Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R009XY046OR
Shrubby Moist North 15+ PZ
Accessed: 12/03/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Associated sites
R009XY030OR |
South 17-22 PZ south 17-22" PZ |
---|---|
R009XY031OR |
Shallow South 14+ PZ Shallow South 14"+ PZ |
R009XY041OR |
Deep North 14-17 PZ Deep North 14-17" PZ |
R009XY045OR |
North 17-24 PZ North 17-24" PZ |
R009XY060OR |
Shrubby North 15+ PZ Shrubby North 15"+ PZ |
Similar sites
R009XY060OR |
Shrubby North 15+ PZ Shrubby North 15"+ PZ (lower production, less subsurface flow) |
---|---|
R009XY041OR |
Deep North 14-17 PZ Deep North 14-17" PZ (lower production, little subsurface flow) |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
Not specified |
Herbaceous |
Not specified |
Physiographic features
This site occurs on the upper slopes of prairies and on the slopes of canyons and mountain plateaus. It si typically on steep slopes and swales having north and northeast aspects. Slopes range from 12 to 70%, with gradients of 40 to 70% being most typical. Elevation varies from 2000 to 3800 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Mountain
(2) Plateau |
---|---|
Elevation | 610 – 1,158 m |
Slope | 12 – 70% |
Aspect | N, NE |
Climatic features
The annual precipitation ranges from 14 to 30 inches with 17 to 24 inches being most typical. Seasonal subsurface flows augment the precipitation. The precipitation occurs as snow during the months of November through March followed by ample spring rainfall. Localized, occasionally severe, covection storms occur during the summer. The mean annual air temperture is approximately 43 degrees F. to -30 degrees F. Soil temperature regimes are frigid. The frost-free period ranges from 30 to 100 days. Teh period of optimum plant growth is from mid April through July.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 100 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 0 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 762 mm |
Figure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils of this site are formed in loess and colluvium over basalt bedrock. They are deep to very deep. Typically the surface layer is a silt loam about 19 inches thick. The subsoil is a silt loam over a coobly silty clay loam. Soil permeabilty is moderate. The available water holding capacity (AWC) is 10 to 14 inches. Erosion potential is high.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Silt loam |
---|---|
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Moderate |
Ecological dynamics
Range in Characteristics:
The production and density of shrubs is dependant on aspect, soil depth and the extent and duration of lateral subsurface water flows. Tall shrubs such as hawthorn and chokecherry, increase on deep, due north slopes and swales receiving subsurface flows late into the growing season. Mallow ninebark increases on shallow areas having lower water storage capacities and recieving moderate duration subsurface flows. Snowberry increases on drier areas. Shrubs occur in dese patches and present strong competition to the less stable grass/forb component of the site. Scattered ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir bearng fire scars are often present. As a site highly susceptible to fire, fire frequency will influence vegetative production and cover. With an increase in fire frequency, rhizomatus, root sprouting shrubs and grasses will increase. With a increase in fire frequency, hawthorn will increase, forming dense thickets.
Response to Disturbance:
If the condition of the site deteriorates as a result of overgrazing, Idaho fescue decreases along with other palatable understory grasses and forbs. Kentucky bluegrass, annuals and unpalatable forbs will invade. Rhizomatous shrubs increase through shading and root competetion of the weakened understory component. With further deterioration areas of bare ground under and adjacent to shrubs increase, forage production decreases and erosion accelerates. Erosion from concentrated flows reduces the site productivity and contributes to downstream sedimentation.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant Community
Community 1.1
Historic Climax Plant Community
The potential native plant community is strongly dominated by hawthorn. Mallow ninebark, serviceberry, snowberry and rose are common. Spirea, currant, oceanspray, Idaho fescue and a variety of forbs are present. The potential vegetative composition is approximately 80 percent shrubs, 10 percent grass and 5 percent forbs.
Figure 3. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 2757 | 3564 | 4371 |
Grass/Grasslike | 303 | 572 | 841 |
Forb | 101 | 202 | 303 |
Total | 3161 | 4338 | 5515 |
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | Perennial Deep-rooted Dominant | 168–336 | ||||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 168–336 | – | ||
2 | Perennial Deep-rooted Sub-dominant | 67–168 | ||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 67–168 | – | ||
5 | PPGG | 67–336 | ||||
sedge | CAREX | Carex | 2–13 | – | ||
pinegrass | CARU | Calamagrostis rubescens | 2–13 | – | ||
blue wildrye | ELGL | Elymus glaucus | 2–13 | – | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 2–13 | – | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 2–13 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
7 | Perennial All Dominant | 67–135 | ||||
cinquefoil | POTEN | Potentilla | 34–67 | – | ||
ragwort | SENEC | Senecio | 34–67 | – | ||
9 | PPFF | 34–168 | ||||
common yarrow | ACMI2 | Achillea millefolium | 3–16 | – | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 3–16 | – | ||
miner's lettuce | CLPE | Claytonia perfoliata | 3–16 | – | ||
bedstraw | GALIU | Galium | 3–16 | – | ||
old man's whiskers | GETR | Geum triflorum | 3–16 | – | ||
common cowparsnip | HEMA80 | Heracleum maximum | 3–16 | – | ||
Scouler's woollyweed | HISC2 | Hieracium scouleri | 3–16 | – | ||
waterleaf | HYDRO4 | Hydrophyllum | 3–16 | – | ||
lupine | LUPIN | Lupinus | 3–16 | – | ||
bluebells | MERTE | Mertensia | 3–16 | – | ||
beardtongue | PENST | Penstemon | 3–16 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
13 | Perennial Deciduous Dominant | 2186–3026 | ||||
hawthorn | CRATA | Crataegus | 1681–2354 | – | ||
mallow ninebark | PHMA5 | Physocarpus malvaceus | 504–673 | – | ||
14 | Perennial Deciduous Sub-dominant | 471–1009 | ||||
Saskatoon serviceberry | AMAL2 | Amelanchier alnifolia | 168–336 | – | ||
common snowberry | SYAL | Symphoricarpos albus | 168–336 | – | ||
chokecherry | PRVI | Prunus virginiana | 67–168 | – | ||
rose | ROSA5 | Rosa | 67–168 | – | ||
15 | SSSS | 101–336 | ||||
oceanspray | HOLOD | Holodiscus | 26–84 | – | ||
wax currant | RICE | Ribes cereum | 26–84 | – | ||
elderberry | SAMBU | Sambucus | 26–84 | – | ||
spirea | SPIRA | Spiraea | 26–84 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
Livestock Grazing:
This site is suited to late spring, summer and fall sue by cattle, sheep and horses under a planned grazing system. The key species is Idaho fescue or Kentucky bluegrass if Idaho fescue is not present. Idaho fescue can be damaged if heavily grazed during periods of flowering and seed formation when root reserves are low. If Kentucky bluegrass is the key species, adequate ground cver and stubble should be left to prevent erosion and to maintain and improve plant vigor. Periodic presciribed burns or other brush control measures will greatly improve the forage production capabillity of the site. As this site occurs on steep slopes, care should be taken to avoid trampling damage and soil compaction when soils are wet.
Wildlife:
When the ecological condition is high this site provides excellent food and cover for deer, elk, toher mammals and upland birds. It is important wintering area for mule deer and elk. Wild life cover values, thermal, hiding and escape, should be considered in designing treatment measures that alter the kind and amount of shurb species present.
Native Wildlife Associated With The Potential Climax Community:
Mule deer, white-tail deer, elk, rodents,and a variety of upland birds use this site for food and cover. Cover is excellent when the ecological condition is high.
Hydrological functions
The soils of this stie have excellent water holding capacities, providing late season water for plant growth and slow release to streams. The hydrologic cover condititon is high.
Recreational uses
In the Blue Mountians this site occurs on ridgetops in association with forest. It provides visual mosaic patterns and diversity with the forests.
Wood products
A few scatered ponderosa pine and/or Douglas-fir may be present. These provide limiteed economic benefits in terms of wood products, but are of value for diversity and cover for wildlife.
Other information
Periodic prescribed burns or other brush control measures will both improve forage production and reduce wildlife cover values. these two oppostie interfacing effects should be considered in designing treatment measures that alter the kind and amount of shrub species present. When in poor condition the site has a high potential for mechanical rnage seeding on moderate slopes and a low potential on steep slopes. Aerial seeding is practical on intensely burned areas, realizing forage production will reduce as shrubs resprot and improve vigor.
Supporting information
Contributors
AV. Bahn
Justin Gredvig
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Jeff Repp |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | Oregon NRCS State Rangeland Management Specialist |
Date | 07/30/2012 |
Approved by | Bob Gillaspy |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None to some, severe sheet & rill erosion hazard -
Presence of water flow patterns:
None to some -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
None to some -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
0-5% -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None, slight wind erosion hazard -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine - limited movement -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Significantly resistant to erosion; aggregate stability = 4-6 -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Deep to very deep, well drained, with a thick (19") silt loam surface; moderate OM (2-4%) -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Significant ground cover (90-110%) and moderately to very steep slopes (12-70%) moderately limit rainfall impact and overland flow -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Hawthorn > Mallow ninebark > other dominant shrubs > Idaho fecue > other shrubs > other grasses > Bluebunch wheatgrass > forbs > treesSub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Normal decadence and mortality expected -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Favorable: 3500, Normal: 3000, Unfavorable: 2000 lbs/acre/year at high RSI (HCPC) -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial brush species will increase with deterioration of plant community. Bluegrasses, annual bromes, and medusahead invade sites that have lost deep rooted perennial grass functional groups. Excessive erosion may occur, deteriorating site potential. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All species should be capable of reproducing annually
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.