Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R047XC462UT
Mountain Stony Loam (mountain big sagebrush)
Accessed: 11/24/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Classification relationships
Modal Soil: Roughlow CBV-L, 30-60% and 10-30% — loamy-skeletal, mixed Typic Argiborolls
Associated sites
R047XC430UT |
Mountain Loam (mountain big sagebrush) |
---|---|
R047XC446UT |
Mountain Shallow Loam (mountain big sagebrush) |
R047XC460UT |
Mountain Stony Loam (shrub) |
Similar sites
R047XC460UT |
Mountain Stony Loam (shrub) |
---|
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana |
Herbaceous |
Not specified |
Physiographic features
Mountain Side Slopes
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Mountain slope
|
---|---|
Elevation | 2,073 – 3,048 m |
Slope | 10 – 60% |
Climatic features
The climate is characterized by cool, moist summers and cold, snowy winters. Approximately 60 percent of the moisture comes as rain from May through October. On the average January through April are the driest months and May through October are the wettest months. The soil moisture regime is ustic and soil temperatures are in the frigid regime.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 90 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 0 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 635 mm |
Figure 2. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
Soil features
The soil is deep and well drained. It formed in colluvium derived mainly from duchesne river interbedded sandstone and shale, and uinta mountain sandstone and quartzite. Rock fragments cover 25 to 50 percent of the soil surface. The soil is very to extremely cobbly and stony with over 50 percent coarse fragments in the soil profile. Available water capacity is 0.07 to 0.13 inches per inch.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Very cobbly (2) Extremely cobbly (3) Stony |
---|---|
Drainage class | Well drained |
Soil depth | 102 – 152 cm |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 25 – 50% |
Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
0.18 – 0.33 cm |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
50% |
Ecological dynamics
As this site deteriorates due to grazing pressure bluebunch wheatgrass, needleandthread and bluegrass decrease while big sagebrush, western wheatgrass, letterman needlegrass, lupine, and aster may increase. Fire will kill big sagebrush and often decrease bitterbrush while western wheatgrass, lupine and low rabbitbrush increase.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Reference State
Community 1.1
Reference State
The general view of this site is bluebunch wheatgrass and mountain big sagebrush. The composition by air-dry weight is approximately 40 percent perennial grasses, 10 percent forbs, and 50 percent shrubs.
Figure 3. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine | 532 | 757 | 925 |
Grass/Grasslike | 426 | 605 | 740 |
Forb | 106 | 151 | 185 |
Total | 1064 | 1513 | 1850 |
Table 6. Ground cover
Tree foliar cover | 0% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana foliar cover | 49-51% |
Grass/grasslike foliar cover | 19-21% |
Forb foliar cover | 4-6% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 0% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 0% |
Table 7. Canopy structure (% cover)
Height Above Ground (m) | Tree | Shrub/Vine | Grass/ Grasslike |
Forb |
---|---|---|---|---|
<0.15 | – | – | – | – |
>0.15 <= 0.3 | – | – | – | 4-6% |
>0.3 <= 0.6 | – | – | 19-21% | – |
>0.6 <= 1.4 | – | 49-51% | – | – |
>1.4 <= 4 | – | – | – | – |
>4 <= 12 | – | – | – | – |
>12 <= 24 | – | – | – | – |
>24 <= 37 | – | – | – | – |
>37 | – | – | – | – |
Additional community tables
Table 8. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
0 | Dominant Shrubs | 471–706 | ||||
mountain big sagebrush | ARTRV | Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana | 235–314 | – | ||
antelope bitterbrush | PUTR2 | Purshia tridentata | 157–235 | – | ||
Utah serviceberry | AMUT | Amelanchier utahensis | 78–157 | – | ||
3 | Sub-Dominant Shrubs | 314–549 | ||||
Shrub (>.5m) | 2SHRUB | Shrub (>.5m) | 78–157 | – | ||
alderleaf mountain mahogany | CEMO2 | Cercocarpus montanus | 47–78 | – | ||
yellow rabbitbrush | CHVIL4 | Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus ssp. lanceolatus | 47–78 | – | ||
crispleaf buckwheat | ERCO14 | Eriogonum corymbosum | 47–78 | – | ||
slender buckwheat | ERMI4 | Eriogonum microthecum | 47–78 | – | ||
mountain snowberry | SYOR2 | Symphoricarpos oreophilus | 47–78 | – | ||
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
0 | Dominant Grasses | 314–549 | ||||
bluebunch wheatgrass | PSSP6 | Pseudoroegneria spicata | 157–235 | – | ||
needle and thread | HECO26 | Hesperostipa comata | 78–157 | – | ||
1 | Sub-Dominant Grasses | 314–785 | ||||
Grass, annual | 2GA | Grass, annual | 78–157 | – | ||
Grass, perennial | 2GP | Grass, perennial | 78–157 | – | ||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 16–47 | – | ||
Letterman's needlegrass | ACLE9 | Achnatherum lettermanii | 16–47 | – | ||
Columbia needlegrass | ACNE9 | Achnatherum nelsonii | 16–47 | – | ||
Geyer's sedge | CAGE2 | Carex geyeri | 16–47 | – | ||
squirreltail | ELEL5 | Elymus elymoides | 16–47 | – | ||
sheep fescue | FEOV | Festuca ovina | 16–47 | – | ||
prairie Junegrass | KOMA | Koeleria macrantha | 16–47 | – | ||
oniongrass | MEBU | Melica bulbosa | 16–47 | – | ||
western wheatgrass | PASM | Pascopyrum smithii | 16–47 | – | ||
Sandberg bluegrass | POSE | Poa secunda | 16–47 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
0 | Dominant Forbs | 94–157 | ||||
arrowleaf balsamroot | BASA3 | Balsamorhiza sagittata | 47–78 | – | ||
tapertip hawksbeard | CRAC2 | Crepis acuminata | 47–78 | – | ||
2 | Sub-Dominant Forbs | 251–471 | ||||
Forb, annual | 2FA | Forb, annual | 47–78 | – | ||
Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 47–78 | – | ||
white sagebrush | ARLU | Artemisia ludoviciana | 16–31 | – | ||
silverleaf milkvetch | ASAR4 | Astragalus argophyllus | 16–31 | – | ||
Wyoming Indian paintbrush | CALI4 | Castilleja linariifolia | 16–31 | – | ||
sego lily | CANU3 | Calochortus nuttallii | 16–31 | – | ||
blue flax | LIPE2 | Linum perenne | 16–31 | – | ||
stemless dwarf lupine | LUCAC2 | Lupinus caespitosus var. caespitosus | 16–31 | – | ||
rock goldenrod | PEPU7 | Petradoria pumila | 16–31 | – | ||
longleaf phlox | PHLO2 | Phlox longifolia | 16–31 | – | ||
Pacific aster | SYCHC | Symphyotrichum chilense var. chilense | 16–31 | – | ||
American vetch | VIAM | Vicia americana | 16–31 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
This site provides grazing for cattle and sheep during late spring, summer and fall.
This site provides food and cover for many species of wildlife.
Wildlife using this site include sage grouse, rabbit, coyote, mule deer, and elk.
Hydrological functions
The soil series are in hydrologic group b. The hydrologic curve number is 61 when the vegetation is in good condition.
Recreational uses
This site offers color and aesthetic appeal in spring, summer, and fall. Recreation activities include hiking and hunting.
Wood products
None
Other products
Supporting information
Contributors
Garth W. Leishman, Lars L. Rassmussen
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | V. Keith Wadman (NRCS Retired). |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | shane.green@ut.usda.gov |
Date | 11/09/2012 |
Approved by | |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
Rare to Slight. Some slight rill development may occur on steeper slopes (> 20%) or on areas located below exposed bedrock or other water shedding areas where increased runoff may occur. Where these rills are present, they should be fairly short (4-8 feet), < 1 inch deep and somewhat widely spaced (5-10 feet). Minor rill development may be observed on all slopes following major thunderstorm or spring runoff events but should heal during the next growing season. -
Presence of water flow patterns:
Slight. Some minor evidence of water flow patterns may be found winding around perennial plant bases. They show little evidence of current erosion. They are expected to be short (3-6 feet), stable, sinuous and normally not connected. There may be very minor evidence of deposition. Evidence of water flow may increase somewhat on slopes > 20%. -
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
Perennial vegetation shows little evidence of erosional pedestalling (1 to 2% of individual plants). Plant roots are covered and most litter remains in place around plant crowns. Terracettes should be absent or, if present, stable. A slight increase in both pedestal and terracette development may occur with increasing slope. -
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
Bare ground ranges from 20% - 25%. Soil surface may be covered by 10 to 70% coarse fragments. Bare ground openings should not be greater than 1 foot in diameter and should normally not be connected. -
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
None to Rare at site level. Scattered landscape level gully channels, however, are a normal component of basin/range environments. Where landscape gullies are present, they should be stable, partially vegetated on their sides and bottoms, with no evidence of head-cutting. Some slight increase in disturbance may be evident following significant weather events or when gullies convey considerable runoff from higher elevation rocky or naturally eroding areas. -
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
None. No evidence of wind generated soil movement is present. Wind caused blowouts and deposition are not present. -
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
Most litter resides in place with some redistribution caused by water movement. Minor litter removal may occur in flow channels with deposition occurring within 1 to 2 feet at points of obstruction. The majority of litter accumulates at the base of plants. Some grass leaves and small twigs (grass stems) may accumulate in soil depressions adjacent to plants. Woody stems are not likely to move. However, some litter movement is expected (up to 6 feet) with increases in slopes >20% and/or increased runoff resulting from heavy thunderstorms. -
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
This site should have a soil stability rating of 5 or 6 under the plant canopies, and a rating of 4 to 5 in the interspaces. The average rating should be a 5. Soil surface textures are typically loams, very fine sandy loams and silt loams. -
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
(Windham) Soil surface 0-6 inches. Texture is a gravelly clay loam; color is dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2); and structure moderate fine granular. Mollic epipedon ranges from 7 to 16 inches. Use the specific information for the soil you are assessing found in the published soil survey to supplement this description. -
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
Perennial vegetation produces sufficient cover and spatial arrangement to intercept most raindrops and reduce raindrop splash erosion. Litter on soil surface and cryptogamic crusting, where present, also protect the soil surface from splash erosion and encourage higher infiltration. Bare spaces are expected to be small and irregular in shape and usually not connected. Vegetative structure and distribution are usually adequate to capture snow and ensure that snowmelt occurs in a controlled manner, allowing maximum time for infiltration, and reducing runoff and erosion in all but the most extreme storm events. When perennial grasses and shrubs decrease due to natural events such as long-term drought, insect damage, etc., runoff is likely to increase and infiltration be reduced. -
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
None. Some soils may have natural textural variability within their profiles, including changes in clay content, these should not be mistaken for a compaction pan. -
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Non-sprouting shrub (mountain big sagebrush) = > Perennial bunchgrasses (bluebunch wheatgrass, needle-and-thread) >> Sprouting shrubs (bitterbrush, Utah serviceberry).Sub-dominant:
Perennial bunchgrasses & grasslikes (Nevada bluegrass, Geyer sedge) > Sprouting shrubs (green rabbitbrush, mountain snowberry) > Perennial forbs (arrowleaf balsamroot).Other:
A wide variety of other perennial grasses and both perennial and annual forbs can be expected to occur in the plant community.Additional:
Natural disturbance regimes include fire, drought, and insects. Assumed fire cycle of 30 to 40+ years. Functional/structural groups may appropriately contain non-native species if their ecological function is the same as the native species in the reference. Following a disturbance such as fire, drought, rodents or insects that remove woody vegetation, forbs and perennial grasses (herbaceous species) may dominate the community for a period of time. If a disturbance has not occurred for an extended period of time, woody species may continue to increase. These conditions would reflect different functional community phases within the reference state. -
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
All age classes of perennial grasses should be present under average to above average growing conditions with age class expression likely subdued during periods of extended drought. Slight decadence in the principle shrubs could occur near the end of the fire cycle or during periods of extended drought, or insect infestations. In general, a mix of age classes should be expected with some dead and decadent plants present. -
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
Litter cover will be heavier under plants. Most litter will be herbaceous and depths of 1 to 2 inches would be considered normal. Perennial vegetation should be well distributed on the site. -
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
Annual production in air-dry herbage should be approximately 1300 - 1400 #/acre on an average year but could range from 900 - 1700 #/acre during periods of prolonged drought or above average precipitation.
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
Cheatgrass, alyssum, mustard species, Canada thistle, black medic, Utah juniper, Gamble oak. -
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
All perennial plants should have the ability to reproduce in all years, except in extreme drought years. Green rabbitbrush sprouts vigorously following fire. There are no restrictions on either seed or vegetative reproduction. Some seedling recruitment of major species is expected to be present during average and above average growing years.
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.