

Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site BX012X02D026
Loamy, Calcareous 20-24 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains
Last updated: 5/19/2025
Accessed: 07/20/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 012X–Lost River Valleys and Mountains
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) 12, Lost River Valleys and Mountains, consists of approximately 4.85 million acres in the state of Idaho. MLRA 12 is broken into two Land Resource Units (LRU) based on geology, landscape, common soils, water resources and plant community potentials. The elevation ranges from approximately 3,600 feet (1,100m) in the valleys and extends to the highest point in Idaho, Mt. Borah, at 12,662 feet (3,869m). Annual precipitation has a significant range from 6 to 47 inches, the driest areas in the valley bottoms and the wettest areas on the mountain summits. This MLRA encompasses portions of the Salmon-Challis National Forest, small amounts of private land, as well as other public land managed by the State of Idaho and the Bureau of Land Management; Idaho Falls District. The Continental Divide runs through the Beaverhead Mountain Range directly East of the MLRA and adjacent forests and parks include the Beaverhead National Forest, Custer Gallatin National Forest, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, and Craters of the Moon National Park.
LRU notes
The Lost River Mountain LRU is located on the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountain Ranges. These mountain ranges extend from the town of Salmon, Idaho to the North, Craters of the Moon National Monument to the South, The Beaverhead Mountain Range to the East, and the Sawtooth Mountains to the West. This LRU borders MLRA 43B - Central Rocky Mountains, and a small portion of MLRA 10 - Central Rocky Mountains and Foothills.
The geology of this LRU is comprised mostly of colluvium from the Challis Volcanic Group, limestone from the Permian to Mississippian Period, and till from Pleistocene glacial deposits. Additionally, metasedimentary formations from the Proterozoic dominate the Lemhi Range. The elevation range of this LRU is similar to that of the MLRA (approximately 4,000 to 12,500 feet) because the boundary of the unit begins where the three mountain ranges meet the valley floor and extends to the mountain peaks. Effective precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) generally ranges between 10 to 36 plus inches. The soil temperature regimes present are frigid and cryic, and the soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic. The soils for the LRU are dominated by mollisols and inceptisols from limestone and quartzite parent material, as well as glacial till.
Classification relationships
Relationship to Other Established Classification Systems
National Vegetation Classification System (NVC):
3 Semi-Desert
3.B.1 Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland
3.B.1.Ne Western North American Cool Semi-Desert Scrub & Grassland Division
M170 Great Basin-Intermountain Dry Shrubland & Grassland Macrogroup
G304 Intermountain Mountain Big Sagebrush Steppe and Shrubland Group
A3208 Mountain Big Sagebrush - Mixed Steppe and Shrubland Alliance
CEGL001032 Mountain Big Sagebrush - Antelope Bitterbrush/Bluebunch Wheatgrass Shrubland Association
Ecological site concept
This site does not receive additional water, and is not greatly impacted by slope or aspect.
These soils:
o Are not saline , saline-sodic, or sodic
o Are highly calcareous within the 10 to 20 inch (25 to 50 centimeter) portion of the soil profile.
o Are moderately deep, deep, or very deep
o Consist of fine sandy loam to clay loam textures (includes silt loams, loams, and sandy clay loams)
o Are moderately productive
The primary resource limitation for this ecological site is soil chemistry. This site is not impacted by depth to a restriction, slope steepness, or high volumes of course fragments within the soil profile.
Associated sites
BX012X02D022 |
Loamy 20-24 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site also has loamy soil textures but does not have calcareous soils in the top 50cm. |
---|---|
BX012X02E070 |
Steep Loamy 25-35 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can be adjacent where steeper slopes exist. |
BX012X02D063 |
Shallow Loamy, Calcareous 20-24 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can be found when calcareous soils are closer to the surface. |
BX012X02D068 |
Skeletal 20-24 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site can be adjacent on the landscape, however has a higher volume of coarse fragments in the soil profile. |
Similar sites
BX012X02D063 |
Shallow Loamy, Calcareous 20-24 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site has highly calcareous soils in the 4-10 inch (10-25cm) range of the soil profile. |
---|---|
BX012X02D070 |
Steep Loamy 20-24 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site also has loamy soil textures but does not have calcareous soils in the top 50 cm. |
BX012X02C026 |
Loamy, Calcareous 15-19 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site has calcareous soils in the 10-20 inch (25-50cm) section of the soil profile but exists in a lower climatic subset. |
BX012X02D022 |
Loamy 20-24 Inch Precipitation Zone Lost River Mountains This site also has loamy soil textures but does not have calcareous soils in the top 50cm. |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana |
Herbaceous |
(1) Pseudoroegneria spicata |
Legacy ID
R012XD026ID
Physiographic features
This site can occur on mountain slope, alluvial fan, or canyon wall all within the mountain landscape. The site is not aspect dependent, though aspect may influence the elevation at which it occurs. Additionally, this site is not influenced by slope percentage, however generally occurs on slopes ranging from 15 to 55 percent (averaging 43 percent). Runoff is low to moderate and flooding and ponding do not occur.
Landscape Definition:
Mountains -- A region or landscape characterized by mountains and their intervening valleys.
Landform Definition:
Mountain Slope -- A part of a mountain between the summit and the foot.
Canyon wall -- The steep to near vertical slope between an canyon bottom and higher, adjacent hillslopes, mountain slopes, or summits. Canyon walls are generally dominated by rock outcrop and or bedrock within the soil profile.
Alluvial fan -- A low, outspread mass of loose materials and/or rock material, commonly
with gentle slopes, shaped like an open fan or a segment of a cone, deposited by a stream
(best expressed in semiarid regions) at the place where it issues from a narrow mountain or
upland valley.

Figure 1. Aspect and elevation of Loamy, Calcareous 20 - 24 inch PZ sites.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Mountains
> Mountain slope
(2) Mountains > Alluvial fan (3) Mountains > Canyon wall |
---|---|
Runoff class | Low to medium |
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 7,070 – 8,438 ft |
Slope | 15 – 55% |
Aspect | W, NW, N, NE, E, SE, S, SW |
Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)
Runoff class | Not specified |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 5,807 – 8,891 ft |
Slope | 15 – 65% |
Climatic features
In the Lost River Mountain LRU, both precipitation and temperatures fluctuate significantly throughout the seasons and year to year. Relative effective annual precipitation (estimate of the moisture available for plant use and soil forming processes at a given site) generally ranges between 10 to greater than 36 inches. Average daily temperatures during the growing season (April to August) range from 33 to 57 degrees Fahrenheit. These wide fluctuations in temperature and precipitation are largely due to elevation and aspect differences as well as lower relative humidity's and drier air in the mountainous terrain of the LRU. The wettest months in terms of rainfall are May and June. The growing season varies across the LRU in relation to topographical and local conditions; however, generally ranges between 30 to 90 days. Most primary growth occurs from late April through June. Soil temperature regimes include cryic and frigid and soil moisture regimes include xeric and udic.
For this Loamy, Calcareous ecological site, the effective precipitation is 20 to 24 inches. Precipitation and temperature data were taken from Forest Service remote automated weather stations (RAWS) located on the Salmon-Challis National Forest at Bonanza Creek and Copper Basin and Snowtel stations located on the Lost River and Lemhi Range. Precipitation data was taken from Snowtel sites that record actual precipitation and sit a slightly higher elevations than what where the Rocky Hills ecological site tends to be found. Therefore, values shown in the precipitation tables may be higher than the climatic subset of 15 to 19 inches.
Table 4. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (characteristic range) | 30-60 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (characteristic range) | 45-75 days |
Precipitation total (characteristic range) | 20-24 in |
Frost-free period (actual range) | 25-75 days |
Freeze-free period (actual range) | 40-100 days |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 16-33 in |
Frost-free period (average) | 45 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | 60 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 22 in |
Figure 2. Monthly minimum temperature range
Figure 3. Monthly maximum temperature range
Figure 4. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Figure 5. Annual precipitation pattern
Figure 6. Annual average temperature pattern
Influencing water features
This is an upland ecological site and is not influenced by additional water beyond the precipitation the site receives.
Wetland description
This ecological site is not associated with wetlands.
Soil features
The soils of this site are moderately deep to very deep, ranging from 20 to greater than 60 inches (50 to150 centimeters) and consist of textures ranging from fine sandy loams to clay loams. Soils can be skeletal (greater than 35 percent coarse fragments) and are primarily formed from slope alluvium and colluvium derived from limestone. Soils are highly calcareous within the 10 to 20 inch (25 to 50 centimeter) section of the soil profile. This is represented by a calcium carbonate equivalency (CCE) greater than 15 percent which is identified by having a pH of 7.8 or greater coupled with an effervescence of strong or higher. These soils are well drained.
Major soil series correlated to this site include: Farlow, Parding, Mcninch, and Windicreek
Additional minor soil series correlated to this site include: Kitchell and Meegero
Representative Taxonomy:
Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive Calcic Haplocryolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, frigid Calcic Haploxerolls
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive Calcic Haplocryolls

Figure 7. Texture diagram: LyC 20-24 inch sites.

Figure 8. pH diagram: LyC 20-24 inch sites.
Table 5. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Alluvium
–
limestone
(2) Colluvium – limestone (3) Colluvium – volcanic rock |
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Gravelly, cobbly, very cobbly loam (2) Gravelly, cobbly, very gravelly silt loam (3) Gravelly, cobbly, extremely cobbly sandy loam |
Drainage class | Moderately well drained to well drained |
Permeability class | Moderate to rapid |
Soil depth | 20 – 80 in |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 5 – 18% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 2% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
0.12 – 0.19 in |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in) |
7.8 – 8.4 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20in) |
15 – 42% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20in) |
1 – 9% |
Table 6. Representative soil features (actual values)
Drainage class | Not specified |
---|---|
Permeability class | Not specified |
Soil depth | Not specified |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 45% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 18% |
Available water capacity (0-20in) |
0.07 – 0.45 in |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-20in) |
5.5 – 8.7 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (0-20in) |
14 – 72% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (0-20in) |
20% |
Ecological dynamics
The Loamy, Calcareous 20-24 inch ecological site is a rangeland ecological site in the greater sagebrush steppe ecosystem. In the reference community, mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata vaseyana) is the dominant overstory (or co-dominant with low sagebrush) and bluebunch wheatgrass is the dominant understory.
Transitions from the reference state are driven by disturbances both natural and anthropogenic. The two primary disturbances likely to impact this ecological site is fire and herbivory. To a lesser extent, climate driven disturbances such as drought or flood can also instigate transitions within the site's range of variability.
A State-and-Transition Model (STM) diagram for this ecological site is depicted in this section. Thorough descriptions of each state, transition, plant community phase, and pathway are found after the State and Transition Model. This STM is based on available experimental research, field observations, professional consensus, and interpretations. While based on the best available information, the STM will change over time as knowledge of ecological processes increases.
Plant community composition within this ecological site has a natural range of variability across the LRU due to the natural variability in weather, soils, and aspect. The reference plant community may not fit management goals. Selection of other plant communities is valid if the identified range health attributes have none to slight or slight departures from the Reference State. The biological processes on this site are complex; therefore, representative values are presented in a land management context. The species lists are representative and are not botanical descriptions of all species potentially occurring on this site. They are not intended to cover every situation or the full range of conditions, species, and responses for the ecological site.
Both percent species composition by weight and percent cover are used in this ecological site description. Foliar cover is used to define plant community phases and states in the STM. Cover drives the transitions between communities and states because of the influence of shade and interception of rainfall.
Species composition by dry weight remains an important descriptor of the herbaceous community and of site productivity as a whole and includes both herbaceous and woody species. Calculating similarity index requires data on species composition by dry weight.
Although there is considerable qualitative experience supporting the pathways and transitions within the State-and-Transition Model, no quantitative information exists that specifically identifies threshold parameters between reference states and degraded states in this ecological site. For information on STMs, see the following citations: Bestelmeyer et.al. 2003, Bestelmeyer et.al. 2004, Bestelmeyer et.al. 2010, Bestelmeyer and Brown 2005, Briske et.al. 2008, and Stringham et,al. 2003.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference

The Reference state consists of three dominant plant communities: The mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata sp. vasayana)/little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula spp. Longiloba) dominated community, a mountain big sagebrush/bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata) dominated community, and a community where the dominant overstory shrub is mountain big sagebrush, and the understory is a mix of bunchgrasses. The greatest difference between the three plant communities is composition and foliar cover of sagebrush (Artemisia) species and understory grass species. Generally, mountain big sagebrush foliar cover increases on sites that are closer to the higher end of the effective precipitation range (15 to 19 inch) or the calcium carbonate concentration in the soil is lower, closer to minimum 15 percent required in the site concept. This community also occurs more often when calcareous soil presence is deeper in the soil profile, closer to a depth of 20 inches (50cm). Processes (both natural and anthropogenic) that can result in state and community changes include fire, grazing, land use change, and establishment of invasive species (Davies et al., 2011).
Characteristics and indicators. The shift between states (and plant communities) at this site is generally driven by calcium carbonate concentration in soils, effective precipitation, and sagebrush killing disturbances or lack thereof. Historically, low to mixed severity fires occurred at relatively frequent fire return intervals of 10 to 25 years, limiting sagebrush canopy density and creating a mosaic of sagebrush stands and more open grasslands (Knick, Holmes, & Miller, 2005). Exclusion of fire (in conjunction with climate change) increases sagebrush canopy cover and can lead to more severe stand replacing fires, often times at more frequent intervals. These severe fires can drive shifts to grassland communities as well as create opportunities for invasive species establishment (Roadhouse, Irvine, & Bowerstock, 2020; Knick et al., 2005). Improper grazing practices can also lead to an increase in sagebrush canopy cover and increased risk of severe, stand replacing fire occurrence. Removal of understory grasses can lessen the opportunities for low severity fire occurrence which leads to increased canopy densities and increases potential for severe fire disturbance events (Knick et al., 2005).
Resilience management. This site has moderate resilience as a result of the cryic soil temperature regime and xeric soil moisture regime. Resistance and resilience of a specific site has been attributed with abiotic conditions favorable to plant growth and reproduction (Maestas et al. 2016). Soils that fall within the cryic (cold) temperature regime and xeric (wet) moisture regime tend to have higher diversity and production, and are therefore more resilient, specifically in terms of resisting or recovering from invasion post disturbance (Maestas et al., 2016). Although little sagebrush is susceptible to fire damage and usually killed by fire events, fire events within these communities are usually rare. These communities generally lack the fine fuels required to carry fire, promoting relatively infrequent fire return intervals (Steinberg, 2002). Mountain big sagebrush is also highly susceptible to damage and mortality from fire events. However, these communities tend to have higher fuel loading and carry fire more easily and frequently than in the little sagebrush communities (Innes, 2017).
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
pussytoes (Antennaria), other herbaceous
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
Community 1.1
Mountain Big Sagebrush, Little Sagebrush, and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

Community 1.1 is well adapted to the abiotic conditions of the Lost River Mountain LRU. Little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula) and mountain big sagebrush are often able to coexist on the highly calcareous soils that form from limestone parent material. Little sagebrush more often dominates the canopy at this ecological site when concentrations of calcium carbonates are higher or exist closer to the surface; however, it is not uncommon for the percent composition between mountain big sagebrush and little sagebrush to be nearly equal. It is also possible that one of the two species is missing from the canopy completely. Mountain Big Sagebrush, Little Sagebrush, and Bluebunch Wheatgrass communities can form in a mosaic distribution with other communities in this state (1.2 & 1.3) across the range of relative effective annual precipitation. As effective precipitation increases, the understory of bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata) decreases in percent canopy cover. Other bunchgrasses such as Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) increase in canopy cover as available moisture increases. Production in this community ranges from 500 to 900 pounds per acre, averaging 700 pounds per acre. In this community, overstory shrubs and understory grasses contribute a nearly equal amount to overall production.
Resilience management. Resilience is moderate in Community 1.1. Mountain big sagebrush and little sagebrush are both drought tolerant species able to withstand periods of below average precipitation. Bluebunch wheatgrass is well suited to the variable climate experienced in the Lost River Mountains and is resilient towards many natural disturbances including drought and fire. Bluebunch wheatgrass has shown to recover to pre-fire disturbance population levels in 1 to 7 years post disturbance. Under certain conditions, canopy cover and production can exceed pre-fire values (Zlatnik, 1999). Bluebunch wheatgrass is a decreaser, reducing in canopy cover and production in relation to grazing pressure. Under heavy grazing pressure the species will shift towards areas such as under the canopy of shrubs, opening the canopy for the establishment of rhizomatous grass species, invasive species, or bare ground.
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
lupine (Lupinus), other herbaceous
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
Figure 9. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 7. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 225 | 300 | 375 |
Grass/Grasslike | 225 | 275 | 350 |
Forb | 75 | 125 | 175 |
Total | 525 | 700 | 900 |
Table 8. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 15-35% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 15-25% |
Forb foliar cover | 5-9% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 8-25% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 2-20% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 3-12% |
Table 9. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 2-5% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 3-6% |
Forb basal cover | 0-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 5-20% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 4-22% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-7% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 4-15% |
Figure 10. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0912, ARTRV-PSSP6 high elevation.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 30 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.2
Mountain Big Sagebrush and Bluebunch Wheatgrass

The Mountain Big Sagebrush and Mixed Bunchgrass community is well adapted to the abiotic conditions of the Lost River Mountain LRU. Mountain big sagebrush can occur on Mollisols, Aridisols, and Inceptisols, however, is most abundant on Mollisols (Innes, 2017). Mountain big sagebrush increases in canopy cover as highly calcareous soils are found deeper in the soil profile, which often coincides with a slight increase in relative effective annual precipitation. In this community, mountain big sagebrush has the ability to form dense monocultures with little competition from other shrub species. The understory is dominated by bunchgrasses, primarily bluebunch wheatgrass, and to a lesser extent at the higher end of the effective precipitation range, Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis). Plant diversity in mountain big sagebrush dominated communities is higher than with any other big sagebrush species. This primarily due to high diversity in forb and grass understory species (Innes, 2017). Total annual production of Community 1.3 ranges from 700 to 1,100 pounds per acre, averaging 970 pounds per acre. Shrub canopy cover can be as high as 40 percent, with 30 percent comprised of mountain big sagebrush. Grass canopy cover can also reach 40 percent, the majority consisting of bluebunch wheatgrass, Idaho fescue, and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda).
Resilience management. This community has moderate. Mountain big sagebrush is the least drought tolerant of the big sagebrush species. Mountain big sagebrush is highly flammable and fire typically kills plants within the disturbance area. Because this species reproduces via seed that is dispersed through wind, water, and zoochory, distance from a viable source population plays a major role in post disturbance regeneration. When disturbance events cover a large area spatially, regeneration timespan increases and likelihood of transitioning to another state or community increases (Innes, 2017). Slow regeneration can open windows for erosion to occur and invasive species to establish. Post disturbance seeding and planting can increase restoration success. Bluebunch wheatgrass is a much more resilient species to the local disturbance regimes. The species is drought tolerant and usually is not killed except during the most severe wildfire events. During severe disturbances that remove the sagebrush overstory, bluebunch wheatgrass can persist as the dominant vegetation on this ecological site (Zlatnik, 1999).
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
fleabane (Erigeron), other herbaceous
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
-
pussytoes (Antennaria), other herbaceous
Figure 11. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 10. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 350 | 449 | 499 |
Grass/Grasslike | 313 | 388 | 495 |
Forb | 94 | 129 | 188 |
Total | 757 | 966 | 1182 |
Table 11. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 18-40% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 25-40% |
Forb foliar cover | 4-12% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 10-30% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 2-12% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-2% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 0-15% |
Table 12. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 2-4% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-5% |
Forb basal cover | 0-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 14-35% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 4-15% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-3% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 0-18% |
Figure 12. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID0912, ARTRV-PSSP6 high elevation.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 30 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Community 1.3
Mountain Big Sagebrush and Mixed Bunchgrass

The Mountain Big Sagebrush and Mixed Bunchgrass community is well adapted to the abiotic conditions of the Lost River Mountain LRU. Mountain big sagebrush can occur on Mollisols, Aridisols, and Inceptisols, however, is most abundant on Mollisols (Innes, 2017). Mountain big sagebrush increases in canopy cover as highly calcareous soils are found deeper in the soil profile, which often coincides with a slight increase in relative effective annual precipitation. In this community, mountain big sagebrush has the ability to form dense monocultures with little competition from other shrub species. The understory is dominated by bunchgrasses, primarily Idaho fescue, and to a lesser extent at the lower end of the effective precipitation range, bluebunch wheatgrass. Plant diversity in mountain big sagebrush dominated communities is higher than with any other big sagebrush species. This primarily due to high diversity in forb and grass understory species (Innes, 2017). Total annual production of Community 1.3 is high, ranging from 700 to 1,500 pounds per acre, averaging 1,100 pounds per acre. Production is generally split evenly between shrub and grass functional groups. Shrub canopy cover can be as high as 30 percent, while grass canopy cover can exceed 25 percent, the majority attributed to Idaho fescue, bluebunch wehatgrass, and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda). Forb canopy cover can reach 22 percent, but is more often closer to 10 percent.
Resilience management. This community has moderately low resilience. Mountain big sagebrush is the least drought tolerant of the big sagebrush species. Mountain big sagebrush is highly flammable and fire typically kills plants within the disturbance area. Because this species reproduces via seed that is dispersed through wind, water, and zoochory, distance from a viable source population plays a major role in post disturbance regeneration. When disturbance events cover a large area spatially, regeneration timespan increases and likelihood of transitioning to another state or community increases (Innes, 2017). Slow regeneration can open windows for erosion to occur and invasive species to establish. Post disturbance seeding and planting can increase restoration success. When Idaho fescue is the dominant understory or shares dominance in the understory, fire return intervals can be as frequent as 10 to 15 years. Although Idaho fescue fares better than mountain big sagebrush during fire events, mortality averages between 20 and 50 percent and can exceed 75 percent after severe events (Zouhar, 2000). Severe fire events prompt a shift into the Disturbed State. The additional effective precipitation received at this site (20 to 24 inch) adds resilience. Available moisture has shown to be a key component of successful post disturbance recovery (Chamber et al., 2014).
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), grass
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
common yarrow (Achillea millefolium), other herbaceous
-
arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagittata), other herbaceous
-
lupine (Lupinus), other herbaceous
Figure 13. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 13. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 300 | 516 | 600 |
Grass/Grasslike | 300 | 488 | 550 |
Forb | 111 | 147 | 250 |
Total | 711 | 1151 | 1400 |
Table 14. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 15-25% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 11-25% |
Forb foliar cover | 3-15% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 10-25% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 5-35% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-8% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 0-8% |
Table 15. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 2-4% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 3-6% |
Forb basal cover | 0-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 12-30% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 7-45% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-12% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 2-12% |
Figure 14. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). ID1205, FEID-PSSPS. State 1.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 25 | 30 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.2


Transition from community 1.1 to 1.2 is a product of slightly higher effective precipitation and slight changes in soil characteristics. Of all the big sagebrush species, mountain big sagebrush prefers sites with higher available moisture. Mountain big sagebrush thrives in deep soils that lack shallow concentrations of calcium carbonates (Innes, 2017). As carbonates are pushed deeper into the soil profile (which tends to occurs as effective precipitation increases), conditions become more ideal for mountain big sagebrush dominance.
Context dependence. The abiotic conditions that result in community transitions from Community 1.1 to 1.2 are site specific and not directly influenced by anthropogenic or biotic interactions.
Pathway 1.1B
Community 1.1 to 1.3


The primary drive that differentiates community 1.3 and community 1.2 is a slight increase in relative effective annual precipitation (REAP). When a Loamy Calcareous Ecological Site exists at the upper end of the 15 to 19 inch climatic subset, mountain big sagebrush and Idaho fescue are more likely to occupy a significant portion of the understory canopy. Idaho fescue prefers slightly higher volumes of effective precipitation and increases in canopy cover and production values accordingly (Zouhar, 2000).
Context dependence. The abiotic conditions that result in community transitions from Community 1.1 to 1.3 are site specific and not directly influenced by anthropogenic or biotic interactions.
Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.3


The primary driver that differentiates community 1.2 and community 1.3 is a slight increase in relative effective annual precipitation (REAP). When a Loamy Calcareous Ecological Site exists at the upper end of the 15 to 19 inch climatic subset, Idaho fescue is more likely to occupy a significant portion of the understory canopy. Idaho fescue prefers slightly higher volumes of effective precipitation and increases in canopy cover and production values accordingly (Zouhar, 2000).
Context dependence. The abiotic conditions that result in community transitions from Community 1.1 to 1.2 are site specific and not directly influenced by anthropogenic or biotic interactions.
State 2
Grazed

The Grazed state of the Loamy, Calcareous 20-24 inch ecological site has one major community. The Grazed state is a mechanism of chronic defoliation from grazing pressure by agricultural grazing, natural grazing, or a combination of the two. Transition from the Reference State to the Grazed State occurs when understory grasses of the Reference State, such as Idaho fescue and bluebunch wheatgrass experience chronic defoliation to the point that they are replaced by more grazing tolerant species such as Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) and rhizomatous wheatgrasses. Without managed grazing and rest, it is difficult to restore this state to the reference. Production in this state is lower and shifts more towards the shrub functional group. This state is also more susceptible to invasive species establishment resulting from removal of Reference State species competition and hoof disturbance to the soil.
Characteristics and indicators. The primary indicator of the Grazed State is a shift in compositional structure of the understory grass species. The bunchgrasses found in the reference state (bluebunch wheatgrass and Idaho fescue) are removed through chronic defoliation and replaced with more grazing tolerant species such as Sandberg bluegrass and rhizomatous wheatgrasses like slender wheatgrass (Elymus trachycaulus). There is often also an increase in invasive species in this state as opportunities for establishment are created as the native species decrease. Soil disturbance from hoof traffic can also increase invasive species recruitment.
Resilience management. The Grazed state is moderately resilient. Most species present in this state are drought tolerant and response to frequent or severe fire varies by plant. Replacement of native vegetation through chronic defoliation from grazing increases opportunities for invasive species to establish. The greater the canopy cover of invasive species, the lower the resilience of the site.
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), grass
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
pussytoes (Antennaria), other herbaceous
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
Community 2.1
Shrub and Low Stature Bunchgrass

Figure 15. Community 2.1
The Shrub and Low Stature Bunchgrass community is well adapted to the conditions present at this ecological site, as well as the pressures of more intensive grazing practices. The understory grass species prevalent in this community such as Sandberg bluegrass are grazing tolerant and even increase under grazing pressure to a certain extent (Howard, 1997). Bunchgrass species that are found in the Reference State (bluebunch wheatgrass and Idaho fescue) can still be found on site, but are usually concentrated under the canopy of overstory shrubs where they are more protected from grazing species. Grazing or disturbance tolerant forb species such as phlox (Phlox sp.) and pussytoes (Antennaria sp.) will become more prevalent. Annual production in this community is lower than the communities in the reference state. Production also shifts to be more heavily weighted in the shrub functional group. The production for this community can range from 350 - 850 lbs/acre, averaging 600 lbs/acre.
Resilience management. The Big Sagebrush and Sandberg Bluegrass community has moderate resilience. Many of the species found in this community are drought tolerant. Depending on grazing use, there may be increased resistance to severe or frequent fire resulting from the utilization and removal of fine fuels in the understory. This community has an increased risk of invasive species establishment as a result of grazing pressure and chronic defoliation of species present. This lowers the overall resilience of the community.
Dominant plant species
-
mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita), shrub
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), grass
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
-
pussytoes (Antennaria), other herbaceous
Figure 16. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 16. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 150 | 260 | 400 |
Grass/Grasslike | 130 | 240 | 300 |
Forb | 80 | 100 | 150 |
Total | 360 | 600 | 850 |
Table 17. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 7-25% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 5-22% |
Forb foliar cover | 5-25% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 4-15% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 5-18% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-3% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 3-15% |
Table 18. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 2-5% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 1-3% |
Forb basal cover | 1-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 8-22% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 8-25% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 5-25% |
State 3
Disturbed

The Disturbed state is a result of both natural and anthropogenic disturbance events that result in widespread sagebrush mortality at a given site. The primary natural disturbance resulting in sagebrush mortality at this ecological site is wildfire; however, flooding, intense freeze events, and insect and disease can also occur. Mountain big sagebrush is highly susceptible to stand replacing fires and often experiences complete canopy loss during moderate and severe wildfire events (Innes, 2017 & Tirmenstein, 1999). Because this LRU exists primarily on publicly managed lands (US Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and State), widespread anthropogenic disturbance events are infrequent. Examples of anthropogenic disturbance events include brush management through sagebrush mowing or removal treatments, chemical treatments, or improper grazing techniques that result in high intensity hoof disturbance. A combination of natural and anthropogenic disturbance is possible and can result in increased severity of disturbance, decreased resilience, and greater difficulty returning to the Reference State. For example, improper grazing practices post fire disturbance can increase bare ground cover, increase erosion potential, and slow the reestablishment of grass species that preclude the return of overstory sagebrush canopy (Zlatnik, 1999).
Characteristics and indicators. The primary indicator of the Disturbed state is a near complete loss of overstory sagebrush species, often replaced by shrub species that are able to take advantage of the local disturbance regime. Common replacement species include Artemisia tripartita (threetip sagebrush) and Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus (yellow rabbitbrush). A shift towards an increase in native and disturbance tolerant grasses and forbs is likely with the removal of resource competition associated with the sagebrush overstory presence. Severe disturbance events also increase the opportunity for invasion of annual grasses and weeds such as cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and thistle species. The canopy cover percentage of these species is usually dependent on distance of a seed source post disturbance, but mostly stays under five percent (Zlatnik, 1999).
Resilience management. Resilience in this state is moderate. Many of the post disturbance grasses and shrubs that are common in this state establish quickly and reach a representative canopy within 10 years post disturbance. Grasses and shrubs continue to increase until overstory canopy of sagebrush begins to return. However, local resilience in this state is highly dependent on current soil moisture availability, seed sources, timing and severity of the disturbance. In the instance of fire disturbance, bluebunch wheatgrass mortality can be significantly lower if the fire occurs in the spring as opposed to fall. Recovery can be impacted by quantity of immediate post fire precipitation (Zlatnik, 1999). More severe disturbances increase possibility of post disturbance invasion. The greater the establishment of invasives, the lower the site resilience becomes.
Dominant plant species
-
threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita), shrub
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
pussytoes (Antennaria), other herbaceous
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
Community 3.1
Rabbitbrush and Bunchgrass

Figure 17. Rabbitbrush/Bunchgrass Community
The Rabbitbrush and Bunchgrass community is driven by the disturbance related removal of the primary overstory of sagebrush species. Both natural and anthropogenic disturbances that result in near complete removal of the sagebrush overstory create opportunities for increased establishment of both native and non-native grasses and forbs, as well as disturbance tolerant shrubs. In this community, the primary sagebrush removing disturbance at this ecological site is frequent or severe fire. The frequency and severity of these fire disturbances are highly influenced by the overstory composition of the specific site in the reference state, prior to disturbance. The composition and extent of the sagebrush species in the overstory impacts that respective fire regime. Communities in the Reference State with mountain big sagebrush overstory are highly susceptible to stand replacing fire events with fire return intervals ranging from 5 to 70 years (Innes, 2017 & Termenstein, 1999). This increases likelihood of transition from the Reference State to the Disturbed State (Community 2.1) following fire disturbances. In Community 3.1, the overstory is comprised of disturbance tolerant shrubs at a reduced canopy. The primary overstory species include yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus) and threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita). Bunchgrasses, primarily bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) primarily occupy the understory. Canopy cover of bunchgrasses is often higher early in the successional period following a disturbance, decreasing as the yellow rabbitbrush or threetip sagebrush canopy increases. Production in community 3.1 ranges from 300 - 800 lbs/acre, averaging 550 lbs/acre.
Resilience management. This plant community is moderately resilient because the grasses and forbs that dominate the composition are resistant to a variety of disturbances and able to re-establish quickly in the event of more severe disturbances. Both bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegenaria spicata) and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) are rarely harmed by fire events except for in the most severe instances. Both plants are able to reduce the amount of heat transfer to the root systems, allowing successful regrowth (Zlatnik, 1999 & Howard, 1997). Studies show that in the absence of grazing, bluebunch wheatgrass dominated systems are able to return to pre-fire production levels eight years post disturbance (Zlatnick, 1999). Sandberg bluegrass has been shown to fully re-establish post plowing events in as little as 7 years (Howard, 1997). Idaho fescue (Festuca Idahoensis) is less resilient to both fires and grazing. Idaho fescue can often survive low severity fires, however, moderate to severe fires are more destructive, resulting in a 30 year return to pre-disturbance canopy cover (Zouhar, 2000). Both yellow rabbitbrush and threetip sagebrush are often the first shrub species to re-establish on this ecological site following a disturbance, and can increase in relation to the severity or frequency of the disturbance. Although yellow rabbitbrush can exist in relatively small numbers within the Reference State, it becomes the dominant shrub species in highly disturbed systems (Terminstein, 1999).
Dominant plant species
-
yellow rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus), shrub
-
threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tripartita), shrub
-
bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), grass
-
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), grass
-
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis), grass
-
phlox (Phlox), other herbaceous
-
pussytoes (Antennaria), other herbaceous
Figure 18. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 19. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 170 | 300 | 500 |
Forb | 130 | 150 | 200 |
Shrub/Vine | 0 | 150 | 200 |
Total | 300 | 600 | 900 |
Table 20. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 0-15% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 8-30% |
Forb foliar cover | 3-15% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 5-20% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 3-18% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-5% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 14-29% |
Table 21. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 1-3% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 2-5% |
Forb basal cover | 1-3% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 7-25% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 5-22% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-6% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 16-33% |
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2


Transition from the Reference state to the Grazed state is a mechanism of intensive grazing practices that result in chronic defoliation of the understory vegetation. Overtime, species like bluebunch wheatgrass and Idaho fescue are not able to recover from defoliation and total canopy cover of that species will decrease on a site. In the absence of these species, grazing tolerant plants such as Sandberg bluegrass will increase in canopy cover and production. Remaining bluebunch wheatgrass and Idaho Fescue will be concentrated under the overstory shrub cover.
Constraints to recovery. Constraints to recovery include: o Continued improper grazing techniques that result in chronic defoliation of vegetation o Prolonged periods of drought that diminish regeneration of desired species o Loss of nutrient rich top soil due to increased erosion o Establishment of invasive species
Context dependence. Restoration efforts can be greatly influenced by precipitation patterns. Successful regeneration of Reference state understory species is highly dependent on moisture received post restoration efforts. Rates of successful establishment of Idaho fescue and bluebunch wheatgrass increase when available moisture is high during critical regeneration periods (Zlatnik, 1999 & Howard, 1997).
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3


Transition from the Reference state to the Disturbed state is a mechanism of frequent or severe disturbances that remove the overstory shrubs on a given site. The most common disturbance that results in the loss of the shrub overstory is high intensity fire. Mountain big sagebrush is sensitive to all but the lowest severity fire, generally resulting in stand replacement. Since 1900, fire exclusion and removal of fine fuels through grazing has increased fire return intervals and increased the likelihood of more severe fire events that are often stand destroying (Gucker, 2006).
Constraints to recovery. Constraints to recovery include: o Frequent disturbances before recovery has completed o Prolonged periods of drought that diminish regeneration of desired species o Loss of nutrient rich top soil due to increased erosion o Establishment of invasive species o Distance from seed source
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1


The primary mechanism for restoration from the Grazed state to the Reference state is rest from grazing. Reference State grasses such as bluebunch wheatgrass and Idaho fescue will not be able to re-establish while grazing pressure continues. Seeding of desired species may speed up the restoration process.
Context dependence. Time frame for restoration is highly dependent on variations in localized weather patterns. Prolonged periods of drought can dramatically increase time required to return to the Reference State, whereas periods of above normal precipitation can decrease that time frame. Grazing practices that are infrequent and of light intensity, mimicking natural historic grazing patterns will not impact the restoration pathway. However, continuous early season grazing at moderate to high intensity resulting in significant defoliation will perpetuate the Grazed State.
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 1


Restoration from the Disturbed state to the Reference state is a mechanism of time without stand destroying disturbance. Once the shrub overstory has been removed, replacement seedlings will need to reach maturity without any further disturbances.
Context dependence. Restoration is highly dependent on time without disturbance. New sagebrush seedlings are moderately sensitive to disturbances such as flood, freeze, and insect and disease. They are highly sensitive to herbivory and even low severity fire events (Fryer, 2009 & Steinberg 2002). Seeding and planting of desired species can speed up the restoration process, however; regeneration success with or without planting is highly dependent on localized weather patterns during the restoration period. Periods of drought will slow the process significantly, whereas periods of above normal precipitation aid in sagebrush regeneration and establishment (Innes, 2017; Steinberg 2002 & Fryer, 2009).
Additional community tables
Table 22. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 225–375 | |||||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 80–225 | 4–20 | ||
little sagebrush | ARARL | Artemisia arbuscula ssp. longiloba | 40–175 | 3–15 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–110 | 0–7 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 225–350 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 140–350 | 7–25 | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 0–100 | 0–5 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 0–50 | 0–5 | ||
crested wheatgrass | AGCR | Agropyron cristatum | 0–40 | 0–3 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 75–175 | |||||
lupine | LUPIN | Lupinus | 10–50 | 1–4 | ||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 10–42 | 1–4 | ||
Lava aster | IOAL | Ionactis alpina | 0–42 | 0–3 | ||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 10–40 | 1–4 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 5–20 | 1–3 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
cushion buckwheat | EROV | Eriogonum ovalifolium | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
desertparsley | LOMAT | Lomatium | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
oblongleaf bluebells | MEOB | Mertensia oblongifolia | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
bluebells | MERTE | Mertensia | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
common dandelion | TAOF | Taraxacum officinale | 0–10 | 0–1 |
Table 23. Community 1.2 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 350–648 | |||||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 200–450 | 12–30 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–175 | 0–10 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–150 | 0–7 | ||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 0–50 | 1–4 | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 0–50 | 0–3 | ||
juniper | JUNIP | Juniperus | 0–40 | 0–2 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 175–540 | |||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 50–375 | 3–20 | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 0–225 | 0–15 | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 0–175 | 0–15 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 0–125 | 0–8 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 20–200 | |||||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 30–90 | 2–5 | ||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 20–70 | 2–3 | ||
fleabane | ERIGE2 | Erigeron | 15–50 | 1–3 | ||
slender buckwheat | ERMI4 | Eriogonum microthecum | 0–45 | 0–3 | ||
lupine | LUPIN | Lupinus | 0–40 | 0–3 | ||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 7–30 | 0–3 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 10–30 | 1–3 | ||
hawksbeard | CREPI | Crepis | 0–20 | 0–2 | ||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 0–15 | 0–1 | ||
blue flax | LIPE2 | Linum perenne | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
desertparsley | LOMAT | Lomatium | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
beardtongue | PENST | Penstemon | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
yellow salsify | TRDU | Tragopogon dubius | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
sego lily | CANU3 | Calochortus nuttallii | 7–10 | 0–1 | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
onion | ALLIU | Allium | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–10 | 0–1 |
Table 24. Community 1.3 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 300–600 | |||||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 175–440 | 9–18 | ||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 0–110 | 0–5 | ||
threetip sagebrush | ARTR4 | Artemisia tripartita | 0–75 | 0–4 | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–60 | 0–3 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 300–550 | |||||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 125–440 | 7–17 | ||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 50–200 | 3–9 | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 0–80 | 0–5 | ||
Geyer's sedge | CAGE2 | Carex geyeri | 0–75 | 0–5 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 110–250 |
Table 25. Community 2.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 150–400 | |||||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 130–300 | |||||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 50–150 | 3–15 | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 50–135 | 3–14 | ||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 30–135 | 3–14 | ||
sedge | CAREX | Carex | 0–50 | 0–5 | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 0–20 | 0–2 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 80–150 | |||||
pussytoes | ANTEN | Antennaria | 10–110 | 2–15 | ||
phlox | PHLOX | Phlox | 10–68 | 2–10 | ||
milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–23 | 0–3 | ||
sego lily | CANU3 | Calochortus nuttallii | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 0–10 | 0–1 | ||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 0–10 | 0–1 |
Table 26. Community 3.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
1 | 0–150 | |||||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 40–150 | 1–8 | ||
threetip sagebrush | ARTR4 | Artemisia tripartita | 20–150 | 1–7 | ||
spineless horsebrush | TECA2 | Tetradymia canescens | 0–40 | 0–3 | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
2 | 170–500 | |||||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 20–175 | 2–10 | ||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 30–175 | 1–10 | ||
Idaho fescue | FEID | Festuca idahoensis | 0–125 | 0–8 | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 0–45 | 0–3 | ||
Forb
|
||||||
3 | 130–200 |
Interpretations
Animal community
Listed below are production ranges for each community in the Loamy, Calcareous ecological site within the 20 to 24 inch climatic subset. These values can be used to estimate stocking rates, however, community composition as listed in this ecological site description may not entirely match current composition at a given site. Field visits to document actual plant composition and production should be conducted to calculate actual stocking rates at a location.
Communities and Production Ranges (in pounds per acre):
Reference State:
1.1 - 500 - 700 - 900
1.2 - 700 - 970 - 1,100
1.3 - 700 - 1,100 - 1,500
Grazed:
2.1 - 350 - 600 - 850
Disturbed:
3.1 - 300 - 550 - 800
Wildlife Interpretations:
Sagebrush steppe ecosystems in the Western United States cover nearly 165 million acres and provide vital habitat for over 170 different species of birds and mammals (NWF, 2022).
The sagebrush grasslands in the Lost River Mountain LRU provide critical winter range for mule deer, elk, pronghorn and moose. The LRU also encompasses critical habitat for greater sage grouse populations in the Lemhi, Lost River, and White Knob Mountain mountain ranges. Sage grouse priority planning areas have been identified by the Challis Sage Grouse Local Working group in Grouse and Morse Creek, the Upper Pahsimeroi north of Sawmill Canyon, Mackay Bar, and Barton Flats (CSLWG, 2007). According to Idaho Fish and Game Management spatial layers developed in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management, US Forest Service, and US Fish and Wildlife Service, greater sage grouse general habitat exists on the northern end of the White Knob Mountain range, northern end of the Pahsimeroi Mountain range, and portions of the eastern side of the Lemhi and White Knob Mountain ranges. More importantly to the species, significant areas designated important and priority habitat have been identified across the entirety of the White Knob, Lost River, and Lemhi mountain ranges.
The following are dominant plant species within this ecological site and their associated value to wildlife present in the LRU:
Mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata spp. vaseyana) - Communities 1.3:
Mountain big sagebrush is considered to be highly palatable by most wildlife browsers (Rosenstrater, 2005). Sage grouse, ungulates, and rodents browse mountain big sagebrush primarily during the winter when it becomes one of the more palatable available forages. However, seasonal snow levels can exclude many browsing species. Several studies have shown that Mountain big sagebrush is preferred forage by elk, mule deer, and sage grouse when compared to the other big sagebrush species (Innes, 2017). Sage grouse are considered obligate species of mountain big sagebrush and other big sagebrush varieties. These species are generally preferred over the low sagebrush species; Artemisia nova and Artemisia arbuscula (Dalke et al., 1963).
Threetip sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata spp. tripartita) - Community 2.1:
Three tip sagebrush is not a preferred browse species for most wild ungulates. It can be used to a minor extent by mule deer in both the winter and summer and as emergency forage for other large ungulates (Tirmenstein, 1999.)
Bluebunch wheatgrass (Psuedoeogenaria spicata) - All states/communities:
Bluebunch wheatgrass is considered one of the most important forage species on Western rangelands for both livestock and wildlife (Sours, 1983). In Idaho, utilization of bluebunch wheatgrass by elk was medium-high, medium for mule deer, high for bighorn sheep, and low for pronghorn (Zlatnik, 1999).
Idaho fescue (Festuca idahoensis) - Communities 1.2, 1.3, 2.1
When available, Idaho fescue can be a dominant component to many wild ungulate diets, including pronghorn, deer, elk, and bighorn sheep. In some instances depending on other available forage, the species can be considered as valuable but not preferred forage for ungulates. The species is a valuable component to the diet of the Northern pocket gopher and grizzly bear when it is found within their range.
Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) - Communities 1.2, 1.3, 2.1
Sandberg bluegrass is one of the earliest grasses to green up during the spring and become available forage for wildlife; however becomes less utilized during the later summer months. Degree of use for elk and pronghorn is good to poor, and good to fair for mule deer, small mammals, small nongame birds, and upland game birds. Usage is fair to poor by waterfowl (Howard, 1997).
Little sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula longiloba): Communities 1.1, 1.2
In early spring and winter, little sagebrush is often a preferred forage species for mule deer (Blaisdell et al., 1982). In the Great Basin, little sagebrush dominated sites are heavily utilized by pronghorn during the summer (Kindschy et al., 1982). Little sagebrush, among other varieties is an important forage source for sage grouse throughout the year (Steinberg, 2002).
Hydrological functions
Hydrological functions
Water in the form of annual precipitation is the primary limiting factor of total plant production on this ecological site. Soils associated with this site are primarily associated with hydrologic group B. Runoff potential ranges from moderate to rapid and soil permeability is moderate. Water transmission through the soil is unimpeded.
Higher infiltration rates and lower runoff rates tend to coincide with ground cover percentage. Reduced infiltration and increased runoff have the greatest potential when ground cover is less than 50 percent.
Recreational uses
This ecological site provides hunting opportunities for upland game birds and large game animals including pronghorn, mule deer, elk, and moose. Many trails and campsites exist within the LRU and are maintained by public land management agencies.
The diverse plants that exist in this LRU and on this ecological site have an aesthetic value that appeals to recreationists.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Site ID's and data collection intensity for each site used in development of this ecological site description are listed below. Tier III data sets include five rangeland inventory protocols: Line point intercept, canopy/basal gap, production, continuous line intercept for overstory canopy, and soil stability. Tier II datasets include Line point intercept and at least one other survey. Tier I datasets include an ocular macroplot survey that involved a site plant census, canopy cover estimates, production by species estimates, and total site production estimates.
2019ID7031049 1.1 White Knob/Pioneer Mtns -Low
2020ID7031139 1.2 Lost River Range - Low & High
2020ID7031155 1.2 Lost River Range - Low & High
2020ID7031186 2.1 Lost River Range - Low
2020ID7031187 1.2 Lost River Range - Low
2020ID7032157 1.3 Lost River Range - Low
2020ID7032221 1.3 Lost River Range - Low & High
2020ID7032256 3.1 Lost River Range - Low
2020ID7033132 1.2 Lost River Range - Low
2021ID7033146 1.1 Lemhi Range - Low
2021ID7202021 1.3 Lemhi Range - Low
Other references
Aleksoff, Keith C. 1999. Symphoricarpos oreophilus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Bestelmeyer, B., J.R. Brown, K.M. Havstad, B. Alexander, G. Chavez, and J.E. Herrick. 2003. Development and Use of State and Transition Models for Rangelands. Jornal of Range Management 56:114–126.
Bestelmeyer, B. and J.R. Brown. 2005. State-and-Transition Models 101: a Fresh Look at Vegetation Change.
Bestelmeyer, B., J.R. Brown, J.E. Herrick, D.A. Trujillo, and K.M. Havstad. 2004. Land Management in the American Southwest: a state-and-transition approach to ecosystem complexity. Environmental Management 34:38–51.
Bestelmeyer, B.T., K. Moseley, P.L. Shaver, H. Sanchez, D.D. Briske, and M.E. Fernandez-Gimenez. 2010. Practical guidance for developing state-and-transition models. Rangelands 32:23–30.
Blaisdell, James P.; Murray, Robert B.; McArthur, E. Durant. 1982. Managing Intermountain rangelands--sagebrush-grass ranges. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-134. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 41 p.
Chambers, J.C., J.L. Beck, T.J. Christiansen, K.J. Clause, J.B. Dinkins, K.E. Doherty, K.A. Griffin, D.W. Havlina, K.F. Henke, L.L. Kurth, J.D. Maestas, M. Manning, K.E. Mayer, B.A. Mealor, C. McCarthy, M.A. Perea, and D.A. Pyke. 2016. Using resilience and resistance concepts to manage threats to sagebrush ecosystems, Gunnison sage-grouse, and Greater sage-grouse in their eastern range: A strategic multi-scale approach.. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-356.. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. 1–143.
Challis Sage-grouse Local Working Group (CSLWG). 2007. Challis Sage-grouse Conservation Plan.
Chambers, J.C., D.A. Pyke, J.D. Maestas, M. Pellant, C.S. Boyd, S.B. Campbell, S. Esipinosa, D.W. Havlina, K.E. Mayer, and A. Wuenschel. 2014. Using resistance and resilience concepts to reduce impacts of invasive annual grasses and altered fire regimes on the sagebrush ecosystem and greater sage-grouse: A strategic multi-scale approach.. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-326.. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station., Fort Collins, CO. 73.
Clary, Warren P.; Beale, Donald M. 1983. Pronghorn reactions to winter sheep grazing, plant communities, and topography in the Great Basin. Journal of Range Management. 36(6): 749-752.
Dalke, Paul D.; Pyrah, Duane B.; Stanton, Don C.; Crawford, John E.; Schlatterer, Edward F. 1963. Ecology, productivity, and management of sage grouse in Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management. 27(4): 810-841.
Daubenmire, R. F. (1940). Plant Succession Due to Overgrazing in the Agropyron Bunchgrass Prairie of Southeastern Washington. Ecology, 21(1), 55–64.
Davies, K. Boyd, C. Bates, J. Eighty Years of Grazing by Cattle Modifies Sagebrush and Bunchgrass Structure. 2018. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 71(3):27
Fryer, Janet L. 2009. Artemisia nova. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artnov/all.html
Forest Service Remote Automoted Weather Station (Bonanza & Copper Basin). Retrieved from: Western Regional Climate Center. October, 2022. https://wrcc.dri.edu/
Francis, John K. ed. 2004. Wildland shrubs of the United States and its Territories: thamnic descriptions: volume 1. Gen. Tech. Rep. IITF-GTR-26. San Juan, PR: USDA, Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, and Fort Collins, CO: USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 830 p.
Fryer, Janet L. 1997. Amelanchier alnifolia. In: Fire Effects
Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Furniss, Malcolm M. 1983. Entomology of antelope bitterbrush. In: Tiedemann, Arthur R.; Johnson, Kendall L., compilers. Proceedings--research and management of bitterbrush and cliffrose in western North America; 1982 April 13-15; Salt Lake City, UT. General Technical Report INT-152. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 164-172.
Howard, Janet L. 1997. Poa secunda. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station,
Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/graminoid/poasec/all.html
Innes, Robin J. 2017. Artemisia tridentata subsp. vaseyana, mountain big sagebrush. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/arttriv/all.html
Johnson, Kathleen A. 2000. Prunus virginiana. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Kindschy, Robert R.; Sundstrom, Charles; Yoakum, James D. 1982. Wildlife habitats in managed rangelands--the Great Basin of southeastern Oregon: pronghorns. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-145. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 18 p.
Kirk W. Davies, Jon D. Bates, Rory O'Connor. 2021. Long-term evaluation of restoring understories in Wyoming big sagebrush communities with mowing and seeding native bunchgrasses. Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 75, Pages 81-90.
Knick, S.T.; Holmes, A.L.; Miller, Richard F. 2005. The role of fire in structuring sagebrush habitats and bird communities. Pages 63-75 In: Saab, Victoria A.; Powell, Hugh D. W. (eds.). Fire and Avian Ecology in North America. Studies in Avian Biology No. 30. Camarillo, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society.
Marshall, K. Anna. 1995. Ribes montigenum. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
McArthur and Stevens. 2009. Composite Shrubs. In: S.B. Monsen, R. Stevens, and N.L. Shaw [compilers]. Restoring western ranges and wildlands. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRSGTR-136-vol-2. p. 493-537.
Miller, M., Belnap, J., Beatty, S., Reynolds, R. (2006). Performance of Bromus tectorum L. in Relation to Soil Properties, Water Additions, and Chemical Amendments in Calcareous Soils of Southeastern Utah, USA. Canyonlands Research. 288. 10.1007/s11104-006-0058-4.
National Wildlife Federation (NWF). 2022. Sagebrush Steppe. Retrieved from: https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife-Guide/Threats-to-Wildlife/Climate-Change/Habitats/Sagebrush-Steppe.
Tom H. Oliver, Matthew S. Heard, Nick J.B. Isaac, David B. Roy, Deborah Procter, Felix Eigenbrod, Rob Freckleton, Andy Hector, C. David L. Orme, Owen L. Petchey, Vânia Proença, David Raffaelli, K. Blake Suttle, Georgina M. Mace, Berta Martín-López, Ben A. Woodcock, James M. Bullock. Biodiversity and Resilience of Ecosystem Functions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Volume 30, Issue 11, 2015.
Rodhouse TJ, Irvine KM and Bowersock L (2020) Post-Fire Vegetation Response in a Repeatedly Burned Low-Elevation Sagebrush Steppe Protected Area Provides Insights About Resilience and Invasion Resistance. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8:584726.
Rosentreter, Roger. 2005. Sagebrush identification, ecology, and palatability relative to sage-grouse. In: Shaw, Nancy L.; Pellant, Mike; Monsen, Stephen B., eds. Sage-grouse habitat restoration symposium proceedings; 2001 June 4-7; Boise, ID. Proc. RMRS-P-38. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 3-16
Sours, John M. 1983. Characteristics and uses of important grasses for arid western rangelands. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Shaw, Nancy, compilers. Managing Intermountain rangelands--improvement of range and wildlife habitats: Proceedings of a symposia; 1981 September 15-17; Twin Falls, ID; 1982 June 22-24; Elko, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-157. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 90-94.
Steinberg, Peter D. 2002. Artemisia arbuscula. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/artarb/all.html
TIlley, D. and L. St. John [1]. 2012. Plant Guide for black sagebrush (Artemisia nova). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho 83210.
TIlley, D. and L. St. John [2]. 2012. Plant Guide for low sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen Plant Materials Center. Aberdeen, Idaho 83210.
https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/shrub/chrvis/all.html
USNVC [United States National Vegetation Classification]. 2021. United States National Vegetation Classification Database, V2.031. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation Subcommittee, Washington DC. [usnvc.org]
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Artemisia tripartita. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Artemisia tridentata subsp. tridentata. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Tirmenstein, D. 1999. Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Zlatnik, Elena. 1999. Pseudoroegneria spicata, bluebunch wheatgrass. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.usda.gov /database/feis/plants/graminoid/psespi/all.html [2022, October 25].
Zlatnik, Elena. 1999. Purshia tridentata. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Zouhar, Kristin L. 2000. Festuca idahoensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Zouhar, Kris. 2003. Bromus tectorum. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Contributors
Zachary Van Abbema
Carla Rebernak
Grant Petersen
Kirt Walstad
Marji Patz
Karen Clause
Approval
Kirt Walstad, 5/19/2025
Acknowledgments
Carla Rebernak
Katelyn Palmer
Nick Kozlowski
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | 10/11/2024 |
Approved by | Kirt Walstad |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.