limited movement
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Moderately resistant to erosion with adequate cover: aggregate stability = 3-4
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Granular to subangular blocky structure; Dry color value 4-5; 9-14" thick; low OM (1-2%)
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Significant ground cover (90-100%) and moderate slopes (0-15%) effectively limit rainfall impact and overland flow
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Basin wildrye > bluebunch wheatgrass > idaho fescueSub-dominant:
other perennial grasses > shrubsOther:
forbsAdditional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Normal decadence and mortality expected
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Favorable: 4000, Normal: 3000, Unfavorable: 2000 lbs/acre/year at high RSI (HCPC)
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial brush species will increase with deterioration of plant community. Cheatgrass and Medusahead invade sites that have lost deep rooted perennial grass functional groups
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All species should be capable of reproducing annually
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.