Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R010XY008OR
Sodic Meadow
Accessed: 12/21/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Associated sites
R010XY003OR |
Wet Meadow Wet meadow. |
---|---|
R010XY005OR |
Loamy Bottom Loamy Bottoms. |
R010XY007OR |
Sodic Bottom Sodic bottom. |
Similar sites
R010XY007OR |
Sodic Bottom Sodic bottom (higher position, lower water table). |
---|
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
Not specified |
Herbaceous |
(1) Distichlis stricta |
Physiographic features
This site occurs on the low floodplains of perennial streams and rivers. Slopes range from 0 to 3%. Elevation varies from 500 to 4,000 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Flood plain
|
---|---|
Flooding frequency | Occasional |
Elevation | 500 – 4,000 ft |
Slope | 3% |
Water table depth | 12 – 24 in |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
The annual precipitation ranges from 9 to 12 inches, most of which occurs in the form of snow during the months of November through March. A perennial supply of subsurface moisture augments the precipitation. Localized convection storms occasionally occur during the summer. The soil temperature regime is mesic with a mean annual air temperature of 51 degrees F. Temperature extremes range from 100 to -10 degrees F. The frost-free period ranges from 90 to 180 days. The optimum growth period is from April through August.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 180 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 0 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 12 in |
Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils of this site are recent, very deep and poorly drained. Typically the surface layer is a silt loam about 9 inches thick. The subsoil is a silt loam about 20 inches thick over a silt loam to sandy clay loam. The upper 30 inches of soil is moderate to very strongly alkaline (pH 8.2 to 9.9) with Sodium Absorption Ratios up to 71 in the upper 3 inches. Permeability is moderately slow. The available water holding capacity (AWC) is about 10 to 12 inches for the profile. Perennial to near perennial subsurface flows augment the available water. The high water table fluctuates between 12 and 24 inches from Febuary through may with occasional flooding. The potential for water erosion is high. See Appendix II for soils on which this site occurs.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Silt loam |
---|---|
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
Permeability class | Moderately slow |
Soil depth | Not specified |
Available water capacity (0-40in) |
10 – 12 in |
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-40in) |
71 |
Ecological dynamics
Range in Characteristics-
Production of inland saltgrass and other salt and alkali tolerant grasses is dependent on depth to the water table, soil salinity and the quality and duration of subsurface water flows. Inland saltgrass increases and the quality of subsurface water flows decrease. Conversely, lemmon alkali-grass, other salt and alkali tolerant grasses and rushes increase along with production as soil salinity decreases where subsurface water flows are of higher quality and longer duration.
Response to Disturbance-
If the condition of the site deteriorates as a result of overgrazing, inland saltgrass increases while other more palatable grasses decrease. Rushes increase in wetter areas adn foxtail barley invades in areas of lower soil salinity. With further deterioration areas of bare ground increase and saline conditions are accentuated. Streambanks become unstable from loss of vegetation and channels may degrade, becoming deeper and wider in the process. Subsurface flows are affected. The water table drops and production decreases substantially.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant Community
Community 1.1
Historic Climax Plant Community
The potential native plant community is dominated by inland saltgrass and Lemmon alkali-grass. Alkali sacaton, rush and alkali cordgrass are common. Basin wildrye and black greasewood occur sporadically. Vegetative composition of the community is approximately 95 percent grasses and grasslike plants, 2 percent forbs and 3 percent shrubs. The approximate ground cover is 80-90 percent (basal and crown).
Figure 2. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 1140 | 1545 | 1950 |
Shrub/Vine | 15 | 30 | 45 |
Forb | 15 | 23 | 30 |
Total | 1170 | 1598 | 2025 |
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | Perennial, Deep-rooted, Dominant | 900–1350 | ||||
saltgrass | DISP | Distichlis spicata | 450–600 | – | ||
Lemmon's alkaligrass | PULE | Puccinellia lemmonii | 300–450 | – | ||
alkali sacaton | SPAI | Sporobolus airoides | 150–300 | – | ||
2 | Perennial, Deep-rooted, Sub-Dominant | 180–420 | ||||
rush | JUNCU | Juncus | 75–150 | – | ||
alkali cordgrass | SPGR | Spartina gracilis | 75–150 | – | ||
basin wildrye | LECI4 | Leymus cinereus | 30–120 | – | ||
5 | Perennial, Other (PPGG), All | 30–120 | ||||
squirreltail | ELEL5 | Elymus elymoides | 15–60 | – | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 15–60 | – | ||
clustered field sedge | CAPR5 | Carex praegracilis | 0–20 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
9 | Perennial, Other (PPFF), ALL | 15–30 | ||||
camas | CAMAS | Camassia | 3–5 | – | ||
aster | EUCEP2 | Eucephalus | 3–5 | – | ||
iris | IRIS | Iris | 3–5 | – | ||
povertyweed | IVAX | Iva axillaris | 3–5 | – | ||
dock | RUMEX | Rumex | 3–5 | – | ||
ragwort | SENEC | Senecio | 3–5 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
15 | Perennial, Other(SSSS), ALL | 15–45 | ||||
rabbitbrush | CHRYS9 | Chrysothamnus | 8–23 | – | ||
greasewood | SAVE4 | Sarcobatus vermiculatus | 8–23 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
Wildlife-
This site offers food for mule deer, rodents and a variety of birds.
Livestock Grazing-
This site is suited to use by cattle, sheep and horses in the summer and fall. Limitations in the winter and spring are saturated wet soils and unstable banks. Use should be postponed until the soils are firm enought to prevent trampling damage and soil compaction yet, while soil moisture is adequate to allow the completion of the plant growth cycle. Improvement and/or maintenance of bank protecting vegetation should be considered during all seasons, particularly in the fall and winter for spring high flow periods.
Hydrological functions
Watersed-
The soils are in hydrologic group D. The soils of this site have high runoff potential. This site is potentially subject to three high flow periods: low elevation snowmelt, high elevation snowmelt, and summer cloudburst flow.
Other information
The soils of this site have good water holding capacities providing late season water for plant growth and slow water release to streams. As a salinity affected site it is imperative to maintain vigorous plant growth. With a reduction of plant cover and organic matter, surface salts increase, soil particles become disperesed, water intake rates are reduced and production is affected. When incised channels are present rehabilitation wil improve production and restore good hydrologic characteristics. On altered sites the reintroduction of desirable plants may be needed to full restore the site potential.
Supporting information
Contributors
A. Bahn
J.Joye(OSU)
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Jeff Repp |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | Oregon NRCS State Rangeland Management Specialist |
Date | 08/07/2012 |
Approved by | Bob Gillaspy |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None to some, severe sheet & rill erosion hazard -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Frequent flooding with seasonal high water table and ponding -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
None to some -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
0-10% -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None, slight wind erosion hazard -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine to moderately coarse - limited movement -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Moderately resistant to erosion: aggregate stability = 3-4 -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Deep, very deep, somewhat poorly drained with a silt loam surface about 9" thick - upper 30" of soil is moderately to very strongly alkaline (pH 8.2-9.9): Moderate OM (2-4%) -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Significant ground cover (80-90%) and very gentle slopes (0-3%) effectively limit rainfall impact and overland flow -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Inland saltgrass > Lemon alkaligrass > Alkali sacaton > rush >Alkali cordgrass > Basin wildrye > other grasses > Black greasewood > forbsSub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
normal decadence and mortality expected -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Favorable: 2500, Normal: 1500, Unfavorable: 1000 lbs/acre/year at high RSI (HCPC) -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Black greasewood will increase with deterioration of plant community. Inland saltgrass strongly increases on sites that have lost deep rooted perennial grass functional groups. Bare alkali areas will increase with loss of vegetation. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All species should be capable of reproducing annually
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.