Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R035XA128AZ
Tephra Uplands, Loamy 10-14" p.z
Accessed: 11/21/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 035X–Colorado Plateau
This ecological site occurs in Common Resource Area 35.1 - the Colorado Plateau Mixed Grass Plains
Elevations range from 4800 to 6300 feet and precipitation averages 10 to 14 inches per year. Vegetation includes Stipa species, Indian ricegrass, galleta, and blue grama, fourwing saltbush, winterfat, and cliffrose. The soil temperature regime is mesic and the soil moisture regime is ustic aridic. This unit occurs within the Colorado Plateau Physiographic Province and is characterized by a sequence of flat to gently dipping sedimentary rocks eroded into plateaus, valleys and deep canyons. Sedimentary rock classes dominate the plateau with volcanic fields occurring for the most part near its margin.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
| Tree |
Not specified |
|---|---|
| Shrub |
(1) Atriplex canescens |
| Herbaceous |
(1) Bouteloua eriopoda |
Physiographic features
This site occurs on uplands of fan remants, structural benches, footslopes of hills and cinder cones. This site does not suffer from excessive runoff or benefit from run-in moisture. Moisture infiltration is good because of the coarse textures of the soil. Some available moisture is lost on steeper slopes. Slopes generally range from 0-15% with occasional steeper slopes.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
| Landforms |
(1)
Fan remnant
(2) Hill (3) Cinder cone |
|---|---|
| Flooding frequency | None |
| Ponding frequency | None |
| Elevation | 1,463 – 1,920 m |
| Slope | 0 – 15% |
| Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
50-60% of moisture falls as rain Jul-Sep and is the most effective moisture for plant growth. The remaining moisture comes as snow during the winter.
Mean temperature for the hottest month (Jul) is 72 F; for the coldest month (Jan) is 32 F. Extreme temperatures of 105 F and -28F have been recorded. Long periods with little or no effective moisture are relatively common.
Cool season plants begin growth in early spring and mature early summer. Warm season plants take advantage of summer rains and are growing and nutritious Jul-Sep.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
| Frost-free period (average) | 160 days |
|---|---|
| Freeze-free period (average) | 180 days |
| Precipitation total (average) | 330 mm |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Soil features
The soils on this site are shallow over cinders or cemented cinders. The surface horizons, about 2 to 10 inches thick, generally have textures of gravelly to very gravelly loam. The subsurface horizons have textures of gravelly to very gravelly loams over a cinders or cemented cinders. Permeability is moderate to moderately slow but the soils on level slopes can absorb and hold all the mositure the climate can supply. On steeper slopes some moisture is lost in runoff. The soil reaction ranges from slightly to moderately alkaline (pH 7.4-8.4).
Typical taxonomic units include:
Little Colorado River SSA707 MU's-Wilaha 65, Wukoki 67 & 68, Wupatki 68;
Table 4. Representative soil features
| Parent material |
(1)
Cinders
–
pyroclastic rock
|
|---|---|
| Surface texture |
(1) Gravelly loam (2) Very gravelly loam |
| Family particle size |
(1) Loamy |
| Drainage class | Well drained to somewhat excessively drained |
| Permeability class | Moderately slow to moderately rapid |
| Soil depth | 25 – 51 cm |
| Surface fragment cover <=3" | 15 – 55% |
| Surface fragment cover >3" | 0 – 25% |
| Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
3.3 – 8.89 cm |
| Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-101.6cm) |
0 – 25% |
| Electrical conductivity (0-101.6cm) |
0 – 2 mmhos/cm |
| Sodium adsorption ratio (0-101.6cm) |
0 – 2 |
| Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-101.6cm) |
7.4 – 8.4 |
Ecological dynamics
The plant communities found on an ecological site are naturally variable. Composition and production will vary with yearly conditions, location, aspect, and the natural variability of the soils. The historical climax plant community represents the natural potential plant communities found on relict or relatively undisturbed sites. Other plant communities described here represent plant communities that are known to occur when the site is disturbed by factors such as grazing, fire, or drought.
Production data provided in this site description is standardized to air-dry weight at the end of the summer growing season. The plant communities described in this site description are based on near normal rainfall years.
NRCS uses a Similarity Index to compare existing plant communities to the plant communities described here. Similarity Index is determined by comparing the production and composition of a plant community to the production and composition of a plant community described in this site description. To determine Similarity Index, compare the production (air-dry weight) of each species to that shown in the plant community description. For each species, count no more than the maximum amount shown for the species, and for each group, count no more than the maximum shown for the group. Divide the resulting total by the total normal year production shown in the plant community description. If rainfall has been significantly above or below normal, use the total production shown for above or below normal years. If field data is not collected at the end of the summer growing season, then the field data must be corrected to the end of the year production before comparing it to the site description. The growth curve can be used as a guide for estimating production at the end of the summer growing season.
The State and Transition model shows the most common occurring plant communities likely to be encountered on this ecological site. This model may not show every possible plant community, but only those that are most prevalent and observed through field inventory. As more data is collected and research is available, these plant communities may be revised, removed, and even added to reflect the ecological dynamics of this site.
State and transition model
Figure 4. State and Transition Model - R035XA128AZ
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
The reference state and the reference (climax) plant community has been determined by study of relict areas or areas protected from excessive disturbances. Trends in plant communities unmanaged grazed areas to managed grazed areas, seasonal use pastures and historical accounts have also been used. The reference state is characterized as a grassland community of mid and short grasses with a moderate percentage of shrubs and half shrubs.
Community 1.1
Black grama - Blue grama/ Fourwing saltbush
Figure 5. Cinder Hills 10-14" p.z.
This plant community is made up primarily of mid and short grasses with a relatively small percentage of shrubs, half shrubs and forbs. The plant community may have an occasional juniper at higher elevations. There is a mixture of both cool and warm season grasses. Plants most likely to invade or increase on this site when it deteriorates are broom snakeweed, wooly groundsel, annuals, cacti, juniper and rabbitbrush. Unmanaged grazing during the winter and spring periods will decrease the cool season grasses, which are replaced by warm season, lower forage value grasses and shrubs. In this plant community there may be a trace of non-native annuals present. They do not change the sites ecological processes in these minor amounts
Figure 6. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
| Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grass/Grasslike | 275 | 460 | 633 |
| Shrub/Vine | 45 | 73 | 101 |
| Forb | 17 | 22 | 28 |
| Tree | – | – | 11 |
| Total | 337 | 555 | 773 |
Community 1.2
Blue grama - Galleta/ Snakeweed - Rubber rabbitbrush
Plant community is made up primarily of mid and short grasses and scattered large and half shrubs with a relatively small percentage of forbs and trees. It has an open overstory of scattered junipers. There is a mixture of both cool and warm season grasses. Plants most likely to invade or increase on this site when it deteriorates are broom snakeweed, wooly groundsel, annuals, cacti, juniper and rabbitbrush. Unmanaged grazing during the winter and spring periods will decrease the cool season grasses, which are replaced by warm season, lower forage value grasses and shrubs. The plant community composition for this site is 45-65% grasses, 30-40% shrubs, 1-10% forbs and 1-5% trees. In this plant community there may be trace amounts of non-native annuals present. They do not change the sites ecological processes in these minor amounts
Pathway 1.1a
Community 1.1 to 1.2
Drought, Unmanaged grazing
Pathway 1.2a
Community 1.2 to 1.1
Prescribed grazing, favorable climate or periods of good precipitation
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
| Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
| 1 | Dominant Grasses | 336–527 | ||||
| black grama | BOER4 | Bouteloua eriopoda | 112–224 | – | ||
| blue grama | BOGR2 | Bouteloua gracilis | 56–168 | – | ||
| James' galleta | PLJA | Pleuraphis jamesii | 28–84 | – | ||
| sideoats grama | BOCU | Bouteloua curtipendula | 28–84 | – | ||
| 2 | Other Grasses | 56–135 | ||||
| needle and thread | HECO26 | Hesperostipa comata | 17–39 | – | ||
| common wolfstail | LYPH | Lycurus phleoides | 17–39 | – | ||
| squirreltail | ELELE | Elymus elymoides ssp. elymoides | 6–28 | – | ||
| muttongrass | POFE | Poa fendleriana | 6–28 | – | ||
| spike dropseed | SPCO4 | Sporobolus contractus | 6–28 | – | ||
| sand dropseed | SPCR | Sporobolus cryptandrus | 6–28 | – | ||
| Grass, perennial | 2GP | Grass, perennial | 0–17 | – | ||
| threeawn | ARIST | Aristida | 0–17 | – | ||
| vine mesquite | PAOB | Panicum obtusum | 0–17 | – | ||
| Grass, annual | 2GA | Grass, annual | 0–11 | – | ||
|
Forb
|
||||||
| 3 | Forbs | 6–28 | ||||
| Forb, annual | 2FA | Forb, annual | 0–11 | – | ||
| Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 0–11 | – | ||
| globemallow | SPHAE | Sphaeralcea | 0–6 | – | ||
|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
| 4 | Dominant Shrubs | 28–84 | ||||
| fourwing saltbush | ATCA2 | Atriplex canescens | 28–56 | – | ||
| jointfir | EPHED | Ephedra | 22–45 | – | ||
| winterfat | KRLA2 | Krascheninnikovia lanata | 22–45 | – | ||
| 5 | Other Shrubs | 28–84 | ||||
| prairie sagewort | ARFR4 | Artemisia frigida | 0–28 | – | ||
| Greene's rabbitbrush | CHGR6 | Chrysothamnus greenei | 0–28 | – | ||
| yellow rabbitbrush | CHVI8 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus | 0–28 | – | ||
| rubber rabbitbrush | ERNA10 | Ericameria nauseosa | 0–28 | – | ||
| woolly groundsel | PACA15 | Packera cana | 0–17 | – | ||
| yerba de pasmo | BAPT | Baccharis pteronioides | 0–17 | – | ||
| pricklypear | OPUNT | Opuntia | 0–11 | – | ||
| Whipple cholla | CYWH | Cylindropuntia whipplei | 0–11 | – | ||
|
Tree
|
||||||
| 6 | Trees | 0–11 | ||||
| oneseed juniper | JUMO | Juniperus monosperma | 0–11 | – | ||
Table 7. Community 1.2 plant community composition
| Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) |
|---|
Interpretations
Animal community
This site is suitable for grazing at any time of the year by all livestock types. Planned grazing systems can be readily adapted for use on this site. Mechanical improvement practices, such as chaining, pitting or seeding would not be adaptable to this site; however, this site will respond relatively fast to good management.
The nearly level to steeper topography adds habitat diversity to the site. Juniper stands have developed in many areas as a result of fire exclusion and overgrazing. These tree forms increase diversity of wildlife.
Recreational uses
Winters are cold, but summers are quite warm and attractive for recreational use.
Uses include cross country travel, photography, wildlife observation, hunting, and rock collecting.
Wood products
Even though Juniper can develop on this site as a result of fire exclusion and overgrazing there is not enough production for commercial firewood harvesting or posts.
Supporting information
Type locality
| Location 1: Apache County, AZ | |
|---|---|
| General legal description | Near old highway 666, seven miles northwest of Springerville, AZ |
Other references
Updates and revisions for this ESD were conducted as part of a 2007-2012 Interagency Technical Assistance Agreement between the Bureau of Indian Affairs–Navajo Region and the NRCS-Arizona.
This site was originally included with the Cinder Hills (R035XA102AZ), but was separated to capture the lower slopes with more soil developement, the shallow slopes overlying cinders or duripan of lime-cemented cinders with higher vegetation production.
Contributors
Ken Gishi
Kenneth Gishi
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
| Author(s)/participant(s) | Kenneth Gishi |
|---|---|
| Contact for lead author | State Rangeland Management Specialist, NRCS-Arizona State Office, Phoenix, AZ |
| Date | 09/13/2012 |
| Approved by | Byron Lambeth |
| Approval date | |
| Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None. Due to high content of gravels and cobbles along with loamy textures no rills would be expected. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
None Expected. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
None expected. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground ranges from 15-30%. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
None. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
High amounts of vegetation production (mostly grasses) along with high surface rock content yields moderate to high resistance to water erosion and wind resistance. Expected stability values range from 1-2. The site is fairly stable due to the cindery surface. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Soil structure is typically weak very fine granular structure or weak thick platy structure. Surface thickness ranges from 2-10 inches thick. Colors are typically brown (10YR 5/3) or grayish brown (10YR 5/2). See the local soil survey report for specific soils information. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
There is a fairly even distribution of grasses with scattered shrubs and a small amount of forbs. This plant community on this site is moderately effective at capturing and storing moisture. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None. These soils are gravelly to very gravelly with cinders. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Warm season colonizing grasses > Warm season bunch grasses >Sub-dominant:
Cool season bunch grasses > Large shrubs > Half shrubs >Other:
Forbs > TreesAdditional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
In a normal year up to 10% of grasses and shrubs die off. During and after drought years there can be from 10 to 20% die off of shrubs and grasses. Severe winter droughts affect shrubs, trees and cool season grasses the most. Severe summer droughts affect the warm season grasses the most. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Average annual production on this site is expected to be 450 to 550 lbs/ac. in a year of average annual precipitation. -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Snakeweed, rabbitbrush, junipers, wooly groundsel, and cacti all have the potential to increase and invade the site with disturbance. Non-native annuals, such as cheatgrass and Russian thistle also have the potentials to invade the site with or without disturbance. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All plants native to this site are adapted to the climate and are capable of producing seeds, stolons and rhizomes except during the most severe droughts.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.