
Silty 9-12 PZ Snake River Warm Plains
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
-
Transition T1A
Introduction of non-native species; inappropriate grazing management
More details -
Transition T2A
Inappropriate grazing management
More details -
Transition T2B
Fire, soil disruption, inapropriate grazing management
More details -
Restoration pathway R3A
Shrub removal, possible perennial grass reseeding
More details -
Transition T3A
Catastrophic fire, soil disturbing treatments, inappropriate grazing management
More details -
Restoration pathway R4B
Annual grass treatment, reseeding
More details -
Restoration pathway R4A
Annual grass treatment, reseeding
More details -
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
The reference state is representative of the natural range of variability in pristine condition. This is not considered a "historical" condition as examples of this site may still occur across the landscape. This state has no introduced plant species. Disturbance patterns reflect historic return cycles or increased return has not reduced the sites resistance and resilience to disturbance. The reference state has two community phases; a grass shrub community and a perennial grass community. Community dynamics are controlled primarily by fire and time. All functional groups are present and a diverse forb component exists although it is not the dominant component. At the time of this writing, no sites were found in the reference state so community information is inferred from current potential sites and historical data.
Characteristics and indicators
•No introduced plant species
•All functional groups present
•High plant vigor and reproductive capacity
Resilience management
Reference sites should be prioritized for protection whenever possible. Management should focus on conservation and protection above other uses. Surrounding landscapes should be managed to reduce non-native species introductions and other impacts.
Submodel
Description
This state is similar to the refence state but some amount of non-native species occur and species composition has been somewhat altered. Ecological functions often remain intact but due to the presence of these non-native species, resistance and resilience to disturbance has been reduced. This state has three community phases; a grass-shrub phase, a shrub-grass phase, and a grass phase. The latter two representing two different "at-risk" phases, at risk of converting to shrubland and at risk of converting to an annual state.
Characteristics and indicators
•Low cover of introduced plant species (commonly less than fifteen percent total)
•Deep-rooted perennial grass cover at or above twenty percent
•All functional groups present with no significant decrease in reproductive capability
Resilience management
Sites in the current potential state should be prioritized for protection wherever possible, especially when in good quality condition. Management activities should focus on limited seed sources of invasive annual grasses and promote perennial plant vigor and reproduction.
Submodel
Description
This state is dominated by shrubs and shallow-rooted perennial grasses and is a result of over grazing especially during key growth periods of cool-season bunchgrasses. Deep-rooted perennial grass have been reduced or completely excluded rarely exceeding five percent foliar cover. This state consists of two communities, a Wyoming big sagebrush and shallow-rooted grass community, and a shallow-rooted grass community. Although highly variable, invasive annual grass cover is often higher than in the current potential state. Without deep-rooted grasses, this state is more prone to erosion than the current potential state.
Characteristics and indicators
•Typically less than 5% cover deep-rooted perennial grasses.
•High cover of shallow-rooted perennial grass
•Increased invasive annual grass but not enough to become a dominant component.
Resilience management
Management actions should focus on reintroduction of deep-rooted perennial grasses. Invasive annual grass control may also be a priority to avoid transitioning to an annual state.
Submodel
Description
This state is dominated by invasive annual grasses. These grasses increase litter amounts which inhibits deep-rooted perennial grass recruitment and increases fire frequency. These two effects create a positive feedback loop that increases invasive annual grass populations.
Characteristics and indicators
•Annual grass foliar cover greater than 25%
•Sagebrush cover is variable but even when common, interspaces dominated by invasive annual grasses.
•Herbaceous litter cover can be higher than other states
Resilience management
Any management actions should focus on reducing annual grass cover and limiting its spread to other areas.
Submodel
Mechanism
Introduction of non-native species. Inappropriate grazing management could also aid in susceptibility of the site to invasion.
Context dependence
Circumstances that increase bare soil such as drought or soil disturbing activities, may increase opportunities for non-native species to invade.
Mechanism
Inappropriate grazing management, repeated over grazing reduces deep-rooted perennial grasses and shifts to shrubs and shallow-rooted grasses increasing bare soil and possible soil erosion.
Context dependence
Soil vulnerability to compaction will be highest in spring when soil is saturated and unfrozen.
Mechanism
High intensity or frequent fire that removes sagebrush component from the site. Soil disturbing treatments or repeated overutilization may also cause this transition.
Context dependence
Transition rate will depend on a number of factors including existing plant cover, biological soil crust integrity, seed bank integrity, and recent weather patterns.
Mechanism
Mowing shrubs may allow for perennial grasses to become more dominant.
Context dependence
Actions to remove Wyoming big sagebrush increase the risk of invasive annual grasses becoming prevalent. Recovery may depend on existing plant understory and the ability to control annual grasses while recovery takes place.
Mechanism
High intensity or frequent fire. Sagebrush removal activities that disturb soil.
Context dependence
Transition rate will depend on existing cover and seedbank integrity.
Mechanism
Treatment of annual grasses with herbicide coupled with seeding of desired native species.
Context dependence
Overall success may depend on above average yearly precipitation increasing establishment success.
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.