Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R030XC334AZ
Clay Loam Upland 10-13" p.z.
Last updated: 10/21/2024
Accessed: 11/21/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 030X–Mojave Basin and Range
This unit occurs within the Basin and Range Province and is characterized by broad basins, valleys, and old lakebeds. Widely spaced mountains trending north to south occur throughout the area. Isolated, short mountain ranges are separated by an aggraded desert plain. The mountains are fault blocks that have been tilted up. Long alluvial fans coalesce with dry lakebeds between some of the ranges.
LRU notes
AZ LRU 30-3 – Upper Mohave Desert
Elevations range from 2800 to 4500 feet and precipitation averages 9 to 12 inches per year. Vegetation includes Joshua tree, blackbrush, creosotebush, ratany, bush muhly, big galleta, black grama, desert needlegrass, and Indian ricegrass. The soil temperature regime is thermic and the soil moisture regime is typic aridic.
Ecological site concept
This ecological site is located on gently sloping uplands. Soils are non-calcareous, moderately deep to deep. Textures range from from sandy clay to cobbly clay loam.
Associated sites
| R030XC331AZ |
Sandy Loam Slopes 10-13" p.z. Limy, Skeletal |
|---|
Table 1. Dominant plant species
| Tree |
Not specified |
|---|---|
| Shrub |
(1) Eriogonum fasciculatum |
| Herbaceous |
(1) Pleuraphis rigida |
Physiographic features
This ecological site occurs in an upland position on shoulders, ridges and footslopes of fan terraces.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
| Landforms |
(1)
Terrace
(2) Fan |
|---|---|
| Flooding frequency | None |
| Ponding frequency | None |
| Elevation | 823 – 1,280 m |
| Slope | 2 – 15% |
| Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
The climate is arid and warm. Annual precipitation ranges from 10 to 13 inches. About 65 percent of the rainfall comes from October through May as gentle rain from Pacific storms which may last for a couple of days. The rest of the rainfall comes during the summer monsoon season from July through September as spotty, brief, intense thunderstorms. Snow rarely falls, and only remains on the ground a few hours at most. Annual air temperature ranges from 46 to 76 degrees F. The average frost-free period ranges from 121 to 231 days.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
| Frost-free period (average) | 231 days |
|---|---|
| Freeze-free period (average) | 269 days |
| Precipitation total (average) | 330 mm |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Soil features
The soil of this ecological site is deep with surface textures of very gravelly sandy loam, gravelly loamy sand and sandy loam. Subsoil textures are very gravelly clay, very gravelly sandy clay, very gravelly loam, clay loam, clay, and cobbly clay loam. The parent material is alluvium from varied geologic formations. Soil available water capacity is high. The soil's erosion hazard for water is slight to moderate and for wind is slight to severe. Runoff from this soil is slow. The soil is non-saline and non-sodic. The soil moisture regime is typic aridic and temperature regime is thermic.
A typical soil profile is:
A-0 to 1 inch; very gravelly sandy loam
Bt-1 to 8 inches; very gravelly clay
Bt-8 to 32 inches; very gravelly clay
Bt3-32 to 52 inches; very gravelly sandy clay
2Bkb-52 to 60 inches; very gravelly loam
The taxanomic classification of soils correlated to this ecological site include Clayey-skeletal, mixed, superactive, thermic Typic Calciargids.
Soil map units correlated to this ecological site include 697096, Eba family soil, Mohave County, AZ, Central Part SSA.
Table 4. Representative soil features
| Surface texture |
(1) Very gravelly sandy loam (2) Gravelly loamy sand (3) Sandy loam |
|---|---|
| Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
| Drainage class | Well drained |
| Permeability class | Slow |
| Soil depth | 152 cm |
| Surface fragment cover <=3" | 45 – 70% |
| Surface fragment cover >3" | 0 – 15% |
| Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
7.62 – 15.24 cm |
| Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-101.6cm) |
0 – 25% |
| Electrical conductivity (0-101.6cm) |
0 mmhos/cm |
| Sodium adsorption ratio (0-101.6cm) |
0 |
| Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-101.6cm) |
6.6 – 8.4 |
| Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
45 – 70% |
| Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
0 – 25% |
Ecological dynamics
Clay Loam Upland, 10"-13" p.z., is a grass-shrubland ecological site. Shrubs are well-dispersed across the site. Annual forbs and grasses flourish following rainfall. Natural disturbances are rare. After introduction of non-native annuals (forbs and/or grasses), the shift in total productivity is shift increased seasonal herbaceous production following periods of rain. Continuous, yearlong, livestock grazing will remove the perennial grass dominance.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historic Climax Plant Community
Community 1.1
Historic Climax Plant Community
The dominant aspect of this plant community is a desert grassland - shrub mix. Major grasses are big galleta, black grama and fluffgrass. Shrubs include flattop buckwheat, Mexican bladdersage, range ratany, banana yucca and rayless goldenhead. In some areas, Joshua tree and California Juniper are present in minor amounts.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
| Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grass/Grasslike | 55 | 174 | 389 |
| Shrub/Vine | 56 | 168 | 389 |
| Forb | 1 | 17 | 38 |
| Tree | – | 6 | 25 |
| Total | 112 | 365 | 841 |
Table 6. Ground cover
| Tree foliar cover | 0% |
|---|---|
| Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 1-3% |
| Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 0-2% |
| Forb foliar cover | 0% |
| Non-vascular plants | 0% |
| Biological crusts | 0% |
| Litter | 0% |
| Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
| Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
| Bedrock | 0% |
| Water | 0% |
| Bare ground | 0% |
Table 7. Canopy structure (% cover)
| Height Above Ground (m) | Tree | Shrub/Vine | Grass/ Grasslike |
Forb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <0.15 | – | – | – | 0-2% |
| >0.15 <= 0.3 | – | – | 9-11% | – |
| >0.3 <= 0.6 | – | – | – | – |
| >0.6 <= 1.4 | – | 13-17% | – | – |
| >1.4 <= 4 | 0-2% | – | – | – |
| >4 <= 12 | – | – | – | – |
| >12 <= 24 | – | – | – | – |
| >24 <= 37 | – | – | – | – |
| >37 | – | – | – | – |
Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). AZ3024, 30.3 10-13" p.z. upland sites. Growth begins in the spring and continues through the summer..
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
| 0 | 1 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 11 | 14 | 20 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
State 2
Historic Native Plant Community plus Introduced Annuals
Community 2.1
Non-native Annuals
This plant community resembles the historic native plant community, but exotic annuals have been introduced. Non-native species include wild oat, red brome, Mediterranean grass (Schismus spp.), and filaree. The flourish of non-native annuals that occurs following rainfalls may preclude native annuals.
State 3
Shrubland
Community 3.1
Shrubs and Annuals
Years of continuous livestock grazing (same season, yearlong) will remove perennial grasses and reduce desirable shrubs. Native and non-native annuals flourish in the bare interspaces.
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2
Introduction of non-native annual forb and grass seed.
Transition T1B
State 1 to 3
Yearlong continuous livestock grazing. Introduction of non-native annual forb and grass seed.
Transition T2A
State 2 to 3
Yearlong continuous livestock grazing.
Restoration pathway R3A
State 3 to 2
Prescribed grazing/no grazing. Range seeding may accelerate establishment of perennial grasses and desirable shrubs.
Additional community tables
Table 8. Community 1.1 plant community composition
| Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
| 1 | 73–110 | |||||
| big galleta | PLRI3 | Pleuraphis rigida | 73–110 | – | ||
| 2 | 3–11 | |||||
| bush muhly | MUPO2 | Muhlenbergia porteri | 3–11 | – | ||
| 3 | 3–18 | |||||
| black grama | BOER4 | Bouteloua eriopoda | 3–18 | – | ||
| 4 | 3–18 | |||||
| low woollygrass | DAPU7 | Dasyochloa pulchella | 3–18 | – | ||
| 5 | 0–7 | |||||
| Parish's threeawn | ARPUP5 | Aristida purpurea var. parishii | 0–7 | – | ||
| 6 | 0–3 | |||||
| sand dropseed | SPCR | Sporobolus cryptandrus | 0–3 | – | ||
| 7 | 0–7 | |||||
| desert needlegrass | ACSP12 | Achnatherum speciosum | 0–7 | – | ||
| 8 | 3–18 | |||||
| Grass, perennial | 2GP | Grass, perennial | 3–7 | – | ||
|
Forb
|
||||||
| 9 | 0–3 | |||||
| desert trumpet | ERIN4 | Eriogonum inflatum | 0–3 | – | ||
| 10 | 0–3 | |||||
| desert marigold | BAMU | Baileya multiradiata | 0–3 | – | ||
| 11 | 3–11 | |||||
| Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 0–7 | – | ||
| 12 | 0–7 | |||||
| Forb, annual | 2FA | Forb, annual | 0–7 | – | ||
|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
| 13 | 36–55 | |||||
| Eastern Mojave buckwheat | ERFAP | Eriogonum fasciculatum var. polifolium | 36–55 | – | ||
| 14 | 3–18 | |||||
| banana yucca | YUBA | Yucca baccata | 3–18 | – | ||
| 15 | 0–11 | |||||
| Nevada jointfir | EPNE | Ephedra nevadensis | 0–11 | – | ||
| 16 | 3–18 | |||||
| rayless goldenhead | ACSP | Acamptopappus sphaerocephalus | 3–18 | – | ||
| 17 | 0–18 | |||||
| crucifixion thorn | CAHO3 | Canotia holacantha | 0–18 | – | ||
| 18 | 3–18 | |||||
| littleleaf ratany | KRER | Krameria erecta | 3–18 | – | ||
| 19 | 3–18 | |||||
| broom snakeweed | GUSA2 | Gutierrezia sarothrae | 3–18 | – | ||
| 20 | 0–11 | |||||
| water jacket | LYAN | Lycium andersonii | 0–11 | – | ||
| 21 | 0–11 | |||||
| creosote bush | LATR2 | Larrea tridentata | 0–11 | – | ||
| 22 | 18–36 | |||||
| Mexican bladdersage | SAME | Salazaria mexicana | 18–36 | – | ||
| 23 | 3–7 | |||||
| catclaw acacia | ACGR | Acacia greggii | 3–7 | – | ||
| 24 | 0–7 | |||||
| buckhorn cholla | CYACM | Cylindropuntia acanthocarpa var. major | 0–7 | – | ||
| 25 | 0–3 | |||||
| whitestem paperflower | PSCO2 | Psilostrophe cooperi | 0–3 | – | ||
| 26 | 3–18 | |||||
| Shrub, other | 2S | Shrub, other | 3–18 | – | ||
|
Tree
|
||||||
| 27 | 0–3 | |||||
| California juniper | JUCA7 | Juniperus californica | 0–3 | – | ||
| 28 | 0–7 | |||||
| Joshua tree | YUBR | Yucca brevifolia | 0–7 | – | ||
Interpretations
Supporting information
Contributors
Harmon Hodgkinson
Harmon S. Hodgkinson
Larry D. Ellicott
Steve Barker
Approval
Kendra Moseley, 10/21/2024
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
| Author(s)/participant(s) | |
|---|---|
| Contact for lead author | |
| Date | 11/21/2024 |
| Approved by | Kendra Moseley |
| Approval date | |
| Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.