Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R030XB213AZ
Gypsum Upland 6-9" p.z. Alkaline
Last updated: 10/21/2024
Accessed: 12/22/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 030X–Mojave Basin and Range
This unit occurs within the Basin and Range Province and is characterized by broad basins, valleys, and old lakebeds. Widely spaced mountains trending north to south occur throughout the area. Isolated, short mountain ranges are separated by an aggraded desert plain. The mountains are fault blocks that have been tilted up. Long alluvial fans coalesce with dry lakebeds between some of the ranges.
LRU notes
AZ LRU 30-2 – Middle Mohave Desert
Elevations range from 1500 to 3200 feet and precipitation averages 6 to 9 inches per year. Vegetation includes creosotebush, white bursage, yucca, prickly pear and cholla species, Mormon tea, flattop buckwheat, ratany, winterfat, bush muhly, threeawns, and big galleta. The soil temperature regime is thermic and the soil moisture regime is typic aridic.
Ecological site concept
This ecological site is located on uplands of relic lake beds. The gypsic soil is moderately deep over gypsite bedrock. It is strongly effervescent at the surface grading to non-effervescent at 5 inch depth. Gypsum crystal size increases with depth.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
| Tree |
Not specified |
|---|---|
| Shrub |
(1) Atriplex confertifolia |
| Herbaceous |
Not specified |
Physiographic features
The ecological site occurs in an upland position on pediments with naturally occurring sinuous drainages and washes. The higher areas do not benefit from run-on moisture, while the drainages receive some benefit. The site occurs on all aspects.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
| Landforms |
(1)
Pediment
(2) Drainageway (3) Wash |
|---|---|
| Flooding frequency | None |
| Ponding frequency | None |
| Elevation | 1,600 – 3,000 ft |
| Slope | 2 – 15% |
| Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
The climate is arid and warm. Annual precipitation ranges from 6 to 9 inches. About 65 percent of the rainfall comes from October through May as gentle rain from Pacific storms which may last for a couple of days. The rest of the rainfall comes during the summer monsoon season from July through September as spotty, brief, intense thunderstorms. Snow rarely falls, and only remains on the ground a few hours at most. Annual air temperature ranges from 59 to 70 degrees F. The average frost-free period ranges from 156 to 259 days.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
| Frost-free period (average) | 259 days |
|---|---|
| Freeze-free period (average) | 290 days |
| Precipitation total (average) | 9 in |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Soil features
The soil of this ecological site is moderately deep. The surface texture of the soil is fine to very fine sandy loam. Subsoil textures of the soil are sand, loamy sand, and sandy loam, sometimes channery (gypsite). The soil's parent material is colluvium and residuum from gypsiferous lacustrine sediments. The moisture regime of the soil is typic aridic and the temperature regime is thermic. The water erosion hazard is slight to moderate and wind erosion is slight. The plant-soil moisture relationship is poor as the coarse texture, sodium and other salts, and very high gypsum content combine to severely limit plant available water. The interspersed drainages and wahses have more water available for plants.
A typical soil profile is:
C-0 to 1 inch; very fine sandy loam; 7 percent sand and gravel-sized gypsum crystals; strongly effervescent
Cy1-1 to 5 inches; very gravelly sand; 50 percent gravel-sized gypsum crystals, 30 percent sand-sized gypsum crystals; slightly effervescent
Cy2-5 to 20 inches; channery sandy loam; 30 percent channer-sized gypsum crystals; noneffervescent
Cy3-20 to 28 inches; 60 percent weathered gypsite channers; 15 percent gypsite gravel; 10 percent sand-sized gypsum crystals; noneffervescent
Cr-28 inches; gypsite bedrock
The taxonomic classification of the soil is Loamy-skeletal, gypsic, thermic Typic Torriorthents.
Soils correlated to this ecological site include map unit 701044, Gypill soil, Grand Canyon Area, AZ, Parts of Coconino and Mohave Counties SSA.
Table 4. Representative soil features
| Parent material |
(1)
Colluvium
–
rock gypsum
|
|---|---|
| Surface texture |
(1) Gypsiferous fine sandy loam (2) Very fine sandy loam |
| Family particle size |
(1) Sandy |
| Drainage class | Somewhat excessively drained |
| Permeability class | Moderate |
| Soil depth | 20 – 30 in |
| Surface fragment cover <=3" | 1% |
| Surface fragment cover >3" | 1% |
| Available water capacity (0-40in) |
0.7 – 2.4 in |
| Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-40in) |
5% |
| Electrical conductivity (0-40in) |
2 – 30 mmhos/cm |
| Sodium adsorption ratio (0-40in) |
2 – 13 |
| Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-40in) |
7.6 – 8.2 |
| Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
10 – 50% |
| Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
15 – 60% |
Ecological dynamics
This ecological site is characterized by extremely scattered, salt tolerant shrubs with occasional perennial forbs. The site is stable to natural disturbances but the gypsic soils are extremely vulnerable to erosion once disturbed. Soil chemistry prohibits non-native annual forbs and grasses.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant Community
Community 1.1
Historic Climax Plant Community
This ecological site is characterized by very widely scattered desert shrubs. Shadscale and ephedra are dominant, but white ratany, Fremont dalea and wolfberry are also common. Perennial grasses are almost absent and are confined to drainaages. Perennial and annual forbs are widely scattered although they are a significant component of the plant community because of very low overall production. Typical perennial plant spacing is 3.5-5 feet. Cryptogamic crust formation can be extensive in the absence of repeated disturbance.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
| Plant type | Low (lb/acre) |
Representative value (lb/acre) |
High (lb/acre) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shrub/Vine | 22 | 35 | 72 |
| Forb | 3 | 11 | 24 |
| Grass/Grasslike | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Total | 25 | 48 | 98 |
Table 6. Ground cover
| Tree foliar cover | 0% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 0-1% |
| Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 0% |
| Forb foliar cover | 0% |
| Non-vascular plants | 0% |
| Biological crusts | 31-58% |
| Litter | 0% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 0% |
Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3022, 30.2 6-9" p.z. upland sites. Growth begins in the late winter, most growth occurs in the spring..
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
| 0 | 2 | 19 | 33 | 18 | 7 | 7 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
State 2
Eroded
Community 2.1
Eroded
Soil surface disturbance initiates extreme erosion events. Shrubs and forbs are pedestalled or absent from eroded areas.
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2
Mechanical soil disturbance such as off-road vehicle trailing.
Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1
None.
Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
| Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (lb/acre) | Foliar cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
| 1 | 0–2 | |||||
| big galleta | PLRI3 | Pleuraphis rigida | 0–2 | – | ||
| 2 | 0–3 | |||||
| Grass, annual | 2GA | Grass, annual | 0–3 | – | ||
|
Forb
|
||||||
| 3 | 1–5 | |||||
| desert trumpet | ERIN4 | Eriogonum inflatum | 1–5 | – | ||
| 4 | 1–5 | |||||
| desert globemallow | SPAM2 | Sphaeralcea ambigua | 1–5 | – | ||
| 5 | 0–1 | |||||
| Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 0–1 | – | ||
| desert marigold | BAMU | Baileya multiradiata | 0–1 | – | ||
| dyssodia | DYSSO | Dyssodia | 0–1 | – | ||
| pepperweed | LEPID | Lepidium | 0–1 | – | ||
| princesplume | STANL | Stanleya | 0–1 | – | ||
| wirelettuce | STEPH | Stephanomeria | 0–1 | – | ||
| 6 | 0–2 | |||||
| Forb, annual | 2FA | Forb, annual | 0–2 | – | ||
| milkvetch | ASTRA | Astragalus | 0–2 | – | ||
| flatcrown buckwheat | ERDE6 | Eriogonum deflexum | 0–2 | – | ||
| buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 0–2 | – | ||
| spurge | EUPHO | Euphorbia | 0–2 | – | ||
| lettuce | LACTU | Lactuca | 0–2 | – | ||
| evening primrose | OENOT | Oenothera | 0–2 | – | ||
| phacelia | PHACE | Phacelia | 0–2 | – | ||
| desert Indianwheat | PLOV | Plantago ovata | 0–2 | – | ||
|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
| 7 | 10–15 | |||||
| shadscale saltbush | ATCO | Atriplex confertifolia | 10–15 | – | ||
| 8 | 8–13 | |||||
| Nevada jointfir | EPNE | Ephedra nevadensis | 5–8 | – | ||
| Torrey's jointfir | EPTO | Ephedra torreyana | 5–8 | – | ||
| 9 | 3–5 | |||||
| white ratany | KRGR | Krameria grayi | 3–5 | – | ||
| 10 | 2–4 | |||||
| Fremont's dalea | PSFR | Psorothamnus fremontii | 2–4 | – | ||
| 11 | 1–3 | |||||
| water jacket | LYAN | Lycium andersonii | 1–3 | – | ||
| 12 | 0–3 | |||||
| narrowleaf goldenbush | ERLI6 | Ericameria linearifolia | 0–3 | – | ||
| 13 | 0–3 | |||||
| creosote bush | LATR2 | Larrea tridentata | 0–3 | – | ||
| 14 | 0–5 | |||||
| Shrub, other | 2S | Shrub, other | 0–2 | – | ||
| burrobush | AMDU2 | Ambrosia dumosa | 0–2 | – | ||
| desert brickellbush | BRDE3 | Brickellia desertorum | 0–2 | – | ||
| Eastern Mojave buckwheat | ERFAP | Eriogonum fasciculatum var. polifolium | 0–2 | – | ||
| spiny hopsage | GRSP | Grayia spinosa | 0–2 | – | ||
| broom snakeweed | GUSA2 | Gutierrezia sarothrae | 0–2 | – | ||
| winterfat | KRLA2 | Krascheninnikovia lanata | 0–2 | – | ||
| Mojave yucca | YUSC2 | Yucca schidigera | 0–2 | – | ||
Interpretations
Supporting information
Type locality
| Location 1: Mohave County, AZ | |
|---|---|
| Township/Range/Section | T33N R15W S5 |
| General legal description | Lake Mead National Recreation Area; Gyp Hills 7.5 quad. |
Contributors
Art Meen
Larry D. Ellicott
Approval
Kendra Moseley, 10/21/2024
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
| Author(s)/participant(s) | |
|---|---|
| Contact for lead author | |
| Date | 10/22/2024 |
| Approved by | Kendra Moseley |
| Approval date | |
| Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.