Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Ecological site F043AY576ID

Poorly Drained Vitrandic Foothills 30-45" PZ Frigid Western Bitterroot Foothills

Last updated: 10/14/2020
Accessed: 04/02/2025

Home / Esd catalog / MLRA 043A / Ecological site F043AY576ID

USC

Metric

General information

Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.

MLRA notes

Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 043A–Northern Rocky Mountains

Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 043A–Northern Rocky Mountains

Description of MLRAs can be found in: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.

Available electronically at: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/?cid=nrcs142p2_053624#handbook

LRU notes

Most commonly found in LRU 43A09 (Western Bitterroot Foothills). Also found in 43A07 (Eastern Columbia Plateau Embayments). Climate parameters were obtained from PRISM and other models for the area. Landscape descriptors are derived from USGS DEM products and their derivatives..

Classification relationships

Relationship to Other Established Classifications:

United States National Vegetation Classification (2008), A3612 Western Hemlock – Western Redcedar Cool-Mesic Central Rocky Mountain Forest & Woodland Alliance.

Washington Natural Heritage Program. Ecosystems of Washington State, A Guide to Identification, Rocchio and Crawford, 2015 - Northern Rocky Mt. Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest (Cedar-Hemlock)

Description of Ecoregions of the United States, USFS PN # 1391, 1995 - M333 Northern Rocky Mt. Forest-Steppe-Coniferous Forest-Alpine Meadow Province

Level III and IV Ecoregions of WA, US EPA, June 2010 – 15y Selkirk Mountains, 15w Western Selkirk Maritime Forest.

This ecological site includes the following USDA Forest Service Plant Associations Western Redcedar Series: THPL/CLUN, THPL/ASCA. (Williams et. al. 1995)

Ecological site concept

This ES group is distinguished by an overstory of western redcedar, grand fir and Douglas-fir and a diverse understory of shrubs such as woods rose and Utah honeysuckle; and herbs such as bride’s bonnet, Idaho goldthread and starry false solomon’s seal. It occurs on foothills, mountainsides, and ridges. These soils have developed in highly mixed Mazama tephra deposits over alluvium. The soils are very deep and have adequate available water capacity to a depth of 40 inches. They have an apparent water table within 30 inches during the May-Oct period. The soils are somewhat poorly to moderately well drained. This ES group fits into the National Vegetation Standard’s Tsuga heterophylla - Thuja plicata Cool-Mesic Central Rocky Mountain Forest & Woodland Alliance and Washington State’s Natural Heritage Program’s Northern Rocky Mountain Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest.

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Tree	(1) Thuja plicata (2) Abies grandis
Shrub	(1) Vaccinium membranaceum (2) Linnaea borealis ssp. longiflora
Herbaceous	(1) Clintonia uniflora (2) Asarum caudatum

Download full description

Physiographic features

Physiographic Features
Landscapes: Foothills, River Valleys
Landform: floodplains, stream terraces, flood-plain steps

Elevation (m): Total range = 580 to 1255 m
(1,900 to 4,115 feet)
Central tendency = 830 to 1000 m
(2,720 to 3,280 feet)

Slope (percent): Total range = 0 to 45 percent
Central tendency = 3 to 20 percent

Aspect: none dominant

Table 2. Representative physiographic features

Landforms	(1) River valley > Flood plain (2) Foothills > Stream terrace (3) Foothills > Flood-plain step
Flooding duration	Brief (2 to 7 days)
Flooding frequency	Very rare
Ponding duration	Not specified
Ponding frequency	None
Elevation	829 – 1,000 m
Slope	3 – 20%
Water table depth	51 cm
Aspect	Aspect is not a significant factor

Table 3. Representative physiographic features (actual ranges)

Flooding duration	Brief (2 to 7 days)
Flooding frequency	None to occasional
Ponding duration	Long (7 to 30 days)
Ponding frequency	None to frequent
Elevation	579 – 1,254 m
Slope	0 – 45%
Water table depth	3 – 102 cm

Climatic features

Climatic Features
Frost-free period (days): Total range = 75 to 120 days
Central tendency = 100 to 115 days

Mean annual precipitation (cm): Total range = 645 to 1265 mm
(25 to 50 inches)
Central tendency = 835 to 1010 mm
(33 to 40 inches)

MAAT (C): Total range = 5.9 to 8.7
(43 to 48 F)
Central tendency = 6.8 to 7.5
(44 to 46 F)

Climate Stations: none

Soil features

Representative Soil Features

This ecological site is associated with a several soil components (e.g. Spacecreek, Caseycreek, Mannering, and Aquic Udifluvents). These soils are Oxyaquic Udivitrands, Vitrandic Eutrudepts, and Aquic Udifluvents. These soils have developed in highly mixed Mazama tephra deposits over alluvium. The soils are very deep and have adequate available water capacity to a depth of 40 inches. They have an apparent water table within 30 inches during the May-Oct period. The soils are somewhat poorly to moderately well drained.

Table 4. Representative soil features

Parent material	(1) Volcanic ash (2) Alluvium
Surface texture	(1) Ashy silt loam (2) Medial silt loam (3) Silt loam
Drainage class	Somewhat poorly drained
Permeability class	Moderate
Depth to restrictive layer	203 cm
Surface fragment cover >3"	0%
Available water capacity (0-101.6cm)	14.48 cm
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-152.4cm)	0%
Electrical conductivity (0-152.4cm)	0 mmhos/cm
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-152.4cm)	5.7
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (25.4-152.4cm)	5%
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (25.4-152.4cm)	0%

Table 5. Representative soil features (actual values)

Drainage class	Somewhat poorly drained to moderately well drained
Permeability class	Moderately slow to moderately rapid
Depth to restrictive layer	203 cm
Surface fragment cover >3"	0%
Available water capacity (0-101.6cm)	11.18 – 20.57 cm
Calcium carbonate equivalent (0-152.4cm)	0%
Electrical conductivity (0-152.4cm)	0 mmhos/cm
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-152.4cm)	5 – 7.3
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (25.4-152.4cm)	1 – 40%
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (25.4-152.4cm)	0 – 40%

Ecological dynamics

Ecological Dynamics of the Site

This ecological site is highly diverse in tree species, shrub and forb composition. Forest composition is dependent of fire severity, occurrence, and tree species seed source after fire. Western white pine used to dominate stands after stand replacing fires before the white pine blister rust. Now, western larch, Douglas-fir, lodgepole, and ponderosa pine (dry exposures) have replaced it. Grand fir and western red cedar also get established but sit in understory underneath the other species until release from canopy openings. In early stands after fire Quaking aspen, paper birch, and black cottonwood will be present only to be overtopped in later years. Shrub competition can be severe after fire with many shrub species dominating the site. Red stem ceanothus or snowbrush ceanothus (drier areas) could dominate sites with severe burns. Mixed severity fires create a patchy mosaic of all tree species being present. Reference condition will have fire exclusion or fire intervals of over 150 years which produce an all-aged western red cedar – grand fir forest. Relic western larch, Douglas-fir, and ponderosa pine may be present.

State and transition model

Custom diagram

Standard diagram

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models

More interactive model formats are also available. View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text

State 1
Reference

This state with extended fire intervals turns into an all aged western redcedar stand with some grand fir present. Most understory regeneration is western redcedar again with some grand fir. Stand replacing fires start off in the herb/shrub stage with many species of shrubs potentially occupying the site. Shrubs include Douglas maple, serviceberry, snowbrush ceanothus, redstem ceanothus, snowberry, and ninebark. Tree regeneration is variable depending on available seed source. A host of seral species can establish including western larch, Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine, lodgepole pine, and western white pine (limited due to blister rust). Cedar and grand fir can also establish, but will sit underneath the seral species until released. Severe fires can cause soil degradation causing sites to remain in shrubs for long periods preventing tree establishment. With successful tree regeneration a mix of seral tree species can occupy the stand or in some cases, a single species like western larch will dominate the stand. These stands go into the stem exclusion phase with tree to tree competition. Understory vegetation will be sparse. As these stands mature mixed severity fires create a mosaic of stand structure and species composition with a combination of seral species and shade tolerant cedar and grand fir. Sites on midslopes are more likely to burn more intensely than lower slopes due to a “thermal belt” condition with lower slopes being cooler and midslopes warmer and drier in summer conditions.

Community 1.1
Reference

Mature stands of 150+ old western redcedar with some grand fir. An all aged stand structure is present with most regeneration being cedar with some grand fir. Relic western larch, Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine, and western white pine (if not killed by blister rust) may be present. Paper birch can be present in the understory. Major herb species include queencup beadily (brides bonnet), starry Solomonplume, w. rattlesnake plantain, and round-leaved violet. Major shrubs include pachistima, twinflower, w. prince’s pine, baldhip rose, Oregon grape, Douglas maple, and Utah honeysuckle.

Dominant plant species

western redcedar (Thuja plicata), tree
grand fir (Abies grandis), tree
Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca), tree
western larch (Larix occidentalis), tree
Oregon boxleaf (Paxistima myrsinites), shrub
longtube twinflower (Linnaea borealis ssp. longiflora), shrub
pipsissewa (Chimaphila umbellata), shrub
Rocky Mountain maple (Acer glabrum), shrub
Utah honeysuckle (Lonicera utahensis), shrub
dwarf rose (Rosa gymnocarpa), shrub
hollyleaved barberry (Mahonia aquifolium), shrub
darkwoods violet (Viola orbiculata), other herbaceous
bride's bonnet (Clintonia uniflora), other herbaceous
western rattlesnake plantain (Goodyera oblongifolia), other herbaceous
starry false lily of the valley (Maianthemum stellatum), other herbaceous
Piper's anemone (Anemone piperi), other herbaceous
Pacific trillium (Trillium ovatum ssp. ovatum), other herbaceous
fairy slipper (Calypso bulbosa), other herbaceous

Community 1.2
Mixed Species Stand

Mixed severity fires create a mosaic of mixed tree species. Western larch, Douglas-fir, western white pine, ponderosa pine (drier sites), and lodgepole pine can compose the stand. Cedar and grand fir will be mixed into the stand structure. Quaking aspen, black cottonwood and paper birch can be part on these mosaic stands.

Dominant plant species

grand fir (Abies grandis), tree
Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca), tree
western redcedar (Thuja plicata), tree
western larch (Larix occidentalis), tree
western white pine (Pinus monticola), tree

Community 1.3
Stem Exclusion

Dense pole size stand competition. Stands composed of mixed seral species or in some cases only cedar

Dominant plant species

grand fir (Abies grandis), tree
western redcedar (Thuja plicata), tree
Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca), tree

Community 1.4
Stand Initiation

Shrub and herb phase with tree regeneration depending on seed source. Single species regeneration such as western larch or mixed with larch, Douglas-fir, white pine, grand fir and cedar. Ponderosa pine establishment mostly on drier warmer sites. Lodgepole pine establishment possible on hotter burn sites. Shrubs can dominate for long periods preventing tree establishment

Pathway 1.1A
Community 1.1 to 1.4

Reference

Stand Initiation

Stand replacing fire

Pathway 1.2A
Community 1.2 to 1.1

Mixed Species Stand

Reference

Fire interval extended to allow shade tolerant cedar and grand fir to grow up from understory to dominate stand.

Pathway 1.3C
Community 1.3 to 1.1

Stem Exclusion

Reference

Time, fire interval extended to allow cedar and grand fir to dominate stand. No disturbance to allow seral species to dominate.

Pathway 1.3A
Community 1.3 to 1.2

Stem Exclusion

Mixed Species Stand

Time, allowing stands to reach maturity before a stand replacing fire. Mixed severity fires then occur.

Pathway 1.3B
Community 1.3 to 1.4

Stem Exclusion

Stand Initiation

Stand replacing fire in dense pole stands.

Pathway 1.4A
Community 1.4 to 1.3

Stand Initiation

Stem Exclusion

Time, allowing tree regeneration to grow into pole stands

State 2
Shrubfields

Severe fires change reference state to a shrubfield site. No tree regeneration due to shrub competition and soil conditions. Major shrubs include snowbrush and redstem ceanothus, serviceberry, ninebark, Scouler willow, elderberry species, snowberry, spirea, and Douglas maple

Dominant plant species

ceanothus (Ceanothus), shrub
Saskatoon serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia), shrub
mallow ninebark (Physocarpus malvaceus), shrub
Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana), shrub
red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), shrub
common snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus), shrub
white spirea (Spiraea betulifolia), shrub
Rocky Mountain maple (Acer glabrum), shrub

Community 2.1
Reference

Transition T1A
State 1 to 2

Reference

Shrubfields

Severe fires creating shrubfields preventing tree establishment for long time periods.

Restoration pathway R2A
State 2 to 1

Shrubfields

Reference

Site by site analysis to determine tree planting survival. Tree planting species mostly seral species like, larch, Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine, and white pine (blister rust resistant).

Additional community tables

Interpretations

Table 6. Representative site productivity

Common name	Symbol	Site index low	Site index high	CMAI low	CMAI high	Age of CMAI	Site index curve code	Site index curve basis
western white pine	PIMO3	75	110	144	201	100	–	–
grand fir	ABGR	76	124	106	201	95	–	–
Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir	PSMEG	64	98	65	152	104	–	–
western larch	LAOC	56	93	74	146	70	–	–
Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir	PSMEG	66	100	56	130	88	–	–

Supporting information

References

. Idaho Department of Lands H.T. Groupings based on Forest HTs of Northern Idaho.
Cooper, S.V., K.E. Neiman, R. Steele, and D.W. Roberts. 1991. Forest Habitat types of Northern Idaho, A Second Approximation.
Finklin, A.I. 1983. Climate of Priest River Experimental Forest, northern Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-159. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT. 53.
McDonald, G.L., A.E. Harvey, and J.R. Tonn. 2000. Fire, Competition, and Forest Pests: Landscape Treatment to Sustain Ecosystem Functions, The Joint Fire Science Conference and Workshop.. Pages 195–211 in Proceedings from the Joint Fire Science Conference and Workshop: crossing the millennium: integrating spatial technologies and ecological principles for a new age in fire management.
Miller and Gravelle. October, 2005. Species Selection Guidelines for Planting, Natural Regeneration and Crop Tree Selection on Potlatch Land in Northern Idaho, Forestry Technical Paper TP -2003-1.
Smith and Fischer. 1997. Fire Ecology of the Forest Habitat Types of Northern Idaho.
Zack, A. 1997. Biophysical Classification- Habitat Groups and Description of Northern Idaho and Northwestern Montana, Lower Clarkfork and Adjacent Areas..

Approval

Curtis Talbot, 10/14/2020

Rangeland health reference sheet

Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.

Author(s)/participant(s)
Contact for lead author
Date	04/02/2025
Approved by	Curtis Talbot
Approval date
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on	Annual Production

Indicators

Number and extent of rills:
Presence of water flow patterns:
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):

Dominant:

Sub-dominant:

Other:

Additional:
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Perennial plant reproductive capability:

Download reference sheet

Search

Natural ResourcesConservation Service

Ecological site F043AY576ID

Poorly Drained Vitrandic Foothills 30-45" PZ Frigid Western Bitterroot Foothills

Last updated: 10/14/2020 Accessed: 04/02/2025

General information

MLRA notes

LRU notes

Classification relationships

Ecological site concept

Table 1. Dominant plant species

Ecosystem states

State 1 submodel, plant communities

State 2 submodel, plant communities

Natural Resources
Conservation Service

Last updated: 10/14/2020
Accessed: 04/02/2025