Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R040XB217AZ
Sandy Upland 7"-10" p.z.
Accessed: 11/21/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
MLRA notes
Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 040X–Sonoran Basin and Range
AZ 40.2 – Middle Sonoran Desert
Elevations range from 1200 to 2000 feet and precipitation averages 7 to 10 inches per year. Vegetation includes saguaro, palo verde, creosotebush, triangle bursage, brittlebush, prickly pear, cholla, desert saltbush, wolfberry bush muhly, threeawns, and big galleta. The soil temperature regime is hyperthermic and the soil moisture regime is typic aridic. This unit occurs within the Basin and Range Physiographic Province and is characterized by numerous mountain ranges that rise abruptly from broad, plain-like valleys and basins. Igneous and metamorphic rock classes dominate the mountain ranges and sediments filling the basins represent combinations of fluvial, lacustrine, colluvial and alluvial deposits.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Larrea tridentata var. tridentata |
Herbaceous |
(1) Sporobolus contractus |
Physiographic features
This site occurs as stream terraces, fan terraces and dunes. Slopes are generally 3-5 percent or less, however, short side slopes, in dune areas, may exceed 15 percent. Elevations are from 1000 to 2200 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Stream terrace
(2) Fan (3) Dune |
---|---|
Elevation | 305 – 671 m |
Slope | 3 – 15% |
Climatic features
Precipitation in the sub-resource area ranges from 7 to 10 inches. Elevations range from 900 to 2050 feet. Winter-summer rainfall ratios range from 40% to 60% in the southern part along the international boundary, to 60% to 40% in the central and northern parts of the sub-resource area. As one moves from east to west in this resource area rains become more unpredictable and variable with Coefficients of Variation of annual rainfall equal to 38% at Florence and 46% at Aguila. Summer rains fall July- September, originate in the Gulf of Mexico, and are convective, usually brief, intense thunderstorms. Summer precipitation is extremely erratic and undependable in this area. Cool season moisture tends to be frontal, originates in the Pacific and Gulf of California, and falls in widespread storms with long duration and low intensity. This is the dependable moisture supply for vegetation in the area. Snow is very rare and usually melts on contact. May-June is the driest time of the year. Humidity is very low.
Winter temperatures are very mild with very few days recording freezing for short periods of time. Summertime temperatures are hot to very hot with many days in June-July exceeding 105 degrees F. Frost-free days range from 280 at stations in major river valleys with cold air drainage to 320 to 350 days at upland stations.
Both the spring and the summer growing seasons are equally important for perennial grass, forb and shrub growth. Cool and warm season annual forbs and grasses can be common in their respective seasons with above average rainfall. Perennial forage species can remain green throughout the year with available moisture.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 350 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 0 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 254 mm |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Soil features
These soils are deep and sandy. Plant-soil moisture relationship is very good as these soils take all the moisture the climate supplies and makes it available to plants.
Soils mapped on this site include: SSA-645 Aguila-Carefree area MU Vint(fine sandy loam, loamy sand, and loamy fine sand) unflooded-125; SSA-651 Central Maricopa county MU Duneland-Dn; SSA-659 Western Pinal county MU Rositas-40; SSA-661 Eastern Pinal-Southern Gila counties MU Momoli-216; SSA-703 Tohono O'odham area MU Rositas(sand, fine sand, loamy sand, and loamy fine sand)-54.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Sand (2) Loamy sand (3) Loamy fine sand |
---|---|
Family particle size |
(1) Sandy |
Drainage class | Well drained |
Permeability class | Very rapid |
Soil depth | 152 cm |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 0% |
Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
9.14 – 12.19 cm |
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-101.6cm) |
0 – 3% |
Electrical conductivity (0-101.6cm) |
0 mmhos/cm |
Sodium adsorption ratio (0-101.6cm) |
0 |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-101.6cm) |
7.4 – 8.4 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
0% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
0% |
Ecological dynamics
The plant communities found on an ecological site are naturally variable. Composition and production will vary with yearly conditions, location, aspect, and the natural variability of the soils. The Historical Climax Plant Community represents the natural potential plant communities found on relict or relatively undisturbed sites. Other plant communities described here represent plant communities that are known to occur when the site is disturbed by factors such as fire, grazing, or drought.
Production data provided in this site description is standardized to air dry weight at the end of the summer growing season. The plant communities described in this site description are based on near normal rainfall years.
NRCS uses a Similarity Index to compare existing plant communities to the plant communities described here. Similarity Index is determined by comparing the production and composition of a plant community to the production and composition of a plant community described in this site description. To determine Similarity Index, compare the production (air dry weight) of each species to that shown in the plant community description. For each species, count no more than the maximum amount shown for the species, and for each group, count no more than the maximum amount shown for the group. Divide the resulting total by the total normal year production shown in the plant community description. If the rainfall has been significantly above or below normal, use the total production shown for above or below normal years. If field data is not collected at the end of the summer growing season, then the field data must be corrected to the end of the year production before comparing it to the site description. The growth curve can be used as a guide for estimating production at the end of the summer growing season.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Historical Climax Plant Community
Community 1.1
Historical Climax Plant Community
The plant community is a mixture of perennial and annual grasses, forbs and desert shrubs. When the plant cover has been depleted, these soils are very susceptible to wind blowing and water increase on the site with surface disturbance.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 510 | – | 667 |
Shrub/Vine | 39 | – | 118 |
Forb | 78 | – | 118 |
Total | 627 | – | 903 |
Additional community tables
Table 6. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | 392–549 | |||||
spike dropseed | SPCO4 | Sporobolus contractus | 336–448 | – | ||
big galleta | PLRI3 | Pleuraphis rigida | 56–101 | – | ||
2 | 39–78 | |||||
Santa Rita threeawn | ARCAG | Aristida californica var. glabrata | 0–17 | – | ||
Parish's threeawn | ARPUP5 | Aristida purpurea var. parishii | 0–17 | – | ||
sand dropseed | SPCR | Sporobolus cryptandrus | 0–11 | – | ||
mesa dropseed | SPFL2 | Sporobolus flexuosus | 0–11 | – | ||
purple threeawn | ARPU9 | Aristida purpurea | 0–11 | – | ||
California threeawn | ARCA9 | Aristida californica | 0–11 | – | ||
3 | 39–78 | |||||
witchgrass | PACA6 | Panicum capillare | 0–11 | – | ||
sixweeks fescue | VUOC | Vulpia octoflora | 0–11 | – | ||
sixweeks threeawn | ARAD | Aristida adscensionis | 0–11 | – | ||
prairie threeawn | AROL | Aristida oligantha | 0–11 | – | ||
needle grama | BOAR | Bouteloua aristidoides | 0–11 | – | ||
sixweeks grama | BOBA2 | Bouteloua barbata | 0–11 | – | ||
Rothrock's grama | BORO2 | Bouteloua rothrockii | 0–6 | – | ||
Arizona brome | BRAR4 | Bromus arizonicus | 0–1 | – | ||
feather fingergrass | CHVI4 | Chloris virgata | 0–1 | – | ||
canyon cupgrass | ERLE7 | Eriochloa lemmonii | 0–1 | – | ||
tufted lovegrass | ERPEP2 | Eragrostis pectinacea var. pectinacea | 0–1 | – | ||
Mexican sprangletop | LEFUU | Leptochloa fusca ssp. uninervia | 0–1 | – | ||
mucronate sprangletop | LEPA6 | Leptochloa panicea | 0–1 | – | ||
Bigelow's bluegrass | POBI | Poa bigelovii | 0–1 | – | ||
Arizona signalgrass | URAR | Urochloa arizonica | 0–1 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
4 | 8–39 | |||||
desert lily | HEUN2 | Hesperocallis undulata | 0–8 | – | ||
birdcage evening primrose | OEDE2 | Oenothera deltoides | 0–8 | – | ||
whitemargin sandmat | CHAL11 | Chamaesyce albomarginata | 1–4 | – | ||
desert sand verbena | ABVI | Abronia villosa | 0–3 | – | ||
desert marigold | BAMU | Baileya multiradiata | 0–3 | – | ||
lacy tansyaster | MAPIP4 | Machaeranthera pinnatifida ssp. pinnatifida var. pinnatifida | 0–1 | – | ||
canaigre dock | RUHY | Rumex hymenosepalus | 0–1 | – | ||
smooth threadleaf ragwort | SEFLM | Senecio flaccidus var. monoensis | 0–1 | – | ||
5 | 39–78 | |||||
desert Indianwheat | PLOV | Plantago ovata | 0–11 | – | ||
desert globemallow | SPAM2 | Sphaeralcea ambigua | 0–6 | – | ||
Coulter's globemallow | SPCO2 | Sphaeralcea coulteri | 0–6 | – | ||
common fiddleneck | AMMEI2 | Amsinckia menziesii var. intermedia | 0–6 | – | ||
bristly fiddleneck | AMTE3 | Amsinckia tessellata | 0–6 | – | ||
Booth's evening primrose | CABOI | Camissonia boothii ssp. intermedia | 0–3 | – | ||
chuckwalla combseed | PEHE | Pectocarya heterocarpa | 0–3 | – | ||
broadfruit combseed | PEPL | Pectocarya platycarpa | 0–2 | – | ||
wingnut cryptantha | CRPT | Cryptantha pterocarya | 0–2 | – | ||
hairy prairie clover | DAMO | Dalea mollis | 0–1 | – | ||
soft prairie clover | DAMO2 | Dalea mollissima | 0–1 | – | ||
California shieldpod | DICA7 | Dithyrea californica | 0–1 | – | ||
miniature woollystar | ERDI2 | Eriastrum diffusum | 0–1 | – | ||
woolly sunflower | ERIOP2 | Eriophyllum | 0–1 | – | ||
kidneyleaf buckwheat | ERRE3 | Eriogonum reniforme | 0–1 | – | ||
Thomas' buckwheat | ERTH | Eriogonum thomasii | 0–1 | – | ||
little deserttrumpet | ERTR8 | Eriogonum trichopes | 0–1 | – | ||
California poppy | ESCAM | Eschscholzia californica ssp. mexicana | 0–1 | – | ||
spurge | EUPHO | Euphorbia | 0–1 | – | ||
Arizona poppy | KAGR | Kallstroemia grandiflora | 0–1 | – | ||
Great Basin langloisia | LASE3 | Langloisia setosissima | 0–1 | – | ||
shaggyfruit pepperweed | LELA | Lepidium lasiocarpum | 0–1 | – | ||
Bigelow's linanthus | LIBI2 | Linanthus bigelovii | 0–1 | – | ||
foothill deervetch | LOHU2 | Lotus humistratus | 0–1 | – | ||
desert deervetch | LOMI | Lotus micranthus | 0–1 | – | ||
bajada lupine | LUCO | Lupinus concinnus | 0–1 | – | ||
Coulter's lupine | LUSP2 | Lupinus sparsiflorus | 0–1 | – | ||
California desertdandelion | MACA6 | Malacothrix californica | 0–1 | – | ||
yellowcomet | MEAF2 | Mentzelia affinis | 0–1 | – | ||
whitestem blazingstar | MEAL6 | Mentzelia albicaulis | 0–1 | – | ||
cottonheads | NEDE | Nemacaulis denudata | 0–1 | – | ||
glandular threadplant | NEGL | Nemacladus glanduliferus | 0–1 | – | ||
desert evening primrose | OEPR | Oenothera primiveris | 0–1 | – | ||
giant Spanish needle | PAARG | Palafoxia arida var. gigantea | 0–1 | – | ||
brittle spineflower | CHBR | Chorizanthe brevicornu | 0–1 | – | ||
Esteve's pincushion | CHST | Chaenactis stevioides | 0–1 | – | ||
Panamint cryptantha | CRAN4 | Cryptantha angustifolia | 0–1 | – | ||
redroot cryptantha | CRMI | Cryptantha micrantha | 0–1 | – | ||
New Mexico silverbush | ARNE2 | Argythamnia neomexicana | 0–1 | – | ||
Cedros milkvetch | ASIN6 | Astragalus insularis | 0–1 | – | ||
spiderling | BOERH2 | Boerhavia | 0–1 | – | ||
onyxflower | ACCO3 | Achyronychia cooperi | 0–1 | – | ||
manybristle chinchweed | PEPA2 | Pectis papposa | 0–1 | – | ||
small wirelettuce | STEX | Stephanomeria exigua | 0–1 | – | ||
longbeak streptanthella | STLO4 | Streptanthella longirostris | 0–1 | – | ||
woolly tidestromia | TILA2 | Tidestromia lanuginosa | 0–1 | – | ||
desert unicorn-plant | PRAL4 | Proboscidea althaeifolia | 0–1 | – | ||
New Mexico plumeseed | RANE | Rafinesquia neomexicana | 0–1 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
6 | 39–78 | |||||
creosote bush | LATR2 | Larrea tridentata | 6–22 | – | ||
burrobush | AMDU2 | Ambrosia dumosa | 2–11 | – | ||
Nevada jointfir | EPNE | Ephedra nevadensis | 2–11 | – | ||
longleaf jointfir | EPTR | Ephedra trifurca | 2–11 | – | ||
white ratany | KRGR | Krameria grayi | 2–11 | – | ||
7 | 8–39 | |||||
lotebush | ZIOB | Ziziphus obtusifolia | 0–11 | – | ||
singlewhorl burrobrush | HYMO | Hymenoclea monogyra | 0–11 | – | ||
fourwing saltbush | ATCA2 | Atriplex canescens | 0–6 | – | ||
honey mesquite | PRGLG | Prosopis glandulosa var. glandulosa | 0–3 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
This site produces year round forage and is easily traversed by all classes of cattle except in the summer season when lack of shade and loose sandy soils greatly hinder livestock use. As these soils are very susceptible to wind and water erosion, management which maintains the plant cover is most important. Fencing and water development may be important in achieving grazing control.
Due to the sandy soils and good diversity in feed plants, this site is host to a variety of burrowing, desert mammals. It is mainly a feeding ground for the larger desert mammals, the predatory mammals, reptiles and birds of the desert.
Other information
T&E: Antilocapra Americana sonoriensis
(Sonoran pronghorn)
Supporting information
Type locality
Location 1: Pinal County, AZ | |
---|---|
Township/Range/Section | T7S R4E S10 |
General legal description | Casa Grande FO - 3.4 miles west of where old Greens Wash crosses I-8 |
Location 2: Pinal County, AZ | |
Township/Range/Section | T2S R4E S30 |
General legal description | Casa Grande FO |
Location 3: Pima County, AZ | |
Township/Range/Section | T8S R5E S5 |
General legal description | Sells FO - West of Chiuchu |
Location 4: Maricopa County, AZ | |
Township/Range/Section | T3N R1E S18 |
General legal description | Phoenix FO - Along Agua Fria Wash at Sun City |
Location 5: Maricopa County, AZ | |
Township/Range/Section | T2S R1E S18 |
General legal description | Buckeye FO - Beloat Ranch |
Contributors
Dan Robinett
Larry D. Ellicott
Steve Barker
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | Dave Womack, Emilio Carrillo, Dan Robinett |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | NRCS Tucson Area Office |
Date | 03/07/2005 |
Approved by | S. Cassady |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
None due to high infiltration rates. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Water flow patterns are uncommon due to high infiltration rates. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
All shrubs have symmerical mounds 2-5 inches tall formed by combined action of splash, erosion and rodents. There are no pedestals on rock or gravel fragments and no terracettes are present. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
60-70% -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Minor evidence of soil movement by wind. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Herbaceous litter can move by wind. Woody litter remains under shrub canopies. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface resistance to erosion is good under shrub canopies to moderate in interspaces due to crusts formed by raindop impact. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Weak thin plat to granula; color 7.5-10YR6/4 dry, 7.5-10YR4/5 moist; to 2inces thick -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Canopy 15-20%. Herbaceous litter is present in some years and absent in others. Large shubs with large coppice mounds with high infiltration rates. Subshrubs with smal mounds with high infiltration rates. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
perennial grass > shrubs > winter annuals > trees > summer annuals > succulents = perennial forbs > cryptogamsSub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
0-50% canopy mortality; 90-100 mortality on perennial grasses. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
400 lbs/ac unfavorable precipitation, 700 lbs/ac normal precipitation, 1000 lbs/ac favorabl precipitation -
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Sahara mustard (potential), mesquite, creosote -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Not impaired for shrubs, drought impaired for perennial grasses and forbs.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.