Search

Search for a Major Land Resource Area or ecological site by name and/or ID.

Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Ecological site R023XY119OR

BASIN WILLOW

Accessed: 12/21/2024

Home / Esd catalog / MLRA 023X / Ecological site R023XY119OR

USC

Metric

General information

Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.

Click to explore map

Figure 1. Mapped extent

Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.

Associated sites

R023XY104OR	LOAMY BOTTOM Loamy Bottom
R023XY116OR	SEMI-WET MARSH Semi-Wet Marsh
R023XY117OR	BASIN WET MEADOW Basin Wet Meadow
R023XY118OR	BASIN DRY MEADOW Basin Dry Meadow

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Tree	Not specified
Shrub	(1) Salix exigua
Herbaceous	Not specified

Download full description

Physiographic features

This site occurs in dry lake basins and valleys. It typically occurs on banks of perennial or intermittent drainage systems. Slopes range from 0 to 3 percent. Elevation varies from 4000 to 4600 feet.

Table 2. Representative physiographic features

Landforms	(1) Valley (2) Lakebed
Flooding frequency	Occasional
Elevation	4,000 – 4,600 ft
Slope	3%
Water table depth	10 – 30 in
Aspect	Aspect is not a significant factor

Soil features

The soils of this site are very deep over lacustrine and alluvial sediments. Influenced by periodic flooding they are quite variable, often occuring as small naturally built-up levees along stream edges. Typically they have a loamy surface over a loamy to clay loam subsoil. Gravels are common. Along banks and berms localized seasonal surface drainage and aeration is good. This is desirable for willow growth and root structure. However, they are hydric with an overall drainage classification of somewhat poor. A seasonal water table occurs at 10 to 30 inches. Permeability is moderate. The available water holding capacity (AWC) is 6 to 10 inches.

Table 3. Representative soil features

Surface texture	(1) Gravelly loam
Family particle size	(1) Clayey
Drainage class	Somewhat poorly drained
Permeability class	Moderate
Available water capacity (0-40in)	6 – 10 in

Ecological dynamics

Range in Characteristics:

Seasonal availability and depth to groundwater influences the productivity of willow and other overstory species. With an increase in fire frequency, basin big sagebrush will decrease and basin wildrye will increase.

Response to Disturbance:

If the condition of the site deteriorates as a result of overgrazing or drainage, basin wildrye will decrease while creeping wildrye, basin big sagebrush, gray rabbitbrush, and greasewood will increase. Heavy suumer and fall use results in heavy hedging of willow. With further deterioration, banks become unstable, streams become incised and groundwater tables are lowered. Shrubs will continue to increase, annual invade, and areas of bareground increase. The stand of willows will develop a "tunnelled" appearance.

State and transition model

Custom diagram

Standard diagram

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text

Ecosystem states

1. Reference State

State 1 submodel, plant communities

1.1. Reference Plant Community

State 1
Reference State

Community 1.1
Reference Plant Community

The potential native plant community is strongly dominated by willows. Coyote willow, a rhizomatous species, is clearly dominant followed by yellow and Pacific willow. Other shrubs and a variety of forbs and grasses are present. The potential vegetative composition is approximately 80 percent shrubs, 10 percent grass and grass-like, and 5 percent forbs. Approximate ground cover is 80-120 percent (basal and crown).

Figure 2. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)

Table 4. Annual production by plant type

Plant type	Low (lb/acre)	Representative value (lb/acre)	High (lb/acre)
Shrub/Vine	1500	2250	3000
Grass/Grasslike	400	600	800
Forb	100	150	200
Total	2000	3000	4000

Additional community tables

Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition

Group	Common name	Symbol	Scientific name	Annual production (lb/acre)	Foliar cover (%)
Grass/Grasslike
1	Perennial, rhizomatous grass			150–300
	beardless wildrye	LETR5	Leymus triticoides	150–300	–
2	Other grasslike			120–480
	sedge	CAREX	Carex	60–240	–
5	Other perennial grasses			60–240
	shortawn foxtail	ALAE	Alopecurus aequalis	0–60	–
	teal lovegrass	ERHY	Eragrostis hypnoides	0–60	–
	basin wildrye	LECI4	Leymus cinereus	0–60	–
	bluegrass	POA	Poa	0–60	–
Forb
9	Other perennial forbs			30–240
	silverweed cinquefoil	ARAN7	Argentina anserina	0–60	–
	cowparsnip	HERAC	Heracleum	0–60	–
	biennial cinquefoil	POBI7	Potentilla biennis	0–60	–
	dock	RUMEX	Rumex	0–60	–
	ragwort	SENEC	Senecio	0–60	–
Shrub/Vine
12	Rhizomatous, deciduous, wetland obligate shrub			600–1200
	narrowleaf willow	SAEX	Salix exigua	600–1200	–
13	Deciduous, wetland obligate shrub			450–750
	yellow willow	SALU2	Salix lutea	450–750	–
14	Deciduous, facultative wetland shrub			450–750
	Pacific willow	SALUL	Salix lucida ssp. lasiandra	450–750	–
15	Other shrubs			30–240
	gray alder	ALIN2	Alnus incana	0–30	–
	golden currant	RIAU	Ribes aureum	0–30	–
	Woods' rose	ROWO	Rosa woodsii	0–30	–
	red elderberry	SARA2	Sambucus racemosa	0–30	–
Tree
18	Deciduous			0–30
	balsam poplar	POBA2	Populus balsamifera	0–30	–

Interpretations

Animal community

Livestock Grazing:

This site is suited to summer, fall, and winter use by cattle and horses under a planned grazing system. The key species is willow. Palatable shrubs such as willow can be damaged if heavily grazed during periods when the herbaceous species are mature or dormant. Grazing prescriptions should be based on both vegetative and stream function goals.

Native Wildlife Associated with the Potential Climax Community:

Mammals and a variety of waterfowl and upland birds including savannah sparrows, bobolinks, and meadowlarks utilize this site for food and cover. It provides a high degree of diversity and high quality habitat for a large variety of wildlife. Cover and habitat value is excellent when the ecological condition is high. The value of the site increases when it is near wet marshes, perennial streams, and open water areas.

Hydrological functions

The hydrologic cover condition is excellent when the ecological condition is high.

Other information

In fair condition with a remnant stand of willow, this site rapidly responds to good management.

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)	Jeff Repp
Contact for lead author	Oregon NRCS State Rangeland Management Specialist
Date	08/09/2012
Approved by	Bob Gillaspy
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production

Indicators

Number and extent of rills:
None, moderate sheet & rill erosion hazard
Presence of water flow patterns:
None to some. With reduced vegetative cover streambakns become unstable, streams become incised and groundwater tables are lowered.
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
None
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
0-5%
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None, moderate wind erosion hazard
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine to coarse - limited movement
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Moderately resistant to erosion: aggregate stability = 3-5
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Very deep somewhat poorly drained loams: Moderate to high OM (3-6%)
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Significant ground cover (80-120%) andd gentle slopes (0-3%) significantly limit rainfall impact and overland flow
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):

Dominant:
Coyote willow > Yellow willow = Pacific willow > Creeping wildrye > Baltic rush = sedges = other grasses & grass-likes > other shrubs = forbs

Sub-dominant:

Other:

Additional:
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Normal decadence and mortality expected
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Favorable: 4000, Normal: 3000, Unfavorable: 2000 lbs/acre/year at high RSI (HCPC)
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial brush species will increase with deterioration of plant community. Cheatgrass and Medusahead invade sites that have lost deep rooted perennial grass functional groups.
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All species should be capable of reproducing annually

Download reference sheet