Loamy-North (18-22" PZ)
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
- Transition T1 More details
- Transition T6 More details
- Transition T2 More details
- Transition T6 More details
- Restoration pathway R3a More details
- Restoration pathway R3b More details
- Transition T6 More details
- Transition T4 More details
- Transition T6 More details
- Transition T5 More details
- Restoration pathway R5 More details
-
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
This state represents the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of this ecological site. This state was co-dominated by cool- and warm-season grasses. In pre-European times, the primary disturbance mechanisms for this site in the reference condition included frequent fire and grazing by large herding ungulates. Timing of fires and grazing coupled with weather events dictated the dynamics that occurred within the natural range of variability. Taller cool- and warm-season grasses would have declined and a corresponding increase in short statured grass and grass-like species would have occurred. Today, a similar state can be found on areas that are properly managed with grazing and/or prescribed burning, and sometimes on areas receiving occasional short periods of rest.
Submodel
Description
This state represents the more common range of variability that exists with higher levels of grazing management but in the absence of periodic fire due to fire suppression. This state is dominated by cool-season grasses, with warm-season grasses being subdominant. It can be found on areas that are properly managed with grazing and/or prescribed burning, and sometimes on areas receiving occasional short periods of rest. Native cool- and warm-season species can decline and a corresponding increase in non-native species will occur.
Submodel
Description
This state is the result of invasion and dominance of introduced species. This state is characterized by the dominance of Kentucky bluegrass and smooth bromegrass, and an increasing thatch layer that effectively blocks introduction of other plants into the system. Plant litter accumulation tends to favor the more shade tolerant introduced grass species. The nutrient cycle is also impaired, and the result is typically a higher level of nitrogen which also favors the introduced species. Increasing plant litter decreases the amount of sunlight reaching plant crowns thereby shifting competitive advantage to shade tolerant introduced grass species. Studies indicate that soil biological activity is altered, and this shift apparently exploits the soil microclimate and encourages growth of the introduced grass species. Once the threshold is crossed, a change in grazing management alone cannot cause a reduction in the invasive grass dominance. Preliminary studies would tend to indicate this threshold may exist when Kentucky bluegrass exceeds 30% of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40% of the plant community composition.
Once the state is well established, even drastic events such as high intensity fires driven by high fuel loads of litter and thatch will not result in more than a very short term reduction of Kentucky bluegrass. These events may reduce the dominance of Kentucky bluegrass, but due to the large amount of rhizomes in the soil there is no opportunity for the native species to establish and dominate before Kentucky bluegrass rebounds and again dominates the system.
Submodel
Description
This state is the result of seeding of introduced forage-type species, improved/selected varieties of native species, or a combination thereof. The soil and site stability, and the hydrologic function will typically be improved as compared to either the Introduced Grass State (State 3) or Early Seral State (State 5). The biotic integrity will also likely be improved depending on the species established.
Submodel
Description
This state is the result of very heavy, concentrated disturbance such as cropping, concentrated rodent activity, or concentrated livestock areas. This State can also result from invasion by highly competitive weed species such as Canada thistle, hound’s tongue, leafy spurge, or knapweeds. In most cases, this phase is dominated by annual and/or pioneer perennial species. Bare ground is also typically much higher than on any other plant community phase.
Submodel
Mechanism
Encroachment of non-native grasses such as Kentucky bluegrass and smooth bromegrass, and disruption of natural disturbance regimes (typically as a result of fire suppression following settlement led this state over a threshold to the Native/Introduced State (State 2).
Mechanism
Abandonment of cropping, encroachment of non-native invasive/noxious species, or extremely heavy disturbance (such as areas with concentrated animal/rodent use) may lead this plant community phase over a threshold to the Early Seral State (State 5) and more specifically to the 5.1 Annual/Pioneer Perennial, Bare Ground Plant Community Phase.
Mechanism
Heavy continuous grazing or non-use and no fire for prolonged periods of time (several years) will lead this plant community phase over a threshold to the Introduced Grass State (State 3).
Mechanism
Abandonment of cropping, encroachment of non-native invasive/noxious species, or extremely heavy disturbance (such as areas with concentrated animal/rodent use) may lead this plant community phase over a threshold to the Early Seral State (State 5) and more specifically to the 5.1 Annual/Pioneer Perennial, Bare Ground Plant Community Phase.
Mechanism
Prescribed burning, followed by long-term prescribed grazing (moderate stocking levels coupled with adequate recovery periods, or other grazing systems such as high-density, low-frequency intended to treat specific species dominance, or periodic light to moderate stocking levels possibly including periodic rest) may lead this plant community phase over a threshold to the Native/Introduced State (State 2). Pest management (i.e., herbicide) may also be needed to suppress cool-season invasive grasses. This will likely take a long period of time, possibly up to 10 years or more, and recovery may not be attainable. Success depends on whether native reproductive propagules remain intact on the site.
Relevant conservation practices
Practice | External resources |
---|---|
Prescribed Burning |
|
Prescribed Grazing |
|
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) |
Mechanism
Seeding of introduced forage-type species, seeding of improved/selected varieties of native species, or a combination of the two may lead this plant community phase over a threshold to the Seeded Rangeland State (State 4). While the biotic integrity of the plant community may not be improved, the hydrologic function will likely be significantly improved compared to the Introduced Grass State (State 3).
Mechanism
Abandonment of cropping, encroachment of non-native invasive/noxious species, or extremely heavy disturbance (such as areas with concentrated animal/rodent use) may lead this plant community phase over a threshold to the Early Seral State (State 5) and more specifically to the 5.1 Annual/Pioneer Perennial, Bare Ground Plant Community Phase.
Mechanism
Heavy continuous grazing or non-use and no fire for prolonged periods of time (typically five or more years) will lead this plant community phase over a threshold to the Introduced Grass State (State 3). Refer to the associated Forage Suitability Group Description and the Field Office Technical Guide for management guidance related to maintaining stands of introduced forage species.
Mechanism
Abandonment of cropping, encroachment of non-native invasive/noxious species, or extremely heavy disturbance (such as areas with concentrated animal/rodent use) may lead this plant community phase over a threshold to the Early Seral State (State 5) and more specifically to the 5.1 Annual/Pioneer Perennial, Bare Ground Plant Community Phase.
Mechanism
Non-use and no fire for prolonged periods of time (typically five or more years) will lead this plant community phase over a threshold to the Introduced Grass State (State 3).
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.