JD Shrubby Mountain Shallow 12-16 PZ
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
-
Transition T1A
Introduction of non-native plant species
More details -
Transition T2A
Chronic, inappropriate grazing management, fire or brush treatment/tree thinning
More details -
Transition T2B
Catastrophic fire, failed rehabilitation attempt or combination, inappropriate grazing management in the presence of non-native annuals
More details -
Transition T2C
Time and lack of disturbance, may be combined with inappropriate grazing management.
More details -
Restoration pathway R3A
Shrub and tree reduction treatments and seeding of desired native species
More details -
Transition T3A
Catastrophic fire, failed rehabilitation attempt or combination, inappropriate grazing management in the presence of non-native annuals
More details -
Restoration pathway R3B
Shrub and tree reduction treatments and seeding of desired native species
More details -
Transition T3B
Time and lack of disturbance, may be combined with inappropriate grazing management.
More details -
Restoration pathway R4A
Herbicide of annual species and seeding of desired species; may be coupled with brush management
More details -
Restoration pathway R5A
Juniper stand thinning or removal
More details -
Restoration pathway R5B
Juniper stand removal and seeding of desired cultivated species: herbicide may be necessary
More details -
Transition T6B
Chronic, heavy growing season grazing will decrease bunchgrasses, increase Sandberg bluegrass and shrubs. Severe fire.
More details -
Transition T6A
Catastrophic fire. Inappropriate grazing facilitates decrease in bunchgrasses and increase in non-native annual grasses.
More details -
Transition T6C
Time without disturbance allows for maturation of tree community
More details -
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
The Reference State is representative of the natural range of variability for the site under pristine conditions. The reference state is a bunchgrass shrubland. State dynamics are maintained by interactions between climatic patterns and disturbance regimes. Negative feedbacks enhance ecosystem resilience and contribute to the stability of the state. These are maintained by ecosystem processes and structural elements such as the presence of all structural and functional plant groups, the retention of organic matter and the maintenance of plant community cover. Plant community phase changes are primarily driven by infrequent fire and periodic drought.
Submodel
Description
This state is similar to the Reference State. Ecological function has not changed fundamentally, however the resiliency of the site has been reduced by the presence of invasive plants. Additionally, livestock herbivory may be present as a disturbance process and changes in climate may be altering ecological dynamics. Non-native plant species may increase in abundance but will not become dominant or control ecological processes within this state. These species can be highly flammable and can promote fire where historically fire had been infrequent. Negative feedbacks enhance ecosystem resilience and contribute to the stability of the state. These are maintained by ecosystem processes and structural elements such as the presence of all structural and functional groups, and retention of organic matter and nutrients. Positive feedbacks driven by plant community invasion decrease ecosystem resilience and stability of the state. These include exotic plant species' high seed output, persistent seed bank, rapid growth rate, ability to cross pollinate, and adaptations for seed dispersal. Plant community phase changes are primarily driven by infrequent fire, periodic drought and ungulate herbivory.
Current potential plant communities mirror those of the above Historical Reference (State 1) yet with the addition of a low level of invasive exotic plant invasion and influences of livestock herbivory. Livestock herbivory may result in decreases in deep rooted perennial grasses, and related increases in shallow-rooted perennial grasses (such as Sandberg bluegrass), unpalatable forbs and shrubs.
Submodel
Description
Within this state, site resources are primarily controlled by shrub species. Native deep-rooted perennial grass composition has been reduced considerably, with shallow-rooted and disturbance adapted grasses such as Sandberg bluegrass and squirreltail increasing. Antelope bitterbrush and mountain big sagebrush dominate the shrub overstory, with rabbitbrush an important component in some instances. Exotic herbaceous species such as cheatgrass and medusahead are likely.
Sagebrush cover has increased beyond the natural range of variability for the site and may be decadent, reflecting stand maturity and lack of seedling establishment due to competition with mature plants. The dominance of site resources by the shrub overstory and Sandberg bluegrass understory leads to a temporal redistribution of soil water, nutrient capture, nutrient cycling and soil organic matter. In both community phases, bare ground may be significant with soil redistribution occurring between interspace and shrub locations. Western juniper increases and may begin to influence the understory vegetation.
Submodel
Description
Within this state, site resources are primarily controlled by exotic annual and perennial herbaceous species. Native perennial grass composition has been greatly diminished. Shrub species and western juniper may also be present.
Multiple plant communities are possible within this state, all of which are dominated by invasive annual grasses such as cheatgrass and medusahead and possibly invasive annual and perennial forbs. Sagebrush, bitterbrush and rabbitbrush may be common in the overstory. Overtime, with increasing invasion, soil stabilizing perennial root biomass will be decreased. Bare ground will increase during winter, potentially increasing erosion even on this low slope site during extreme weather events.
Submodel
Description
This state is characterized by a dominance of young juniper (<100 years old) in the overstory. Big sagebrush and perennial bunchgrasses may still be present, but they are no longer controlling site resources. Soil moisture, soil nutrients and soil organic matter distribution and cycling have been spatially and temporally altered. Juniper encroachment can decrease cover of perennial grasses and shrubs by reducing light availability and altering site hydrology through increased interception of precipitation, reduced infiltration and increased erosion. Bare ground will increase and erosion may be increased even on this low slope site during extreme weather events.
Submodel
Description
Within this state, site resources are primarily controlled by introduced range grasses such as crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum) and intermediate wheatgrass (Agropyron intermedium). Multiple community phases may occur within this state and will include different compositions of native and introduced shrub and grass species. Western juniper may be present. Similar to ecological dynamics within other states of this site, shrub species and western juniper will increase with greater time since fire and herbivory pressure. While introduced range grasses may provide some analogous ecological functions to native perennial grasses, they may outcompete native grasses in the long-term.
Submodel
Mechanism
Chronic, inappropriate grazing management reduces perennial grasses and allows for an increase in shrub/tree species. Fire or brush treatment/tree thinning; may be coupled with inappropriate grazing management. With fire suppression, western juniper trees will
increase.
Mechanism
Catastrophic fire, failed rehabilitation attempt or combination, inappropriate grazing management in the presence of non-native annuals or competitive increase in medusahead through lack of active management.
Mechanism
Time and lack of disturbance allows for maturation of the tree community. May be combined with inappropriate grazing management.
Mechanism
Shrub and tree reduction treatments and seeding of desired native species
Mechanism
Catastrophic fire or failed rehabilitation treatment or combination of both. Inappropriate grazing management in the presence of annual non-native species or competitive increase in medusahead through lack of active management.
Mechanism
Shrub and tree reduction treatments and seeding of desired native species
Mechanism
Time and lack of disturbance allows for maturation of the tree community. May be combined with inappropriate grazing management.
Mechanism
Herbicide of annual species and seeding of desired species; may be coupled with brush management
Mechanism
Juniper stand removal and seeding of desired cultivated species: herbicide may be necessary
Mechanism
Chronic, heavy growing season grazing will decrease bunchgrasses, increase Sandberg bluegrass and shrubs. Severe fire.
Mechanism
Catastrophic fire. Inappropriate grazing facilitates decrease in bunchgrasses and increase in non-native annual grasses.
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.