Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R030XA175CA
Sandy upper fan apron 5-8" p.z.
Last updated: 2/18/2025
Accessed: 03/17/2025
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Ecological site concept
This ecological site is located on alluvial fans and fan aprons. It is typically located near hills from which it receives more direct runoff than the lower end of the fan apron. This ecological site occurs on sandy and sandy-skeletal soils.
Please refer to group concept R030XA002CA to view the provisional STM.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
| Tree |
(1) Acacia greggii |
|---|---|
| Shrub |
(1) Ephedra californica |
| Herbaceous |
Not specified |
Physiographic features
This ecological site is located on alluvial fans and fan aprons. It is typically located near hills from which it receives more direct runoff than the lower end of the fan apron.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
| Landforms |
(1)
Fan apron
(2) Alluvial fan (3) Drainageway |
|---|---|
| Flooding duration | Very brief (4 to 48 hours) |
| Flooding frequency | None to rare |
| Elevation | 2,460 – 3,500 ft |
| Slope | 2 – 8% |
| Water table depth | 72 in |
| Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
The Mojave Deserts experiences clear, dry conditions for most of the year. Monthly minimum temperature averages range from 30 to 80 degrees F (-1 to 27 degrees C). Monthly maximum temperature averages range from 60 to 110 degrees F (16 to 43 degrees C). This ecological site receives 5 to 8 inches of rain in an average year. Rainfall distribution is bimodal.
Influencing water features
Soil features
This ecological site occurs on sandy and sandy-skeletal soils.
Morongo--Mixed, thermic Typic Torripsamments
Arizo--Sandy-skeletal, mixed, thermic Typic Torriorthents
Table 3. Representative soil features
| Surface texture |
(1) Sand |
|---|---|
| Family particle size |
(1) Sandy |
| Drainage class | Somewhat excessively drained |
| Permeability class | Rapid to very rapid |
| Soil depth | 60 in |
| Surface fragment cover <=3" | 40 – 75% |
| Surface fragment cover >3" | 10% |
| Available water capacity (0-40in) |
1.6 – 3.2 in |
| Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-40in) |
1% |
| Electrical conductivity (0-40in) |
2 mmhos/cm |
| Sodium adsorption ratio (0-40in) |
4 |
| Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-40in) |
6.2 – 7.8 |
| Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
1 – 30% |
Ecological dynamics
Please refer to group concept R030XA002CA to view the provisional STM.
Water is a major factor affecting this ecological site. The major species on this site have a greater water requirment than other Mojave Desert species. This site is typically found near hills from which it receives runon. Close to the hills, the water disturbance is more pronounced than on the lower fan apron. This allows several species tolerant of water disturbance to dominate.
The major species are catclaw (Acacia greggii), California jointfir (Ephedra californica), and Mojave indigobush (Psorothamnus arborescens). These species are found on alluvial soils as well as hilly, rocky areas from which water runs off quickly. The ability to adapt to these different growing substrates helps explain why this ecological site can be found on skeletal and non-skeletal soils.
This ecological site is located near urban areas that may affect the ecological site. Road and housing construction may alter flow of water down the alluvial fan and fan arpon. Disturbance-adapted, colonizing species such as burrobrush (Hymenoclea salsola) may become more abundant. Joints of cactus species such as golden cholla (Cylindropuntia echinocarpa) are easily broken off during a disturbance and readily distributed gravity and by attaching to distribution agents such as humans or animals.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Catclaw-California jointfir
Community 1.1
Catclaw-California jointfir
This ecological site is dominated by catclaw acacia (Acacia gregii) and California jointfir (Ephedra californica). Other species include burrobrush (Hymenoclea salsola) and Mojave indigobush (Psorothamnus arborescens). Big galleta (Pleuraphis rigida) may be present in small amounts.
Figure 1. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 4. Annual production by plant type
| Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shrub/Vine | 100 | 500 | 800 |
| Forb | 25 | 250 | 500 |
| Grass/Grasslike | 25 | 100 | 200 |
| Total | 150 | 850 | 1500 |
Table 5. Ground cover
| Tree foliar cover | 0% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 20-30% |
| Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 5-10% |
| Forb foliar cover | 5-25% |
| Non-vascular plants | 0% |
| Biological crusts | 0% |
| Litter | 10-20% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 20-30% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 10-15% |
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
| Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
| 1 | Shrubs | 100–800 | ||||
| catclaw acacia | ACGR | Acacia greggii | 150–300 | – | ||
| California jointfir | EPCA2 | Ephedra californica | 100–300 | – | ||
| creosote bush | LATR2 | Larrea tridentata | 0–100 | – | ||
| Mojave indigobush | PSAR4 | Psorothamnus arborescens | 50–100 | – | ||
| burrobrush | HYSA | Hymenoclea salsola | 25–75 | – | ||
| desert almond | PRFA | Prunus fasciculata | 50–75 | – | ||
| Mojave yucca | YUSC2 | Yucca schidigera | 25–75 | – | ||
| white ratany | KRGR | Krameria grayi | 25–50 | – | ||
| Eastern Mojave buckwheat | ERFA2 | Eriogonum fasciculatum | 25–50 | – | ||
| Mexican bladdersage | SAME | Salazaria mexicana | 5–25 | – | ||
| Wiggins' cholla | CYEC3 | Cylindropuntia echinocarpa | 5–15 | – | ||
|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
| 2 | Annual grasses | 25–200 | ||||
| red brome | BRRU2 | Bromus rubens | 25–200 | – | ||
| common Mediterranean grass | SCBA | Schismus barbatus | 25–200 | – | ||
|
Forb
|
||||||
| 3 | Annual forbs | 25–500 | ||||
| pincushion flower | CHFR | Chaenactis fremontii | 25–450 | – | ||
| redstem stork's bill | ERCI6 | Erodium cicutarium | 25–200 | – | ||
| chuckwalla combseed | PEHE | Pectocarya heterocarpa | 25–100 | – | ||
| small wirelettuce | STEX | Stephanomeria exigua | 25–100 | – | ||
Interpretations
Animal community
This area is suitable habitat for small mammals and reptiles.
Hydrological functions
This ecological site receives run-on from adjacent hills. Water availability and disturbance is an important factor affecting plant community composition.
Recreational uses
Urban development occurs in the vicinity of this ecological site.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Cover data for this ecological site was described using 2 line-point intercept transects. The complete protocol for this sampling method is found in Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland and Savanna Ecosystems, Volume 1: Quick Start.
Production data for this ecological site was described using 2 modified double-sampling transects. The protocol was modified by California State Rangeland Ecologist Kendra Moseley to use fewer plots and less destructive sampling. The complete protocol for this sampling method is found in Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland and Savanna Ecosystems, Volume 2: Design, supplementary methods and interpretation.
Contributors
Allison Tokunaga
Approval
Kendra Moseley, 2/18/2025
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
| Author(s)/participant(s) | |
|---|---|
| Contact for lead author | |
| Date | 02/21/2025 |
| Approved by | Kendra Moseley |
| Approval date | |
| Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.