Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R010XY116OR
Swale 12-16 PZ
Accessed: 11/21/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Associated sites
R010XY005OR |
Loamy Bottom Loamy Bottom, mesic, 5000#/acre normal |
---|
Similar sites
R010XY005OR |
Loamy Bottom Loamy Bottom, mesic, 5000#/acre normal |
---|
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata |
Herbaceous |
(1) Leymus cinereus |
Physiographic features
This site occurs adjacent to and on the floodplains of ephemeral streams. It is at the upper end of drainages occupying broad to narrow swale areas. Slopes range from 2 to 12%. Elevations range from 2,100 to 4,000 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Flood plain
(2) Swale |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 640 – 1,219 m |
Slope | 2 – 12% |
Water table depth | 152 cm |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
The annual precipitation ranges from 12 to 16 inches, most of which occurs in the form of snow during the months of November through March. Ephemeral subsurface moisture augments the precipitation. Localized convection storms occasionally occur during the summer. The soil temperature regime is mesic to frigid near mesic with a mean annual air temperature of 50 degrees F. Temperature extremes range from 100 to -10 degrees F. The frost-free period ranges from 60 to 130 days. The optimum growth period for native plants is from April through June.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 130 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 0 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 406 mm |
Figure 1. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils of this site are recent, deep to very deep and well drained. Typically the surface layer is a silt loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is a silty clay loam over 40 inches thick. The substratum varies from alluvium to bedrock. Gravel content in the profile ranges from 0 to 30 percent. Permeability is moderate. The available water holding capacity (AWC) is about 8 to 10 inches for the profile. Seasonal subsurface flows from adjacent slopes augment the available water. The potential for erosion is moderate.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Silt loam |
---|---|
Family particle size |
(1) Clayey |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Moderate |
Soil depth | 127 cm |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0 – 30% |
Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
20.32 – 25.4 cm |
Ecological dynamics
Range In Characteristics:
The amount of basin wildrye in relation to bluebunch wheatgrass is dependent on the extent and duration of lateral subsurface water flows. Basin wildrye increases and bluebunch wheatgrass decreases on swales receiving subsurface flows late into the growing season. This would be on swales with large drainage areas. Conversely, bluebunch wheatgrass would increase on swales with limited drainage areas. This would typically be at the upper ends of watersheds where drainage area is limited. Production follows a similar pattern increasing on swales with large drainage areas. As a fire susceptable site, the amount of basin big sagebrush is influenced by fire frequency.
Response To Disturbance:
If the condition of the site deteriorates as a result of overgrazing, basin wildrye, bluebunch wheatgrass, and Idaho fescue decrease. Bluegrasses invade and basin big sagebrush increases. With further deterioration, annuals invade and useable forage production decreases. Streambanks become unstable from loss of vegetation and channels degrade, becoming deeper and wider in the process. Subsurface flows are affected. Peak discharges increase, the water table drops and storage of water for late season use is reduced. Erosion from concentrated flows reduces the site potential and contributes to downstream sedimentation.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
Community 1.1
Reference Plant Community
The potential native plant community is dominated by basin wildrye and bluebunch wheatgrass. Basin big sagebrush and Idaho fescue are common. Prairie junegrass, Thurber needlegrass, bluegrasses, and a variety of forbs are present. Vegetative composition is approximately 90 percent grasses, 2 percent forbs, and 8 percent shrubs. Approximate ground cover is 70-80 percent (basal and crown).
Figure 2. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 2018 | 2522 | 3026 |
Shrub/Vine | 179 | 224 | 269 |
Forb | 45 | 56 | 67 |
Total | 2242 | 2802 | 3362 |
Figure 3. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). OR4161, B10 JD FAN & SWALE 9-16. B10B FAN, SWALE, Gumbo, & JD Sandy Lm 9-16 RPC Growth Curve.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 30 | 35 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | Perennial, deep rooted, dominant | 1821–3082 | ||||
basin wildrye | LECI4 | Leymus cinereus | 1121–1681 | – | ||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 420–841 | – | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 280–560 | – | ||
2 | Perennial, deep rooted, sub-dominant | 56–140 | ||||
Thurber's needlegrass | ACTH7 | Achnatherum thurberianum | 56–140 | – | ||
4 | Perennial, shallow rooted, sub-dominant | 84–224 | ||||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 56–140 | – | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 28–84 | – | ||
5 | Other perennial grasses | 56–224 | ||||
sedge | CAREX | Carex | 0–56 | – | ||
squirreltail | ELEL5 | Elymus elymoides | 0–56 | – | ||
western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 0–56 | – | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 0–56 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
7 | Perennial, dominant | 56–112 | ||||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 28–56 | – | ||
lupine | LUPIN | Lupinus | 28–56 | – | ||
9 | Other perennial forbs | 28–112 | ||||
common yarrow | ACMI2 | Achillea millefolium | 0–28 | – | ||
white sagebrush | ARLU | Artemisia ludoviciana | 0–28 | – | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–28 | – | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 0–28 | – | ||
fleabane | ERIGE2 | Erigeron | 0–28 | – | ||
western stoneseed | LIRU4 | Lithospermum ruderale | 0–28 | – | ||
desertparsley | LOMAT | Lomatium | 0–28 | – | ||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 0–28 | – | ||
ragwort | SENEC | Senecio | 0–28 | – | ||
deathcamas | ZIGAD | Zigadenus | 0–28 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
11 | Perennial, Evergreen, Dominant | 56–140 | ||||
basin big sagebrush | ARTRT | Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata | 56–140 | – | ||
12 | Perennial, Evergreen, Sub-dominant | 28–56 | ||||
green rabbitbrush | ERTE18 | Ericameria teretifolia | 28–56 | – | ||
14 | Perennial, Deciduous, Sub-dominant | 28–56 | ||||
wax currant | RICE | Ribes cereum | 28–56 | – | ||
15 | Other shrubs | 56–224 | ||||
antelope bitterbrush | PUTR2 | Purshia tridentata | 0–56 | – | ||
horsebrush | TETRA3 | Tetradymia | 0–56 | – | ||
Tree
|
||||||
16 | Perennial, Evergreen, Dominant | 0–56 | ||||
western juniper | JUOC | Juniperus occidentalis | 0–56 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
Livestock Grazing:
This site is suited to use by cattle, sheep, and horses in late spring, summer and fall under a planned grazing system. Limitations in the spring are saturated wet soils and unstable banks. Use should be postponed until the soils are firm enough to prevent trampling damage and soil compaction. Improvement and/or maintenance of herbaceous bank protection should be considered during all seasons, particularly going into winter for spring runoff protection.
Native Wildlife Associated With The Potential Climax Community:
Deer
Antelope
Elk
Hawks
Songbirds
Rodents
This site will offer food and cover for mule deer, elk, antelope, rodents, and a variety of birds. It it an important wintering area for mule deer, antelope and elk.
Hydrological functions
The soils are in hydrologic group B. The soils of this site have moderately low runoff potential.
Wood products
This site is susceptible to an increase in western juniper. Where this has occurred, the site will yield fence posts, firewood, and specialty products.
Other information
The soils in this site have good water holding capacities providing late season water for plant growth and slow water releases to streams. Increase in western juniper and the subsequent competition for moisture will lead to a reduction of available forage. Overgrazing can easily reduce ground cover and accelerate soil loss. Improving infiltration and permeability, and reducing runoff should be the immediate goal of juniper control. When incised channels are present, rehabilitation will markedly improve production, reduce downstream sedimentation and restore good hydrologic characteristics. On altered site the reintroduction of deep rooted plants may be needed to fully restore the site potential.
Supporting information
Contributors
Bob Gillaspy
Cici Brooks
J. Thompson, A. Bahn
M. Parks (OSU)
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | |
Approved by | |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.