Overflow
Scenario model
Current ecosystem state
Select a state
Management practices/drivers
Select a transition or restoration pathway
- Transition T1B More details
- Transition T1A More details
- Transition T1C More details
- Transition T7A More details
- Transition T2B More details
- Transition T2A More details
- Transition T7A More details
- Transition T3A More details
- Transition T3B More details
- Transition T3C More details
- Transition T7A More details
- Transition T4A More details
- Transition T4B More details
- Transition T7A More details
- Transition T7A More details
-
No transition or restoration pathway between the selected states has been described
Target ecosystem state
Select a state
Description
The Reference State represents what is believed to show the natural range of variability that dominated the dynamics of the ecological site prior to European settlement. This site in the Reference State (1.0) was typically dominated by warm-season grasses, with occasional shifts to a near co-dominance of cool- and warm-season grasses. In pre-European times, the primary disturbance mechanisms for this site in the reference condition included periods of below and/or above average precipitation, periodic fire, and herbivory by insects and large ungulates. Timing of fires and herbivory coupled with weather events dictated the dynamics that occurred within the natural range of variability. A combination of disturbances would likely have caused a shift to more cool-season grasses with a corresponding decrease in tall warm-season grasses. An increase in fire frequency or fire followed by occasional grazing would have caused an increase in warm-season grasses. Today, a similar state will be difficult to find due to the predominance and invasiveness of non-native cool-season perennial gasses.
The 2011 version of the Loamy Overflow (R061XY020SD) ESD documented two additional plant communities in the Reference State (1.0). Because of the spread of non-native cool-season grasses onto this site, those two plant communities were omitted for this update. The 2011 version is available to view on the South Dakota electronic Field Office Technical Guide (eFOTG), Section II.
Submodel
Description
The Shortgrass Sod State occurs as a result of heavy stocking levels, inadequate recovery periods between grazing events, or a combination of these disturbances. Drought conditions may hasten the transition to this state. This state is dominated by warm-season grasses, with cool-season grasses being subdominant. The shallow, compact nature of the roots of the dominant species causes increased runoff and reduced infiltration. In addition, reduced shading due to a lesser amount of foliar cover causes increased soil temperatures and increased evaporation of the surface soil moisture. These conditions combine to cause the site to become more droughty and thus reduce the opportunity for recruitment and establishment of the taller statured grasses. This state is relatively stable and resistant to change.
Submodel
Description
The Native/Invaded State (3.0) represents the more common range of variability that exists with higher levels of grazing management but in the absence of periodic fire due to fire suppression. This state is dominated by cool- and warm-season grasses, it can be found on areas that are properly managed with grazing and/or prescribed burning, and sometimes on areas receiving occasional short periods of rest. Native cool- and warm-season species can decline and a corresponding increase in non-native cool-season grasses will occur. Non-Native cool-season grasses will make up less than 15 percent of total annual production. Preliminary studies tend to indicate that when Kentucky bluegrass exceeds 30 percent of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40 percent of the plant community composition a threshold has been crossed to an Invaded State (5.0). These invaded plant communities that are dominated by Kentucky bluegrass will have significantly less cover and diversity of native grasses and forb species (Toledo, D. et al., 2014).
Submodel
Description
This state occurs as a result of extreme disturbance that typically removes most of the native species normally present on this site. Disturbance in the form of severe grazing over several years are the most typical. Occupation by black-tailed prairie dogs may also result in this transition. The dominant species present is highly variable, but the common characteristics include high amounts of bare ground, reduced soil aggregate stability, increased runoff and increased erosion (including increased sediment loads in the runoff). Restoration of the ecological processes will be very difficult. Channelization and downcutting within the Overflow ecological site are a potential result of this state.
Submodel
Description
The Invaded State is the result of invasion and dominance of non-native cool-season grass species. This state is characterized by the dominance of Kentucky bluegrass and smooth brome and an increasing thatch layer that effectively blocks introduction of other plants into the system. Heavy grazing or long-term light grazing (under-stocked) will tend to result in an increase of smooth brome. Non-use and no fire will tend to benefit Kentucky bluegrass due to the increasing thatch layer. Plant litter accumulation tends to favor the more shade tolerant introduced grass species. The nutrient cycle is also impaired, and the result is typically a higher level of nitrogen which also favors the introduced species. Increasing plant litter decreases the amount of sunlight reaching plant crowns thereby shifting competitive advantage to shade tolerant introduced grass species. Studies indicate that soil biological activity is altered, and this shift apparently exploits the soil microclimate and encourages growth of the introduced grass species. Once the threshold is crossed, a change in grazing management alone cannot cause a reduction in the invasive grass dominance. Preliminary studies would tend to indicate this threshold may exist when Kentucky bluegrass exceeds 30 percent of the plant community and native grasses represent less than 40 percent of the plant community composition. Plant communities dominated by Kentucky bluegrass have significantly less cover and diversity of native grasses and forb species (Toledo, D. et al., 2014).
Once the state is well established, even drastic events such as high intensity fires driven by high fuel loads of litter and thatch will not result in more than a very short-term reduction of Kentucky bluegrass. These events may reduce the dominance of Kentucky bluegrass, but due to the large amount of rhizomes in the soil, there is no opportunity for the native species to establish and dominate before Kentucky bluegrass rebounds and again dominates the system.
Submodel
Description
This State can be transitioned to from any plant community. The two separate vegetative plant communities, Go-Back and Seeded, are highly variable in nature. They are derived through different management scenarios and are not related successionally. Infiltration, runoff, and soil erosion will vary depending on the vegetation present on the site.
The Go-Back Plant Community (6.1) was previously tilled for crop production and then abandoned. The plant community that develops on this site will be greatly influenced by the plant communities that are located on adjacent land. The Seeded Plant Community (6.2) was typically tilled and then seeded to a perennial forage species or mix of species.
Submodel
Mechanism
Continuous seasonal grazing (spring or winter); or continuous season-long grazing, without adequate recovery following grazing event; heavy grazing in combination with drought; or excessive haying will transition the Reference State (1.0) to the Shortgrass Sod State (2.0).
Mechanism
Long-term light grazing; or no use and no fire; and the invasion of non-native cool-season grasses will transition the Reference State (1.0) to the Native/Invaded State (3.0).
Mechanism
Heavy, continuous season-long grazing; or frequent and severe defoliation; heavy disturbance; or heavy grazing in combination with drought, will transition the Reference State (1.0) to the Early Successional State (4.0).
Mechanism
Heavy disturbance, including soil erosion, tillage, abandoned cropland, or seeding to improved pasture species will result in a transition to the Disturbed State (6.0).
Mechanism
Long-term prescribed grazing, including proper stocking rates, change in season of use, adequate time for recovery; or periodic light to moderate stocking levels possibly including periodic rest; invasion of non-native cool-season grasses; a return to normal precipitation patterns following drought, may transition the Shortgrass Sod State (2.0) to the Native/Invaded State (3.0). This transition may not be fast or meet management objectives.
Relevant conservation practices
Practice | External resources |
---|---|
Prescribed Grazing |
Mechanism
Heavy, continuous season-long grazing; frequent and severe defoliation; heavy grazing in combination with drought; or heavy disturbance will transition the Shortgrass Sod State (2.0) to the Early Successional State (4.0).
Mechanism
Heavy disturbance including soil erosion, tillage, abandoned cropland, or seeding to improved pasture species result in a transition to the Disturbed State (6.0).
Mechanism
Continuous season-long grazing, without adequate recovery following grazing events; heavy grazing in combination with drought; or excessive haying will transition the Native/Invaded State (3.0) to the Shortgrass Sod State (2.0).
Mechanism
Heavy, continuous season-long grazing; frequent and severe defoliation; heavy grazing in combination with drought; or heavy disturbance will transition the Native/Invaded State (3.0) to the Early Successional State (4.0).
Mechanism
Heavy, continuous season-long grazing; excessive haying; or long-term light grazing will result in an increase in non-native cool-season grasses and cause a transition to the Native/Invaded State (3.0) to the Invaded State (5.0). With extended periods of non-use and no fire, heavy litter layer build-up will favor cool-season non-natives grasses such as Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome and other non-native species, also resulting in a transition the Invaded State (5.0).
Mechanism
Heavy disturbance including soil erosion, tillage, abandoned cropland, or seeding to improved pasture species result in a transition to the Disturbed State (6.0).
Mechanism
Removal of management induced disturbance, herbaceous weed control, and seeding to native grass species, followed by prescribed grazing may result in a transition from the Early Successional State (4.0). With the predominance of non-native cool-season perennial gasses this transition will likely be to the Native/Invaded State (3.0). This transition may not be fast or meet management objectives.
Relevant conservation practices
Practice | External resources |
---|---|
Prescribed Grazing |
|
Range Planting |
|
Herbaceous Weed Control |
Mechanism
Removal of management induced disturbance, herbaceous weed control, and invasion of non-native cool-season grasses will likely transition the Early Successional State (4.0) to the Invaded State (5.0).
Relevant conservation practices
Practice | External resources |
---|---|
Herbaceous Weed Control |
Mechanism
Heavy disturbance including soil erosion, tillage, abandoned cropland, or seeding to improved pasture species result in a transition to the Disturbed State (6.0).
Model keys
Briefcase
Add ecological sites and Major Land Resource Areas to your briefcase by clicking on the briefcase () icon wherever it occurs. Drag and drop items to reorder. Cookies are used to store briefcase items between browsing sessions. Because of this, the number of items that can be added to your briefcase is limited, and briefcase items added on one device and browser cannot be accessed from another device or browser. Users who do not wish to place cookies on their devices should not use the briefcase tool. Briefcase cookies serve no other purpose than described here and are deleted whenever browsing history is cleared.
Ecological sites
Major Land Resource Areas
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.