![](/images/logos/USDA-logo.png)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R034AY285CO
Foothill Swale
Last updated: 9/07/2023
Accessed: 08/17/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 034A–Cool Central Desertic Basins and Plateaus
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 34A-Cool Central Desertic
Basins and Plateaus
For further information regarding MLRAs, refer to:
http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/mlra/index.html
LRU notes
Land Resource Unit (LRU) 34A-10:
• Moisture Regime: aridic ustic
• Temperature Regime: frigid
• Dominant Cover: rangeland
• Representative Value (RV) Effective Precipitation: 12-16 inches
• RV Frost-Free Days: 75-95 days
Classification relationships
Relationship to Other Established Classification Systems
Ecoregions (EPA):
Level I: 10 North American Deserts
Level II: 10.1 Cold Deserts
Level III: 10.1.4 Wyoming Basin
Ecological site concept
• This receives additional water.
• These soils:
o are not saline or saline-sodic
o are deep, or very deep
o are not skeletal within 20” of the soil surface; and have minimal rock fragments at the soil surface
o are not strongly or violently effervescent in the surface mineral layer (within top 10”)
o have surface textures that usually range from fine sandy loam to loam in surface mineral layer (4”)
• have slopes less than 30 percent
• does not have a clay content that is greater than 35% in mineral soil surface layer (1-2”)
Associated sites
R034AY298CO |
Rolling Loam |
---|
Similar sites
R034AY433CO |
Silty Swale |
---|
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Artemisia tridentata |
Herbaceous |
(1) Leymus cinereus |
Physiographic features
This site occurs in the swales, valleys, aluvial bottomlands, and other low-lying areas which receive runoff from adjacent upands.
Elevation ranges from 6000 feet to 7600 feet above sea level
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Valley floor
(2) Drainageway (3) Stream terrace |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | Rare |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 1,829 – 2,316 m |
Slope | 0 – 4% |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
Annual precipitation ranges between 12 to 16 inches, with about 60 percent coming as snow.
The optimum growing season for native plants is April 15 to July 15.
Due to its position, this site receives occasional beneficial moisture from run-in water and overflow water.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (actual range) | 75-95 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (actual range) | |
Precipitation total (actual range) | 305-406 mm |
Frost-free period (average) | 85 days |
Freeze-free period (average) | |
Precipitation total (average) | 406 mm |
Influencing water features
This is a run-in site that receives additional moisture from adjacent uplands.
Wetland description
No wetland classification, may be associated with wetlands.
Soil features
Deep,well drained, medium and moderately coarse textured soils. Brown and grayish brown surface soils 5 to 9 inches thick underlain by stratified loamy materials. These soils have a good intake rates, good permeability, and a high waterholding capacity. Fertility levels are usually high. Soils are usually in the frigid family.
Soils in this site inclued: Havre loam and Glendive fine sandy loam.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Parent material |
(1)
Alluvium
–
sedimentary rock
|
---|---|
Surface texture |
(1) Fine sandy loam (2) Loam |
Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Very slow to moderately rapid |
Soil depth | 51 – 152 cm |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0 – 5% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 0 – 5% |
Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
7.62 – 20.83 cm |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-101.6cm) |
5 – 10% |
Electrical conductivity (Depth not specified) |
0 – 4 mmhos/cm |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
0 – 5% |
Ecological dynamics
The aspect of this site is a valley grassland plant community with a rather sparse stand of shrubs, basin wildrye, western and streambank wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass, squirreltail, and Nevada bluegrass are the dominant grasses. Shrubs include big sagebrush, rubber rabbitbrush, and fourwing saltbush. Principal forbs are yarrow, fleabane, globemallow, Indian paintbrush, and wild buckwheat. Invaders of this site are cheatgrass, Kentucky bluegrass, and black greasewood.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
Community 1.1
Basin Wildrye/Rhizomatous wheatgrasses
This site supports a plant community of approximately 75 to 85 percent grass/grass-like, 5 to 10 percent forbs, and 10 to 15 percent shrubs.
Figure 1. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 785 | 1793 | 2802 |
Shrub/Vine | 224 | 280 | 336 |
Forb | 112 | 168 | 224 |
Total | 1121 | 2241 | 3362 |
State 2
Degraded State
This State is result of soil-disturbing activities such as hoof-action, anthropogenic activity, and rodent activity. It can also occur after brush management followed by improper grazing techniques that usually include high-intensity grazing without appropriate recovery periods.
Transition T1A
State 1 to 2
The driver for transition T1A from State 1 (Reference State) to State 2 (Degraded) is low to high intensity, long duration, and high frequency herbivory events.
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | 1681–1905 | |||||
basin wildrye | LECI4 | Leymus cinereus | 673–1121 | – | ||
western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 112–224 | – | ||
thickspike wheatgrass | ELLA3 | Elymus lanceolatus | 112–224 | – | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 22–112 | – | ||
squirreltail | ELEL5 | Elymus elymoides | 22–112 | – | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 22–112 | – | ||
slender wheatgrass | ELTRT | Elymus trachycaulus ssp. trachycaulus | 22–67 | – | ||
needle and thread | HECOC8 | Hesperostipa comata ssp. comata | 22–67 | – | ||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 22–45 | – | ||
beardless wheatgrass | PSSPI | Pseudoroegneria spicata ssp. inermis | 22–45 | – | ||
sand dropseed | SPCR | Sporobolus cryptandrus | 22–45 | – | ||
Grass, perennial | 2GP | Grass, perennial | 11–22 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
2 | 112–224 | |||||
yarrow | ACHIL | Achillea | 22–45 | – | ||
white sagebrush | ARLU | Artemisia ludoviciana | 22–45 | – | ||
Indian paintbrush | CASTI2 | Castilleja | 22–45 | – | ||
streamside fleabane | ERGLP | Erigeron glabellus var. pubescens | 22–45 | – | ||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 22–45 | – | ||
bladderpod | LESQU | Lesquerella | 22–45 | – | ||
globemallow | SPHAE | Sphaeralcea | 22–45 | – | ||
Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 11–22 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
3 | 224–336 | |||||
Wyoming big sagebrush | ARTRW8 | Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis | 112–224 | – | ||
fourwing saltbush | ATCA2 | Atriplex canescens | 45–112 | – | ||
rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 45–112 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
WILDLIFE INTERPRETATIONS:
This site offers a high value rating for deer, cottontail, and upland game birds. It offers a medium value rating for antelope, bison, elk, and waterfowl.
GRAZING INTERPRETATIONS:
This site offers a high value ratng for sheep. It offers a medium value rating for cattle and horses.
Hydrological functions
This site offers a medium value rating for watershed.
Recreational uses
Medium value.
Wood products
None.
Supporting information
Inventory data references
Information presented here has been derived from NRCS clipping data and other inventory data. Field observations from range trained personnel were also used. Other sources used as references include: USDA NRCS Water and Climate Center, USDA NRCS National Range and Pasture Handbook, and USDA NRCS Soil Surveys from various counties.
Type locality
Location 1: Rio Blanco County, CO | |
---|---|
General legal description | Major dranages in the Piceance Basin, Rio Blanco County. |
Other references
Belnap, J. and S. L. Phillips. 2001. Soil biota in an ungrazed grassland: Response to annual grass (Bromus tectorum) invasion. Ecological Applications: 11: 1261-1275.
Caudle, D., H. Sanchez, J. DiBenedetto, C. Talbot, and M. Karl. 2013. Draft Interagency Ecological Site Handbook for Rangelands. US Dept. of Agriculture. Washington D.C
Cleland, D.T.; Freeouf, J.A.; Keys, J.E., Jr.; Nowacki, G.J.; Carpenter, C; McNab, W.H. 2007. Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections of the Conterminous United States.[1:3,500,000], Sloan, A.M., cartog. Gen. Tech. Report WO-76. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
Musgrave, G.W. 1955. How much of the rain enters the soil? In Water: U.S. Department of Agriculture Yearbook. Washington, D.C. P. 151-159.
National Engineering Handbook. US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available: http://www.info.usda.gov/CED/Default.cfm#National%20Engineering%20Handbook. Accessed February 25, 2008.
Passey, H. B., W. K. Hugie, E. W. Williams, and D. E. Ball. 1982. Relationships between soil, plant community, and climate on rangelands of the Intermountain west. USDA, Soil Conservation Service, Tech. Bull. No. 1669.
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed [8/10/2015].
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
Western Regional Climate Center. Retrieved from http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/summary/Climsmco.html on May 17, 2018.
Contributors
Brandon Sanders
Suzanne Mayne Kinney
Approval
Kirt Walstad, 9/07/2023
Acknowledgments
Field offices in Colorado where the site occures: Craig, Glenwood Springs, Grand Junction, and Meeker.
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | 08/17/2024 |
Approved by | Kirt Walstad |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.