Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Ecological site R070BY074NM
Sandy Plains (Cool)
Last updated: 9/12/2023
Accessed: 11/23/2024
General information
Provisional. A provisional ecological site description has undergone quality control and quality assurance review. It contains a working state and transition model and enough information to identify the ecological site.
Figure 1. Mapped extent
Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated.
Ecological site concept
This site occurs on deep or very deep soils with coarse surface textures and a significant clay increase with depth. Slopes range from 0 to 15 percent. While climatic criteria have not been specified, this site occupies cooler areas than R070BY055NM.
Table 1. Dominant plant species
Tree |
Not specified |
---|---|
Shrub |
(1) Ephedra |
Herbaceous |
(1) Andropogon gerardii |
Physiographic features
This site occurs on level to gently sloping or undulating piedmont slopes or plains. Slopes average less than 10 percent, but range as high as 15 percent. Aspect varies but is not ecologically significant. Elevation ranges from 5,000 to 7,000 feet.
Table 2. Representative physiographic features
Landforms |
(1)
Plain
(2) Sand sheet |
---|---|
Flooding frequency | None |
Ponding frequency | None |
Elevation | 1,524 – 2,134 m |
Slope | 10 – 15% |
Water table depth | 183 cm |
Aspect | Aspect is not a significant factor |
Climatic features
The narrative below applies to MLRA 70B in general. However, this site is distinguished as being “cool.” Thus, it can be expected to either occur at the cooler end of this climatic spectrum and, perhaps, extend beyond it.
The climate of this area can be classified as “semi-arid continental”.
Annual average precipitation ranges from 11 to 16 inches. Roughly 78 percent of the moisture falls during the 6-month period of May through October. Most of this summer precipitation falls in the form of brief and heavy afternoon and evening thunderstorms. Hail may accompany the more severe summer storms. In the winter, there is normally only one day a month when as much as one-tenth inch of moisture falls, usually in the form of snow. Snow seldom lies on the ground for more than a few days.
Temperatures are characterized by a distinct seasonal change and large annual and diurnal temperature ranges. Summers are moderately warm. Maximum temperature average above 90 degrees F from July to August, and an average summer includes about 80 days with high readings exceeding 90 degrees F and 10 days with readings above 100 degrees F. Temperatures usually fall rapidly after sundown and lows average 60 degrees F on most summer nights. Winters are mild, sunny, and dry. Daytime shade temperatures in midwinter usually rise to the 50’s. However, freezing temperatures normally occur at night from mid-November to mid-March.
The freeze-free season ranges from 196 to 218 days. Dates of the last freeze range from April 11th to April 17th and the first freeze ranges from October 20th to October 25th.
Both temperature and rainfall distribution favor warm-season, perennial plant communities in the area. However, sufficient late winter and early spring moisture allows cool-season species to occupy a minor component within the plant community.
Climate data was obtained from http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/summary/climsmnm.html web site. Data were interpreted utilizing NM Climate Summarizer spreadsheet.
Table 3. Representative climatic features
Frost-free period (average) | 196 days |
---|---|
Freeze-free period (average) | 218 days |
Precipitation total (average) | 406 mm |
Figure 2. Monthly precipitation range
Figure 3. Monthly average minimum and maximum temperature
Influencing water features
This site is not influenced by water from a wetland or stream.
Soil features
The soils of this site are well-drained, and range from moderately deep to very deep. Typically, the surface horizon is 5 to 8 inches thich with a texture of loamy fine sand. Subsoil has a texture of sandy clay loam, clay loam, or very fine sandy loam. Permeability is moderately rapid to rapid with moderate to high water-holding capacity. Due to the coarse-textured surfaces, these soils are subject to blowing when plant cover does not protect the surface.
Table 4. Representative soil features
Surface texture |
(1) Loamy fine sand |
---|---|
Family particle size |
(1) Sandy |
Drainage class | Moderately well drained to well drained |
Permeability class | Moderately rapid to rapid |
Soil depth | Not specified |
Surface fragment cover <=3" | 0 – 3% |
Surface fragment cover >3" | 0 – 3% |
Available water capacity (0-101.6cm) |
15.24 – 30.48 cm |
Electrical conductivity (0-101.6cm) |
0 – 2 mmhos/cm |
Soil reaction (1:1 water) (0-101.6cm) |
7.4 – 8.4 |
Subsurface fragment volume <=3" (Depth not specified) |
0 – 3% |
Subsurface fragment volume >3" (Depth not specified) |
0 – 3% |
Ecological dynamics
This site occurs on piedmont slopes or plains at elevations of 5,000 to 7,000 feet. Perennial grasses dominate the historic plant community in association with scattered shrubs and trees. Sand bluestem and big bluestem are the dominant grasses of the reference community. Continuous grazing pressure can result in a decrease in these and other palatable grasses and can eventually result in a less productive, sod-bound blue grama state. Pinyon/juniper may encroach due to seed dispersal, lack of fire, and decreased competition resulting from loss of grass cover. Periods of mild, wet winters may also favor pinyon/juniper encroachment.
State and transition model
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
More interactive model formats are also available.
View Interactive Models
Click on state and transition labels to scroll to the respective text
Ecosystem states
State 1 submodel, plant communities
State 2 submodel, plant communities
State 3 submodel, plant communities
State 1
Grassland
This state is dominated by grasses.
Community 1.1
Grassland
In the reference plant community, sand bluestem and big bluestem are the dominant grasses with sideoats grama, little bluestem, blue grama, and dropseeds occurring as sub-dominants. Other grasses that can occur in significant amounts include black grama and Indian ricegrass. This site will support a wide variety of woody species although they are a minor component of the reference plant community. At higher elevations, pinyon and juniper are favored, whereas yucca, fourwing saltbush, and sand sagebrush are more typical of lower elevations. Although forbs are usually a minor component, during years of abundant rainfall, their production may increase significantly. Continuous grazing pressure can cause a decrease in bluestems, sideoats grama, and Indian ricegrass, resulting in communities dominated by blue grama, with hairy grama and threeawns occurring as sub-dominants. Diagnosis: Grass and litter cover is typically uniform with few large (greater than 1 meter) bare areas present. Blue grama exhibits an upright, bunchgrass form. Grass species such as sand bluestem, big bluestem, little bluestem, sideoats grama, and sand dropseed, are present in significant amounts. Shrubs and trees are a scattered with a combined canopy cover of less than 10 percent. Evidence of erosion is minimal.
Forest understory. Other grasses that could appear on this site include: cane bluestem, mesa dropseed, threeawn spp., green sprangletop, bottlebrush squirreltail, mat muhly, plains lovegrass, purple lovegrass, bush muhly and tumble windmillgrass. Other shrubs that could appear on this site include: rabbitbrush, broom snakeweed, pinyon, Bigelow sagebrush, cacti spp. and catclaw acacia. Other forbs that could appear on this site include: larkspur, purple nightshade, salsify, curly dock, Indian paintbrush, scarlet globemallow, Rocky Mountain beeplant, threadleaf groundsel, wooly Indianwheat, tansymustard and Russian thistle.
Figure 4. Annual production by plant type (representative values) or group (midpoint values)
Table 5. Annual production by plant type
Plant type | Low (kg/hectare) |
Representative value (kg/hectare) |
High (kg/hectare) |
---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike | 706 | 1681 | 2242 |
Shrub/Vine | 101 | 224 | 415 |
Forb | 101 | 224 | 415 |
Total | 908 | 2129 | 3072 |
Table 6. Soil surface cover
Tree basal cover | 2-3% |
---|---|
Shrub/vine/liana basal cover | 3-6% |
Grass/grasslike basal cover | 10-15% |
Forb basal cover | 5-10% |
Non-vascular plants | 0% |
Biological crusts | 0% |
Litter | 8-10% |
Surface fragments >0.25" and <=3" | 0-3% |
Surface fragments >3" | 0-3% |
Bedrock | 0% |
Water | 0% |
Bare ground | 60-70% |
Figure 5. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM4074, R070BY074NM Sandy Plains Cool Reference State. R070BY074NM Sandy Plains Cool Reference State.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
State 2
Blue Grama-Sod
This state is characterized by abundant, sod-bound blue grama.
Community 2.1
Blue grama-Sod
Under continuous grazing pressure without adequate recovery periods, blue grama may form a less productive, low growing sod. Grass species such as big bluestem, sand bluestem, little bluestem, sideoats grama, and Indian ricegrass are present only in trace amounts or are absent. Threeawns, ring muhly, and buffalograss typically increase in representation. In some instances, broom snakeweed may be a major component in response to increased amounts of fall or early spring moisture. Diagnosis: Blue grama is the dominant grass. It exhibits a low-growing, sod-like growth form. Black grama, sideoats grama, and New Mexico feathergrass are either sparsely represented or absent. Transition to Blue Grama-Sod (1a) Continuous grazing without adequate recovery periods may cause this transition. Blue grama is resilient to grazing due to the location of its growing points at or near the soil surface and high ratio of vegetative shoots. When grazed or clipped close to the ground, it can spread laterally by tillers and form a less-productive, low-growing sod. Key indicators of approach to transition: Decrease in cover of black and sideoats grama Increase in cover of blue grama Transition back to Grassland (1b) Long term prescribed grazing may be successful in reversing the transition back to a Grassland state. The timeframe is affected by the presence/absence and the recruitment of key species such as bluestems, sideoats grama, and Indian ricegrass. Alternatively, chemical or mechanical treatment of the portion of the range dominated by blue grama may reduce competition for nutrients and available water. This may accelerate the change back to a more upright, bunchgrass form and increase production. Seeding may be necessary to reestablish desired key species where they are sparse or absent. Prescribed grazing will help to maintain proper forage utilization.
Figure 6. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM4074, R070BY074NM Sandy Plains Cool Reference State. R070BY074NM Sandy Plains Cool Reference State.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
State 3
Pinyon/Juniper Encroached
This state contains considerable amounts of pinyon/juniper.
Community 3.1
Pinyon/Juniper Encroached
An increase in pinyon and/or juniper and decreased cover and production of grasses characterize this state. Blue grama is the dominant grass. Other species that are typically present in varying amounts include hairy grama, ring muhly, galleta, buffalograss, threeawns, and sand dropseed. Diagnosis: Pinyon/juniper is present in significant amounts. Blue grama is the dominant grass. Grass cover is variable ranging from fairly uniform to patchy with large bare areas present. Evidence of erosion such as elongated water flow patterns, pedestalling of plants, and rills may be common. Transition to Pinyon/Juniper Encroached (2, 3a) Loss of grass cover, the associated decreased competition by grasses, seed dispersal, and lack of fire are believed to facilitate the encroachment of piñon/juniper. Loss of herbaceous cover due to overgrazing and drought can provide competition-free areas for seedling establishment, and afford a competitive advantage to established woody species. Wildlife and livestock can act as dispersal agents for pinyon/juniper seed and increase the probability of invasion. Sites in close proximity to established pinyon/juniper woodlands are at greater risk of invasion. Historically, periodic fire may have helped to suppress pinyon/juniper by killing seedlings and some established trees, and by increasing the susceptibility in others to damage by insects, disease, and drought. Additionally, variation in precipitation patterns such as periods of mild wet winters may produce conditions favorable to the establishment and growth of woody species, initiating periods of increased recruitment and establishment. Key indicators of approach to transition: Increase in bare ground patch size Increase in amount of piñon/juniper seedlings Transition back to Grassland (3b) Brush control is necessary to reduce the competitive influence of pinyon/juniper and facilitate grass recovery. Prescribed fire may be useful in maintaining grass dominance, provided adequate fine fuels remain. Prescribed grazing will help ensure adequate rest following brush control and will assist in the establishment and maintenance of grass cover.
Figure 7. Plant community growth curve (percent production by month). NM4074, R070BY074NM Sandy Plains Cool Reference State. R070BY074NM Sandy Plains Cool Reference State.
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D |
0 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Additional community tables
Table 7. Community 1.1 plant community composition
Group | Common name | Symbol | Scientific name | Annual production (kg/hectare) | Foliar cover (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grass/Grasslike
|
||||||
1 | 280–381 | |||||
big bluestem | ANGE | Andropogon gerardii | 286–381 | – | ||
sand bluestem | ANHA | Andropogon hallii | 286–381 | – | ||
2 | 191–280 | |||||
sideoats grama | BOCU | Bouteloua curtipendula | 191–286 | – | ||
little bluestem | SCSC | Schizachyrium scoparium | 191–286 | – | ||
3 | 90–191 | |||||
black grama | BOER4 | Bouteloua eriopoda | 95–191 | – | ||
4 | 191–280 | |||||
blue grama | BOGR2 | Bouteloua gracilis | 191–286 | – | ||
hairy grama | BOHI2 | Bouteloua hirsuta | 191–286 | – | ||
5 | 191–247 | |||||
spike dropseed | SPCO4 | Sporobolus contractus | 191–252 | – | ||
sand dropseed | SPCR | Sporobolus cryptandrus | 191–252 | – | ||
6 | 90–191 | |||||
Indian ricegrass | ACHY | Achnatherum hymenoides | 95–191 | – | ||
7 | 56–90 | |||||
common wolfstail | LYPH | Lycurus phleoides | 57–95 | – | ||
8 | 56–90 | |||||
Indiangrass | SONU2 | Sorghastrum nutans | 57–95 | – | ||
9 | 34–56 | |||||
sedge | CAREX | Carex | 38–57 | – | ||
10 | 56–90 | |||||
Graminoid (grass or grass-like) | 2GRAM | Graminoid (grass or grass-like) | 57–95 | – | ||
Forb
|
||||||
11 | 34–56 | |||||
buckwheat | ERIOG | Eriogonum | 38–57 | – | ||
12 | 34–56 | |||||
leatherweed | CRPOP | Croton pottsii var. pottsii | 38–57 | – | ||
13 | 34–56 | |||||
locoweed | OXYTR | Oxytropis | 38–57 | – | ||
14 | 34–56 | |||||
purple sand verbena | ABAN | Abronia angustifolia | 38–57 | – | ||
15 | 34–56 | |||||
Forb, perennial | 2FP | Forb, perennial | 38–57 | – | ||
Shrub/Vine
|
||||||
16 | 34–90 | |||||
fourwing saltbush | ATCA2 | Atriplex canescens | 38–95 | – | ||
jointfir | EPHED | Ephedra | 38–95 | – | ||
winterfat | KRLA2 | Krascheninnikovia lanata | 38–95 | – | ||
yucca | YUCCA | Yucca | 38–95 | – | ||
17 | 90–191 | |||||
sand sagebrush | ARFI2 | Artemisia filifolia | 95–191 | – | ||
juniper | JUNIP | Juniperus | 95–191 | – | ||
skunkbush sumac | RHTR | Rhus trilobata | 95–191 | – | ||
18 | 34–90 | |||||
Shrub, deciduous | 2SD | Shrub, deciduous | 38–95 | – | ||
sacahuista | NOMI | Nolina microcarpa | 38–95 | – |
Interpretations
Animal community
Habitat for Wildlife: This site provides habitat for a resident animal community characterized by pronghorn antelope, kit fox, badger, coyote, bobcat, desert cottontail, Ord’s kangaroo rat, white-throated woodrat, Botta’s pocket gopher, plains pocket mouse, northern grasshopper mouse, sparrow hawk, mourning dove, meadowlark, plains spadefoot toad, eastern fence lizard, plateau whiptail, shorthorned lizard, and prairie rattlesnake. Where dense stands of pinyon and/or juniper occur, woodland wildlife species such as mule deer, gray fox, rock squirrel, pinyon jay, scrubjay, and Cassin’s kingbird are characteristic. Common raven and prairie falcon hunt over this site.
Hydrological functions
The runoff curve numbers are determined by field investigations using hydrologic cover conditions and hydrologic soil groups.
Hydrologic Interpretations
Soil Series Hydrologic Group
Berwolf ---------------------B
Pojo ------------------------C
Recreational uses
This site offers fair potential for hiking, backpacking, camping, and picnicking, each limited by the lack of surface water and shade. Hunting for antelope, small game, and birds is good. Trapping of fur-bearing animals is also good. The natural beauty of the area is enhanced during years of abundant rainfall by a large variety of wildflowers.
Wood products
This site has no significant potential for wood products. Where stands of pinyon or juniper occur, care must be taken when harvesting fence material or fuelwood due to the soils' susceptibility to erosion.
Other products
Grazing: This site is suitable for grazing by all kinds and classes of livestock during all seasons of the year. However, it is not suited to continuous yearlong grazing or continuous grazing during the growing season. This site responds rapidly to any rainfall it might receive. It also responds well to a system of grazing which rotates the season of use. As this site deteriorates, palatable cool- and warm-season grasses disappear and are replaced by low-vigor sod-like blue grama. As deterioration continues, this sod-like blue grama will decrease and an increase of bare ground and woody vegetation will occur. If this happens, the site may support a good even-aged stand of pinyon and/or juniper. This site is extremely erosive when in a deteriorated state.
Other information
Guide to Suggested Initial Stocking Rate Acres per Animal Unit Month
Similarity Index Ac/AUM
100 - 76 2.1 – 2.9
75 – 51 2.8 – 4.3
50 – 26 4.2 – 6.8
25 – 0 6.8+
Supporting information
Type locality
Location 1: De Baca County, NM |
---|
Other references
Data collection for this site was performed in conjunction with the progressive soil surveys within the Pecos-Canadian Plains and Valleys 70 Major Land Resource Area of New Mexico. This site has been mapped and correlated to soils in the following counties: San Miguel, Quay, Guadalupe, De Baca and Chaves.
Contributors
Don Sylvester
Elizabeth Wright
John Tunberg
Approval
Kendra Moseley, 9/12/2023
Rangeland health reference sheet
Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health is a qualitative assessment protocol used to determine ecosystem condition based on benchmark characteristics described in the Reference Sheet. A suite of 17 (or more) indicators are typically considered in an assessment. The ecological site(s) representative of an assessment location must be known prior to applying the protocol and must be verified based on soils and climate. Current plant community cannot be used to identify the ecological site.
Author(s)/participant(s) | |
---|---|
Contact for lead author | |
Date | 11/23/2024 |
Approved by | Kendra Moseley |
Approval date | |
Composition (Indicators 10 and 12) based on | Annual Production |
Indicators
-
Number and extent of rills:
-
Presence of water flow patterns:
-
Number and height of erosional pedestals or terracettes:
-
Bare ground from Ecological Site Description or other studies (rock, litter, lichen, moss, plant canopy are not bare ground):
-
Number of gullies and erosion associated with gullies:
-
Extent of wind scoured, blowouts and/or depositional areas:
-
Amount of litter movement (describe size and distance expected to travel):
-
Soil surface (top few mm) resistance to erosion (stability values are averages - most sites will show a range of values):
-
Soil surface structure and SOM content (include type of structure and A-horizon color and thickness):
-
Effect of community phase composition (relative proportion of different functional groups) and spatial distribution on infiltration and runoff:
-
Presence and thickness of compaction layer (usually none; describe soil profile features which may be mistaken for compaction on this site):
-
Functional/Structural Groups (list in order of descending dominance by above-ground annual-production or live foliar cover using symbols: >>, >, = to indicate much greater than, greater than, and equal to):
Dominant:
Sub-dominant:
Other:
Additional:
-
Amount of plant mortality and decadence (include which functional groups are expected to show mortality or decadence):
-
Average percent litter cover (%) and depth ( in):
-
Expected annual annual-production (this is TOTAL above-ground annual-production, not just forage annual-production):
-
Potential invasive (including noxious) species (native and non-native). List species which BOTH characterize degraded states and have the potential to become a dominant or co-dominant species on the ecological site if their future establishment and growth is not actively controlled by management interventions. Species that become dominant for only one to several years (e.g., short-term response to drought or wildfire) are not invasive plants. Note that unlike other indicators, we are describing what is NOT expected in the reference state for the ecological site:
-
Perennial plant reproductive capability:
Print Options
Sections
Font
Other
The Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool is an information system framework developed by the USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and New Mexico State University.
Click on box and path labels to scroll to the respective text.