Montane Moderately Warm Dry Coniferous Seeley, Swan, Flathead and Tobacco Valleys
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
-
Transition T1A
Armillaria Root Rot State in which the forest has been converted to a shrubland
More details -
Transition T1B
Fire exclusion over long periods allowing stands to grow into homogenous, dense, multi-storied stands.
More details -
Transition T1C
Housing and road development within Douglas fir forest that reduces forest patch size, increases edge and decreases interior acreage of intact forest and ecological services
More details -
Transition T1D
Forest stand with understory dominated by weedy invasive species or forest converted to cropland or pastureland. Introduced grasses and/or weedy species dominate the understory with overstory of Douglas fir or site is a cropland or pasture.
More details -
Restoration pathway R2A
Forest management practices to convert shrubland back to forest including tree planting of less Armillaria Root Rot sensitive tree species
More details -
Restoration pathway R3A
Forest stand structure, composition and historical fire regime restored by overstory thinning, ground and ladder fuels reduction, and prescribed fire.
More details -
Restoration pathway R4A
Potentially not feasible; removal of housing and road development and restoration for Douglas fir overstory and perennial native bunchgrass understory.
More details -
Restoration pathway R5A
Range management practices to convert introduced grass and/or weedy species dominated understory to native understory vegetation.
More details -
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Submodel
States 1 and 5 (additional transitions)
1.1. Reference Plant Community Douglas fir(western larch-ponderosa pine)/ Serviceberry/white spirea-common snowberry/ Creeping barberry-kinnickinik/pinegrass
1.5. Vertical Differentiation Phase Douglas fir(western larch-Ponderosa pine)/ Serviceberry/white spirea-common snowberry/ creeping barberry/pinegrass
Description
Armillaria Root Rot State
2.1 Community Shrubland.
Metasedimentary Parent Material
Time=50yrs
If a stand sustains very high levels of roots disease mortality, then a forest stand could cross a threshold and become a shrubland, once all trees are gone (Kimsey et al., 2012). Persistent shrub fields may take a century or longer for the infected root mass to decline, which will return the root disease potential to background levels, and allow the reintroduction of resistant conifer species. Extensive management is needed to convert the resultant shrubland back to a forest community. The shrubs that would create the converted shrubland are from those already on the ecological site such as common snowberry, serviceberry, and white spirea. A mosaic of brushy openings, patches of dying trees, and apparently unaffected trees may cover large areas.
Description
Fire Excluded
3.1 Community
Multi-storied stands of Douglas fir/Ponderosa pine with dense understory of shrubs and/or young trees
This State has been shaped by fire exclusion in which the forest structure, species composition, patch patterns and fuel loading has been dramatically increased due to a dramatic reduction or elimination of fire from the ecological site. Tree density and fuel loading have reached a point in which fire if it did occur would be of very high severity. Dense multi-layered forests of Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine now exist and is homogenous on the landscape. Intensive forest management practices can reduce the risk of severe fire. There has been a dramatic increase in the area of “Dry PVG” (Douglas fir dominated forests) that used to burn with low severity fires that now has a mixed severity of lethal stand replacing fire regime (Gautreaux, Russ. 1999). Forest stand composition changes with fire suppression as well. Douglas fir does not require a post-fire mineral bed for seedling development like ponderosa pine and will outcompete it when fire does not occur. There is also usually an increase in shrubs that become decadent with the lack of fire.
Plant Community 3.1
Multi-level canopy of mature Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine over sapling/pole/seedling stands of Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine. Eventually, Douglas fir outcompetes ponderosa pine completely with long-term fire suppression. These dense multi-storied Douglas fir forest can be more prone to and capable of supporting populations of western spruce budworm which results in severe defoliation and mortality (Gautreaux, Russ. 1999). As well, more continuous cover of Douglas fir can increase the area of Armillaria root disease of which Douglas fir is a primary host. Large areas of lodgepole pine can have high levels of bark beetle caused mortality. These increases in mortality change forest structure and allow for higher fuel build up and potential for severe stand replacing fire. In areas without tree regeneration dense stands of shrubs will occur, mainly serviceberry, white spirea or snowberry. Forest management practices which include selective overstory removal along with understory fuel load management, including prescribed fire, can transition the forest into a more drought, insect and fire resilient condition.
Description
Alternative State 4 Developed State (timber harvest, private development, roads)
4.1 Community
Development uses alter forest structure, patch size, dynamics, species composition significantly
STATE 4 – Developed State
A portion of this ecological site has been developed for human uses including timber harvest, private development of houses or roads. This has occurred on the lower slope foothills and valleys. Additionally, other factors have changed forest structure including years of hygrading (harvesting largest best trees on site), prevalence of many roads which create fire breaks, and tree plantations. There are generally more early seral stands now due to the frequency and scale of timber harvest in recent decades on the Kootenai N.F. (Gautreaux, Russ. 1999). Timber harvesting and road development lead to changes in forest patch size.
Description
Alternative State 5 Invaded weedy understory/crop/pasture
5.1 Community
Understory dominated by weedy invasive species or forest converted to crop or pasture, tame grasses dominate.
STATE 5 – Invaded weed understory forest or Forest converted to crop or Pastureland
A portion of this ecological site has either been significantly altered by weedy species invasion or the forest has been converted to annual cropland or pasture. This has occurred on the lower slope foothills and valleys. Weedy or increaser species that may be a problem including: slender crupina, rush skeletonweed, musk thistle, leafy spurge, knapweed species, tansy ragwort, dalmatian and yellow toadflaxes, common St. John’s wort and sulphur cinquefoil (Gautreaux, Russ. 1999).
Mechanism
T1A – Armillaria Root Rot State in which the forest has been converted to a shrubland
Mechanism
T1B - Fire exclusion over long periods allowing stands to grow into homogenous, dense, multi-storied stands. This dense forest structure can increase fuel loads of ladder fuels in live trees, standing dead trees and woody and herbaceous litter on the ground. This increase in fuel loading and forest structure can change fire severity once fire occurs.
Mechanism
T1C – Housing and road development within Douglas fir forest that reduces forest patch size, increases edge and decreases interior acreage of intact forest and ecological services
Mechanism
T1D – Forest stand with understory dominated by weedy invasive species or forest converted to cropland or pastureland. Introduced grasses and/or weedy species dominate the understory with overstory of Douglas fir or site is a cropland or pasture. This occurs with the introduction of these introduced/weedy species (through human or livestock use, proximity to development or other means), establishment and dominance of the native understory vegetation community; or active management to convert forest to cropland/pasture by cutting trees, removing stumps and planting introduced crop and/or pasture grasses.
Mechanism
R2A – Forest management practices to convert shrubland back to forest including tree planting of less Armillaria Root Rot sensitive tree species
There can be highly significant losses, usually requiring species conversion in the active management approach. Management tactics include to correctly identify the type of root disease(s) on the management unit, and manage species such as late seral pine and larch. Pre-commercial thinning will improve growth and vigor of the residual stand. Thinning and harvest operations should remove susceptible species (Douglas-fir or true firs) to the degree practical, retaining late seral species such as western larch and pine (Hagle, 2010). Tree planting can be used to facilitate a shift in species composition to those conifers which have greater tolerance to root diseases. There has been a link determined between parent material and susceptibility to root disease.
Mechanism
R3A – Forest stand structure, composition and historical fire regime restored by overstory thinning, ground and ladder fuels reduction, and prescribed fire. This may be economically infeasible, is completely dependent on site conditions and will require numerous entries into a forest stand.
R3A – Forest stands restored by overstory thinning, ground and ladder fuels reduction, prescribed fire and seeding of native grasses and forbs.
VRU Recommendations for silvicultural practices (Gautreaux, Russ. 1999):
• Desired forest structures would reflect the product of frequent low to moderate severity ground fires, and occasional stand replacement events
• Largely multi-storied and two-aged conditions would be sustained through prescribed fire and timber harvest at frequencies consistent with natural fire return interval (15 to 45 years). A variety of successional stages represented.
• Create small openings (2 to 5 acres) within an irregularly shaped, large treatment area (20-200 acres).
• Individual or small group selection on a 20 to 25 year re-entry schedule
• Shelterwood preparatory cuts and shelterwood seed cuts
• Intermediate harvest methods (improvements cuttings and thinning from below (where stand regeneration is not the intent and root disease is not a concern)
• Prescribed fire as a tool for periodic reduction in fuels, restoring and maintaining vegetative composition and structure
• Reforestation and species management
Mechanism
R4A – Potentially not feasible; removal of housing and road development and restoration for Douglas fir overstory and perennial native bunchgrass understory. This is probably the least feasible restoration pathway for this ecological site due to lack of public support to curb private home building and desire to restore developed areas back to forest. The feasibility of restoration depends on size of development i.e. if there is one house on 10 acres with only one dirt road, this may be restored with removal of structures, forestry management practices for the overstory and range management practices for the understory whereas more developed areas will not be feasible to restore.
Mechanism
R5A – Range management practices to convert introduced grass and/or weedy species dominated understory to native understory vegetation. This may not be feasible if the native plant composition is less than 10 percent and may be economically infeasible. As well, feasibility is dependent on the type of weed species and amount i.e. extreme cheatgrass or smooth brome coverage may be impossible to restore; soil condition and ability to restore. Overstory restoration through forestry management practices of afforestation through planting of native trees and range management practices of seeding of native grasses, forbs, and shrubs and treatment of invasive plants and Time. This restoration may not be feasible and is dependent on: soil condition and feasibility of restoration with amendments and other practices, amount and type of introduced grasses and weed species on site and feasibility of restoration, and economic feasibility.
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.