Loamy-North (18-22" PZ)
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
- Transition T1A More details
- Transition T6A More details
- Transition T2A More details
- Transition T2B More details
- Transition T6A More details
- Restoration pathway R3A More details
- Transition T3A More details
- Transition T6A More details
- Transition T4A More details
- Transition T6A More details
-
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
The Reference State represents what is believed to show the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of the ecological site prior to European settlement. This site in the Reference State (1.0) is co-dominated by cool- and warm-season grasses. In pre-European times the primary disturbance mechanisms included frequent fire and grazing by large herding ungulates. Timing of fires and grazing coupled with weather events dictated the dynamics that occurred within the natural range of variability. Taller cool- and warm-season grasses would have declined and a corresponding increase in short statured grass and grass-like species would have occurred. Today, a similar state can be found on areas that are properly managed with grazing and prescribed burning and sometimes on areas receiving occasional short periods of rest. The Reference State is very susceptible to invasion of non-native cool-season grasses.
Submodel
Description
The Native/Invaded State represents the more common range of variability that exists with higher levels of grazing management, but in the absence of periodic fire due to fire suppression. This state is dominated by native cool- and warm-season grasses, and subdominant non-native cool-season grasses. It can be found on areas that would appear to be properly managed with grazing and possibly prescribed burning. Extended periods of non-use and no fire or long-term light grazing can result in the invasion and establishment of non-native cool-season grasses onto this site. If the native cool-season grasses decline, a corresponding increase of non-native cool-season grasses can occur. The non-native cool-season grasses will include smooth brome, Kentucky bluegrass, cheatgrass, and field brome.
Submodel
Description
This state is the result of invasion and dominance of non-native cool-season grass species. This state is characterized by the dominance of smooth brome, Kentucky bluegrass, and an increasing thatch layer that effectively blocks introduction of other plants into the system. Heavy grazing, long-term light grazing (understocked), or excessive haying will tend to result in an increase of smooth brome. Non-use and no fire will tend to benefit Kentucky bluegrass due to an increasing thatch layer that effectively blocks the introduction of other plants into the system. Plant litter accumulation tends to favor the more shade-tolerant introduced grass species. The nutrient cycle is also impaired, and the result is typically a higher level of nitrogen which also favors the introduced species. Increasing plant litter decreases the amount of sunlight reaching plant crowns thereby shifting competitive advantage to shade-tolerant introduced grass species. Studies indicate that soil biological activity is altered, and this shift apparently exploits the soil microclimate and encourages growth of the introduced grass species. Once the threshold is crossed, a change in grazing management alone cannot cause a reduction in the invasive grass dominance. Preliminary studies indicate this threshold may exist when Kentucky bluegrass exceeds 30 percent of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40 percent of the plant community composition. Plant communities dominated by Kentucky bluegrass have significantly less cover and diversity of native grasses and forb species (Toledo, D. et al., 2014).
Once the state is well established, even drastic events such as high intensity fires driven by high fuel loads of litter and thatch will not result in more than a very short-term reduction of Kentucky bluegrass. These events may reduce the dominance of Kentucky bluegrass, but due to the large amount of rhizomes in the soil, there is no opportunity for the native species to establish and dominate before Kentucky bluegrass rebounds and again dominates the system.
Submodel
Description
This state occurs as a result of extreme disturbance that typically removes most of the native species normally present on this site. Disturbance in the form of severe grazing over several years is the most typical. Occupation by black-tailed prairie dogs may also result in this transition. The dominant species present is highly variable, but the common characteristics include high amounts of bare ground, reduced soil aggregate stability, increased runoff, and increased erosion (including increased sediment loads in the runoff). Restoration of the ecological processes will be very difficult.
Submodel
Description
This state can be transitioned to from any plant community. The two separate vegetative plant communities, Go-Back and Seeded, are highly variable in nature. They are derived through different management scenarios and are not related successionally. Infiltration, runoff, and soil erosion will vary depending on the vegetation present on the site.
The Go-Back Plant Community (5.1) was previously tilled for crop production and then abandoned. The plant community that develops on this site will be greatly influenced by the plant communities that are located on adjacent land. The Seeded Plant Community (5.2) was typically tilled and then seeded to a perennial forage species or mix of species.
Submodel
Mechanism
Heavy continuous season-long grazing; long-term light grazing; or no use and no fire; and the invasion of non-native cool-season grasses will transition the Reference State (1.0) to the Native/Invaded State (2.0).
Mechanism
Heavy disturbance including soil erosion; tillage; abandoned cropland; or seeding to improved pasture species results in a transition to the Disturbed State (5.0).
Mechanism
Heavy, continuous season-long grazing, long-term light grazing, or excessive haying will transition the Native/Invaded State 2.0) to the Invaded State (3.0). With extended periods of non-use and no fire, heavy litter layer build-up will favor cool-season non-natives grasses such as Kentucky bluegrass and other non-native species, and will also transition the Native/Invaded State (2.0) to the Invaded State (3.0).
Mechanism
Heavy, continuous season-long grazing; frequent and severe defoliation; or heavy disturbance will transition the Native/Invaded State (2.0) to the Early Successional State (4.0).
Mechanism
Heavy disturbance including soil erosion; tillage; abandoned cropland; or seeding to improved pasture species result in a transition to the Disturbed State (5.0).
Mechanism
Prescribed burning, followed by long-term prescribed grazing (moderate stocking levels coupled with adequate recovery periods, or other grazing systems such as high-density, low-frequency intended to treat specific species dominance, or periodic light to moderate stocking levels possibly including periodic rest) may lead the Invaded State (3.0) to the Native/Invaded State (2.0). Herbaceous weed control (i.e., herbicide) may also be needed to suppress the non-native cool-season grass. This will likely take a long period of time, and recovery may not be attainable. Overall success depends on whether native reproductive propagules remain intact on the site.
Relevant conservation practices
Practice | External resources |
---|---|
Prescribed Burning |
|
Prescribed Grazing |
|
Herbaceous Weed Control |
Mechanism
Heavy, continuous season-long grazing; frequent and severe defoliation; or heavy disturbance will transition the Invaded State (3.0) to the Early Successional State (4.0).
Mechanism
Heavy disturbance including soil erosion; tillage; abandoned cropland; or seeding to improved pasture species result in a transition to the Disturbed State (5.0).
Mechanism
Removal of disturbances; herbaceous weed control; followed by prescribed grazing that includes proper stocking, change in season of use, and deferment that provides time for adequate recovery; and the invasion of non-native cool-season perennial gasses will likely transition the Early Successional State (4.0) to the Invaded State (3.0).
Relevant conservation practices
Practice | External resources |
---|---|
Prescribed Burning |
|
Prescribed Grazing |
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.