Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R023XY119OR
BASIN WILLOW
Accessed: 11/21/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Associated sites
R023XY104OR |
LOAMY BOTTOM Loamy Bottom |
---|---|
R023XY116OR |
SEMI-WET MARSH Semi-Wet Marsh |
R023XY117OR |
BASIN WET MEADOW Basin Wet Meadow |
R023XY118OR |
BASIN DRY MEADOW Basin Dry Meadow |
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Salix exigua |
Herbaceous |
Not specified |
Physiographic features
This site occurs in dry lake basins and valleys. It typically occurs on banks of perennial or intermittent drainage systems. Slopes range from 0 to 3 percent. Elevation varies from 4000 to 4600 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Valley
(2) Lakebed |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | Occasional |
Elevation | 4,000 – 4,600 ft |
Slope | 3% |
Water table depth | 10 – 30 in |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils of this site are very deep over lacustrine and alluvial sediments. Influenced by periodic flooding they are quite variable, often occuring as small naturally built-up levees along stream edges. Typically they have a loamy surface over a loamy to clay loam subsoil. Gravels are common. Along banks and berms localized seasonal surface drainage and aeration is good. This is desirable for willow growth and root structure. However, they are hydric with an overall drainage classification of somewhat poor. A seasonal water table occurs at 10 to 30 inches. Permeability is moderate. The available water holding capacity (AWC) is 6 to 10 inches.
Table 3. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Gravelly loam |
---|---|
Family particle size |
(1) Clayey |
Drainage class | Somewhat poorly drained |
Permeability class | Moderate |
Available water capacity (0-40in) |
6 – 10 in |
Ecological dynamics
Range in Characteristics:
Seasonal availability and depth to groundwater influences the productivity of willow and other overstory species. With an increase in fire frequency, basin big sagebrush will decrease and basin wildrye will increase.
Response to Disturbance:
If the condition of the site deteriorates as a result of overgrazing or drainage, basin wildrye will decrease while creeping wildrye, basin big sagebrush, gray rabbitbrush, and greasewood will increase. Heavy suumer and fall use results in heavy hedging of willow. With further deterioration, banks become unstable, streams become incised and groundwater tables are lowered. Shrubs will continue to increase, annual invade, and areas of bareground increase. The stand of willows will develop a "tunnelled" appearance.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
Community 1.1
Reference Plant Community
The potential native plant community is strongly dominated by willows. Coyote willow, a rhizomatous species, is clearly dominant followed by yellow and Pacific willow. Other shrubs and a variety of forbs and grasses are present. The potential vegetative composition is approximately 80 percent shrubs, 10 percent grass and grass-like, and 5 percent forbs. Approximate ground cover is 80-120 percent (basal and crown).
Figure 2. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 4. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 1500 | 2250 | 3000 |
Grass/Grasslike | 400 | 600 | 800 |
Forb | 100 | 150 | 200 |
Total | 2000 | 3000 | 4000 |
Additional community tables
Table 5. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | Perennial, rhizomatous grass | 150–300 | ||||
beardless wildrye | LETR5 | Leymus triticoides | 150–300 | – | ||
2 | Other grasslike | 120–480 | ||||
sedge | CAREX | Carex | 60–240 | – | ||
5 | Other perennial grasses | 60–240 | ||||
shortawn foxtail | ALAE | Alopecurus aequalis | 0–60 | – | ||
teal lovegrass | ERHY | Eragrostis hypnoides | 0–60 | – | ||
basin wildrye | LECI4 | Leymus cinereus | 0–60 | – | ||
bluegrass | POA | Poa | 0–60 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
9 | Other perennial forbs | 30–240 | ||||
silverweed cinquefoil | ARAN7 | Argentina anserina | 0–60 | – | ||
cowparsnip | HERAC | Heracleum | 0–60 | – | ||
biennial cinquefoil | POBI7 | Potentilla biennis | 0–60 | – | ||
dock | RUMEX | Rumex | 0–60 | – | ||
ragwort | SENEC | Senecio | 0–60 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
12 | Rhizomatous, deciduous, wetland obligate shrub | 600–1200 | ||||
narrowleaf willow | SAEX | Salix exigua | 600–1200 | – | ||
13 | Deciduous, wetland obligate shrub | 450–750 | ||||
yellow willow | SALU2 | Salix lutea | 450–750 | – | ||
14 | Deciduous, facultative wetland shrub | 450–750 | ||||
Pacific willow | SALUL | Salix lucida ssp. lasiandra | 450–750 | – | ||
15 | Other shrubs | 30–240 | ||||
gray alder | ALIN2 | Alnus incana | 0–30 | – | ||
golden currant | RIAU | Ribes aureum | 0–30 | – | ||
Woods' rose | ROWO | Rosa woodsii | 0–30 | – | ||
red elderberry | SARA2 | Sambucus racemosa | 0–30 | – | ||
Tree
|
||||||
18 | Deciduous | 0–30 | ||||
balsam poplar | POBA2 | Populus balsamifera | 0–30 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
Livestock Grazing:
This site is suited to summer, fall, and winter use by cattle and horses under a planned grazing system. The key species is willow. Palatable shrubs such as willow can be damaged if heavily grazed during periods when the herbaceous species are mature or dormant. Grazing prescriptions should be based on both vegetative and stream function goals.
Native Wildlife Associated with the Potential Climax Community:
Mammals and a variety of waterfowl and upland birds including savannah sparrows, bobolinks, and meadowlarks utilize this site for food and cover. It provides a high degree of diversity and high quality habitat for a large variety of wildlife. Cover and habitat value is excellent when the ecological condition is high. The value of the site increases when it is near wet marshes, perennial streams, and open water areas.
Hydrological functions
The hydrologic cover condition is excellent when the ecological condition is high.
Other information
In fair condition with a remnant stand of willow, this site rapidly responds to good management.
Supporting information
Contributors
Alan V. Bahn
Bob Gillaspy
M. Parks (OSU)
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Jeff Repp |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | Oregon NRCS State Rangeland Management Specialist |
Date | 08/09/2012 |
Approved by | Bob Gillaspy |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None, moderate sheet & rill erosion hazard -
Presence of water flow patterns:
None to some. With reduced vegetative cover streambakns become unstable, streams become incised and groundwater tables are lowered. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
None -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
0-5% -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None, moderate wind erosion hazard -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Fine to coarse - limited movement -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Moderately resistant to erosion: aggregate stability = 3-5 -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Very deep somewhat poorly drained loams: Moderate to high OM (3-6%) -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Significant ground cover (80-120%) andd gentle slopes (0-3%) significantly limit rainfall impact and overland flow -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Coyote willow > Yellow willow = Pacific willow > Creeping wildrye > Baltic rush = sedges = other grasses & grass-likes > other shrubs = forbsSub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Normal decadence and mortality expected -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Favorable: 4000, Normal: 3000, Unfavorable: 2000 lbs/acre/year at high RSI (HCPC) -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial brush species will increase with deterioration of plant community. Cheatgrass and Medusahead invade sites that have lost deep rooted perennial grass functional groups. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All species should be capable of reproducing annually
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.